JK and Apache

[Vic Cekvenich <vc...@basebeans.com>]

This list is becoming a JK/Apace list. :-(


Not starting to try a flame, but a word to the wise:
IMO, using Apache or JK in most circumstances is a bad practice. This 
goes back when sales people would say you need Apache, and Tomcat and 
EJB server. No need for that. Fact is Tomcat can do it all, display HTML 
and do JavaBean persistance.

http://www.caucho.com/articles/benchmark.xtp
See last line says JSP and static performance is similar, only in JSP 
you can CMS to DB.
Plus a lot less admin time.

hth,
V



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tomcat-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: tomcat-user-help@jakarta.apache.org