You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@shindig.apache.org by Paul Lindner <li...@inuus.com> on 2014/08/17 12:05:53 UTC

maven 3?

Would people be willing to make maven 3.0.4 a requirement for building?  I
could then update to the latest yuicompressor.

Re: maven 3?

Posted by Paul Lindner <li...@inuus.com>.
great! submitted.

On Mon Aug 18 2014 at 4:16:56 AM Ryan Baxter <rb...@gmail.com> wrote:

> +1
>
> -Ryan
>
> > On Aug 18, 2014, at 6:27 AM, Stanton Sievers <ss...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >
> > +1
> >
> > I don't see a reason to still support maven 2.
> >
> > Sent from a mobile device. Please forgive brevity or typos.
> >> On Aug 18, 2014 6:26 AM, "Andreas Kohn" <an...@apache.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> from my point of view: would there be any reason to stick with Maven 2?
> >> Maven 3 seems to be "stable" since quite a while.
> >>
> >> --
> >> Andreas
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>> On Sun, Aug 17, 2014 at 12:05 PM, Paul Lindner <li...@inuus.com>
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Would people be willing to make maven 3.0.4 a requirement for building?
> >> I
> >>> could then update to the latest yuicompressor.
> >>
>

Re: maven 3?

Posted by Ryan Baxter <rb...@gmail.com>.
+1

-Ryan

> On Aug 18, 2014, at 6:27 AM, Stanton Sievers <ss...@apache.org> wrote:
> 
> +1
> 
> I don't see a reason to still support maven 2.
> 
> Sent from a mobile device. Please forgive brevity or typos.
>> On Aug 18, 2014 6:26 AM, "Andreas Kohn" <an...@apache.org> wrote:
>> 
>> Hi,
>> 
>> from my point of view: would there be any reason to stick with Maven 2?
>> Maven 3 seems to be "stable" since quite a while.
>> 
>> --
>> Andreas
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> On Sun, Aug 17, 2014 at 12:05 PM, Paul Lindner <li...@inuus.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Would people be willing to make maven 3.0.4 a requirement for building?
>> I
>>> could then update to the latest yuicompressor.
>> 

Re: maven 3?

Posted by Stanton Sievers <ss...@apache.org>.
+1

I don't see a reason to still support maven 2.

Sent from a mobile device. Please forgive brevity or typos.
On Aug 18, 2014 6:26 AM, "Andreas Kohn" <an...@apache.org> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> from my point of view: would there be any reason to stick with Maven 2?
> Maven 3 seems to be "stable" since quite a while.
>
> --
> Andreas
>
>
>
>
> On Sun, Aug 17, 2014 at 12:05 PM, Paul Lindner <li...@inuus.com> wrote:
>
> > Would people be willing to make maven 3.0.4 a requirement for building?
> I
> > could then update to the latest yuicompressor.
> >
>

Re: maven 3?

Posted by Andreas Kohn <an...@apache.org>.
Hi,

from my point of view: would there be any reason to stick with Maven 2?
Maven 3 seems to be "stable" since quite a while.

--
Andreas




On Sun, Aug 17, 2014 at 12:05 PM, Paul Lindner <li...@inuus.com> wrote:

> Would people be willing to make maven 3.0.4 a requirement for building?  I
> could then update to the latest yuicompressor.
>