Re: shambhala bug (v0.5.2)

[Cliff Skolnick <cl...@organic.com>]

So far things seem to be quite excellent.  I think Brian and I have
replace all Apache servers we had with Shambhala now, and all is well.
Performance is very good, no problems so far.  One annoying thing is
I run the server at home, I get about 200 hits/day there, and I
want the forking behavior back for that :)  If I use a small number of
processes (2 or 3), my slow link kills netscape since it tries to make multiple
connections.  So I end up having all these servers hanging out idle most of
the time.

The "fork a process if no child was available" and running zero children
would be a nice option :)  [In other words, give me the old behavior
back by option]

On another note, are we going to revive the patch database?

On Fri, 07 Jul 1995 09:06:10 EDT, rst@ai.mit.edu (Robert S. Thau) wrote:

}    Date: Thu, 6 Jul 1995 19:49:39 -0700
}    From: Cliff Skolnick <cl...@organic.com>
} 
}    It seems 5.2 (and earlier I think) did not log "file not found" stuff in
}    the error log.  Here's a patch:
} 
} OK --- FITNR.  How's it performing otherwise?
} 
} rst
--