You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@wicket.apache.org by Fernando Wermus <fe...@gmail.com> on 2009/05/15 01:02:03 UTC
Wizard, checkGroup and check
Hi!,
I am facing a problem that I don't know how to face.
I have a wizard several steps. One of them has a checkGroup and several
check. If I go to a step back and then a step foward, the checked boxes are
lost. The same happens when a required field is not completed.
I verified several times if there was a problem between models and It
is not the case. What I found is that the checkgroup is raw, according to
check impl, and it doesn't compare the second elseif. I don't know how to
manage this situation and I looked up in Google and I saw some people asking
about the same problem. I am using wicket 1.3.0.
(check.class)
if (group.hasRawInput())
{
final String[] input = group.getInputAsArray();
if (input != null)
{
for (int i = 0; i < input.length; i++)
{
if (uuid.equals(input[i]))
{
tag.put("checked", "checked");
}
}
}
}
else if (collection.contains(getModelObject()))
{
tag.put("checked", "checked");
}
Thanks in advance.
--
Fernando Wermus.
www.linkedin.com/in/fernandowermus
Re: Wizard, checkGroup and check
Posted by Fernando Wermus <fe...@gmail.com>.
Hi,
Finally I got solved the problem and I wanna share with you. My
checkgroup in the wizard panel werent setting up the setReuseItem in the
ListView.... It was hard to realize but I get it.
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 9:17 PM, Jeremy Thomerson <jeremy@wickettraining.com
> wrote:
> Please file a JIRA at the URL below [1]. The most effective issues
> are ones that are submitted with a patch. To make it even more
> effective, please run all tests against the patched codebase (run "mvn
> clean test") and notate that you did so when you submit your patch.
>
> [1] - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET
>
> --
> Jeremy Thomerson
> http://www.wickettraining.com
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 6:56 PM, Fernando Wermus
> <fe...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > I moved to wicket 1.3.6, the lastest before 1.4, without any luck.
> What
> > I did next, it was to cut the code that was bother me and It is working
> now.
> > Of course, I am afraid that this could have colateral effects. This is
> the
> > code,
> >
> > if (group.hasRawInput())
> > {
> > final String[] input = group.getInputAsArray();
> >
> > if (input != null)
> > {
> > for (int i = 0; i < input.length; i++)
> > {
> > if (uuid.equals(input[i]))
> > {
> > tag.put("checked", "checked");
> > }
> > }
> > }
> > }
> >
> > If I liked to write a Jira with an example, What would I do? I've never
> done
> > this before.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 4:13 PM, Martijn Dashorst <
> > martijn.dashorst@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> upgrading to a newer version is always preferred as a first measure.
> >>
> >> Martijn
> >>
> >> On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 1:12 AM, Igor Vaynberg <igor.vaynberg@gmail.com
> >
> >> wrote:
> >> > you can search jira for all known issues, i dont remember all of them
> >> > from the top of my head :)
> >> >
> >> > -igor
> >> >
> >> > On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 4:09 PM, Fernando Wermus
> >> > <fe...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >> Igor,
> >> >> I can move to a newer wicket version. Do you know if this is a
> known
> >> >> bug?
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 4:05 PM, Igor Vaynberg <
> igor.vaynberg@gmail.com
> >> >wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >>> if you care to submit a quickstart that demonstrates this in a jira
> >> >>> issue im sure someone will fix it relatively quickly.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> of course patches are applied even quicker :)
> >> >>>
> >> >>> -igor
> >> >>>
> >> >>> On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 4:02 PM, Fernando Wermus
> >> >>> <fe...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >>> > Hi!,
> >> >>> > I am facing a problem that I don't know how to face.
> >> >>> >
> >> >>> > I have a wizard several steps. One of them has a checkGroup and
> >> several
> >> >>> > check. If I go to a step back and then a step foward, the checked
> >> boxes
> >> >>> are
> >> >>> > lost. The same happens when a required field is not completed.
> >> >>> > I verified several times if there was a problem between
> models
> >> and
> >> >>> It
> >> >>> > is not the case. What I found is that the checkgroup is raw,
> >> according to
> >> >>> > check impl, and it doesn't compare the second elseif. I don't know
> >> how to
> >> >>> > manage this situation and I looked up in Google and I saw some
> people
> >> >>> asking
> >> >>> > about the same problem. I am using wicket 1.3.0.
> >> >>> >
> >> >>> > (check.class)
> >> >>> > if (group.hasRawInput())
> >> >>> > {
> >> >>> > final String[] input = group.getInputAsArray();
> >> >>> >
> >> >>> > if (input != null)
> >> >>> > {
> >> >>> > for (int i = 0; i < input.length; i++)
> >> >>> > {
> >> >>> > if (uuid.equals(input[i]))
> >> >>> > {
> >> >>> > tag.put("checked", "checked");
> >> >>> > }
> >> >>> > }
> >> >>> > }
> >> >>> > }
> >> >>> > else if (collection.contains(getModelObject()))
> >> >>> > {
> >> >>> > tag.put("checked", "checked");
> >> >>> > }
> >> >>> >
> >> >>> > Thanks in advance.
> >> >>> >
> >> >>> > --
> >> >>> > Fernando Wermus.
> >> >>> >
> >> >>> > www.linkedin.com/in/fernandowermus
> >> >>> >
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> >> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> --
> >> >> Fernando Wermus.
> >> >>
> >> >> www.linkedin.com/in/fernandowermus
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> >> > For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com
> >> Apache Wicket 1.3.5 is released
> >> Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> > --
> > Fernando Wermus.
> >
> > www.linkedin.com/in/fernandowermus
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
>
>
--
Fernando Wermus.
www.linkedin.com/in/fernandowermus
Re: Wizard, checkGroup and check
Posted by Jeremy Thomerson <je...@wickettraining.com>.
Please file a JIRA at the URL below [1]. The most effective issues
are ones that are submitted with a patch. To make it even more
effective, please run all tests against the patched codebase (run "mvn
clean test") and notate that you did so when you submit your patch.
[1] - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET
--
Jeremy Thomerson
http://www.wickettraining.com
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 6:56 PM, Fernando Wermus
<fe...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
> I moved to wicket 1.3.6, the lastest before 1.4, without any luck. What
> I did next, it was to cut the code that was bother me and It is working now.
> Of course, I am afraid that this could have colateral effects. This is the
> code,
>
> if (group.hasRawInput())
> {
> final String[] input = group.getInputAsArray();
>
> if (input != null)
> {
> for (int i = 0; i < input.length; i++)
> {
> if (uuid.equals(input[i]))
> {
> tag.put("checked", "checked");
> }
> }
> }
> }
>
> If I liked to write a Jira with an example, What would I do? I've never done
> this before.
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 4:13 PM, Martijn Dashorst <
> martijn.dashorst@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> upgrading to a newer version is always preferred as a first measure.
>>
>> Martijn
>>
>> On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 1:12 AM, Igor Vaynberg <ig...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > you can search jira for all known issues, i dont remember all of them
>> > from the top of my head :)
>> >
>> > -igor
>> >
>> > On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 4:09 PM, Fernando Wermus
>> > <fe...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> Igor,
>> >> I can move to a newer wicket version. Do you know if this is a known
>> >> bug?
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 4:05 PM, Igor Vaynberg <igor.vaynberg@gmail.com
>> >wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> if you care to submit a quickstart that demonstrates this in a jira
>> >>> issue im sure someone will fix it relatively quickly.
>> >>>
>> >>> of course patches are applied even quicker :)
>> >>>
>> >>> -igor
>> >>>
>> >>> On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 4:02 PM, Fernando Wermus
>> >>> <fe...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>> > Hi!,
>> >>> > I am facing a problem that I don't know how to face.
>> >>> >
>> >>> > I have a wizard several steps. One of them has a checkGroup and
>> several
>> >>> > check. If I go to a step back and then a step foward, the checked
>> boxes
>> >>> are
>> >>> > lost. The same happens when a required field is not completed.
>> >>> > I verified several times if there was a problem between models
>> and
>> >>> It
>> >>> > is not the case. What I found is that the checkgroup is raw,
>> according to
>> >>> > check impl, and it doesn't compare the second elseif. I don't know
>> how to
>> >>> > manage this situation and I looked up in Google and I saw some people
>> >>> asking
>> >>> > about the same problem. I am using wicket 1.3.0.
>> >>> >
>> >>> > (check.class)
>> >>> > if (group.hasRawInput())
>> >>> > {
>> >>> > final String[] input = group.getInputAsArray();
>> >>> >
>> >>> > if (input != null)
>> >>> > {
>> >>> > for (int i = 0; i < input.length; i++)
>> >>> > {
>> >>> > if (uuid.equals(input[i]))
>> >>> > {
>> >>> > tag.put("checked", "checked");
>> >>> > }
>> >>> > }
>> >>> > }
>> >>> > }
>> >>> > else if (collection.contains(getModelObject()))
>> >>> > {
>> >>> > tag.put("checked", "checked");
>> >>> > }
>> >>> >
>> >>> > Thanks in advance.
>> >>> >
>> >>> > --
>> >>> > Fernando Wermus.
>> >>> >
>> >>> > www.linkedin.com/in/fernandowermus
>> >>> >
>> >>>
>> >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
>> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> Fernando Wermus.
>> >>
>> >> www.linkedin.com/in/fernandowermus
>> >>
>> >
>> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
>> > For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com
>> Apache Wicket 1.3.5 is released
>> Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Fernando Wermus.
>
> www.linkedin.com/in/fernandowermus
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
Re: Wizard, checkGroup and check
Posted by Fernando Wermus <fe...@gmail.com>.
Hi all,
I moved to wicket 1.3.6, the lastest before 1.4, without any luck. What
I did next, it was to cut the code that was bother me and It is working now.
Of course, I am afraid that this could have colateral effects. This is the
code,
if (group.hasRawInput())
{
final String[] input = group.getInputAsArray();
if (input != null)
{
for (int i = 0; i < input.length; i++)
{
if (uuid.equals(input[i]))
{
tag.put("checked", "checked");
}
}
}
}
If I liked to write a Jira with an example, What would I do? I've never done
this before.
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 4:13 PM, Martijn Dashorst <
martijn.dashorst@gmail.com> wrote:
> upgrading to a newer version is always preferred as a first measure.
>
> Martijn
>
> On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 1:12 AM, Igor Vaynberg <ig...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > you can search jira for all known issues, i dont remember all of them
> > from the top of my head :)
> >
> > -igor
> >
> > On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 4:09 PM, Fernando Wermus
> > <fe...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> Igor,
> >> I can move to a newer wicket version. Do you know if this is a known
> >> bug?
> >>
> >>
> >> On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 4:05 PM, Igor Vaynberg <igor.vaynberg@gmail.com
> >wrote:
> >>
> >>> if you care to submit a quickstart that demonstrates this in a jira
> >>> issue im sure someone will fix it relatively quickly.
> >>>
> >>> of course patches are applied even quicker :)
> >>>
> >>> -igor
> >>>
> >>> On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 4:02 PM, Fernando Wermus
> >>> <fe...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> > Hi!,
> >>> > I am facing a problem that I don't know how to face.
> >>> >
> >>> > I have a wizard several steps. One of them has a checkGroup and
> several
> >>> > check. If I go to a step back and then a step foward, the checked
> boxes
> >>> are
> >>> > lost. The same happens when a required field is not completed.
> >>> > I verified several times if there was a problem between models
> and
> >>> It
> >>> > is not the case. What I found is that the checkgroup is raw,
> according to
> >>> > check impl, and it doesn't compare the second elseif. I don't know
> how to
> >>> > manage this situation and I looked up in Google and I saw some people
> >>> asking
> >>> > about the same problem. I am using wicket 1.3.0.
> >>> >
> >>> > (check.class)
> >>> > if (group.hasRawInput())
> >>> > {
> >>> > final String[] input = group.getInputAsArray();
> >>> >
> >>> > if (input != null)
> >>> > {
> >>> > for (int i = 0; i < input.length; i++)
> >>> > {
> >>> > if (uuid.equals(input[i]))
> >>> > {
> >>> > tag.put("checked", "checked");
> >>> > }
> >>> > }
> >>> > }
> >>> > }
> >>> > else if (collection.contains(getModelObject()))
> >>> > {
> >>> > tag.put("checked", "checked");
> >>> > }
> >>> >
> >>> > Thanks in advance.
> >>> >
> >>> > --
> >>> > Fernando Wermus.
> >>> >
> >>> > www.linkedin.com/in/fernandowermus
> >>> >
> >>>
> >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Fernando Wermus.
> >>
> >> www.linkedin.com/in/fernandowermus
> >>
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
> >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com
> Apache Wicket 1.3.5 is released
> Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
>
>
--
Fernando Wermus.
www.linkedin.com/in/fernandowermus
Re: Wizard, checkGroup and check
Posted by Martijn Dashorst <ma...@gmail.com>.
upgrading to a newer version is always preferred as a first measure.
Martijn
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 1:12 AM, Igor Vaynberg <ig...@gmail.com> wrote:
> you can search jira for all known issues, i dont remember all of them
> from the top of my head :)
>
> -igor
>
> On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 4:09 PM, Fernando Wermus
> <fe...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Igor,
>> I can move to a newer wicket version. Do you know if this is a known
>> bug?
>>
>>
>> On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 4:05 PM, Igor Vaynberg <ig...@gmail.com>wrote:
>>
>>> if you care to submit a quickstart that demonstrates this in a jira
>>> issue im sure someone will fix it relatively quickly.
>>>
>>> of course patches are applied even quicker :)
>>>
>>> -igor
>>>
>>> On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 4:02 PM, Fernando Wermus
>>> <fe...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> > Hi!,
>>> > I am facing a problem that I don't know how to face.
>>> >
>>> > I have a wizard several steps. One of them has a checkGroup and several
>>> > check. If I go to a step back and then a step foward, the checked boxes
>>> are
>>> > lost. The same happens when a required field is not completed.
>>> > I verified several times if there was a problem between models and
>>> It
>>> > is not the case. What I found is that the checkgroup is raw, according to
>>> > check impl, and it doesn't compare the second elseif. I don't know how to
>>> > manage this situation and I looked up in Google and I saw some people
>>> asking
>>> > about the same problem. I am using wicket 1.3.0.
>>> >
>>> > (check.class)
>>> > if (group.hasRawInput())
>>> > {
>>> > final String[] input = group.getInputAsArray();
>>> >
>>> > if (input != null)
>>> > {
>>> > for (int i = 0; i < input.length; i++)
>>> > {
>>> > if (uuid.equals(input[i]))
>>> > {
>>> > tag.put("checked", "checked");
>>> > }
>>> > }
>>> > }
>>> > }
>>> > else if (collection.contains(getModelObject()))
>>> > {
>>> > tag.put("checked", "checked");
>>> > }
>>> >
>>> > Thanks in advance.
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> > Fernando Wermus.
>>> >
>>> > www.linkedin.com/in/fernandowermus
>>> >
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Fernando Wermus.
>>
>> www.linkedin.com/in/fernandowermus
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
>
>
--
Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com
Apache Wicket 1.3.5 is released
Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
Re: Wizard, checkGroup and check
Posted by Igor Vaynberg <ig...@gmail.com>.
you can search jira for all known issues, i dont remember all of them
from the top of my head :)
-igor
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 4:09 PM, Fernando Wermus
<fe...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Igor,
> I can move to a newer wicket version. Do you know if this is a known
> bug?
>
>
> On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 4:05 PM, Igor Vaynberg <ig...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> if you care to submit a quickstart that demonstrates this in a jira
>> issue im sure someone will fix it relatively quickly.
>>
>> of course patches are applied even quicker :)
>>
>> -igor
>>
>> On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 4:02 PM, Fernando Wermus
>> <fe...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Hi!,
>> > I am facing a problem that I don't know how to face.
>> >
>> > I have a wizard several steps. One of them has a checkGroup and several
>> > check. If I go to a step back and then a step foward, the checked boxes
>> are
>> > lost. The same happens when a required field is not completed.
>> > I verified several times if there was a problem between models and
>> It
>> > is not the case. What I found is that the checkgroup is raw, according to
>> > check impl, and it doesn't compare the second elseif. I don't know how to
>> > manage this situation and I looked up in Google and I saw some people
>> asking
>> > about the same problem. I am using wicket 1.3.0.
>> >
>> > (check.class)
>> > if (group.hasRawInput())
>> > {
>> > final String[] input = group.getInputAsArray();
>> >
>> > if (input != null)
>> > {
>> > for (int i = 0; i < input.length; i++)
>> > {
>> > if (uuid.equals(input[i]))
>> > {
>> > tag.put("checked", "checked");
>> > }
>> > }
>> > }
>> > }
>> > else if (collection.contains(getModelObject()))
>> > {
>> > tag.put("checked", "checked");
>> > }
>> >
>> > Thanks in advance.
>> >
>> > --
>> > Fernando Wermus.
>> >
>> > www.linkedin.com/in/fernandowermus
>> >
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Fernando Wermus.
>
> www.linkedin.com/in/fernandowermus
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
Re: Wizard, checkGroup and check
Posted by Fernando Wermus <fe...@gmail.com>.
Igor,
I can move to a newer wicket version. Do you know if this is a known
bug?
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 4:05 PM, Igor Vaynberg <ig...@gmail.com>wrote:
> if you care to submit a quickstart that demonstrates this in a jira
> issue im sure someone will fix it relatively quickly.
>
> of course patches are applied even quicker :)
>
> -igor
>
> On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 4:02 PM, Fernando Wermus
> <fe...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi!,
> > I am facing a problem that I don't know how to face.
> >
> > I have a wizard several steps. One of them has a checkGroup and several
> > check. If I go to a step back and then a step foward, the checked boxes
> are
> > lost. The same happens when a required field is not completed.
> > I verified several times if there was a problem between models and
> It
> > is not the case. What I found is that the checkgroup is raw, according to
> > check impl, and it doesn't compare the second elseif. I don't know how to
> > manage this situation and I looked up in Google and I saw some people
> asking
> > about the same problem. I am using wicket 1.3.0.
> >
> > (check.class)
> > if (group.hasRawInput())
> > {
> > final String[] input = group.getInputAsArray();
> >
> > if (input != null)
> > {
> > for (int i = 0; i < input.length; i++)
> > {
> > if (uuid.equals(input[i]))
> > {
> > tag.put("checked", "checked");
> > }
> > }
> > }
> > }
> > else if (collection.contains(getModelObject()))
> > {
> > tag.put("checked", "checked");
> > }
> >
> > Thanks in advance.
> >
> > --
> > Fernando Wermus.
> >
> > www.linkedin.com/in/fernandowermus
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
>
>
--
Fernando Wermus.
www.linkedin.com/in/fernandowermus
Re: Wizard, checkGroup and check
Posted by Igor Vaynberg <ig...@gmail.com>.
if you care to submit a quickstart that demonstrates this in a jira
issue im sure someone will fix it relatively quickly.
of course patches are applied even quicker :)
-igor
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 4:02 PM, Fernando Wermus
<fe...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi!,
> I am facing a problem that I don't know how to face.
>
> I have a wizard several steps. One of them has a checkGroup and several
> check. If I go to a step back and then a step foward, the checked boxes are
> lost. The same happens when a required field is not completed.
> I verified several times if there was a problem between models and It
> is not the case. What I found is that the checkgroup is raw, according to
> check impl, and it doesn't compare the second elseif. I don't know how to
> manage this situation and I looked up in Google and I saw some people asking
> about the same problem. I am using wicket 1.3.0.
>
> (check.class)
> if (group.hasRawInput())
> {
> final String[] input = group.getInputAsArray();
>
> if (input != null)
> {
> for (int i = 0; i < input.length; i++)
> {
> if (uuid.equals(input[i]))
> {
> tag.put("checked", "checked");
> }
> }
> }
> }
> else if (collection.contains(getModelObject()))
> {
> tag.put("checked", "checked");
> }
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
> --
> Fernando Wermus.
>
> www.linkedin.com/in/fernandowermus
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org