You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@spamassassin.apache.org by Owen McShane <om...@vianetworks.co.uk> on 2004/09/29 16:42:35 UTC
Re: V3.0.0 spam not getting scanned
I take it the answer is "No" then? ;-)
Thanks,
Owen
> Hi,
>
> I'm running exim on a Solaris box with mail for certain users being piped through spamc (V2.63), which is using a newly built Fedora core 2 spamd (V3.0.0) server. (This server did have 2.64 on, but was upgraded through CPAN).
>
> I'm getting the following errors in the spamd server's log:
>
> Sep 27 10:22:52 HM199WAR spamd[12382]: logmsg: error: Insecure dependency in eval while running with -T switch at /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.3/Mail/SpamAssassin/PerMsgStatus.pm line 1669, <GEN56> line 38._ , continuing
> Sep 27 10:22:52 HM199WAR spamd[12382]: error: Insecure dependency in eval while running with -T switch at /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.3/Mail/SpamAssassin/PerMsgStatus.pm line 1669, <GEN56> line 38._ , continuing
>
> Not all the mails generate this error, but the ones that do get returned to the mail server unscanned. (I assume either the return error, or a time out is causing this).
>
> I'm running the following flags:
>
> -D -d -c -v -m 20 -u mail -A 194.119.128.69 -i 195.102.4.202
>
> (I have my own custom vuserinfo script, which simply returns the user's default directory,as they are not real users, hence the use of -v to get per-user settings/bayes etc.)
>
> Has anyone come across this, or can anyone recommend a solution?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Owen
>
--
Via Net.Works UK Ltd
Local Touch Global Reach
Owen McShane Systems Administrator
http://www.vianetworks.co.uk Tel +44 (0)1925 484444
Re: [bug 3838] V3.0.0 spam not getting scanned
Posted by Daniel Quinlan <qu...@pathname.com>.
Owen, please don't copy messages to both dev@ and users@.
Anyway, this like the same problem described in bug 3838. Please
follow-up at:
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3838
I have no idea what the cause is -- we really need someone to work
through this and figure out which rule is causing the taint error:
1. find a message that reliably reproduces the problem
2. narrow down the problem to one .cf file (by moving .cf files in and out)
3. narrow down the problem to one or more rules within that file
(Assuming you it *can* be narrowed down.)
It would also help to figure out what the heck is on line 38. Does the
line number change from message to message? I would hope so. The
plug-in for dumping the body (in the wiki) would probably do the job.
Daniel
--
Daniel Quinlan ApacheCon! 13-17 November (3 SpamAssassin
http://www.pathname.com/~quinlan/ http://www.apachecon.com/ sessions & more)
Re: [bug 3838] V3.0.0 spam not getting scanned
Posted by Daniel Quinlan <qu...@pathname.com>.
Owen, please don't copy messages to both dev@ and users@.
Anyway, this like the same problem described in bug 3838. Please
follow-up at:
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3838
I have no idea what the cause is -- we really need someone to work
through this and figure out which rule is causing the taint error:
1. find a message that reliably reproduces the problem
2. narrow down the problem to one .cf file (by moving .cf files in and out)
3. narrow down the problem to one or more rules within that file
(Assuming you it *can* be narrowed down.)
It would also help to figure out what the heck is on line 38. Does the
line number change from message to message? I would hope so. The
plug-in for dumping the body (in the wiki) would probably do the job.
Daniel
--
Daniel Quinlan ApacheCon! 13-17 November (3 SpamAssassin
http://www.pathname.com/~quinlan/ http://www.apachecon.com/ sessions & more)