You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@apr.apache.org by Jim Jagielski <ji...@jaguNET.com> on 2009/07/20 17:18:16 UTC
Tagging APR-1.3.7 (Was: Re: apr-1.3.6 on linux kernel 2.6.26)
Later on today or tomorrow (to give people enough time to
complain :) ) I will be tagging 1.3.7 from HEAD. We can choose
to formal release or not (my pref is to release); I am mainly
doing this so what we have is "best version available" as well
as for the httpd 2.2.12 release...
On Jul 20, 2009, at 10:10 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> We're looking at mainly the configure.in detection patch and a bunch
> of Netware updates, which look safe... So my pref will be to tag
> from HEAD.
>
> On Jul 20, 2009, at 9:45 AM, Graham Leggett wrote:
>
>> Jim Jagielski wrote:
>>
>>> Looking over all this, I would like to suggest we do a quick 1.3.7
>>> for APR,
>>> mostly so we can have httpd 2.2.12 ship with it. Comments?
>>
>> +1.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Graham
>> --
>
Re: Tagging APR-1.3.7 (Was: Re: apr-1.3.6 on linux kernel 2.6.26)
Posted by Sander Striker <s....@striker.nl>.
On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 8:18 AM, Jim Jagielski<ji...@jagunet.com> wrote:
> Later on today or tomorrow (to give people enough time to
> complain :) ) I will be tagging 1.3.7 from HEAD. We can choose
> to formal release or not (my pref is to release); I am mainly
> doing this so what we have is "best version available" as well
> as for the httpd 2.2.12 release...
I don't really see using a non-formal release for httpd as an option.
I'd rather stay far away from going back down the bundling of
unreleased versions path. In short, if we have a releasable APR, by
all means tag :)
Cheers,
Sander
> On Jul 20, 2009, at 10:10 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
>> We're looking at mainly the configure.in detection patch and a bunch
>> of Netware updates, which look safe... So my pref will be to tag
>> from HEAD.
>>
>> On Jul 20, 2009, at 9:45 AM, Graham Leggett wrote:
>>
>>> Jim Jagielski wrote:
>>>
>>>> Looking over all this, I would like to suggest we do a quick 1.3.7 for
>>>> APR,
>>>> mostly so we can have httpd 2.2.12 ship with it. Comments?
>>>
>>> +1.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Graham
>>> --
>>
>
>
Re: Tagging APR-1.3.7 (Was: Re: apr-1.3.6 on linux kernel 2.6.26)
Posted by Paul Querna <pa...@querna.org>.
2009/7/20 Jim Jagielski <ji...@jagunet.com>:
> Later on today or tomorrow (to give people enough time to
> complain :) ) I will be tagging 1.3.7 from HEAD. We can choose
> to formal release or not (my pref is to release); I am mainly
> doing this so what we have is "best version available" as well
> as for the httpd 2.2.12 release...
formal release.
Do not release httpd with anon-formal release of apr,
Thanks,
Paul
> On Jul 20, 2009, at 10:10 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
>> We're looking at mainly the configure.in detection patch and a bunch
>> of Netware updates, which look safe... So my pref will be to tag
>> from HEAD.
>>
>> On Jul 20, 2009, at 9:45 AM, Graham Leggett wrote:
>>
>>> Jim Jagielski wrote:
>>>
>>>> Looking over all this, I would like to suggest we do a quick 1.3.7 for APR,
>>>> mostly so we can have httpd 2.2.12 ship with it. Comments?
>>>
>>> +1.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Graham
>>> --
>>
>
>
Re: Tagging APR-1.3.7 (Was: Re: apr-1.3.6 on linux kernel 2.6.26)
Posted by Guenter Knauf <fu...@apache.org>.
Jim Jagielski schrieb:
> Later on today or tomorrow (to give people enough time to
> complain :) ) I will be tagging 1.3.7 from HEAD. We can choose
> to formal release or not (my pref is to release); I am mainly
> doing this so what we have is "best version available" as well
> as for the httpd 2.2.12 release...
+1 on tagging and formal release.
Günter.
Re: Tagging APR-1.3.7 (Was: Re: apr-1.3.6 on linux kernel 2.6.26)
Posted by Ruediger Pluem <rp...@apache.org>.
On 07/20/2009 05:18 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> Later on today or tomorrow (to give people enough time to
> complain :) ) I will be tagging 1.3.7 from HEAD. We can choose
> to formal release or not (my pref is to release); I am mainly
> doing this so what we have is "best version available" as well
> as for the httpd 2.2.12 release...
+1 on tagging and formal release.
Regards
Rüdiger
Re: Tagging APR-1.3.7 (Was: Re: apr-1.3.6 on linux kernel 2.6.26)
Posted by Jim Jagielski <ji...@jaguNET.com>.
OK... Before I tag and roll, I should likely downgrade from
libtool2 to libtool1.5, right?
Our distros should make that assumption, I think.
On Jul 20, 2009, at 3:03 PM, Guenter Knauf wrote:
> Hi,
> Graham Leggett schrieb:
>> Is HEAD not currently v1.4.0?
> I thought that HEAD is un-branched trunk = v2.0.0;
> and we have a branch-1.4.x trunk, a branch-1.3.x trunk, a branch-1.2.x
> trunk, ........., and a branch-0.9.x trunk :)
>
> Günter.
>
>
Re: Tagging APR-1.3.7 (Was: Re: apr-1.3.6 on linux kernel 2.6.26)
Posted by Jim Jagielski <ji...@jaguNET.com>.
OK... Before I tag and roll, I should likely downgrade from
libtool2 to libtool1.5, right?
Our distros should make that assumption, I think.
On Jul 20, 2009, at 3:03 PM, Guenter Knauf wrote:
> Hi,
> Graham Leggett schrieb:
>> Is HEAD not currently v1.4.0?
> I thought that HEAD is un-branched trunk = v2.0.0;
> and we have a branch-1.4.x trunk, a branch-1.3.x trunk, a branch-1.2.x
> trunk, ........., and a branch-0.9.x trunk :)
>
> Günter.
>
>
Re: Tagging APR-1.3.7 (Was: Re: apr-1.3.6 on linux kernel 2.6.26)
Posted by Guenter Knauf <fu...@apache.org>.
Hi,
Graham Leggett schrieb:
> Is HEAD not currently v1.4.0?
I thought that HEAD is un-branched trunk = v2.0.0;
and we have a branch-1.4.x trunk, a branch-1.3.x trunk, a branch-1.2.x
trunk, ........., and a branch-0.9.x trunk :)
Günter.
Re: Tagging APR-1.3.7 (Was: Re: apr-1.3.6 on linux kernel 2.6.26)
Posted by Graham Leggett <mi...@sharp.fm>.
Jim Jagielski wrote:
> HEAD of the 1.3 branch :)
Ack :)
Regards,
Graham
--
Re: Tagging APR-1.3.7 (Was: Re: apr-1.3.6 on linux kernel 2.6.26)
Posted by Jim Jagielski <ji...@jagunet.com>.
HEAD of the 1.3 branch :)
On Jul 20, 2009, at 11:21 AM, Graham Leggett wrote:
> Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
>> Later on today or tomorrow (to give people enough time to
>> complain :) ) I will be tagging 1.3.7 from HEAD. We can choose
>> to formal release or not (my pref is to release); I am mainly
>> doing this so what we have is "best version available" as well
>> as for the httpd 2.2.12 release...
>
> Is HEAD not currently v1.4.0?
>
> Regards,
> Graham
> --
Re: Tagging APR-1.3.7 (Was: Re: apr-1.3.6 on linux kernel 2.6.26)
Posted by Graham Leggett <mi...@sharp.fm>.
Jim Jagielski wrote:
> Later on today or tomorrow (to give people enough time to
> complain :) ) I will be tagging 1.3.7 from HEAD. We can choose
> to formal release or not (my pref is to release); I am mainly
> doing this so what we have is "best version available" as well
> as for the httpd 2.2.12 release...
Is HEAD not currently v1.4.0?
Regards,
Graham
--