You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@geronimo.apache.org by Matt Hogstrom <ma...@hogstrom.org> on 2007/08/08 13:00:17 UTC
[DISCUSS] Geronimo 2.0 (rc1) Release
For your discussing pleasure.
Re: [DISCUSS] Geronimo 2.0 (rc1) Release
Posted by Vamsavardhana Reddy <c1...@gmail.com>.
Finally we have 2.0 RC :o) Congratulations Matt!!
Vamsi
On 8/8/07, Matt Hogstrom <ma...@hogstrom.org> wrote:
>
> For your discussing pleasure.
>
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Geronimo 2.0 (rc1) Release
Posted by Kevan Miller <ke...@gmail.com>.
Moving discussion to the DISCUSS thread...
On Aug 8, 2007, at 9:45 PM, Lin Sun wrote:
> Hi Matt, it is not obvious to me which one is the binary?
>
> Basically, almost everything has been marked as -src, which
> indicated source. geronimo-2.0-rc1.tar.gz is the only candidate
> but that is 360MB (I expect our server is around 60MB).
Hi Lin,
geronimo-2.0-rc1.tar.gz contains all artifacts that are part of the
release. This includes all of the "binaries" (i.e. the assemblies),
as well as the component jar files, source files, etc.
You can download the assemblies from here -- http://people.apache.org/
~hogstrom/geronimo-2.0-rc1/geronimo-2.0/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies/
--kevan
Re: [DISCUSS] Geronimo 2.0 (rc1) Release
Posted by Matt Hogstrom <ma...@hogstrom.org>.
I have unpacked the tar ball in my account so that it is accessible.
Unfortunately, the bandwidth at my hotel was fairly limited and it
had about 2 hours to upload and it was late. I should have noted my
intention to unpack it when I woke up.
Thanks Kevan for your suggestion.
On Aug 8, 2007, at 6:46 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:
> Moved this discussion from the vote thread.
>
> On Aug 8, 2007, at 8:04 AM, Vamsavardhana Reddy wrote:
>> Would have been better if the separate distribution files were
>> hosted to download and evaluate instead of 360MB single tar.gz. I
>> am getting a download speed of 5K/s ETA 24hrs :o(
>>
>
> Vamsi,
> I've unpacked the tar file on my people account. For the
> assemblies, see:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~kevan/geronimo-2.0-rc1/org/apache/
> geronimo/assemblies/
>
> All of the bits and pieces:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~kevan/geronimo-2.0-rc1/
>
> A few more things:
>
> 1) You can always do the above on your apache account on
> people.apache.org.
> 2) Our focus tends to be on the server assemblies. However, we are
> releasing the source code, and all of the artifacts being deployed
> to a maven repo. We have a shared responsibility to insure these
> are valid, also.
>
> --kevan
Re: [DISCUSS] Geronimo 2.0 (rc1) Release
Posted by Kevan Miller <ke...@gmail.com>.
Moved this discussion from the vote thread.
On Aug 8, 2007, at 8:04 AM, Vamsavardhana Reddy wrote:
> Would have been better if the separate distribution files were
> hosted to download and evaluate instead of 360MB single tar.gz. I
> am getting a download speed of 5K/s ETA 24hrs :o(
>
Vamsi,
I've unpacked the tar file on my people account. For the assemblies,
see:
http://people.apache.org/~kevan/geronimo-2.0-rc1/org/apache/geronimo/
assemblies/
All of the bits and pieces:
http://people.apache.org/~kevan/geronimo-2.0-rc1/
A few more things:
1) You can always do the above on your apache account on
people.apache.org.
2) Our focus tends to be on the server assemblies. However, we are
releasing the source code, and all of the artifacts being deployed to
a maven repo. We have a shared responsibility to insure these are
valid, also.
--kevan
Re: [DISCUSS] Geronimo 2.0 (rc1) Release
Posted by Paul McMahan <pa...@gmail.com>.
FYI, I updated the Geronimo 2.0 plugin catalog to be compatible with
the 2.0 release candidate. This will allow you to test downloading
and installing 2.0-SNAPSHOT plugins from the apache snapshot
repository into your 2.0 server. Many of the 2.0-SNAPSHOT plugins
will install OK but fail to start because of incompatibilities with
the 2.0 runtime - mainly due to api changes in the server that
occurred after the 2.0-SNAPSHOT plugins were deployed.
When Geronimo 2.0 is released and deployed to maven central I will
update the catalog to point at the 2.0 plugins instead of the 2.0-
SNAPSHOT plugins. As Geronimo becomes more componentized we may need
to revisit how this process works so that we don't release the
plugins before verifying they work correctly in the server of that
same version.
Best wishes,
Paul
Re: [DISCUSS] Geronimo 2.0 (rc1) Release
Posted by Matt Hogstrom <ma...@hogstrom.org>.
Yes,
It is at https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/components/
txmanager/branches/2.0
It will be copied to the corresponding tags directory.
On Aug 8, 2007, at 6:58 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
> Is there any branch / tag for the txmanager component 2.0.1 release ?
>
> On 8/8/07, Matt Hogstrom <ma...@hogstrom.org> wrote:
>> For your discussing pleasure.
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Guillaume Nodet
> ------------------------
> Principal Engineer, IONA
> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Geronimo 2.0 (rc1) Release
Posted by Guillaume Nodet <gn...@gmail.com>.
Is there any branch / tag for the txmanager component 2.0.1 release ?
On 8/8/07, Matt Hogstrom <ma...@hogstrom.org> wrote:
> For your discussing pleasure.
>
>
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
------------------------
Principal Engineer, IONA
Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
Re: [DISCUSS] Geronimo 2.0 (rc1) Release
Posted by Kevan Miller <ke...@gmail.com>.
On Aug 8, 2007, at 11:06 PM, Anita Kulshreshtha wrote:
> And I do not see any
> http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/txmanager-2.0.1-rc1/. There is a
> http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/txmanager-2.0-rc1/. Am I missing
> something? I am getting build failure at:
>
> Path to dependency:
> 1) org.apache.geronimo.modules:geronimo-transaction:jar:2.0
> 2) org.apache.geronimo.components:geronimo-transaction:jar:
> 2.0.1
>
> ---------
> required artifact is missing.
Hi Anita,
Building the Geronimo 2.0 release identified a minor problem in the
geronimo-transaction and geronimo-component 2.0 releases. So, a 2.0.1
release of these components was required. As Matt's VOTE states, we
are voting on Geronimo 2.0 *and* txmanager 2.0.1. We're voting on
both releases simultaneously.
The txmanager release can be found here -- http://people.apache.org/
~hogstrom/geronimo-2.0-rc1/geronimo-txmanager-parent-2.0.1.tar.gz
To build Geronimo 2.0, you need to install the txmanager artifacts
into your .m2 repo. Something like this ought to do the trick:
tar zxvf geronimo-txmanager-parent-2.0.1.tar.gz
cp -r geronimo-2.0/* ~/.m2/repository/
--kevan
Re: [DISCUSS] Geronimo 2.0 (rc1) Release
Posted by Matt Hogstrom <ma...@hogstrom.org>.
Anita, thanks for reminding me of the old references. The txmanager
2.0 was released but later found to be missing some classes.
Here is the current candidate http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/
geronimo-2.0-rc1/geronimo-txmanager-parent-2.0.1.tar.gz which is
located in the same dir as geronimo-2.0-rc1. Sorry for the confusion.
On Aug 8, 2007, at 8:06 PM, Anita Kulshreshtha wrote:
> And I do not see any
> http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/txmanager-2.0.1-rc1/. There is a
> http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/txmanager-2.0-rc1/. Am I missing
> something? I am getting build failure at:
>
> Path to dependency:
> 1) org.apache.geronimo.modules:geronimo-transaction:jar:2.0
> 2) org.apache.geronimo.components:geronimo-transaction:jar:
> 2.0.1
>
> ---------
> required artifact is missing.
>
> Thanks
> Anita
>
> --- Anita Kulshreshtha <a_...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>> I was trying to build 2.0-rc1 using
>>
> http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/geronimo-2.0-rc1/geronimo-2.0-
> src.zip
>>
>> It is not a biggie but if txmanager was independently released and
>> available on central, it would have been nice.
>>
>> Thanks
>> Anita
>>
>> --- Matt Hogstrom <ma...@hogstrom.org> wrote:
>>
>>> For your discussing pleasure.
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> ______________
>> Shape Yahoo! in your own image. Join our Network Research Panel
>> today! http://surveylink.yahoo.com/gmrs/yahoo_panel_invite.asp?a=7
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> ______________
> Building a website is a piece of cake. Yahoo! Small Business gives
> you all the tools to get online.
> http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/webhosting
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Geronimo 2.0 (rc1) Release
Posted by Anita Kulshreshtha <a_...@yahoo.com>.
And I do not see any
http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/txmanager-2.0.1-rc1/. There is a
http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/txmanager-2.0-rc1/. Am I missing
something? I am getting build failure at:
Path to dependency:
1) org.apache.geronimo.modules:geronimo-transaction:jar:2.0
2) org.apache.geronimo.components:geronimo-transaction:jar:2.0.1
---------
required artifact is missing.
Thanks
Anita
--- Anita Kulshreshtha <a_...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> I was trying to build 2.0-rc1 using
>
http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/geronimo-2.0-rc1/geronimo-2.0-src.zip
>
> It is not a biggie but if txmanager was independently released and
> available on central, it would have been nice.
>
> Thanks
> Anita
>
> --- Matt Hogstrom <ma...@hogstrom.org> wrote:
>
> > For your discussing pleasure.
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
>
____________________________________________________________________________________
> Shape Yahoo! in your own image. Join our Network Research Panel
> today! http://surveylink.yahoo.com/gmrs/yahoo_panel_invite.asp?a=7
>
>
>
____________________________________________________________________________________
Building a website is a piece of cake. Yahoo! Small Business gives you all the tools to get online.
http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/webhosting
Re: [DISCUSS] Geronimo 2.0 (rc1) Release
Posted by Anita Kulshreshtha <a_...@yahoo.com>.
I was trying to build 2.0-rc1 using
http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/geronimo-2.0-rc1/geronimo-2.0-src.zip
It is not a biggie but if txmanager was independently released and
available on central, it would have been nice.
Thanks
Anita
--- Matt Hogstrom <ma...@hogstrom.org> wrote:
> For your discussing pleasure.
>
>
____________________________________________________________________________________
Shape Yahoo! in your own image. Join our Network Research Panel today! http://surveylink.yahoo.com/gmrs/yahoo_panel_invite.asp?a=7