You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@cloudstack.apache.org by Gaurav Aradhye <ga...@clogeny.com> on 2014/04/15 16:10:12 UTC
Resource counts
Hi all,
The resource counts for primary and secondary storage listed in GBs, and I
haven't seen these in decimals. They are always in int.
What happens if suppose I register an ISO of smaller size (less than 1 GB)?
Shouldn't it show the resource count in decimals?
I am currently seeing the secondary storage resource count as 0 for an ISO
I registered. And for test case purposes I believe smaller ISOs are better
to use because they will have less overhead on execution and on management
server.
Regards,
Gaurav
Re: Resource counts
Posted by Gaurav Aradhye <ga...@clogeny.com>.
Thanks Ilya.
I have filed an improvement bug for this -
CLOUDSTACK-6446<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6446>
Regards,
Gaurav
On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 9:03 PM, ilya musayev
<il...@gmail.com>wrote:
> It appears the size is kept in bytes but end-user representation is done
> in GB.
>
> Should be an easy fix, please file enhacement request - and feel free to
> post a patch, open source projects flourish because of open contribution.
>
>
>
> On 4/15/14, 10:10 AM, Gaurav Aradhye wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> The resource counts for primary and secondary storage listed in GBs, and
>> I
>> haven't seen these in decimals. They are always in int.
>>
>> What happens if suppose I register an ISO of smaller size (less than 1
>> GB)?
>> Shouldn't it show the resource count in decimals?
>>
>> I am currently seeing the secondary storage resource count as 0 for an ISO
>> I registered. And for test case purposes I believe smaller ISOs are better
>> to use because they will have less overhead on execution and on management
>> server.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Gaurav
>>
>>
>
Re: Resource counts
Posted by ilya musayev <il...@gmail.com>.
It appears the size is kept in bytes but end-user representation is done
in GB.
Should be an easy fix, please file enhacement request - and feel free
to post a patch, open source projects flourish because of open contribution.
On 4/15/14, 10:10 AM, Gaurav Aradhye wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> The resource counts for primary and secondary storage listed in GBs, and I
> haven't seen these in decimals. They are always in int.
>
> What happens if suppose I register an ISO of smaller size (less than 1 GB)?
> Shouldn't it show the resource count in decimals?
>
> I am currently seeing the secondary storage resource count as 0 for an ISO
> I registered. And for test case purposes I believe smaller ISOs are better
> to use because they will have less overhead on execution and on management
> server.
>
> Regards,
> Gaurav
>