[jira] [Commented] (DRILL-8475) The binary version License and NOTICE do not comply with the corresponding terms.

["ASF GitHub Bot (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org>]

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-8475?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17814055#comment-17814055 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on DRILL-8475:
---------------------------------------

jnturton opened a new pull request, #2879:
URL: https://github.com/apache/drill/pull/2879

   # [DRILL-8475](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-8475): Update the binary dist LICENSE
   
   ## Description
   
   The LICENSE file included in the binary distributions of Drill becomes an artifact that is generated automatically by the org.codehaus.mojo:license-maven-plugin (and so is no longer part of the Git source tree). Dependencies that it cannot detect are kept in the LICENSE-base.txt file which is combined with the generated license notices by a new Freemarker template. Various other dependency related changes are included as part of this work. It is still possible that fat jars have introduced hidden depedencies but I propose that those are analysed in a subsequent Jira issue.
   
   ## Documentation
   Comments and updated dev docs.
   
   ## Testing
   Comparison of the jars/ directory of a Drill build against the generated LICENSE file to check that every bundled jar has a license notice in LICENSE.
   




> The binary version License and NOTICE do not comply with the corresponding terms.
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: DRILL-8475
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-8475
>             Project: Apache Drill
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 1.21.1
>            Reporter: Calvin Kirs
>            Assignee: James Turton
>            Priority: Blocker
>             Fix For: 1.21.2
>
>         Attachments: dependencies.txt, drill-dep-list.txt
>
>
> I checked the latest released version, and it does not follow the corresponding rules[1]. This is very important and I hope it will be taken seriously by the PMC team. I'd be happy to do it if needed.
> [1] [https://infra.apache.org/licensing-howto.html#binary]
>  
>  



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)