You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@spamassassin.apache.org by Marcin Mirosław <ma...@mejor.pl> on 2019/12/28 19:06:04 UTC
SA 3.4.3 and mimeheader check
Hello,
it looks something changed in mimeheader check. After upgrade to 3.4.3
this rule throws error:
warn: config: SpamAssassin failed to parse line, "__LRM_BAD_ZIPSRULE
Content-Type:raw =~
/^application\/zip;.*xls\s\.zip|^application/zip;.*\.zip\"/" is not
valid for "mimeheader", skipping: mimeheader __LRM_BAD_ZIPSRULE
Content-Type:raw =~
/^application\/zip;.*xls\s\.zip|^application/zip;.*\.zip\"/
What changed in the way how mimeheader works?
Marcin
Re: SA 3.4.3 and mimeheader check
Posted by Marcin Mirosław <ma...@mejor.pl>.
W dniu 2019-12-28 o 21:07, RW pisze:
> On Sat, 28 Dec 2019 20:06:04 +0100
> Marcin Mirosław wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>> it looks something changed in mimeheader check. After upgrade to 3.4.3
>> this rule throws error:
>>
>> warn: config: SpamAssassin failed to parse line, "__LRM_BAD_ZIPSRULE
>> Content-Type:raw =~
>> /^application\/zip;.*xls\s\.zip|^application/zip;.*\.zip\"/" is not
>> valid for "mimeheader", skipping: mimeheader __LRM_BAD_ZIPSRULE
>> Content-Type:raw =~
>> /^application\/zip;.*xls\s\.zip|^application/zip;.*\.zip\"/
>>
>> What changed in the way how mimeheader works?
>
> It has better validation. You are missing a backslash in
> "^application/zip".
>
Indeed, thank you!
Re: SA 3.4.3 and mimeheader check
Posted by RW <rw...@googlemail.com>.
On Sat, 28 Dec 2019 20:06:04 +0100
Marcin Mirosław wrote:
> Hello,
> it looks something changed in mimeheader check. After upgrade to 3.4.3
> this rule throws error:
>
> warn: config: SpamAssassin failed to parse line, "__LRM_BAD_ZIPSRULE
> Content-Type:raw =~
> /^application\/zip;.*xls\s\.zip|^application/zip;.*\.zip\"/" is not
> valid for "mimeheader", skipping: mimeheader __LRM_BAD_ZIPSRULE
> Content-Type:raw =~
> /^application\/zip;.*xls\s\.zip|^application/zip;.*\.zip\"/
>
> What changed in the way how mimeheader works?
It has better validation. You are missing a backslash in
"^application/zip".