You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@ranger.apache.org by Fatima Khan <fa...@gmail.com> on 2017/08/16 13:58:02 UTC

Review Request 61692: RANGER-1705 : Good coding practice in Ranger recommended by static code analysis *

-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/61692/
-----------------------------------------------------------

Review request for ranger, Don Bosco Durai, Gautam Borad, Abhay Kulkarni, Madhan Neethiraj, Pradeep Agrawal, Ramesh Mani, Selvamohan Neethiraj, Sailaja Polavarapu, and Velmurugan Periasamy.


Bugs: RANGER-1705
    https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RANGER-1705


Repository: ranger


Description
-------

Good coding practice in Ranger recommended by static code analysis on
1.UserMgr.java
2.XUserMgr.java
3.TestXUserMgr.java
4.LdapPolicyMgrUserGroupBuilder.java


Diffs
-----

  security-admin/src/main/java/org/apache/ranger/biz/UserMgr.java f27bfc1 
  security-admin/src/main/java/org/apache/ranger/biz/XUserMgr.java 676b1e3 
  security-admin/src/test/java/org/apache/ranger/biz/TestXUserMgr.java 6e6be72 
  ugsync/src/main/java/org/apache/ranger/ldapusersync/process/LdapPolicyMgrUserGroupBuilder.java 9548ed4 


Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/61692/diff/1/


Testing
-------

1.Verified when ranger-admin connect to LDAP server than users are synchronised form there they got same role which is specified in usersync-side.
2.Verified unix authentication and usersync.
3.Junit test was successful


Thanks,

Fatima Khan


Re: Review Request 61692: RANGER-1736 : Good coding practice in Ranger recommended by static code analysis *

Posted by Sailaja Polavarapu <sp...@hortonworks.com>.
-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/61692/#review183554
-----------------------------------------------------------


Ship it!




Ship It!

- Sailaja Polavarapu


On Aug. 16, 2017, 2:01 p.m., Fatima Khan wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/61692/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Aug. 16, 2017, 2:01 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for ranger, Don Bosco Durai, Gautam Borad, Abhay Kulkarni, Madhan Neethiraj, Pradeep Agrawal, Ramesh Mani, Selvamohan Neethiraj, Sailaja Polavarapu, and Velmurugan Periasamy.
> 
> 
> Bugs: RANGER-1736
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RANGER-1736
> 
> 
> Repository: ranger
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Good coding practice in Ranger recommended by static code analysis on
> 1.UserMgr.java
> 2.XUserMgr.java
> 3.TestXUserMgr.java
> 4.LdapPolicyMgrUserGroupBuilder.java
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   security-admin/src/main/java/org/apache/ranger/biz/UserMgr.java f27bfc1 
>   security-admin/src/main/java/org/apache/ranger/biz/XUserMgr.java 676b1e3 
>   security-admin/src/test/java/org/apache/ranger/biz/TestXUserMgr.java 6e6be72 
>   ugsync/src/main/java/org/apache/ranger/ldapusersync/process/LdapPolicyMgrUserGroupBuilder.java 9548ed4 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/61692/diff/1/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 1.Verified when ranger-admin connect to LDAP server than users are synchronised form there they got same role which is specified in usersync-side.
> 2.Verified unix authentication and usersync.
> 3.Junit test was successful
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Fatima Khan
> 
>


Re: Review Request 61692: RANGER-1736 : Good coding practice in Ranger recommended by static code analysis *

Posted by Ankita Sinha <an...@freestoneinfotech.com>.
-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/61692/#review183576
-----------------------------------------------------------


Ship it!




Ship It!

- Ankita Sinha


On Aug. 16, 2017, 2:01 p.m., Fatima Khan wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/61692/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Aug. 16, 2017, 2:01 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for ranger, Don Bosco Durai, Gautam Borad, Abhay Kulkarni, Madhan Neethiraj, Pradeep Agrawal, Ramesh Mani, Selvamohan Neethiraj, Sailaja Polavarapu, and Velmurugan Periasamy.
> 
> 
> Bugs: RANGER-1736
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RANGER-1736
> 
> 
> Repository: ranger
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Good coding practice in Ranger recommended by static code analysis on
> 1.UserMgr.java
> 2.XUserMgr.java
> 3.TestXUserMgr.java
> 4.LdapPolicyMgrUserGroupBuilder.java
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   security-admin/src/main/java/org/apache/ranger/biz/UserMgr.java f27bfc1 
>   security-admin/src/main/java/org/apache/ranger/biz/XUserMgr.java 676b1e3 
>   security-admin/src/test/java/org/apache/ranger/biz/TestXUserMgr.java 6e6be72 
>   ugsync/src/main/java/org/apache/ranger/ldapusersync/process/LdapPolicyMgrUserGroupBuilder.java 9548ed4 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/61692/diff/1/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 1.Verified when ranger-admin connect to LDAP server than users are synchronised form there they got same role which is specified in usersync-side.
> 2.Verified unix authentication and usersync.
> 3.Junit test was successful
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Fatima Khan
> 
>


Re: Review Request 61692: RANGER-1736 : Good coding practice in Ranger recommended by static code analysis *

Posted by Fatima Khan <fa...@gmail.com>.
-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/61692/
-----------------------------------------------------------

(Updated Aug. 16, 2017, 2:01 p.m.)


Review request for ranger, Don Bosco Durai, Gautam Borad, Abhay Kulkarni, Madhan Neethiraj, Pradeep Agrawal, Ramesh Mani, Selvamohan Neethiraj, Sailaja Polavarapu, and Velmurugan Periasamy.


Summary (updated)
-----------------

RANGER-1736 : Good coding practice in Ranger recommended by static code analysis *


Bugs: RANGER-1736
    https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RANGER-1736


Repository: ranger


Description
-------

Good coding practice in Ranger recommended by static code analysis on
1.UserMgr.java
2.XUserMgr.java
3.TestXUserMgr.java
4.LdapPolicyMgrUserGroupBuilder.java


Diffs
-----

  security-admin/src/main/java/org/apache/ranger/biz/UserMgr.java f27bfc1 
  security-admin/src/main/java/org/apache/ranger/biz/XUserMgr.java 676b1e3 
  security-admin/src/test/java/org/apache/ranger/biz/TestXUserMgr.java 6e6be72 
  ugsync/src/main/java/org/apache/ranger/ldapusersync/process/LdapPolicyMgrUserGroupBuilder.java 9548ed4 


Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/61692/diff/1/


Testing
-------

1.Verified when ranger-admin connect to LDAP server than users are synchronised form there they got same role which is specified in usersync-side.
2.Verified unix authentication and usersync.
3.Junit test was successful


Thanks,

Fatima Khan


Re: Review Request 61692: RANGER-1705 : Good coding practice in Ranger recommended by static code analysis *

Posted by Fatima Khan <fa...@gmail.com>.
-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/61692/
-----------------------------------------------------------

(Updated Aug. 16, 2017, 1:59 p.m.)


Review request for ranger, Don Bosco Durai, Gautam Borad, Abhay Kulkarni, Madhan Neethiraj, Pradeep Agrawal, Ramesh Mani, Selvamohan Neethiraj, Sailaja Polavarapu, and Velmurugan Periasamy.


Bugs: RANGER-1736
    https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RANGER-1736


Repository: ranger


Description
-------

Good coding practice in Ranger recommended by static code analysis on
1.UserMgr.java
2.XUserMgr.java
3.TestXUserMgr.java
4.LdapPolicyMgrUserGroupBuilder.java


Diffs
-----

  security-admin/src/main/java/org/apache/ranger/biz/UserMgr.java f27bfc1 
  security-admin/src/main/java/org/apache/ranger/biz/XUserMgr.java 676b1e3 
  security-admin/src/test/java/org/apache/ranger/biz/TestXUserMgr.java 6e6be72 
  ugsync/src/main/java/org/apache/ranger/ldapusersync/process/LdapPolicyMgrUserGroupBuilder.java 9548ed4 


Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/61692/diff/1/


Testing
-------

1.Verified when ranger-admin connect to LDAP server than users are synchronised form there they got same role which is specified in usersync-side.
2.Verified unix authentication and usersync.
3.Junit test was successful


Thanks,

Fatima Khan