You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to dev@tomcat.apache.org by GOMEZ Henri <hg...@slib.fr> on 2001/09/17 17:42:20 UTC

TC 3.3 bugs

|  384|Unc|Nor|2000-12-30|AJP13 returns no Status Message (Reason-Phrase
RFC|

==> This one is fixed in TC 3.3


|  620|Unc|Nor|2001-02-15|StopTomcat defaults to localhost
|

==> It's not abug but a security feature !

|  864|Ver|Maj|2001-03-06|Duplicated definition when the same custom tag is
|
| 1112|Ver|Maj|2001-03-26|Jdk12Interceptor sets wrong ContextClassLoader
|
| 1253|Opn|Nor|2001-04-06|Frequent Connection reset by peer errors
|
| 1663|Unc|Maj|2001-05-08|Tomcat -SSL problem
|

==> Something to check and explain better with Christopher Cain (some works
    is needed in SSL howto....

| 1798|New|Cri|2001-05-17|Tomcat 3.2.2b5 with Apache and ajp13 stops
respond|

==> Couldn't reproduce under heavy load

| 2333|New|Nor|2001-06-26|HTTP Reason will be destroyed in header using
AJP1|

==> the patch is not thread safe .... urgh urgh 

| 2550|New|Nor|2001-07-10|Ajp13 Connection hanging on static content.
|

==> Don't have any problem, redirecting /examples/* to ajp13 for example.

| 3600|New|Enh|2001-09-14|/etc/rc.d scripts of the rpm
|
| 3602|New|Enh|2001-09-14|Tomcat is enabled by default after an rpm install
|
| 3604|New|Nor|2001-09-14|/etc/rc.d scripts and stop command
|
| 3606|New|Enh|2001-09-14|Tomcat rpms are not FHS compliant
|

==> These are very specific to RPM packaging and need to be marked as Enh.
    I've also received sometime ago some patches to allow tomcat to be run
    as nobody, they will be included in final TC 3.3 release and may be 
    in TC 3.2.3 and 4.0.

    I welcome patches and ideas about the RPM current package :)

Re: TC 3.3 bugs

Posted by Nicolas Mailhot <Ni...@one2team.com>.

Le 2001.09.17 17:42, GOMEZ Henri a écrit :

[...]

> | 3604|New|Nor|2001-09-14|/etc/rc.d scripts and stop
> command

[..]

> ==> These are very specific to RPM packaging and need to
> be marked as Enh.

I'm not sure this one should be marked as Enh (that's why I
submitted it in normal) 
since the results of this bug can be pretty ugly:(.

>     I welcome patches and ideas about the RPM current
> package :)

Do not tempt me:)

-- 
Nicolas Mailhot