You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to server-dev@james.apache.org by Robert Burrell Donkin <ro...@gmail.com> on 2008/09/13 10:25:47 UTC
[mailet] Binary Release Contents? [WAS Re: [mailet] Some Minor Release Stuff]
On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 11:20 PM, Stefano Bagnara <ap...@bago.org> wrote:
> Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto:
<snip>
>> 4. dist/mailet-2.4-SNAPSHOT/downloads/src isn't very conventional (at
>> least outside James). maybe it would be better in target.
>
> +1
ATM the binary distribution is minimal - just the licenses and mailet jars.
opinions?
- robert
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscribe@james.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-help@james.apache.org
Re: [mailet] Binary Release Contents? [WAS Re: [mailet] Some Minor
Release Stuff]
Posted by Stefano Bagnara <ap...@bago.org>.
Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto:
> On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 11:20 PM, Stefano Bagnara <ap...@bago.org> wrote:
>> Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto:
>
> <snip>
>
>>> 4. dist/mailet-2.4-SNAPSHOT/downloads/src isn't very conventional (at
>>> least outside James). maybe it would be better in target.
>> +1
>
> ATM the binary distribution is minimal - just the licenses and mailet jars.
>
> opinions?
We could add the dependencies (javamail+jaf) and the apidocs like we do
in jsieve/mime4j/jspf binary distributions.
Stefano
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscribe@james.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-help@james.apache.org