You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@cocoon.apache.org by Jeremy Quinn <sh...@mac.com> on 2003/08/12 12:09:02 UTC
[OT] java[script]doc
Hi All,
Does anyone know if there is an equivalent to the javadoc tool for
JavaScript files?
I'd love to pump out nice html docs for my commented flowscripts ;)
Thanks for any suggestions ....
regards Jeremy
Re: [OT] java[script]doc
Posted by Jeremy Quinn <je...@media.demon.co.uk>.
On Wednesday, August 13, 2003, at 01:23 AM, Bruce Chapman wrote:
> The Rhino javascript engine has an example script which might do what
> you
> want.
>
> http://lxr.mozilla.org/mozilla/source/js/rhino/examples/jsdoc.js
Thanks for the pointer !!!
regards Jeremy
RE: [OT] java[script]doc
Posted by Bruce Chapman <bc...@nec.co.nz>.
The Rhino javascript engine has an example script which might do what you
want.
http://lxr.mozilla.org/mozilla/source/js/rhino/examples/jsdoc.js
regards
Bruce
Re: cocoon-based website needs search engine functionality
Posted by Sylvain Wallez <sy...@anyware-tech.com>.
Frederic wrote:
>Hi everyone,
>
>I'm urgently looking for someone who has experience with building cocoon apps and integrating search functionality to incorporate search functionality into a website counting 500 pages, of which some 150 are also available as pdf and Word docs.
>
>People who are able to incorporate Lucene (open to different products if I can be convinced of its advantages) into Cocoon websites, please inform me about your price and delivery date.
>
>
Do you know that Lucene is *already* incorporated into Cocoon ? Or do
you have special needs regarding indexing non-cocoon generated documents
(the pdf and word docs mentioned above) ?
Sylvain
--
Sylvain Wallez Anyware Technologies
http://www.apache.org/~sylvain http://www.anyware-tech.com
{ XML, Java, Cocoon, OpenSource }*{ Training, Consulting, Projects }
Orixo, the opensource XML business alliance - http://www.orixo.com
cocoon-based website needs search engine functionality
Posted by Frederic <ro...@tiscali.be>.
Hi everyone,
I'm urgently looking for someone who has experience with building cocoon
apps and
integrating search functionality to incorporate search functionality into a
website counting 500 pages, of which some 150 are also available as pdf and
Word docs.
People who are able to incorporate Lucene (open to different products if I
can be convinced of its advantages) into Cocoon websites, please inform me
about your price and delivery date.
You can contact me directly at rofre@swing.be.
Greetings from Frederic
Re: [OT] java[script]doc
Posted by Bertrand Delacretaz <bd...@codeconsult.ch>.
Le Mardi, 12 aoû 2003, à 15:29 Europe/Zurich, Jeremy Quinn a écrit :
> I will have a look at qdox ..... unfortunately, I always found the
> Chaperon grammar impenetrable ;)
It is not the most readable thing, I agree ;-)
OTOH slop + PatternProcessor + some XSLT look like a powerful and
simple combination for light parsing.
-Bertrand
Re: [OT] java[script]doc
Posted by Stephan Michels <st...@apache.org>.
On Tue, 12 Aug 2003, Jeremy Quinn wrote:
>
> On Tuesday, August 12, 2003, at 12:36 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
>
> > Le Mardi, 12 aoû 2003, à 12:09 Europe/Zurich, Jeremy Quinn a écrit :
> >
> >> Does anyone know if there is an equivalent to the javadoc tool for
> >> JavaScript files?
> >
> > Did you try the qdox block?
> > I have no idea if it would work, dunno how strict it is about java
> > syntax, but it might be worth a try.
> >
> > Alternatives would be the Chaperon parser (with your own grammar), or
> > something based on the slop block and the PatternTransformer.
> >
> > -Bertrand
> >
>
> Thanks for your suggestions Bertrand.
>
> I will have a look at qdox ..... unfortunately, I always found the
> Chaperon grammar impenetrable ;)
I think you mean the XML presentation, then I must admit that this
should only be machine readable, not for editing by hand. (IHMO
almost every XML schema is unsuitable for editing by hand). This
is the reason why I offer text grammar format, which is nearly
equal to BNF.
But if not happy with format, then I curious for the reason. Without input
I can't make things better ;-)
Stephan.
Re: [OT] java[script]doc
Posted by Jeremy Quinn <je...@media.demon.co.uk>.
On Tuesday, August 12, 2003, at 12:36 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
> Le Mardi, 12 aoû 2003, à 12:09 Europe/Zurich, Jeremy Quinn a écrit :
>
>> Does anyone know if there is an equivalent to the javadoc tool for
>> JavaScript files?
>
> Did you try the qdox block?
> I have no idea if it would work, dunno how strict it is about java
> syntax, but it might be worth a try.
>
> Alternatives would be the Chaperon parser (with your own grammar), or
> something based on the slop block and the PatternTransformer.
>
> -Bertrand
>
Thanks for your suggestions Bertrand.
I will have a look at qdox ..... unfortunately, I always found the
Chaperon grammar impenetrable ;)
There is a javascriptdocs project on SF, but it looks dead .....
regards Jeremy
Re: [OT] java[script]doc
Posted by Bertrand Delacretaz <bd...@codeconsult.ch>.
Le Mardi, 12 aoû 2003, à 12:09 Europe/Zurich, Jeremy Quinn a écrit :
> Does anyone know if there is an equivalent to the javadoc tool for
> JavaScript files?
Did you try the qdox block?
I have no idea if it would work, dunno how strict it is about java
syntax, but it might be worth a try.
Alternatives would be the Chaperon parser (with your own grammar), or
something based on the slop block and the PatternTransformer.
-Bertrand