You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@ofbiz.apache.org by Scott Gray <sc...@hotwaxmedia.com> on 2009/05/02 08:51:50 UTC
Simple-method-test-suite
Hi All,
In a test def I would like to be able to specify a entire file of
simple-method tests where every simple method in the file would be run
in succession similar to how junit-test-suite works where every method
in a class is run as a test.
The way I see it there are two options:
1. Remove the requirement that the simple-method-test element must
provide a simple method name to run. If it is omitted then then every
simple method should be run.
2. Add a new element simple-method-test-suite specifically for this
purpose.
The goal here is to make tests a little easier to write.
Thanks
Scott
HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
Re: Simple-method-test-suite
Posted by David E Jones <da...@hotwaxmedia.com>.
On May 2, 2009, at 1:06 AM, Ashish Vijaywargiya wrote:
> Please see my comments inline:
>
> Scott Gray wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> In a test def I would like to be able to specify a entire file of
>> simple-method tests where every simple method in the file would be
>> run in succession similar to how junit-test-suite works where every
>> method in a class is run as a test.
>>
>> The way I see it there are two options:
>> 1. Remove the requirement that the simple-method-test element must
>> provide a simple method name to run. If it is omitted then then
>> every simple method should be run.
> Instead of adding new element I will prefer to update the code to
> handle the case of keeping simple method name optional.
> Like if we don't have simple method name then run all the simple
> methods present in a file and if we have simple method name then run
> only that one.
I agree, that sounds line a much better option and is pretty intuitive
(ie it makes sense it would work that way).
-David
>> 2. Add a new element simple-method-test-suite specifically for
>> this purpose.
>>
>> The goal here is to make tests a little easier to write.
>>
>> Thanks
>> Scott
>>
>> HotWax Media
>> http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
>>
>>
>>
Re: Simple-method-test-suite
Posted by Ashish Vijaywargiya <as...@hotwaxmedia.com>.
Your most welcome, Scott :-) !
--
Ashish
Scott Gray wrote:
> Yeah I think that's the best option too, I'll make sure it's
> documented in the xsd so the behavior is clear. Thanks Ashish.
>
> Regards
> Scott
>
> HotWax Media
> http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
>
> On 2/05/2009, at 7:06 PM, Ashish Vijaywargiya wrote:
>
>
Re: Simple-method-test-suite
Posted by Scott Gray <sc...@hotwaxmedia.com>.
Yeah I think that's the best option too, I'll make sure it's
documented in the xsd so the behavior is clear. Thanks Ashish.
Regards
Scott
HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
On 2/05/2009, at 7:06 PM, Ashish Vijaywargiya wrote:
> Please see my comments inline:
>
> Scott Gray wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> In a test def I would like to be able to specify a entire file of
>> simple-method tests where every simple method in the file would be
>> run in succession similar to how junit-test-suite works where every
>> method in a class is run as a test.
>>
>> The way I see it there are two options:
>> 1. Remove the requirement that the simple-method-test element must
>> provide a simple method name to run. If it is omitted then then
>> every simple method should be run.
> Instead of adding new element I will prefer to update the code to
> handle the case of keeping simple method name optional.
> Like if we don't have simple method name then run all the simple
> methods present in a file and if we have simple method name then run
> only that one.
>
> WDYT ?
>
> --
> Ashish
>> 2. Add a new element simple-method-test-suite specifically for
>> this purpose.
>>
>> The goal here is to make tests a little easier to write.
>>
>> Thanks
>> Scott
>>
>> HotWax Media
>> http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
>>
>>
>>
Re: Simple-method-test-suite
Posted by Ashish Vijaywargiya <as...@hotwaxmedia.com>.
Please see my comments inline:
Scott Gray wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> In a test def I would like to be able to specify a entire file of
> simple-method tests where every simple method in the file would be run
> in succession similar to how junit-test-suite works where every method
> in a class is run as a test.
>
> The way I see it there are two options:
> 1. Remove the requirement that the simple-method-test element must
> provide a simple method name to run. If it is omitted then then every
> simple method should be run.
Instead of adding new element I will prefer to update the code to handle
the case of keeping simple method name optional.
Like if we don't have simple method name then run all the simple methods
present in a file and if we have simple method name then run only that one.
WDYT ?
--
Ashish
> 2. Add a new element simple-method-test-suite specifically for this
> purpose.
>
> The goal here is to make tests a little easier to write.
>
> Thanks
> Scott
>
> HotWax Media
> http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
>
>
>