You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@jackrabbit.apache.org by Michael Dürig <md...@apache.org> on 2011/01/26 15:51:34 UTC
Lucene upgrade to Version 3.0.3Lucene upgrade to Version 3.0.3
Hi,
In JCR-2415 [1] Sébastien and I are working towards upgrading Lucene to
Version 3.0.3. I invite everyone to review our work in the Jackrabbit
sandbox [2] and comment on the bug.
The current revision (1063730) uses Lucene 3.0.3, the build works and
all test cases pass. The upgrade was done by trying to keep changes
minimal. That is, deprecated and removed methods/classes were replaced
by their closest counterparts in the new version of Lucene. So far none
of the new functionalities and features of Lucene have been leveraged.
In this sense I see the work on JCR-2415 as an intermediate step which
should enable us to refactor the Jackrabbits Lucene query implementation
toward new Lucene features as it becomes necessary in the future.
If there are no objections I suggest to merge the sandbox branch back
into trunk in a few weeks.
Michael
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-2415
[2] https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jackrabbit/sandbox/JCR-2415-lucene-3.0
Re: Lucene upgrade to Version 3.0.3Lucene upgrade to Version 3.0.3
Posted by Michael Dürig <mi...@gmail.com>.
On 26.1.11 16:01, Jukka Zitting wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 26.01.2011 15:51, Michael Dürig wrote:
>> If there are no objections I suggest to merge the sandbox branch back
>> into trunk in a few weeks.
>
> I suggest to merge it already now to reduce the likelihood of merge
> conflicts. There's no big reason to keep this work in a branch since all
> tests pass and there are no major design controversies to settle. And
> we're still a long way from the 2.3 release, so even some instability is
> quite acceptable.
Ok I reintegrated the branch into trunk:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1064058
Michael
Re: Lucene upgrade to Version 3.0.3Lucene upgrade to Version 3.0.3
Posted by Jukka Zitting <jz...@adobe.com>.
Hi,
On 26.01.2011 15:51, Michael Dürig wrote:
> If there are no objections I suggest to merge the sandbox branch back
> into trunk in a few weeks.
I suggest to merge it already now to reduce the likelihood of merge
conflicts. There's no big reason to keep this work in a branch since all
tests pass and there are no major design controversies to settle. And
we're still a long way from the 2.3 release, so even some instability is
quite acceptable.
--
Jukka Zitting