You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to wsif-dev@ws.apache.org by Owen D Burroughs <OW...@uk.ibm.com> on 2003/01/30 18:16:39 UTC
PROPOSAL- move the source files for the web site
Hi all,
Now that the new Forrest site is up, I'd like to propose that we move the
source for it from the proposals dir, to a new top level directory under
our CVS repository. I'd really rather avoid putting the source under an
existing directory such as docs. This new directory would not be included
in any distribution (I don't think it's relevant). It would also form the
source for the documentation in the docs dir (further discussion required
on how this will be managed). To begin with anyhow, lets just move the
source.
Since I can't make up my mind, how about any of the following suggested
names for the new directory:
forrest
forrest-source
forrest-src
info-source
info-src
site-source
site-src
docs-source
docs-src
What do we all think?
Owen
Re: PROPOSAL- move the source files for the web site
Posted by Jeremy Hughes <hu...@hursley.ibm.com>.
forrest-src gets my vote.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Owen D Burroughs" <OW...@uk.ibm.com>
To: <ws...@ws.apache.org>
Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 5:16 PM
Subject: PROPOSAL- move the source files for the web site
Hi all,
Now that the new Forrest site is up, I'd like to propose that we move the
source for it from the proposals dir, to a new top level directory under
our CVS repository. I'd really rather avoid putting the source under an
existing directory such as docs. This new directory would not be included
in any distribution (I don't think it's relevant). It would also form the
source for the documentation in the docs dir (further discussion required
on how this will be managed). To begin with anyhow, lets just move the
source.
Since I can't make up my mind, how about any of the following suggested
names for the new directory:
forrest
forrest-source
forrest-src
info-source
info-src
site-source
site-src
docs-source
docs-src
What do we all think?
Owen
Re: PROPOSAL- move the source files for the web site
Posted by Aleksander Slominski <as...@cs.indiana.edu>.
forrest-source sounds good for me.
thanks,
alek
Nirmal Mukhi wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Sounds good, I like forrest-src or forrest-source.
>
> Nirmal.
>
>
>
> *"Owen D Burroughs" <OW...@uk.ibm.com>*
>
> 01/30/2003 12:16 PM
> Please respond to wsif-dev
>
>
> To: wsif-dev@ws.apache.org
> cc:
> Subject: PROPOSAL- move the source files for the web site
>
>
>
>
> Hi all,
>
> Now that the new Forrest site is up, I'd like to propose that we move the
> source for it from the proposals dir, to a new top level directory under
> our CVS repository. I'd really rather avoid putting the source under an
> existing directory such as docs. This new directory would not be included
> in any distribution (I don't think it's relevant). It would also form the
> source for the documentation in the docs dir (further discussion required
> on how this will be managed). To begin with anyhow, lets just move the
> source.
>
> Since I can't make up my mind, how about any of the following suggested
> names for the new directory:
>
> forrest
> forrest-source
> forrest-src
> info-source
> info-src
> site-source
> site-src
> docs-source
> docs-src
>
> What do we all think?
>
> Owen
>
>
--
"Mr. Pauli, we in the audience are all agreed that your theory is crazy.
What divides us is whether it is crazy enough to be true." Niels H. D. Bohr
Re: PROPOSAL- move the source files for the web site
Posted by Nirmal Mukhi <nm...@us.ibm.com>.
Hi,
Sounds good, I like forrest-src or forrest-source.
Nirmal.
"Owen D Burroughs" <OW...@uk.ibm.com>
01/30/2003 12:16 PM
Please respond to wsif-dev
To: wsif-dev@ws.apache.org
cc:
Subject: PROPOSAL- move the source files for the web site
Hi all,
Now that the new Forrest site is up, I'd like to propose that we move the
source for it from the proposals dir, to a new top level directory under
our CVS repository. I'd really rather avoid putting the source under an
existing directory such as docs. This new directory would not be included
in any distribution (I don't think it's relevant). It would also form the
source for the documentation in the docs dir (further discussion required
on how this will be managed). To begin with anyhow, lets just move the
source.
Since I can't make up my mind, how about any of the following suggested
names for the new directory:
forrest
forrest-source
forrest-src
info-source
info-src
site-source
site-src
docs-source
docs-src
What do we all think?
Owen