[C++ Broker] QPID-1198 Resolved ?

[Marnie McCormack <ma...@googlemail.com>]

Hi Andrew & Manuel,

I'm just going through the M4 JIRAs to try and help get us closer to M4 :-)

Can you take a look at QPID-1198 - have the commits/patches resolved this
one ?

Thanks very much,
Marnie

Re: [C++ Broker] QPID-1198 Resolved ?

[Andrew Stitcher <as...@redhat.com>]

On Thu, 2008-12-04 at 11:38 +0000, Marnie McCormack wrote:
> Hi Andrew & Manuel,
> 
> I'm just going through the M4 JIRAs to try and help get us closer to M4 :-)
> 
> Can you take a look at QPID-1198 - have the commits/patches resolved this
> one ?

My recollection is that not all the changes there were applied (for
whatever reason). So I think the jira is still outstanding. In any case
the tree has moved on now and without a regular Solaris build it
doubtless break in other places too.

I've put a small amount of effort into getting a Solaris build going,
but I (so far) haven't got further than failing to bootstrap the code
under the latest version of the OpenSolaris tools.

Andrew

Re: [C++ Broker] QPID-1198 Resolved ?

[Marnie McCormack <ma...@googlemail.com>]

Thanks Manuel - I've updated the JIRA with your comments. Appreciate your
effort here.

I think this one would possibly benefit from being several JIRAs to capture
in release notes what has been commited to the repo. I'll leave with the
C++-ers though !
Thanks & Regards,
Marnie
On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 11:58 AM, Manuel Teira Paz <mt...@tid.es> wrote:

> Marnie McCormack escribió:
>
> Hi Andrew & Manuel,
>>
>> I'm just going through the M4 JIRAs to try and help get us closer to M4
>> :-)
>>
>> Can you take a look at QPID-1198 - have the commits/patches resolved this
>> one ?
>>
>> Thanks very much,
>> Marnie
>>
>>
> Hi, Marnie.
> Unfortunately, I'm under a high workload, and don't expect to have time in
> the near future to take a look at this issue.
> I just can say that the last time I watched the state of the trunk, not all
> the changes needed for the solaris port to work, were on the repository,
> some problems with the solaris linker and implicit library dependencies, as
> I commented some time ago here, comes to my mind. I remember also reversed
> condition in the configure.ac regarding the usage of the Sun Workshop
> compiler and some other things. Probably recent changes in the repository
> could have broken solaris specific stuff. Sadly, as I've already said, I
> have no time to dedicate to this, but I will try to contribute again as soon
> as possible, probably no sooner than February. :-(
>
> Best regards.
>
>

RE: [C++ Broker] QPID-1198 Resolved ?

[Steve Huston <sh...@riverace.com>]

FWIW, I have some Solaris boxes that I could use to help complete this
port if someone can see the value in funding it.

-Steve

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Manuel Teira Paz [mailto:mteira@tid.es] 
> Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2008 6:59 AM
> To: qpid-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [C++ Broker] QPID-1198 Resolved ?
> 
> 
> Marnie McCormack escribió:
> > Hi Andrew & Manuel,
> >
> > I'm just going through the M4 JIRAs to try and help get us 
> closer to M4 :-)
> >
> > Can you take a look at QPID-1198 - have the commits/patches 
> resolved this
> > one ?
> >
> > Thanks very much,
> > Marnie
> >   
> Hi, Marnie.
> Unfortunately, I'm under a high workload, and don't expect to 
> have time 
> in the near future to take a look at this issue.
> I just can say that the last time I watched the state of the 
> trunk, not 
> all the changes needed for the solaris port to work, were on the 
> repository, some problems with the solaris linker and 
> implicit library 
> dependencies, as I commented some time ago here, comes to my mind. I

> remember also reversed condition in the configure.ac 
> regarding the usage 
> of the Sun Workshop compiler and some other things. Probably recent 
> changes in the repository could have broken solaris specific stuff. 
> Sadly, as I've already said, I have no time to dedicate to 
> this, but I 
> will try to contribute again as soon as possible, probably no sooner

> than February. :-(
> 
> Best regards.
> 

Re: [C++ Broker] QPID-1198 Resolved ?

[Manuel Teira Paz <mt...@tid.es>]

Marnie McCormack escribió:
> Hi Andrew & Manuel,
>
> I'm just going through the M4 JIRAs to try and help get us closer to M4 :-)
>
> Can you take a look at QPID-1198 - have the commits/patches resolved this
> one ?
>
> Thanks very much,
> Marnie
>   
Hi, Marnie.
Unfortunately, I'm under a high workload, and don't expect to have time 
in the near future to take a look at this issue.
I just can say that the last time I watched the state of the trunk, not 
all the changes needed for the solaris port to work, were on the 
repository, some problems with the solaris linker and implicit library 
dependencies, as I commented some time ago here, comes to my mind. I 
remember also reversed condition in the configure.ac regarding the usage 
of the Sun Workshop compiler and some other things. Probably recent 
changes in the repository could have broken solaris specific stuff. 
Sadly, as I've already said, I have no time to dedicate to this, but I 
will try to contribute again as soon as possible, probably no sooner 
than February. :-(

Best regards.