Re: Demo VM ready (was: RE: Public demo instance hosted by third party)

[Matevž Bradač <ma...@gmail.com>]

Hi Gavin

Please add me to the list as well (I already added the ssh pub key).

Cheers,
matevz

On 22. Jan, 2013, at 10:04, Gavin McDonald wrote:

> Hi All,
> 
> As promised, a VM is ready to go.
> 
> Currently gjm, mpoole and myself have access.
> 
> Let me know if anyone else in interested in helping to maintain the demo VM
> as a whole.
> 
> I'd like to help with the setting up of the Demo Instances, so my work is
> done here with my infra
> hat for now, but will continue on with my bh hat on if I may.
> 
> Thanks
> 
> Gav...
> 
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Gary Martin [mailto:gary.martin@wandisco.com]
>> Sent: Friday, 11 January 2013 9:51 PM
>> To: bloodhound-dev@incubator.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: Public demo instance hosted by third party
>> 
>> On 10/01/13 22:44, Gavin McDonald wrote:
>>> 
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Joachim Dreimann [mailto:joachim.dreimann@wandisco.com]
>>>> Sent: Friday, 11 January 2013 4:48 AM
>>>> To: bloodhound-dev@incubator.apache.org
>>>> Subject: Re: Public demo instance hosted by third party
>>>> 
>>>> Indeed I think the ASF VM should be our first priority. I'm talking
>>>> about
>>> a
>>>> temporary solution until then, not an advertising drive.
>>>> I recognise that this could be a slippery slope (regarding user
>>> perception), but
>>>> I feel confident enough that the lack of slope (ie users) is more
>>> important at
>>>> this point. Hopefully Gary's change to the ticket and comment will
>>>> achieve some progress.
>>>> 
>>> I've got my eye on doing this rsn, just  the backlog of projects
>>> jumping last minute with the svnpubsub/cms deadlines has kept us busy.
>>> 
>>> I will start the VM today.
>>> 
>>> what service urls do you want?
>>> 
>>> I suggest a machine (VM) name of bloodhound-vm2.a.o with service urls
>>> of something like bh-demo1.a.o , bh-demo2.a.o etc ?
>> 
>> The VM name is fine. I guess something like bh-demo-<name>.a.o might be
>> worth going for but I would also be happy to distinguish the demos with
>> something like bh-demo.a.o/<name>/
>> 
>> In case it is helpful to know now, the two demos we expect to start with
>> would probably be:
>> 
>>  * current - the latest official release
>>  * nightly - the current trunk, obviously rebuilt once a day
>> 
>> I think there was also a suggestion of having any upcoming release demoed
>> over the voting period, although we may have to balance any benefit of
> that
>> against the possibility that votes will be made only on the basis of such
> a
>> demo.
>> 
>> Cheers,
>>     Gary
> 

RE: Demo VM ready (was: RE: Public demo instance hosted by third party)

[Gavin McDonald <ga...@16degrees.com.au>]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andrej Golcov [mailto:andrej@digiverse.si]
> Sent: Thursday, 7 February 2013 2:37 AM
> To: bloodhound-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Cc: gavin@16degrees.com.au
> Subject: Re: Demo VM ready (was: RE: Public demo instance hosted by third
> party)
> 
> Hi Gavin,
> 
> Please also add my name on the list.
> SSH pub key is in ldap.
> 

Sorry for delay, you should now have ssh access to 
bloodhound-vm2.aapche.org

If you need sudo, you'll need to set up orthrus (opie) first.

See s.apache.org/opie 

HTH

Gav...

> Regards, Andrej
> 
> On 6 February 2013 10:55, Matevž Bradač <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi Gavin
> >
> > Please add me to the list as well (I already added the ssh pub key).
> >
> > Cheers,
> > matevz
> >
> > On 22. Jan, 2013, at 10:04, Gavin McDonald wrote:
> >
> >> Hi All,
> >>
> >> As promised, a VM is ready to go.
> >>
> >> Currently gjm, mpoole and myself have access.
> >>
> >> Let me know if anyone else in interested in helping to maintain the
> >> demo VM as a whole.
> >>
> >> I'd like to help with the setting up of the Demo Instances, so my
> >> work is done here with my infra hat for now, but will continue on
> >> with my bh hat on if I may.
> >>
> >> Thanks
> >>
> >> Gav...
> >>
> >>
> >>> -----Original Message-----
> >>> From: Gary Martin [mailto:gary.martin@wandisco.com]
> >>> Sent: Friday, 11 January 2013 9:51 PM
> >>> To: bloodhound-dev@incubator.apache.org
> >>> Subject: Re: Public demo instance hosted by third party
> >>>
> >>> On 10/01/13 22:44, Gavin McDonald wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> -----Original Message-----
> >>>>> From: Joachim Dreimann [mailto:joachim.dreimann@wandisco.com]
> >>>>> Sent: Friday, 11 January 2013 4:48 AM
> >>>>> To: bloodhound-dev@incubator.apache.org
> >>>>> Subject: Re: Public demo instance hosted by third party
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Indeed I think the ASF VM should be our first priority. I'm
> >>>>> talking about
> >>>> a
> >>>>> temporary solution until then, not an advertising drive.
> >>>>> I recognise that this could be a slippery slope (regarding user
> >>>> perception), but
> >>>>> I feel confident enough that the lack of slope (ie users) is more
> >>>> important at
> >>>>> this point. Hopefully Gary's change to the ticket and comment will
> >>>>> achieve some progress.
> >>>>>
> >>>> I've got my eye on doing this rsn, just  the backlog of projects
> >>>> jumping last minute with the svnpubsub/cms deadlines has kept us
> busy.
> >>>>
> >>>> I will start the VM today.
> >>>>
> >>>> what service urls do you want?
> >>>>
> >>>> I suggest a machine (VM) name of bloodhound-vm2.a.o with service
> >>>> urls of something like bh-demo1.a.o , bh-demo2.a.o etc ?
> >>>
> >>> The VM name is fine. I guess something like bh-demo-<name>.a.o might
> >>> be worth going for but I would also be happy to distinguish the
> >>> demos with something like bh-demo.a.o/<name>/
> >>>
> >>> In case it is helpful to know now, the two demos we expect to start
> >>> with would probably be:
> >>>
> >>>  * current - the latest official release
> >>>  * nightly - the current trunk, obviously rebuilt once a day
> >>>
> >>> I think there was also a suggestion of having any upcoming release
> >>> demoed over the voting period, although we may have to balance any
> >>> benefit of
> >> that
> >>> against the possibility that votes will be made only on the basis of
> >>> such
> >> a
> >>> demo.
> >>>
> >>> Cheers,
> >>>     Gary
> >>
> >

Re: Demo VM ready (was: RE: Public demo instance hosted by third party)

[Andrej Golcov <an...@digiverse.si>]

Hi Gavin,

Please also add my name on the list.
SSH pub key is in ldap.

Regards, Andrej

On 6 February 2013 10:55, Matevž Bradač <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Gavin
>
> Please add me to the list as well (I already added the ssh pub key).
>
> Cheers,
> matevz
>
> On 22. Jan, 2013, at 10:04, Gavin McDonald wrote:
>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> As promised, a VM is ready to go.
>>
>> Currently gjm, mpoole and myself have access.
>>
>> Let me know if anyone else in interested in helping to maintain the demo VM
>> as a whole.
>>
>> I'd like to help with the setting up of the Demo Instances, so my work is
>> done here with my infra
>> hat for now, but will continue on with my bh hat on if I may.
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Gav...
>>
>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Gary Martin [mailto:gary.martin@wandisco.com]
>>> Sent: Friday, 11 January 2013 9:51 PM
>>> To: bloodhound-dev@incubator.apache.org
>>> Subject: Re: Public demo instance hosted by third party
>>>
>>> On 10/01/13 22:44, Gavin McDonald wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>> From: Joachim Dreimann [mailto:joachim.dreimann@wandisco.com]
>>>>> Sent: Friday, 11 January 2013 4:48 AM
>>>>> To: bloodhound-dev@incubator.apache.org
>>>>> Subject: Re: Public demo instance hosted by third party
>>>>>
>>>>> Indeed I think the ASF VM should be our first priority. I'm talking
>>>>> about
>>>> a
>>>>> temporary solution until then, not an advertising drive.
>>>>> I recognise that this could be a slippery slope (regarding user
>>>> perception), but
>>>>> I feel confident enough that the lack of slope (ie users) is more
>>>> important at
>>>>> this point. Hopefully Gary's change to the ticket and comment will
>>>>> achieve some progress.
>>>>>
>>>> I've got my eye on doing this rsn, just  the backlog of projects
>>>> jumping last minute with the svnpubsub/cms deadlines has kept us busy.
>>>>
>>>> I will start the VM today.
>>>>
>>>> what service urls do you want?
>>>>
>>>> I suggest a machine (VM) name of bloodhound-vm2.a.o with service urls
>>>> of something like bh-demo1.a.o , bh-demo2.a.o etc ?
>>>
>>> The VM name is fine. I guess something like bh-demo-<name>.a.o might be
>>> worth going for but I would also be happy to distinguish the demos with
>>> something like bh-demo.a.o/<name>/
>>>
>>> In case it is helpful to know now, the two demos we expect to start with
>>> would probably be:
>>>
>>>  * current - the latest official release
>>>  * nightly - the current trunk, obviously rebuilt once a day
>>>
>>> I think there was also a suggestion of having any upcoming release demoed
>>> over the voting period, although we may have to balance any benefit of
>> that
>>> against the possibility that votes will be made only on the basis of such
>> a
>>> demo.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>     Gary
>>
>

RE: Demo VM ready (was: RE: Public demo instance hosted by third party)

[Gavin McDonald <ga...@16degrees.com.au>]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Matevž Bradač [mailto:matevzb@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, 6 February 2013 8:26 PM
> To: bloodhound-dev@incubator.apache.org; gavin@16degrees.com.au
> Subject: Re: Demo VM ready (was: RE: Public demo instance hosted by third
> party)
> 
> Hi Gavin
> 
> Please add me to the list as well (I already added the ssh pub key).

Done, sorry for delay, you should now be able to log in to 
bloodhound-vm2.apache.org

for sudo, please set up orthrus (opie) first:

s.apache.org/opie

Once done I can add you to sudoers.

Gav...

> 
> Cheers,
> matevz
> 
> On 22. Jan, 2013, at 10:04, Gavin McDonald wrote:
> 
> > Hi All,
> >
> > As promised, a VM is ready to go.
> >
> > Currently gjm, mpoole and myself have access.
> >
> > Let me know if anyone else in interested in helping to maintain the
> > demo VM as a whole.
> >
> > I'd like to help with the setting up of the Demo Instances, so my work
> > is done here with my infra hat for now, but will continue on with my
> > bh hat on if I may.
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > Gav...
> >
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Gary Martin [mailto:gary.martin@wandisco.com]
> >> Sent: Friday, 11 January 2013 9:51 PM
> >> To: bloodhound-dev@incubator.apache.org
> >> Subject: Re: Public demo instance hosted by third party
> >>
> >> On 10/01/13 22:44, Gavin McDonald wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> -----Original Message-----
> >>>> From: Joachim Dreimann [mailto:joachim.dreimann@wandisco.com]
> >>>> Sent: Friday, 11 January 2013 4:48 AM
> >>>> To: bloodhound-dev@incubator.apache.org
> >>>> Subject: Re: Public demo instance hosted by third party
> >>>>
> >>>> Indeed I think the ASF VM should be our first priority. I'm talking
> >>>> about
> >>> a
> >>>> temporary solution until then, not an advertising drive.
> >>>> I recognise that this could be a slippery slope (regarding user
> >>> perception), but
> >>>> I feel confident enough that the lack of slope (ie users) is more
> >>> important at
> >>>> this point. Hopefully Gary's change to the ticket and comment will
> >>>> achieve some progress.
> >>>>
> >>> I've got my eye on doing this rsn, just  the backlog of projects
> >>> jumping last minute with the svnpubsub/cms deadlines has kept us
> busy.
> >>>
> >>> I will start the VM today.
> >>>
> >>> what service urls do you want?
> >>>
> >>> I suggest a machine (VM) name of bloodhound-vm2.a.o with service
> >>> urls of something like bh-demo1.a.o , bh-demo2.a.o etc ?
> >>
> >> The VM name is fine. I guess something like bh-demo-<name>.a.o might
> >> be worth going for but I would also be happy to distinguish the demos
> >> with something like bh-demo.a.o/<name>/
> >>
> >> In case it is helpful to know now, the two demos we expect to start
> >> with would probably be:
> >>
> >>  * current - the latest official release
> >>  * nightly - the current trunk, obviously rebuilt once a day
> >>
> >> I think there was also a suggestion of having any upcoming release
> >> demoed over the voting period, although we may have to balance any
> >> benefit of
> > that
> >> against the possibility that votes will be made only on the basis of
> >> such
> > a
> >> demo.
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >>     Gary
> >