You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@roller.apache.org by Dave <sn...@gmail.com> on 2015/12/28 16:59:51 UTC
Move to Git?
Now that Git is officially supported by the ASF, would anybody be opposed
to moving Roller to Git? All we have to do is to ask the INFRA team to
switch us over.
My reasons for this move are mostly selfish: I prefer Git, find it easier
to use and use it on all other projects. Also, a move to Git would make it
possible for us to accept GitHub pull-requests.
Thoughts?
Dave
Re: Move to Git?
Posted by Kohei Nozaki <ky...@bridge9.sakura.ne.jp>.
+1
On 12/29/15 02:01, Gaurav Saini wrote:
> +1
> On 28-Dec-2015 10:30 pm, "Matt Raible" <ma...@raibledesigns.com> wrote:
>
>> +1
>> On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 09:00 Dave <sn...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Now that Git is officially supported by the ASF, would anybody be opposed
>>> to moving Roller to Git? All we have to do is to ask the INFRA team to
>>> switch us over.
>>>
>>> My reasons for this move are mostly selfish: I prefer Git, find it easier
>>> to use and use it on all other projects. Also, a move to Git would make
>> it
>>> possible for us to accept GitHub pull-requests.
>>>
>>> Thoughts?
>>>
>>> Dave
>>>
>>
>
Re: Move to Git?
Posted by Gaurav Saini <ga...@gmail.com>.
+1
On 28-Dec-2015 10:30 pm, "Matt Raible" <ma...@raibledesigns.com> wrote:
> +1
> On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 09:00 Dave <sn...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Now that Git is officially supported by the ASF, would anybody be opposed
> > to moving Roller to Git? All we have to do is to ask the INFRA team to
> > switch us over.
> >
> > My reasons for this move are mostly selfish: I prefer Git, find it easier
> > to use and use it on all other projects. Also, a move to Git would make
> it
> > possible for us to accept GitHub pull-requests.
> >
> > Thoughts?
> >
> > Dave
> >
>
Re: Move to Git?
Posted by Matt Raible <ma...@raibledesigns.com>.
+1
On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 09:00 Dave <sn...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Now that Git is officially supported by the ASF, would anybody be opposed
> to moving Roller to Git? All we have to do is to ask the INFRA team to
> switch us over.
>
> My reasons for this move are mostly selfish: I prefer Git, find it easier
> to use and use it on all other projects. Also, a move to Git would make it
> possible for us to accept GitHub pull-requests.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> Dave
>
Re: Move to Git?
Posted by Greg Huber <gr...@gmail.com>.
+1 and thanks for the info.
Cheers Greg
On 30 December 2015 at 16:11, Nicholas Padilla <
nicholas@monstersoftwarellc.com> wrote:
> Last thing,
>
> Here is a write up by the originator of the "Git Flow" idea.
> http://nvie.com/posts/a-successful-git-branching-model/ Just to be clear,
> you end up having a master and develop branches. The master only contains
> the approved production releases. Features are managed in their own
> branches, using the create feature "feature", this can mean any change set
> gets a new feature branch. When done, you finish feature and it is merged
> into develop branch. After you are done with the versions features, they
> are all merged with develop, you can do a Release. The Release process
> just takes the remote develop and tags it, with your provided version, and
> then merges develop with master. That is a really quick summary of the
> process. I am sure everyone can see the benefit behind using such a
> process.
>
>
> Thanks!
>
> Nicholas Padilla
> www.monstersoftwarellc.com
>
> “Problems cannot be solved by the same level of thinking that created
> them.”
> “Learn from yesterday, live for today, hope for tomorrow. The important
> thing is not to stop questioning.
> <
> http://thinkexist.com/quotation/learn_from_yesterday-live_for_today-hope_for/222120.html
> >
> ”
>
> Albert Einstein <http://thinkexist.com/quotes/albert_einstein/>
>
> On Wed, Dec 30, 2015 at 9:04 AM, Nicholas Padilla <
> nicholas@monstersoftwarellc.com> wrote:
>
> > Hello All!
> >
> > Been a long while since I was active in the Roller community. Since my
> > time with Roller, I have used Git heavily. I do believe it is the right
> > solution to managing a code base. If you use Source Tree, a Git client
> > provided by Atlassian, you will see the Git Flow button that allows you
> to
> > manage releases, feature branches, and hot fixes. This process was first
> > outlined by this, http://datasift.github.io/gitflow/ It was intuitive
> > and easy to use, source tree just went a step further. I use this
> > functionality daily to manage all my versioned projects, with the GUI
> > interface it makes it hard for noobs to make mistakes (Source Tree really
> > is one of the best Git clients).
> >
> > If you choose not to use Git Flow, that is fine, but using Git is the
> > right direction.
> >
> > Theres my two cents.
> > Happy New Year!
> >
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > Nicholas Padilla
> > www.monstersoftwarellc.com
> >
> > “Problems cannot be solved by the same level of thinking that created
> > them.”
> > “Learn from yesterday, live for today, hope for tomorrow. The important
> > thing is not to stop questioning.
> > <
> http://thinkexist.com/quotation/learn_from_yesterday-live_for_today-hope_for/222120.html
> >
> > ”
> >
> > Albert Einstein <http://thinkexist.com/quotes/albert_einstein/>
> >
> > On Wed, Dec 30, 2015 at 7:42 AM, Dave <sn...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> On Tue, Dec 29, 2015 at 2:39 AM Greg Huber <gr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> > Don't use it my self, have tried but made just made a mess, so went
> back
> >> > to svn. So -1 for me.
> >> >
> >> > btw, worth checking out what Struts are doing, using a develop branch,
> >> > beforehand.
> >> >
> >>
> >> How strongly do you feel about that -1 Greg?
> >>
> >> I took a quick look at Struts. They use ASF Git repo and is also able to
> >> accept Pull Requests via Git.
> >> https://struts.apache.org/submitting-patches.html.
> >>
> >> I'm not why they use a branch called "develop" instead of master, maybe
> >> that is part of the "Git Flow" process they are using?
> >>
> >> Dave
> >>
> >>
> >> On 28 December 2015 at 15:59, Dave <sn...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > > Now that Git is officially supported by the ASF, would anybody be
> >> opposed
> >> > > to moving Roller to Git? All we have to do is to ask the INFRA team
> >> to
> >> > > switch us over.
> >> > >
> >> > > My reasons for this move are mostly selfish: I prefer Git, find it
> >> easier
> >> > > to use and use it on all other projects. Also, a move to Git would
> >> make
> >> > it
> >> > > possible for us to accept GitHub pull-requests.
> >> > >
> >> > > Thoughts?
> >> > >
> >> > > Dave
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
> >
> >
>
Re: Move to Git?
Posted by Nicholas Padilla <ni...@monstersoftwarellc.com>.
Last thing,
Here is a write up by the originator of the "Git Flow" idea.
http://nvie.com/posts/a-successful-git-branching-model/ Just to be clear,
you end up having a master and develop branches. The master only contains
the approved production releases. Features are managed in their own
branches, using the create feature "feature", this can mean any change set
gets a new feature branch. When done, you finish feature and it is merged
into develop branch. After you are done with the versions features, they
are all merged with develop, you can do a Release. The Release process
just takes the remote develop and tags it, with your provided version, and
then merges develop with master. That is a really quick summary of the
process. I am sure everyone can see the benefit behind using such a
process.
Thanks!
Nicholas Padilla
www.monstersoftwarellc.com
“Problems cannot be solved by the same level of thinking that created them.”
“Learn from yesterday, live for today, hope for tomorrow. The important
thing is not to stop questioning.
<http://thinkexist.com/quotation/learn_from_yesterday-live_for_today-hope_for/222120.html>
”
Albert Einstein <http://thinkexist.com/quotes/albert_einstein/>
On Wed, Dec 30, 2015 at 9:04 AM, Nicholas Padilla <
nicholas@monstersoftwarellc.com> wrote:
> Hello All!
>
> Been a long while since I was active in the Roller community. Since my
> time with Roller, I have used Git heavily. I do believe it is the right
> solution to managing a code base. If you use Source Tree, a Git client
> provided by Atlassian, you will see the Git Flow button that allows you to
> manage releases, feature branches, and hot fixes. This process was first
> outlined by this, http://datasift.github.io/gitflow/ It was intuitive
> and easy to use, source tree just went a step further. I use this
> functionality daily to manage all my versioned projects, with the GUI
> interface it makes it hard for noobs to make mistakes (Source Tree really
> is one of the best Git clients).
>
> If you choose not to use Git Flow, that is fine, but using Git is the
> right direction.
>
> Theres my two cents.
> Happy New Year!
>
>
> Thanks!
>
> Nicholas Padilla
> www.monstersoftwarellc.com
>
> “Problems cannot be solved by the same level of thinking that created
> them.”
> “Learn from yesterday, live for today, hope for tomorrow. The important
> thing is not to stop questioning.
> <http://thinkexist.com/quotation/learn_from_yesterday-live_for_today-hope_for/222120.html>
> ”
>
> Albert Einstein <http://thinkexist.com/quotes/albert_einstein/>
>
> On Wed, Dec 30, 2015 at 7:42 AM, Dave <sn...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Dec 29, 2015 at 2:39 AM Greg Huber <gr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > Don't use it my self, have tried but made just made a mess, so went back
>> > to svn. So -1 for me.
>> >
>> > btw, worth checking out what Struts are doing, using a develop branch,
>> > beforehand.
>> >
>>
>> How strongly do you feel about that -1 Greg?
>>
>> I took a quick look at Struts. They use ASF Git repo and is also able to
>> accept Pull Requests via Git.
>> https://struts.apache.org/submitting-patches.html.
>>
>> I'm not why they use a branch called "develop" instead of master, maybe
>> that is part of the "Git Flow" process they are using?
>>
>> Dave
>>
>>
>> On 28 December 2015 at 15:59, Dave <sn...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > > Now that Git is officially supported by the ASF, would anybody be
>> opposed
>> > > to moving Roller to Git? All we have to do is to ask the INFRA team
>> to
>> > > switch us over.
>> > >
>> > > My reasons for this move are mostly selfish: I prefer Git, find it
>> easier
>> > > to use and use it on all other projects. Also, a move to Git would
>> make
>> > it
>> > > possible for us to accept GitHub pull-requests.
>> > >
>> > > Thoughts?
>> > >
>> > > Dave
>> > >
>> >
>>
>
>
Re: Move to Git?
Posted by Nicholas Padilla <ni...@monstersoftwarellc.com>.
Hello All!
Been a long while since I was active in the Roller community. Since my
time with Roller, I have used Git heavily. I do believe it is the right
solution to managing a code base. If you use Source Tree, a Git client
provided by Atlassian, you will see the Git Flow button that allows you to
manage releases, feature branches, and hot fixes. This process was first
outlined by this, http://datasift.github.io/gitflow/ It was intuitive and
easy to use, source tree just went a step further. I use this
functionality daily to manage all my versioned projects, with the GUI
interface it makes it hard for noobs to make mistakes (Source Tree really
is one of the best Git clients).
If you choose not to use Git Flow, that is fine, but using Git is the right
direction.
Theres my two cents.
Happy New Year!
Thanks!
Nicholas Padilla
www.monstersoftwarellc.com
“Problems cannot be solved by the same level of thinking that created them.”
“Learn from yesterday, live for today, hope for tomorrow. The important
thing is not to stop questioning.
<http://thinkexist.com/quotation/learn_from_yesterday-live_for_today-hope_for/222120.html>
”
Albert Einstein <http://thinkexist.com/quotes/albert_einstein/>
On Wed, Dec 30, 2015 at 7:42 AM, Dave <sn...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 29, 2015 at 2:39 AM Greg Huber <gr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Don't use it my self, have tried but made just made a mess, so went back
> > to svn. So -1 for me.
> >
> > btw, worth checking out what Struts are doing, using a develop branch,
> > beforehand.
> >
>
> How strongly do you feel about that -1 Greg?
>
> I took a quick look at Struts. They use ASF Git repo and is also able to
> accept Pull Requests via Git.
> https://struts.apache.org/submitting-patches.html.
>
> I'm not why they use a branch called "develop" instead of master, maybe
> that is part of the "Git Flow" process they are using?
>
> Dave
>
>
> On 28 December 2015 at 15:59, Dave <sn...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Now that Git is officially supported by the ASF, would anybody be
> opposed
> > > to moving Roller to Git? All we have to do is to ask the INFRA team to
> > > switch us over.
> > >
> > > My reasons for this move are mostly selfish: I prefer Git, find it
> easier
> > > to use and use it on all other projects. Also, a move to Git would make
> > it
> > > possible for us to accept GitHub pull-requests.
> > >
> > > Thoughts?
> > >
> > > Dave
> > >
> >
>
Re: Move to Git?
Posted by Greg Huber <gr...@gmail.com>.
Dave,
I am not really against using git, probably the way to go, just not on my
own projects. Just prefere the svn way, tend to use the view svn compare
alot and never really got to grips with git, the compare, switching
branches etc. Its a different way of working, too complicated/much for my
needs.
Yes the develop branch is the flow process to release.
Cheers Greg.
On 30 December 2015 at 14:42, Dave <sn...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 29, 2015 at 2:39 AM Greg Huber <gr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Don't use it my self, have tried but made just made a mess, so went back
> > to svn. So -1 for me.
> >
> > btw, worth checking out what Struts are doing, using a develop branch,
> > beforehand.
> >
>
> How strongly do you feel about that -1 Greg?
>
> I took a quick look at Struts. They use ASF Git repo and is also able to
> accept Pull Requests via Git.
> https://struts.apache.org/submitting-patches.html.
>
> I'm not why they use a branch called "develop" instead of master, maybe
> that is part of the "Git Flow" process they are using?
>
> Dave
>
>
> On 28 December 2015 at 15:59, Dave <sn...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Now that Git is officially supported by the ASF, would anybody be
> opposed
> > > to moving Roller to Git? All we have to do is to ask the INFRA team to
> > > switch us over.
> > >
> > > My reasons for this move are mostly selfish: I prefer Git, find it
> easier
> > > to use and use it on all other projects. Also, a move to Git would make
> > it
> > > possible for us to accept GitHub pull-requests.
> > >
> > > Thoughts?
> > >
> > > Dave
> > >
> >
>
Re: Move to Git?
Posted by Dave <sn...@gmail.com>.
On Tue, Dec 29, 2015 at 2:39 AM Greg Huber <gr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Don't use it my self, have tried but made just made a mess, so went back
> to svn. So -1 for me.
>
> btw, worth checking out what Struts are doing, using a develop branch,
> beforehand.
>
How strongly do you feel about that -1 Greg?
I took a quick look at Struts. They use ASF Git repo and is also able to
accept Pull Requests via Git.
https://struts.apache.org/submitting-patches.html.
I'm not why they use a branch called "develop" instead of master, maybe
that is part of the "Git Flow" process they are using?
Dave
On 28 December 2015 at 15:59, Dave <sn...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Now that Git is officially supported by the ASF, would anybody be opposed
> > to moving Roller to Git? All we have to do is to ask the INFRA team to
> > switch us over.
> >
> > My reasons for this move are mostly selfish: I prefer Git, find it easier
> > to use and use it on all other projects. Also, a move to Git would make
> it
> > possible for us to accept GitHub pull-requests.
> >
> > Thoughts?
> >
> > Dave
> >
>
Re: Move to Git?
Posted by Greg Huber <gr...@gmail.com>.
Don't use it my self, have tried but made just made a mess, so went back to
svn. So -1 for me.
btw, worth checking out what Struts are doing, using a develop branch,
beforehand.
Cheers Greg.
On 28 December 2015 at 15:59, Dave <sn...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Now that Git is officially supported by the ASF, would anybody be opposed
> to moving Roller to Git? All we have to do is to ask the INFRA team to
> switch us over.
>
> My reasons for this move are mostly selfish: I prefer Git, find it easier
> to use and use it on all other projects. Also, a move to Git would make it
> possible for us to accept GitHub pull-requests.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> Dave
>