You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@systemml.apache.org by Rose Peng <ro...@gmail.com> on 2016/10/21 03:02:45 UTC
[VOTE] SystemML New Logo Ideas
Hi everyone,
The design team has explored a few logo concepts, and we would love to see
which ideas you like the most! We're looking for a logo that conveys
optimization, and we came up with a robot. The smile is inspired by a
matrix bracket to bring to mind the mathematical background of SystemML.
In the attached image, we have two main types of logo explorations. One is
a simple forward-facing robot and the other is an isometric interpretation.
Below that we pulled out a few to show how they would look as logos besides
the words "Apache SystemML".
Ultimately, we want the robot to have interchangeable parts to communicate
the customizability of algorithms that SystemML provides, so whatever logo
ends up being chosen it could still have several variations.
Personally, we like concept #1 for the minimal look, but we'd love to hear
your thoughts. Feel free to mix and match or make other suggestions that we
can take into consideration.
Thanks!
----------------------------------------
*Rose Peng*
MS HCI 2015 - Georgia Institute of Technology
(www.rosepeng.com)
Re: [VOTE] SystemML New Logo Ideas
Posted by fs...@posteo.de.
I really like all of these ideas, so whatever is chosen in the end will
be great.
#1 and #2 remind me a little bit of the lightbend logo
(http://www.lightbend.com/) and I like the isometric versions for
shirts, stickers, action figures ;)
Am 21.10.2016 20:27 schrieb Frederick R Reiss:
> These are awesome! I'm more a fan of option #4 myself.
>
> Fred
>
> Renee Mascarinas ---10/21/2016 11:19:01 AM---love these!!! thank you
> so much! +1 on option 1 because it's both minimalistic and fun!
>
> From: Renee Mascarinas <re...@gmail.com>
> To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
> Date: 10/21/2016 11:19 AM
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] SystemML New Logo Ideas
>
> -------------------------
>
> love these!!! thank you so much!
>
> +1 on option 1 because it's both minimalistic and fun!
>
> On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 10:50 AM, Rose Peng <ro...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> imgur: http://i.imgur.com/iuvOIDB.png [1]
>> google drive:
>> https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B70RXaqBkBoydnlZQUF3N3NUa2c/ [2]
>> view?usp=sharing
>> <https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B70RXaqBkBoydnlZQUF3N3NUa2c/ [2]
>> view?usp=sharing>
>>
>> Hopefully one of these work.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Rose
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 8:41 PM, Felix Schüler
> <fs...@posteo.de>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Hi Rose,
>> >
>> > I believe the attachment was removed - probably because of size
>> > limitations. Could you upload it somewhere else and share the
> link?
>> >
>> > Felix
>> >
>> > On 20.10.2016 20:02, Rose Peng wrote:
>> > > Hi everyone,
>> > >
>> > > The design team has explored a few logo concepts, and we would
> love to
>> > > see which ideas you like the most! We're looking for a logo that
>> conveys
>> > > optimization, and we came up with a robot. The smile is inspired
> by a
>> > > matrix bracket to bring to mind the mathematical background of
>> SystemML.
>> > >
>> > > In the attached image, we have two main types of logo
> explorations. One
>> > > is a simple forward-facing robot and the other is an isometric
>> > > interpretation. Below that we pulled out a few to show how they
> would
>> > > look as logos besides the words "Apache SystemML".
>> > >
>> > > Ultimately, we want the robot to have interchangeable parts to
>> > > communicate the customizability of algorithms that SystemML
> provides,
>> so
>> > > whatever logo ends up being chosen it could still have several
>> > variations.
>> > >
>> > > Personally, we like concept #1 for the minimal look, but we'd
> love to
>> > > hear your thoughts. Feel free to mix and match or make other
>> suggestions
>> > > that we can take into consideration.
>> > >
>> > > Thanks!
>> > >
>> > > ----------------------------------------
>> > > *Rose Peng*
>> > > MS HCI 2015 - Georgia Institute of Technology
>> > > (www.rosepeng.com <http://www.rosepeng.com/ [3]>)
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> ----------------------------------------
>> *Rose Peng*
>> MS HCI 2015 - Georgia Institute of Technology
>> (www.rosepeng.com)
>>
>
>
>
> Links:
> ------
> [1] http://i.imgur.com/iuvOIDB.png
> [2] https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B70RXaqBkBoydnlZQUF3N3NUa2c/
> [3] http://www.rosepeng.com/
Re: [VOTE] SystemML New Logo Ideas
Posted by Jeremy Anderson <je...@objectadjective.com>.
+1 Rose!
Thanks for putting all these together. You can really see a brand coming
together when you see it all at once. Nice work everyone!
...........................
Jeremy Anderson
https://twitter.com/ObjectAdjective
http://www.linkedin.com/in/objectadjective
On 25 October 2016 at 15:39, Renee Mascarinas <re...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> +1 Rose!
>
> Thank you so much for the logo assets! The poster looks amazing as well!
> Yay!
>
> On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 3:35 PM, Rose Peng <ro...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Thank you for your votes and feedback everyone!
> >
> > Going with the idea of using both designs as a family of logos, we will
> be
> > using the minimalistic design as the SystemML logo for headers and
> smaller
> > use cases, and the isometric design as the mascot for illustrations, etc
> > (naming it DML-bot for now). Attached you will find various colors and
> > sizes for the logo, the isometric character in three different
> > configurations, and a poster that showcases both being used.
> >
> > https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B70RXaqBkBoyTGJwZXVBc2E2MlU
> > <https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B70RXaqBkBoyTGJwZXVBc2E2MlU>
> >
> > Rose
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 3:21 PM, Glenn Weidner <gw...@us.ibm.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > +1 for using both.
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > > Glenn
> > >
> > >
> > > [image: Inactive hide details for Deron Eriksson ---10/25/2016 02:24:35
> > > PM---+1 sounds great to me too. On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 12:44 P]Deron
> > > Eriksson ---10/25/2016 02:24:35 PM---+1 sounds great to me too. On Tue,
> > Oct
> > > 25, 2016 at 12:44 PM, <du...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > From: Deron Eriksson <de...@gmail.com>
> > > To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
> > > Date: 10/25/2016 02:24 PM
> > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] SystemML New Logo Ideas
> > > ------------------------------
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > +1 sounds great to me too.
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 12:44 PM, <du...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > +1 that sounds great to me.
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > >
> > > > Mike Dusenberry
> > > > GitHub: github.com/dusenberrymw
> > > > LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/mikedusenberry
> > > >
> > > > Sent from my iPhone.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > On Oct 25, 2016, at 10:45 AM, Madison Myers <
> madisonjmyers@gmail.com
> > >
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > I agree!
> > > > > +1 to using both. I think, like you suggested, that using #1 for
> > > headers
> > > > > and #4 for other uses sounds fantastic.
> > > > >
> > > > > On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 10:36 AM, Jason Azares <
> > jason.azares@gmail.com
> > > >
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >> Hey guys,
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Branding wise, we also feel that #1 and #4 are the best choices.
> > It's
> > > > great
> > > > >> that we're all on the same page. To answer the question of pros
> and
> > > > cons of
> > > > >> each logo, here is a quick list:
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Logo 1:
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> - More versatile because of its scalability; We think logo 4
> will
> > be
> > > > >> hard to discern once sized down; Logo 1 looks cleaner in
> > website
> > > > >> headers
> > > > >> with text
> > > > >> - Relevant because it has a matrix bracket
> > > > >> - It's a simplified version of the robot. Think of it as the
> > > batman
> > > > >> signal and the robot is batman.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Logo 4:
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> - More original because it has a personality
> > > > >> - Diverse in the actions it can perform because it can move,
> > > > animate,
> > > > >> and be customized based on intent and use
> > > > >> - The robot is kind of cute and approachable
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Our suggestion is to use both. Logo 1 is the simplified version of
> > the
> > > > >> robot. Logo 4 is the personification of the logo used to explain
> > > > concepts.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> We'd love to hear your thoughts!
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Regards,
> > > > >> Jason and the design team
> > > > >>
> > > > >> P.S. In general, here are our guidelines for creating a great
> logo:
> > > > >>
> > > > >> - *original* - something that stands out from competitors
> > > > >> - *relevant* - reflects the brand's mission and values
> > > > >> - *versatile* - look good in black and white, in different
> colors
> > > and
> > > > >> sizes depending on context (e.g. billboards, websites, t-shirts,
> > > toys,
> > > > >> business cards, etc)
> > > > >> - *memorable* - easily recognizable everywhere (e.g. mickey
> mouse,
> > > > nike)
> > > > >> - *timeless* - not just based on what's currently popular
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>> On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 9:47 AM, <du...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> Looks like there is a large amount of support for both #1 and #4.
> > > > Design
> > > > >>> team, could you provide some more thoughts on the pros and cons
> for
> > > > each,
> > > > >>> and perhaps any thoughts on ways the icons could be used in
> various
> > > > >> project
> > > > >>> materials?
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> --
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> Mike Dusenberry
> > > > >>> GitHub: github.com/dusenberrymw
> > > > >>> LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/mikedusenberry
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> Sent from my iPhone.
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>> On Oct 25, 2016, at 9:41 AM, Acs S <ac...@yahoo.com.INVALID>
> > wrote:
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> I like #4 as well.
> > > > >>>> +1 on #4.
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> -Arvind
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> From: Berthold Reinwald <re...@us.ibm.com>
> > > > >>>> To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
> > > > >>>> Sent: Monday, October 24, 2016 12:34 AM
> > > > >>>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] SystemML New Logo Ideas
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> +1 on #4.
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> Regards,
> > > > >>>> Berthold Reinwald
> > > > >>>> IBM Almaden Research Center
> > > > >>>> office: (408) 927 2208; T/L: 457 2208
> > > > >>>> e-mail: reinwald@us.ibm.com
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> From: Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com>
> > > > >>>> To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
> > > > >>>> Date: 10/21/2016 04:37 PM
> > > > >>>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] SystemML New Logo Ideas
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 11:27 AM, Frederick R Reiss <
> > > > >> frreiss@us.ibm.com>
> > > > >>>> wrote:
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>> These are awesome! I'm more a fan of option #4 myself.
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>> I like option $4 myself as well.
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> --
> > > > >>>> Luciano Resende
> > > > >>>> http://twitter.com/lresende1975
> > > > >>>> http://lresende.blogspot.com/
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > *Madison J. Myers*
> > > > > *UC Berkeley, Master of Information & Data Science '17*
> > > > >
> > > > > *King's College London, MA Political Science '14*
> > > > > *New York University, BA Political Science '12*
> > > > >
> > > > > -
> > > > > LinkedIn <http://linkedin.com/in/madisonjmyers>
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > ----------------------------------------
> > *Rose Peng*
> > MS HCI 2015 - Georgia Institute of Technology
> > (www.rosepeng.com)
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] SystemML New Logo Ideas
Posted by Renee Mascarinas <re...@gmail.com>.
+1 Rose!
Thank you so much for the logo assets! The poster looks amazing as well!
Yay!
On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 3:35 PM, Rose Peng <ro...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thank you for your votes and feedback everyone!
>
> Going with the idea of using both designs as a family of logos, we will be
> using the minimalistic design as the SystemML logo for headers and smaller
> use cases, and the isometric design as the mascot for illustrations, etc
> (naming it DML-bot for now). Attached you will find various colors and
> sizes for the logo, the isometric character in three different
> configurations, and a poster that showcases both being used.
>
> https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B70RXaqBkBoyTGJwZXVBc2E2MlU
> <https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B70RXaqBkBoyTGJwZXVBc2E2MlU>
>
> Rose
>
> On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 3:21 PM, Glenn Weidner <gw...@us.ibm.com>
> wrote:
>
> > +1 for using both.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Glenn
> >
> >
> > [image: Inactive hide details for Deron Eriksson ---10/25/2016 02:24:35
> > PM---+1 sounds great to me too. On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 12:44 P]Deron
> > Eriksson ---10/25/2016 02:24:35 PM---+1 sounds great to me too. On Tue,
> Oct
> > 25, 2016 at 12:44 PM, <du...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > From: Deron Eriksson <de...@gmail.com>
> > To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
> > Date: 10/25/2016 02:24 PM
> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] SystemML New Logo Ideas
> > ------------------------------
> >
> >
> >
> > +1 sounds great to me too.
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 12:44 PM, <du...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > +1 that sounds great to me.
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > > Mike Dusenberry
> > > GitHub: github.com/dusenberrymw
> > > LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/mikedusenberry
> > >
> > > Sent from my iPhone.
> > >
> > >
> > > > On Oct 25, 2016, at 10:45 AM, Madison Myers <madisonjmyers@gmail.com
> >
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I agree!
> > > > +1 to using both. I think, like you suggested, that using #1 for
> > headers
> > > > and #4 for other uses sounds fantastic.
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 10:36 AM, Jason Azares <
> jason.azares@gmail.com
> > >
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> Hey guys,
> > > >>
> > > >> Branding wise, we also feel that #1 and #4 are the best choices.
> It's
> > > great
> > > >> that we're all on the same page. To answer the question of pros and
> > > cons of
> > > >> each logo, here is a quick list:
> > > >>
> > > >> Logo 1:
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> - More versatile because of its scalability; We think logo 4 will
> be
> > > >> hard to discern once sized down; Logo 1 looks cleaner in
> website
> > > >> headers
> > > >> with text
> > > >> - Relevant because it has a matrix bracket
> > > >> - It's a simplified version of the robot. Think of it as the
> > batman
> > > >> signal and the robot is batman.
> > > >>
> > > >> Logo 4:
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> - More original because it has a personality
> > > >> - Diverse in the actions it can perform because it can move,
> > > animate,
> > > >> and be customized based on intent and use
> > > >> - The robot is kind of cute and approachable
> > > >>
> > > >> Our suggestion is to use both. Logo 1 is the simplified version of
> the
> > > >> robot. Logo 4 is the personification of the logo used to explain
> > > concepts.
> > > >>
> > > >> We'd love to hear your thoughts!
> > > >>
> > > >> Regards,
> > > >> Jason and the design team
> > > >>
> > > >> P.S. In general, here are our guidelines for creating a great logo:
> > > >>
> > > >> - *original* - something that stands out from competitors
> > > >> - *relevant* - reflects the brand's mission and values
> > > >> - *versatile* - look good in black and white, in different colors
> > and
> > > >> sizes depending on context (e.g. billboards, websites, t-shirts,
> > toys,
> > > >> business cards, etc)
> > > >> - *memorable* - easily recognizable everywhere (e.g. mickey mouse,
> > > nike)
> > > >> - *timeless* - not just based on what's currently popular
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>> On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 9:47 AM, <du...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Looks like there is a large amount of support for both #1 and #4.
> > > Design
> > > >>> team, could you provide some more thoughts on the pros and cons for
> > > each,
> > > >>> and perhaps any thoughts on ways the icons could be used in various
> > > >> project
> > > >>> materials?
> > > >>>
> > > >>> --
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Mike Dusenberry
> > > >>> GitHub: github.com/dusenberrymw
> > > >>> LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/mikedusenberry
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Sent from my iPhone.
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>>> On Oct 25, 2016, at 9:41 AM, Acs S <ac...@yahoo.com.INVALID>
> wrote:
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> I like #4 as well.
> > > >>>> +1 on #4.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> -Arvind
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> From: Berthold Reinwald <re...@us.ibm.com>
> > > >>>> To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
> > > >>>> Sent: Monday, October 24, 2016 12:34 AM
> > > >>>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] SystemML New Logo Ideas
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> +1 on #4.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> Regards,
> > > >>>> Berthold Reinwald
> > > >>>> IBM Almaden Research Center
> > > >>>> office: (408) 927 2208; T/L: 457 2208
> > > >>>> e-mail: reinwald@us.ibm.com
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> From: Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com>
> > > >>>> To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
> > > >>>> Date: 10/21/2016 04:37 PM
> > > >>>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] SystemML New Logo Ideas
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 11:27 AM, Frederick R Reiss <
> > > >> frreiss@us.ibm.com>
> > > >>>> wrote:
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>> These are awesome! I'm more a fan of option #4 myself.
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>> I like option $4 myself as well.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> --
> > > >>>> Luciano Resende
> > > >>>> http://twitter.com/lresende1975
> > > >>>> http://lresende.blogspot.com/
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > *Madison J. Myers*
> > > > *UC Berkeley, Master of Information & Data Science '17*
> > > >
> > > > *King's College London, MA Political Science '14*
> > > > *New York University, BA Political Science '12*
> > > >
> > > > -
> > > > LinkedIn <http://linkedin.com/in/madisonjmyers>
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> ----------------------------------------
> *Rose Peng*
> MS HCI 2015 - Georgia Institute of Technology
> (www.rosepeng.com)
>
Re: [VOTE] SystemML New Logo Ideas
Posted by Rose Peng <ro...@gmail.com>.
Thank you for your votes and feedback everyone!
Going with the idea of using both designs as a family of logos, we will be
using the minimalistic design as the SystemML logo for headers and smaller
use cases, and the isometric design as the mascot for illustrations, etc
(naming it DML-bot for now). Attached you will find various colors and
sizes for the logo, the isometric character in three different
configurations, and a poster that showcases both being used.
https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B70RXaqBkBoyTGJwZXVBc2E2MlU
<https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B70RXaqBkBoyTGJwZXVBc2E2MlU>
Rose
On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 3:21 PM, Glenn Weidner <gw...@us.ibm.com> wrote:
> +1 for using both.
>
> Cheers,
> Glenn
>
>
> [image: Inactive hide details for Deron Eriksson ---10/25/2016 02:24:35
> PM---+1 sounds great to me too. On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 12:44 P]Deron
> Eriksson ---10/25/2016 02:24:35 PM---+1 sounds great to me too. On Tue, Oct
> 25, 2016 at 12:44 PM, <du...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> From: Deron Eriksson <de...@gmail.com>
> To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
> Date: 10/25/2016 02:24 PM
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] SystemML New Logo Ideas
> ------------------------------
>
>
>
> +1 sounds great to me too.
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 12:44 PM, <du...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > +1 that sounds great to me.
> >
> > --
> >
> > Mike Dusenberry
> > GitHub: github.com/dusenberrymw
> > LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/mikedusenberry
> >
> > Sent from my iPhone.
> >
> >
> > > On Oct 25, 2016, at 10:45 AM, Madison Myers <ma...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > I agree!
> > > +1 to using both. I think, like you suggested, that using #1 for
> headers
> > > and #4 for other uses sounds fantastic.
> > >
> > > On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 10:36 AM, Jason Azares <jason.azares@gmail.com
> >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >> Hey guys,
> > >>
> > >> Branding wise, we also feel that #1 and #4 are the best choices. It's
> > great
> > >> that we're all on the same page. To answer the question of pros and
> > cons of
> > >> each logo, here is a quick list:
> > >>
> > >> Logo 1:
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> - More versatile because of its scalability; We think logo 4 will be
> > >> hard to discern once sized down; Logo 1 looks cleaner in website
> > >> headers
> > >> with text
> > >> - Relevant because it has a matrix bracket
> > >> - It's a simplified version of the robot. Think of it as the
> batman
> > >> signal and the robot is batman.
> > >>
> > >> Logo 4:
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> - More original because it has a personality
> > >> - Diverse in the actions it can perform because it can move,
> > animate,
> > >> and be customized based on intent and use
> > >> - The robot is kind of cute and approachable
> > >>
> > >> Our suggestion is to use both. Logo 1 is the simplified version of the
> > >> robot. Logo 4 is the personification of the logo used to explain
> > concepts.
> > >>
> > >> We'd love to hear your thoughts!
> > >>
> > >> Regards,
> > >> Jason and the design team
> > >>
> > >> P.S. In general, here are our guidelines for creating a great logo:
> > >>
> > >> - *original* - something that stands out from competitors
> > >> - *relevant* - reflects the brand's mission and values
> > >> - *versatile* - look good in black and white, in different colors
> and
> > >> sizes depending on context (e.g. billboards, websites, t-shirts,
> toys,
> > >> business cards, etc)
> > >> - *memorable* - easily recognizable everywhere (e.g. mickey mouse,
> > nike)
> > >> - *timeless* - not just based on what's currently popular
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>> On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 9:47 AM, <du...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>> Looks like there is a large amount of support for both #1 and #4.
> > Design
> > >>> team, could you provide some more thoughts on the pros and cons for
> > each,
> > >>> and perhaps any thoughts on ways the icons could be used in various
> > >> project
> > >>> materials?
> > >>>
> > >>> --
> > >>>
> > >>> Mike Dusenberry
> > >>> GitHub: github.com/dusenberrymw
> > >>> LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/mikedusenberry
> > >>>
> > >>> Sent from my iPhone.
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>> On Oct 25, 2016, at 9:41 AM, Acs S <ac...@yahoo.com.INVALID> wrote:
> > >>>>
> > >>>> I like #4 as well.
> > >>>> +1 on #4.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> -Arvind
> > >>>>
> > >>>> From: Berthold Reinwald <re...@us.ibm.com>
> > >>>> To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
> > >>>> Sent: Monday, October 24, 2016 12:34 AM
> > >>>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] SystemML New Logo Ideas
> > >>>>
> > >>>> +1 on #4.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Regards,
> > >>>> Berthold Reinwald
> > >>>> IBM Almaden Research Center
> > >>>> office: (408) 927 2208; T/L: 457 2208
> > >>>> e-mail: reinwald@us.ibm.com
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> From: Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com>
> > >>>> To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
> > >>>> Date: 10/21/2016 04:37 PM
> > >>>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] SystemML New Logo Ideas
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 11:27 AM, Frederick R Reiss <
> > >> frreiss@us.ibm.com>
> > >>>> wrote:
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> These are awesome! I'm more a fan of option #4 myself.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>> I like option $4 myself as well.
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> --
> > >>>> Luciano Resende
> > >>>> http://twitter.com/lresende1975
> > >>>> http://lresende.blogspot.com/
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > *Madison J. Myers*
> > > *UC Berkeley, Master of Information & Data Science '17*
> > >
> > > *King's College London, MA Political Science '14*
> > > *New York University, BA Political Science '12*
> > >
> > > -
> > > LinkedIn <http://linkedin.com/in/madisonjmyers>
> >
>
>
>
>
--
----------------------------------------
*Rose Peng*
MS HCI 2015 - Georgia Institute of Technology
(www.rosepeng.com)
Re: [VOTE] SystemML New Logo Ideas
Posted by Glenn Weidner <gw...@us.ibm.com>.
+1 for using both.
Cheers,
Glenn
From: Deron Eriksson <de...@gmail.com>
To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
Date: 10/25/2016 02:24 PM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] SystemML New Logo Ideas
+1 sounds great to me too.
On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 12:44 PM, <du...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 that sounds great to me.
>
> --
>
> Mike Dusenberry
> GitHub: github.com/dusenberrymw
> LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/mikedusenberry
>
> Sent from my iPhone.
>
>
> > On Oct 25, 2016, at 10:45 AM, Madison Myers <ma...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > I agree!
> > +1 to using both. I think, like you suggested, that using #1 for
headers
> > and #4 for other uses sounds fantastic.
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 10:36 AM, Jason Azares <ja...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Hey guys,
> >>
> >> Branding wise, we also feel that #1 and #4 are the best choices. It's
> great
> >> that we're all on the same page. To answer the question of pros and
> cons of
> >> each logo, here is a quick list:
> >>
> >> Logo 1:
> >>
> >>
> >> - More versatile because of its scalability; We think logo 4 will be
> >> hard to discern once sized down; Logo 1 looks cleaner in website
> >> headers
> >> with text
> >> - Relevant because it has a matrix bracket
> >> - It's a simplified version of the robot. Think of it as the
batman
> >> signal and the robot is batman.
> >>
> >> Logo 4:
> >>
> >>
> >> - More original because it has a personality
> >> - Diverse in the actions it can perform because it can move,
> animate,
> >> and be customized based on intent and use
> >> - The robot is kind of cute and approachable
> >>
> >> Our suggestion is to use both. Logo 1 is the simplified version of the
> >> robot. Logo 4 is the personification of the logo used to explain
> concepts.
> >>
> >> We'd love to hear your thoughts!
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >> Jason and the design team
> >>
> >> P.S. In general, here are our guidelines for creating a great logo:
> >>
> >> - *original* - something that stands out from competitors
> >> - *relevant* - reflects the brand's mission and values
> >> - *versatile* - look good in black and white, in different colors
and
> >> sizes depending on context (e.g. billboards, websites, t-shirts,
toys,
> >> business cards, etc)
> >> - *memorable* - easily recognizable everywhere (e.g. mickey mouse,
> nike)
> >> - *timeless* - not just based on what's currently popular
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>> On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 9:47 AM, <du...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Looks like there is a large amount of support for both #1 and #4.
> Design
> >>> team, could you provide some more thoughts on the pros and cons for
> each,
> >>> and perhaps any thoughts on ways the icons could be used in various
> >> project
> >>> materials?
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>>
> >>> Mike Dusenberry
> >>> GitHub: github.com/dusenberrymw
> >>> LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/mikedusenberry
> >>>
> >>> Sent from my iPhone.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> On Oct 25, 2016, at 9:41 AM, Acs S <ac...@yahoo.com.INVALID> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> I like #4 as well.
> >>>> +1 on #4.
> >>>>
> >>>> -Arvind
> >>>>
> >>>> From: Berthold Reinwald <re...@us.ibm.com>
> >>>> To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
> >>>> Sent: Monday, October 24, 2016 12:34 AM
> >>>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] SystemML New Logo Ideas
> >>>>
> >>>> +1 on #4.
> >>>>
> >>>> Regards,
> >>>> Berthold Reinwald
> >>>> IBM Almaden Research Center
> >>>> office: (408) 927 2208; T/L: 457 2208
> >>>> e-mail: reinwald@us.ibm.com
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> From: Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com>
> >>>> To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
> >>>> Date: 10/21/2016 04:37 PM
> >>>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] SystemML New Logo Ideas
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 11:27 AM, Frederick R Reiss <
> >> frreiss@us.ibm.com>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> These are awesome! I'm more a fan of option #4 myself.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>> I like option $4 myself as well.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> Luciano Resende
> >>>> http://twitter.com/lresende1975
> >>>> http://lresende.blogspot.com/
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > *Madison J. Myers*
> > *UC Berkeley, Master of Information & Data Science '17*
> >
> > *King's College London, MA Political Science '14*
> > *New York University, BA Political Science '12*
> >
> > -
> > LinkedIn <http://linkedin.com/in/madisonjmyers>
>
Re: [VOTE] SystemML New Logo Ideas
Posted by Deron Eriksson <de...@gmail.com>.
+1 sounds great to me too.
On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 12:44 PM, <du...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 that sounds great to me.
>
> --
>
> Mike Dusenberry
> GitHub: github.com/dusenberrymw
> LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/mikedusenberry
>
> Sent from my iPhone.
>
>
> > On Oct 25, 2016, at 10:45 AM, Madison Myers <ma...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > I agree!
> > +1 to using both. I think, like you suggested, that using #1 for headers
> > and #4 for other uses sounds fantastic.
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 10:36 AM, Jason Azares <ja...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Hey guys,
> >>
> >> Branding wise, we also feel that #1 and #4 are the best choices. It's
> great
> >> that we're all on the same page. To answer the question of pros and
> cons of
> >> each logo, here is a quick list:
> >>
> >> Logo 1:
> >>
> >>
> >> - More versatile because of its scalability; We think logo 4 will be
> >> hard to discern once sized down; Logo 1 looks cleaner in website
> >> headers
> >> with text
> >> - Relevant because it has a matrix bracket
> >> - It's a simplified version of the robot. Think of it as the batman
> >> signal and the robot is batman.
> >>
> >> Logo 4:
> >>
> >>
> >> - More original because it has a personality
> >> - Diverse in the actions it can perform because it can move,
> animate,
> >> and be customized based on intent and use
> >> - The robot is kind of cute and approachable
> >>
> >> Our suggestion is to use both. Logo 1 is the simplified version of the
> >> robot. Logo 4 is the personification of the logo used to explain
> concepts.
> >>
> >> We'd love to hear your thoughts!
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >> Jason and the design team
> >>
> >> P.S. In general, here are our guidelines for creating a great logo:
> >>
> >> - *original* - something that stands out from competitors
> >> - *relevant* - reflects the brand's mission and values
> >> - *versatile* - look good in black and white, in different colors and
> >> sizes depending on context (e.g. billboards, websites, t-shirts, toys,
> >> business cards, etc)
> >> - *memorable* - easily recognizable everywhere (e.g. mickey mouse,
> nike)
> >> - *timeless* - not just based on what's currently popular
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>> On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 9:47 AM, <du...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Looks like there is a large amount of support for both #1 and #4.
> Design
> >>> team, could you provide some more thoughts on the pros and cons for
> each,
> >>> and perhaps any thoughts on ways the icons could be used in various
> >> project
> >>> materials?
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>>
> >>> Mike Dusenberry
> >>> GitHub: github.com/dusenberrymw
> >>> LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/mikedusenberry
> >>>
> >>> Sent from my iPhone.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> On Oct 25, 2016, at 9:41 AM, Acs S <ac...@yahoo.com.INVALID> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> I like #4 as well.
> >>>> +1 on #4.
> >>>>
> >>>> -Arvind
> >>>>
> >>>> From: Berthold Reinwald <re...@us.ibm.com>
> >>>> To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
> >>>> Sent: Monday, October 24, 2016 12:34 AM
> >>>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] SystemML New Logo Ideas
> >>>>
> >>>> +1 on #4.
> >>>>
> >>>> Regards,
> >>>> Berthold Reinwald
> >>>> IBM Almaden Research Center
> >>>> office: (408) 927 2208; T/L: 457 2208
> >>>> e-mail: reinwald@us.ibm.com
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> From: Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com>
> >>>> To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
> >>>> Date: 10/21/2016 04:37 PM
> >>>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] SystemML New Logo Ideas
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 11:27 AM, Frederick R Reiss <
> >> frreiss@us.ibm.com>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> These are awesome! I'm more a fan of option #4 myself.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>> I like option $4 myself as well.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> Luciano Resende
> >>>> http://twitter.com/lresende1975
> >>>> http://lresende.blogspot.com/
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > *Madison J. Myers*
> > *UC Berkeley, Master of Information & Data Science '17*
> >
> > *King's College London, MA Political Science '14*
> > *New York University, BA Political Science '12*
> >
> > -
> > LinkedIn <http://linkedin.com/in/madisonjmyers>
>
Re: [VOTE] SystemML New Logo Ideas
Posted by du...@gmail.com.
+1 that sounds great to me.
--
Mike Dusenberry
GitHub: github.com/dusenberrymw
LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/mikedusenberry
Sent from my iPhone.
> On Oct 25, 2016, at 10:45 AM, Madison Myers <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I agree!
> +1 to using both. I think, like you suggested, that using #1 for headers
> and #4 for other uses sounds fantastic.
>
> On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 10:36 AM, Jason Azares <ja...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hey guys,
>>
>> Branding wise, we also feel that #1 and #4 are the best choices. It's great
>> that we're all on the same page. To answer the question of pros and cons of
>> each logo, here is a quick list:
>>
>> Logo 1:
>>
>>
>> - More versatile because of its scalability; We think logo 4 will be
>> hard to discern once sized down; Logo 1 looks cleaner in website
>> headers
>> with text
>> - Relevant because it has a matrix bracket
>> - It's a simplified version of the robot. Think of it as the batman
>> signal and the robot is batman.
>>
>> Logo 4:
>>
>>
>> - More original because it has a personality
>> - Diverse in the actions it can perform because it can move, animate,
>> and be customized based on intent and use
>> - The robot is kind of cute and approachable
>>
>> Our suggestion is to use both. Logo 1 is the simplified version of the
>> robot. Logo 4 is the personification of the logo used to explain concepts.
>>
>> We'd love to hear your thoughts!
>>
>> Regards,
>> Jason and the design team
>>
>> P.S. In general, here are our guidelines for creating a great logo:
>>
>> - *original* - something that stands out from competitors
>> - *relevant* - reflects the brand's mission and values
>> - *versatile* - look good in black and white, in different colors and
>> sizes depending on context (e.g. billboards, websites, t-shirts, toys,
>> business cards, etc)
>> - *memorable* - easily recognizable everywhere (e.g. mickey mouse, nike)
>> - *timeless* - not just based on what's currently popular
>>
>>
>>
>>> On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 9:47 AM, <du...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Looks like there is a large amount of support for both #1 and #4. Design
>>> team, could you provide some more thoughts on the pros and cons for each,
>>> and perhaps any thoughts on ways the icons could be used in various
>> project
>>> materials?
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> Mike Dusenberry
>>> GitHub: github.com/dusenberrymw
>>> LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/mikedusenberry
>>>
>>> Sent from my iPhone.
>>>
>>>
>>>> On Oct 25, 2016, at 9:41 AM, Acs S <ac...@yahoo.com.INVALID> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I like #4 as well.
>>>> +1 on #4.
>>>>
>>>> -Arvind
>>>>
>>>> From: Berthold Reinwald <re...@us.ibm.com>
>>>> To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
>>>> Sent: Monday, October 24, 2016 12:34 AM
>>>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] SystemML New Logo Ideas
>>>>
>>>> +1 on #4.
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Berthold Reinwald
>>>> IBM Almaden Research Center
>>>> office: (408) 927 2208; T/L: 457 2208
>>>> e-mail: reinwald@us.ibm.com
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> From: Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com>
>>>> To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
>>>> Date: 10/21/2016 04:37 PM
>>>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] SystemML New Logo Ideas
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 11:27 AM, Frederick R Reiss <
>> frreiss@us.ibm.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> These are awesome! I'm more a fan of option #4 myself.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> I like option $4 myself as well.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Luciano Resende
>>>> http://twitter.com/lresende1975
>>>> http://lresende.blogspot.com/
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> *Madison J. Myers*
> *UC Berkeley, Master of Information & Data Science '17*
>
> *King's College London, MA Political Science '14*
> *New York University, BA Political Science '12*
>
> -
> LinkedIn <http://linkedin.com/in/madisonjmyers>
Re: [VOTE] SystemML New Logo Ideas
Posted by Madison Myers <ma...@gmail.com>.
I agree!
+1 to using both. I think, like you suggested, that using #1 for headers
and #4 for other uses sounds fantastic.
On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 10:36 AM, Jason Azares <ja...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hey guys,
>
> Branding wise, we also feel that #1 and #4 are the best choices. It's great
> that we're all on the same page. To answer the question of pros and cons of
> each logo, here is a quick list:
>
> Logo 1:
>
>
> - More versatile because of its scalability; We think logo 4 will be
> hard to discern once sized down; Logo 1 looks cleaner in website
> headers
> with text
> - Relevant because it has a matrix bracket
> - It's a simplified version of the robot. Think of it as the batman
> signal and the robot is batman.
>
> Logo 4:
>
>
> - More original because it has a personality
> - Diverse in the actions it can perform because it can move, animate,
> and be customized based on intent and use
> - The robot is kind of cute and approachable
>
> Our suggestion is to use both. Logo 1 is the simplified version of the
> robot. Logo 4 is the personification of the logo used to explain concepts.
>
> We'd love to hear your thoughts!
>
> Regards,
> Jason and the design team
>
> P.S. In general, here are our guidelines for creating a great logo:
>
> - *original* - something that stands out from competitors
> - *relevant* - reflects the brand's mission and values
> - *versatile* - look good in black and white, in different colors and
> sizes depending on context (e.g. billboards, websites, t-shirts, toys,
> business cards, etc)
> - *memorable* - easily recognizable everywhere (e.g. mickey mouse, nike)
> - *timeless* - not just based on what's currently popular
>
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 9:47 AM, <du...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Looks like there is a large amount of support for both #1 and #4. Design
> > team, could you provide some more thoughts on the pros and cons for each,
> > and perhaps any thoughts on ways the icons could be used in various
> project
> > materials?
> >
> > --
> >
> > Mike Dusenberry
> > GitHub: github.com/dusenberrymw
> > LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/mikedusenberry
> >
> > Sent from my iPhone.
> >
> >
> > > On Oct 25, 2016, at 9:41 AM, Acs S <ac...@yahoo.com.INVALID> wrote:
> > >
> > > I like #4 as well.
> > > +1 on #4.
> > >
> > > -Arvind
> > >
> > > From: Berthold Reinwald <re...@us.ibm.com>
> > > To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
> > > Sent: Monday, October 24, 2016 12:34 AM
> > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] SystemML New Logo Ideas
> > >
> > > +1 on #4.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Berthold Reinwald
> > > IBM Almaden Research Center
> > > office: (408) 927 2208; T/L: 457 2208
> > > e-mail: reinwald@us.ibm.com
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > From: Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com>
> > > To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
> > > Date: 10/21/2016 04:37 PM
> > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] SystemML New Logo Ideas
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 11:27 AM, Frederick R Reiss <
> frreiss@us.ibm.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >> These are awesome! I'm more a fan of option #4 myself.
> > >>
> > >>
> > > I like option $4 myself as well.
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Luciano Resende
> > > http://twitter.com/lresende1975
> > > http://lresende.blogspot.com/
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
--
*Madison J. Myers*
*UC Berkeley, Master of Information & Data Science '17*
*King's College London, MA Political Science '14*
*New York University, BA Political Science '12*
-
LinkedIn <http://linkedin.com/in/madisonjmyers>
Re: [VOTE] SystemML New Logo Ideas
Posted by fs...@posteo.de.
> Our suggestion is to use both. Logo 1 is the simplified version of the
> robot. Logo 4 is the personification of the logo used to explain
> concepts.
Sounds great!
Am 25.10.2016 19:36 schrieb Jason Azares:
> Hey guys,
>
> Branding wise, we also feel that #1 and #4 are the best choices. It's
> great
> that we're all on the same page. To answer the question of pros and
> cons of
> each logo, here is a quick list:
>
> Logo 1:
>
>
> - More versatile because of its scalability; We think logo 4 will be
> hard to discern once sized down; Logo 1 looks cleaner in website
> headers
> with text
> - Relevant because it has a matrix bracket
> - It's a simplified version of the robot. Think of it as the
> batman
> signal and the robot is batman.
>
> Logo 4:
>
>
> - More original because it has a personality
> - Diverse in the actions it can perform because it can move,
> animate,
> and be customized based on intent and use
> - The robot is kind of cute and approachable
>
> Our suggestion is to use both. Logo 1 is the simplified version of the
> robot. Logo 4 is the personification of the logo used to explain
> concepts.
>
> We'd love to hear your thoughts!
>
> Regards,
> Jason and the design team
>
> P.S. In general, here are our guidelines for creating a great logo:
>
> - *original* - something that stands out from competitors
> - *relevant* - reflects the brand's mission and values
> - *versatile* - look good in black and white, in different colors
> and
> sizes depending on context (e.g. billboards, websites, t-shirts,
> toys,
> business cards, etc)
> - *memorable* - easily recognizable everywhere (e.g. mickey mouse,
> nike)
> - *timeless* - not just based on what's currently popular
>
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 9:47 AM, <du...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Looks like there is a large amount of support for both #1 and #4.
>> Design
>> team, could you provide some more thoughts on the pros and cons for
>> each,
>> and perhaps any thoughts on ways the icons could be used in various
>> project
>> materials?
>>
>> --
>>
>> Mike Dusenberry
>> GitHub: github.com/dusenberrymw
>> LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/mikedusenberry
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone.
>>
>>
>> > On Oct 25, 2016, at 9:41 AM, Acs S <ac...@yahoo.com.INVALID> wrote:
>> >
>> > I like #4 as well.
>> > +1 on #4.
>> >
>> > -Arvind
>> >
>> > From: Berthold Reinwald <re...@us.ibm.com>
>> > To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
>> > Sent: Monday, October 24, 2016 12:34 AM
>> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] SystemML New Logo Ideas
>> >
>> > +1 on #4.
>> >
>> > Regards,
>> > Berthold Reinwald
>> > IBM Almaden Research Center
>> > office: (408) 927 2208; T/L: 457 2208
>> > e-mail: reinwald@us.ibm.com
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > From: Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com>
>> > To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
>> > Date: 10/21/2016 04:37 PM
>> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] SystemML New Logo Ideas
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 11:27 AM, Frederick R Reiss <fr...@us.ibm.com>
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> >> These are awesome! I'm more a fan of option #4 myself.
>> >>
>> >>
>> > I like option $4 myself as well.
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Luciano Resende
>> > http://twitter.com/lresende1975
>> > http://lresende.blogspot.com/
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
Re: [VOTE] SystemML New Logo Ideas
Posted by Jason Azares <ja...@gmail.com>.
Hey guys,
Branding wise, we also feel that #1 and #4 are the best choices. It's great
that we're all on the same page. To answer the question of pros and cons of
each logo, here is a quick list:
Logo 1:
- More versatile because of its scalability; We think logo 4 will be
hard to discern once sized down; Logo 1 looks cleaner in website headers
with text
- Relevant because it has a matrix bracket
- It's a simplified version of the robot. Think of it as the batman
signal and the robot is batman.
Logo 4:
- More original because it has a personality
- Diverse in the actions it can perform because it can move, animate,
and be customized based on intent and use
- The robot is kind of cute and approachable
Our suggestion is to use both. Logo 1 is the simplified version of the
robot. Logo 4 is the personification of the logo used to explain concepts.
We'd love to hear your thoughts!
Regards,
Jason and the design team
P.S. In general, here are our guidelines for creating a great logo:
- *original* - something that stands out from competitors
- *relevant* - reflects the brand's mission and values
- *versatile* - look good in black and white, in different colors and
sizes depending on context (e.g. billboards, websites, t-shirts, toys,
business cards, etc)
- *memorable* - easily recognizable everywhere (e.g. mickey mouse, nike)
- *timeless* - not just based on what's currently popular
On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 9:47 AM, <du...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Looks like there is a large amount of support for both #1 and #4. Design
> team, could you provide some more thoughts on the pros and cons for each,
> and perhaps any thoughts on ways the icons could be used in various project
> materials?
>
> --
>
> Mike Dusenberry
> GitHub: github.com/dusenberrymw
> LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/mikedusenberry
>
> Sent from my iPhone.
>
>
> > On Oct 25, 2016, at 9:41 AM, Acs S <ac...@yahoo.com.INVALID> wrote:
> >
> > I like #4 as well.
> > +1 on #4.
> >
> > -Arvind
> >
> > From: Berthold Reinwald <re...@us.ibm.com>
> > To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
> > Sent: Monday, October 24, 2016 12:34 AM
> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] SystemML New Logo Ideas
> >
> > +1 on #4.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Berthold Reinwald
> > IBM Almaden Research Center
> > office: (408) 927 2208; T/L: 457 2208
> > e-mail: reinwald@us.ibm.com
> >
> >
> >
> > From: Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com>
> > To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
> > Date: 10/21/2016 04:37 PM
> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] SystemML New Logo Ideas
> >
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 11:27 AM, Frederick R Reiss <fr...@us.ibm.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> These are awesome! I'm more a fan of option #4 myself.
> >>
> >>
> > I like option $4 myself as well.
> >
> >
> > --
> > Luciano Resende
> > http://twitter.com/lresende1975
> > http://lresende.blogspot.com/
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] SystemML New Logo Ideas
Posted by du...@gmail.com.
Looks like there is a large amount of support for both #1 and #4. Design team, could you provide some more thoughts on the pros and cons for each, and perhaps any thoughts on ways the icons could be used in various project materials?
--
Mike Dusenberry
GitHub: github.com/dusenberrymw
LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/mikedusenberry
Sent from my iPhone.
> On Oct 25, 2016, at 9:41 AM, Acs S <ac...@yahoo.com.INVALID> wrote:
>
> I like #4 as well.
> +1 on #4.
>
> -Arvind
>
> From: Berthold Reinwald <re...@us.ibm.com>
> To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
> Sent: Monday, October 24, 2016 12:34 AM
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] SystemML New Logo Ideas
>
> +1 on #4.
>
> Regards,
> Berthold Reinwald
> IBM Almaden Research Center
> office: (408) 927 2208; T/L: 457 2208
> e-mail: reinwald@us.ibm.com
>
>
>
> From: Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com>
> To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
> Date: 10/21/2016 04:37 PM
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] SystemML New Logo Ideas
>
>
>
> On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 11:27 AM, Frederick R Reiss <fr...@us.ibm.com>
> wrote:
>
>> These are awesome! I'm more a fan of option #4 myself.
>>
>>
> I like option $4 myself as well.
>
>
> --
> Luciano Resende
> http://twitter.com/lresende1975
> http://lresende.blogspot.com/
>
>
>
>
>
Re: [VOTE] SystemML New Logo Ideas
Posted by Abhishek Srivastava <ab...@gmail.com>.
All of them are amazing ... I too will go with Deron and my +1 to #1 given
its minimalistic design .
Regards,
Abhishek
On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 10:11 PM, Acs S <ac...@yahoo.com.invalid> wrote:
> I like #4 as well.
> +1 on #4.
>
> -Arvind
>
> From: Berthold Reinwald <re...@us.ibm.com>
> To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
> Sent: Monday, October 24, 2016 12:34 AM
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] SystemML New Logo Ideas
>
> +1 on #4.
>
> Regards,
> Berthold Reinwald
> IBM Almaden Research Center
> office: (408) 927 2208; T/L: 457 2208
> e-mail: reinwald@us.ibm.com
>
>
>
> From: Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com>
> To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
> Date: 10/21/2016 04:37 PM
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] SystemML New Logo Ideas
>
>
>
> On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 11:27 AM, Frederick R Reiss <fr...@us.ibm.com>
> wrote:
>
> > These are awesome! I'm more a fan of option #4 myself.
> >
> >
> I like option $4 myself as well.
>
>
> --
> Luciano Resende
> http://twitter.com/lresende1975
> http://lresende.blogspot.com/
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Re: [VOTE] SystemML New Logo Ideas
Posted by Acs S <ac...@yahoo.com.INVALID>.
I like #4 as well.
+1 on #4.
-Arvind
From: Berthold Reinwald <re...@us.ibm.com>
To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
Sent: Monday, October 24, 2016 12:34 AM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] SystemML New Logo Ideas
+1 on #4.
Regards,
Berthold Reinwald
IBM Almaden Research Center
office: (408) 927 2208; T/L: 457 2208
e-mail: reinwald@us.ibm.com
From: Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com>
To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
Date: 10/21/2016 04:37 PM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] SystemML New Logo Ideas
On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 11:27 AM, Frederick R Reiss <fr...@us.ibm.com>
wrote:
> These are awesome! I'm more a fan of option #4 myself.
>
>
I like option $4 myself as well.
--
Luciano Resende
http://twitter.com/lresende1975
http://lresende.blogspot.com/
Re: [VOTE] SystemML New Logo Ideas
Posted by Berthold Reinwald <re...@us.ibm.com>.
+1 on #4.
Regards,
Berthold Reinwald
IBM Almaden Research Center
office: (408) 927 2208; T/L: 457 2208
e-mail: reinwald@us.ibm.com
From: Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com>
To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
Date: 10/21/2016 04:37 PM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] SystemML New Logo Ideas
On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 11:27 AM, Frederick R Reiss <fr...@us.ibm.com>
wrote:
> These are awesome! I'm more a fan of option #4 myself.
>
>
I like option $4 myself as well.
--
Luciano Resende
http://twitter.com/lresende1975
http://lresende.blogspot.com/
Re: [VOTE] SystemML New Logo Ideas
Posted by Renee Mascarinas <re...@gmail.com>.
+1 to Morgan
#1 can scale really well and #4 would make a great mascot. Thanks!
On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 3:38 PM, Morgan Fritz <mo...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> +1 for 1 and 4,
>
> 1 is great for a flat logo icon, for the top of the website, headers, etc.
> that can be scaled very small (and large)
> and
> 4 is perfect for the interactions throughout the website, and other
> animations, branding pieces, etc.
>
> We can definitely have a range of uses for iconography that can utilize
> more than one design!
>
> On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 3:12 PM, Nakul Jindal <na...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > +1 for #1 - more professional and minimalist
> >
> > Second favorite is 3 or 4 - is more "fun" and conveys the idea of
> SystemML
> > being a "black box" and works well with the animation that Rose Peng
> worked
> > on.
> >
> > -Nakul
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 2:53 PM, Madison Myers <ma...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > +1 for SystemML action figures as well :D
> > >
> > > On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 2:53 PM, Madison Myers <
> madisonjmyers@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > +1 for what Mike said! I'd say 1 is my favorite and 4 is my second
> > > > favorite. Would love to incorporate them all as suggested by Mike and
> > > > Jeremy.
> > > >
> > > > These are really great, btw. Awesome work!
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 2:33 PM, Jeremy Anderson <
> > > > jeremy@objectadjective.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> +1 Mike.
> > > >>
> > > >> We're working on t-shirt designs, sticker designs, maybe buttons.
> > Action
> > > >> figures would be really cool!
> > > >>
> > > >> ...........................
> > > >>
> > > >> Jeremy Anderson
> > > >> https://twitter.com/ObjectAdjective
> > > >> http://www.linkedin.com/in/objectadjective
> > > >>
> > > >> On 21 October 2016 at 14:27, <du...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> > I like all of these options! I'll give a +1 for #1 as the main
> > logo,
> > > >> and
> > > >> > I also think it would be great to make use of the rest of the
> > designs
> > > >> > throughout the website and other project materials.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Thanks!!
> > > >> >
> > > >> > -Mike
> > > >> >
> > > >> > --
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Mike Dusenberry
> > > >> > GitHub: github.com/dusenberrymw
> > > >> > LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/mikedusenberry
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Sent from my iPhone.
> > > >> >
> > > >> >
> > > >> > > On Oct 21, 2016, at 1:01 PM, Niketan Pansare <
> npansar@us.ibm.com>
> > > >> wrote:
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > All the logos are awesome, thanks design team !!
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > I vote for #4.
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > Thanks,
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > Niketan Pansare
> > > >> > > IBM Almaden Research Center
> > > >> > > E-mail: npansar At us.ibm.com
> > > >> > > http://researcher.watson.ibm.com/researcher/view.php?person=
> > > >> us-npansar
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > Deron Eriksson ---10/21/2016 12:57:25 PM---Given the
> overwhelming
> > > >> > support for #1, I give my +1 to #1. Deron
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > From: Deron Eriksson <de...@gmail.com>
> > > >> > > To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
> > > >> > > Date: 10/21/2016 12:57 PM
> > > >> > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] SystemML New Logo Ideas
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > Given the overwhelming support for #1, I give my +1 to #1.
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > Deron
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 12:46 PM, Jason Azares <
> > > >> jason.azares@gmail.com>
> > > >> > > wrote:
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > > I vote for #1
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 12:27 PM, Matthias Boehm <
> > > >> > mboehm7@googlemail.com>
> > > >> > > > wrote:
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > > ha, that's interesting - thanks for the pointer Deron, I
> > wasn't
> > > >> > expecting
> > > >> > > > > this at all. Somehow my eyes always ignored this.
> > > >> > > > >
> > > >> > > > > Regards,
> > > >> > > > > Matthias
> > > >> > > > >
> > > >> > > > >
> > > >> > > > > On 10/21/2016 9:22 PM, Deron Eriksson wrote:
> > > >> > > > >
> > > >> > > > >> I think they all look fantastic. My untrained eye likes the
> > > >> > features of
> > > >> > > > 3
> > > >> > > > >> and 4 but I completely defer to the judgements of others
> here
> > > >> since
> > > >> > I
> > > >> > > > have
> > > >> > > > >> no training in design and the multitude of considerations
> > > >> involved
> > > >> > such
> > > >> > > > as
> > > >> > > > >> scalability.
> > > >> > > > >>
> > > >> > > > >> I believe the logo trademark is an official requirement of
> > the
> > > >> ASF (
> > > >> > > > >> http://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/pmcs.html#graphics
> ),
> > > >> > although I
> > > >> > > > >> don't know how strict this is.
> > > >> > > > >>
> > > >> > > > >> Deron
> > > >> > > > >>
> > > >> > > > >>
> > > >> > > > >> On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 12:15 PM, Matthias Boehm <
> > > >> > > > mboehm7@googlemail.com>
> > > >> > > > >> wrote:
> > > >> > > > >>
> > > >> > > > >> Thanks for these proposals. For all the options, I'd prefer
> > to
> > > >> > remove
> > > >> > > > the
> > > >> > > > >>> TM - it's just a little odd for an open source project
> with
> > no
> > > >> > > > intentions
> > > >> > > > >>> to register a trademark. I know, the new Spark logo has it
> > too
> > > >> but
> > > >> > it's
> > > >> > > > >>> probably a different context, especially since there are
> > > >> > discussions to
> > > >> > > > >>> add
> > > >> > > > >>> SPARC support in Spark 2.1 ;-)
> > > >> > > > >>>
> > > >> > > > >>> Regards,
> > > >> > > > >>> Matthias
> > > >> > > > >>>
> > > >> > > > >>>
> > > >> > > > >>> On 10/21/2016 8:47 PM, Dexter Lesaca wrote:
> > > >> > > > >>>
> > > >> > > > >>> +1 for 1
> > > >> > > > >>>>
> > > >> > > > >>>> On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 11:44 AM Jeremy Anderson <
> > > >> > > > >>>> jeremy@objectadjective.com>
> > > >> > > > >>>> wrote:
> > > >> > > > >>>>
> > > >> > > > >>>> +1 on option 1 as well.
> > > >> > > > >>>>
> > > >> > > > >>>>>
> > > >> > > > >>>>> For the 4 options, I think it's important that full logo
> > > with
> > > >> > name
> > > >> > > > and
> > > >> > > > >>>>> mark, scales well. I'm concerned detail will get lost
> with
> > > the
> > > >> > other
> > > >> > > > 3,
> > > >> > > > >>>>> at
> > > >> > > > >>>>> small sizes. I would love to use all of the simple and
> > > >> isometric
> > > >> > > > >>>>> versions.
> > > >> > > > >>>>> They make a great family.
> > > >> > > > >>>>>
> > > >> > > > >>>>> ...........................
> > > >> > > > >>>>>
> > > >> > > > >>>>> Jeremy Anderson
> > > >> > > > >>>>> https://twitter.com/ObjectAdjective
> > > >> > > > >>>>> http://www.linkedin.com/in/objectadjective
> > > >> > > > >>>>>
> > > >> > > > >>>>> On 21 October 2016 at 11:27, Frederick R Reiss <
> > > >> > frreiss@us.ibm.com>
> > > >> > > > >>>>> wrote:
> > > >> > > > >>>>>
> > > >> > > > >>>>> These are awesome! I'm more a fan of option #4 myself.
> > > >> > > > >>>>>
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>
> > > >> > > > >>>>>> Fred
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>
> > > >> > > > >>>>>> [image: Inactive hide details for Renee Mascarinas
> > > >> ---10/21/2016
> > > >> > > > >>>>>> 11:19:01
> > > >> > > > >>>>>> AM---love these!!! thank you so much! +1 on option 1
> > > >> > because]Renee
> > > >> > > > >>>>>> Mascarinas ---10/21/2016 11:19:01 AM---love these!!!
> > thank
> > > >> you
> > > >> > so
> > > >> > > > >>>>>> much!
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>
> > > >> > > > >>>>>> +1
> > > >> > > > >>>>>
> > > >> > > > >>>>> on option 1 because it's both minimalistic and fun!
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>
> > > >> > > > >>>>>> From: Renee Mascarinas <re...@gmail.com>
> > > >> > > > >>>>>> To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
> > > >> > > > >>>>>> Date: 10/21/2016 11:19 AM
> > > >> > > > >>>>>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] SystemML New Logo Ideas
> > > >> > > > >>>>>> ------------------------------
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>
> > > >> > > > >>>>>> love these!!! thank you so much!
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>
> > > >> > > > >>>>>> +1 on option 1 because it's both minimalistic and fun!
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>
> > > >> > > > >>>>>> On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 10:50 AM, Rose Peng <
> > > >> > rosypenguin@gmail.com>
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>
> > > >> > > > >>>>>> wrote:
> > > >> > > > >>>>>
> > > >> > > > >>>>>
> > > >> > > > >>>>>> imgur: http://i.imgur.com/iuvOIDB.png
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>> google drive:
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>> https://drive.google.com/file/
> > > >> d/0B70RXaqBkBoydnlZQUF3N3NUa2c/
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>> view?usp=sharing
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>> <https://drive.google.com/file
> > > >> /d/0B70RXaqBkBoydnlZQUF3N3NUa2c/
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>> view?usp=sharing>
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>> Hopefully one of these work.
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>> Thanks,
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>> Rose
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 8:41 PM, Felix Schüler <
> > > >> > > > fschueler@posteo.de>
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>> wrote:
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>> Hi Rose,
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>>> I believe the attachment was removed - probably
> because
> > > of
> > > >> > size
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>>> limitations. Could you upload it somewhere else and
> > share
> > > >> the
> > > >> > > > link?
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>>> Felix
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>>> On 20.10.2016 20:02, Rose Peng wrote:
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>>> Hi everyone,
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>>>> The design team has explored a few logo concepts,
> and
> > we
> > > >> > would
> > > >> > > > love
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>>>> to
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > >> > > > >>>>>> see which ideas you like the most! We're looking for a
> > logo
> > > >> that
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>>>> conveys
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>> optimization, and we came up with a robot. The smile
> is
> > > >> > inspired
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>>>> by a
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > >> > > > >>>>> matrix bracket to bring to mind the mathematical
> > background
> > > of
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>>>> SystemML.
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>>> In the attached image, we have two main types of logo
> > > >> > > > explorations.
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>>>> One
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > >> > > > >>>>>> is a simple forward-facing robot and the other is an
> > > >> isometric
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>>> interpretation. Below that we pulled out a few to
> show
> > > how
> > > >> > they
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>>>> would
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > >> > > > >>>>> look as logos besides the words "Apache SystemML".
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>>>> Ultimately, we want the robot to have
> interchangeable
> > > >> parts
> > > >> > to
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>>>> communicate the customizability of algorithms that
> > > >> SystemML
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>>>> provides,
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > >> > > > >>>>> so
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>> whatever logo ends up being chosen it could still have
> > > >> several
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>>>> variations.
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>>>> Personally, we like concept #1 for the minimal look,
> > but
> > > >> we'd
> > > >> > > > love
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>>>> to
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > >> > > > >>>>> hear your thoughts. Feel free to mix and match or make
> > other
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>>>> suggestions
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>> that we can take into consideration.
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>>>> Thanks!
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>>>> ----------------------------------------
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>>>> *Rose Peng*
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>>>> MS HCI 2015 - Georgia Institute of Technology
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>>>> (www.rosepeng.com <http://www.rosepeng.com/>)
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>> --
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>> ----------------------------------------
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>> *Rose Peng*
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>> MS HCI 2015 - Georgia Institute of Technology
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>> (www.rosepeng.com)
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>
> > > >> > > > >>>>>
> > > >> > > > >>>>
> > > >> > > > >>
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > >
> > > >> >
> > > >>
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > *Madison J. Myers*
> > > > *UC Berkeley, Master of Information & Data Science '17*
> > > >
> > > > *King's College London, MA Political Science '14*
> > > > *New York University, BA Political Science '12*
> > > >
> > > > -
> > > > LinkedIn <http://linkedin.com/in/madisonjmyers>
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > *Madison J. Myers*
> > > *UC Berkeley, Master of Information & Data Science '17*
> > >
> > > *King's College London, MA Political Science '14*
> > > *New York University, BA Political Science '12*
> > >
> > > -
> > > LinkedIn <http://linkedin.com/in/madisonjmyers>
> > >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] SystemML New Logo Ideas
Posted by Morgan Fritz <mo...@gmail.com>.
+1 for 1 and 4,
1 is great for a flat logo icon, for the top of the website, headers, etc.
that can be scaled very small (and large)
and
4 is perfect for the interactions throughout the website, and other
animations, branding pieces, etc.
We can definitely have a range of uses for iconography that can utilize
more than one design!
On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 3:12 PM, Nakul Jindal <na...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 for #1 - more professional and minimalist
>
> Second favorite is 3 or 4 - is more "fun" and conveys the idea of SystemML
> being a "black box" and works well with the animation that Rose Peng worked
> on.
>
> -Nakul
>
>
> On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 2:53 PM, Madison Myers <ma...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > +1 for SystemML action figures as well :D
> >
> > On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 2:53 PM, Madison Myers <ma...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > +1 for what Mike said! I'd say 1 is my favorite and 4 is my second
> > > favorite. Would love to incorporate them all as suggested by Mike and
> > > Jeremy.
> > >
> > > These are really great, btw. Awesome work!
> > >
> > > On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 2:33 PM, Jeremy Anderson <
> > > jeremy@objectadjective.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >> +1 Mike.
> > >>
> > >> We're working on t-shirt designs, sticker designs, maybe buttons.
> Action
> > >> figures would be really cool!
> > >>
> > >> ...........................
> > >>
> > >> Jeremy Anderson
> > >> https://twitter.com/ObjectAdjective
> > >> http://www.linkedin.com/in/objectadjective
> > >>
> > >> On 21 October 2016 at 14:27, <du...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > I like all of these options! I'll give a +1 for #1 as the main
> logo,
> > >> and
> > >> > I also think it would be great to make use of the rest of the
> designs
> > >> > throughout the website and other project materials.
> > >> >
> > >> > Thanks!!
> > >> >
> > >> > -Mike
> > >> >
> > >> > --
> > >> >
> > >> > Mike Dusenberry
> > >> > GitHub: github.com/dusenberrymw
> > >> > LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/mikedusenberry
> > >> >
> > >> > Sent from my iPhone.
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > > On Oct 21, 2016, at 1:01 PM, Niketan Pansare <np...@us.ibm.com>
> > >> wrote:
> > >> > >
> > >> > > All the logos are awesome, thanks design team !!
> > >> > >
> > >> > > I vote for #4.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Thanks,
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Niketan Pansare
> > >> > > IBM Almaden Research Center
> > >> > > E-mail: npansar At us.ibm.com
> > >> > > http://researcher.watson.ibm.com/researcher/view.php?person=
> > >> us-npansar
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Deron Eriksson ---10/21/2016 12:57:25 PM---Given the overwhelming
> > >> > support for #1, I give my +1 to #1. Deron
> > >> > >
> > >> > > From: Deron Eriksson <de...@gmail.com>
> > >> > > To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
> > >> > > Date: 10/21/2016 12:57 PM
> > >> > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] SystemML New Logo Ideas
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Given the overwhelming support for #1, I give my +1 to #1.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Deron
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > > On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 12:46 PM, Jason Azares <
> > >> jason.azares@gmail.com>
> > >> > > wrote:
> > >> > >
> > >> > > > I vote for #1
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 12:27 PM, Matthias Boehm <
> > >> > mboehm7@googlemail.com>
> > >> > > > wrote:
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > > ha, that's interesting - thanks for the pointer Deron, I
> wasn't
> > >> > expecting
> > >> > > > > this at all. Somehow my eyes always ignored this.
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > Regards,
> > >> > > > > Matthias
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > On 10/21/2016 9:22 PM, Deron Eriksson wrote:
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > >> I think they all look fantastic. My untrained eye likes the
> > >> > features of
> > >> > > > 3
> > >> > > > >> and 4 but I completely defer to the judgements of others here
> > >> since
> > >> > I
> > >> > > > have
> > >> > > > >> no training in design and the multitude of considerations
> > >> involved
> > >> > such
> > >> > > > as
> > >> > > > >> scalability.
> > >> > > > >>
> > >> > > > >> I believe the logo trademark is an official requirement of
> the
> > >> ASF (
> > >> > > > >> http://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/pmcs.html#graphics),
> > >> > although I
> > >> > > > >> don't know how strict this is.
> > >> > > > >>
> > >> > > > >> Deron
> > >> > > > >>
> > >> > > > >>
> > >> > > > >> On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 12:15 PM, Matthias Boehm <
> > >> > > > mboehm7@googlemail.com>
> > >> > > > >> wrote:
> > >> > > > >>
> > >> > > > >> Thanks for these proposals. For all the options, I'd prefer
> to
> > >> > remove
> > >> > > > the
> > >> > > > >>> TM - it's just a little odd for an open source project with
> no
> > >> > > > intentions
> > >> > > > >>> to register a trademark. I know, the new Spark logo has it
> too
> > >> but
> > >> > it's
> > >> > > > >>> probably a different context, especially since there are
> > >> > discussions to
> > >> > > > >>> add
> > >> > > > >>> SPARC support in Spark 2.1 ;-)
> > >> > > > >>>
> > >> > > > >>> Regards,
> > >> > > > >>> Matthias
> > >> > > > >>>
> > >> > > > >>>
> > >> > > > >>> On 10/21/2016 8:47 PM, Dexter Lesaca wrote:
> > >> > > > >>>
> > >> > > > >>> +1 for 1
> > >> > > > >>>>
> > >> > > > >>>> On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 11:44 AM Jeremy Anderson <
> > >> > > > >>>> jeremy@objectadjective.com>
> > >> > > > >>>> wrote:
> > >> > > > >>>>
> > >> > > > >>>> +1 on option 1 as well.
> > >> > > > >>>>
> > >> > > > >>>>>
> > >> > > > >>>>> For the 4 options, I think it's important that full logo
> > with
> > >> > name
> > >> > > > and
> > >> > > > >>>>> mark, scales well. I'm concerned detail will get lost with
> > the
> > >> > other
> > >> > > > 3,
> > >> > > > >>>>> at
> > >> > > > >>>>> small sizes. I would love to use all of the simple and
> > >> isometric
> > >> > > > >>>>> versions.
> > >> > > > >>>>> They make a great family.
> > >> > > > >>>>>
> > >> > > > >>>>> ...........................
> > >> > > > >>>>>
> > >> > > > >>>>> Jeremy Anderson
> > >> > > > >>>>> https://twitter.com/ObjectAdjective
> > >> > > > >>>>> http://www.linkedin.com/in/objectadjective
> > >> > > > >>>>>
> > >> > > > >>>>> On 21 October 2016 at 11:27, Frederick R Reiss <
> > >> > frreiss@us.ibm.com>
> > >> > > > >>>>> wrote:
> > >> > > > >>>>>
> > >> > > > >>>>> These are awesome! I'm more a fan of option #4 myself.
> > >> > > > >>>>>
> > >> > > > >>>>>>
> > >> > > > >>>>>> Fred
> > >> > > > >>>>>>
> > >> > > > >>>>>> [image: Inactive hide details for Renee Mascarinas
> > >> ---10/21/2016
> > >> > > > >>>>>> 11:19:01
> > >> > > > >>>>>> AM---love these!!! thank you so much! +1 on option 1
> > >> > because]Renee
> > >> > > > >>>>>> Mascarinas ---10/21/2016 11:19:01 AM---love these!!!
> thank
> > >> you
> > >> > so
> > >> > > > >>>>>> much!
> > >> > > > >>>>>>
> > >> > > > >>>>>> +1
> > >> > > > >>>>>
> > >> > > > >>>>> on option 1 because it's both minimalistic and fun!
> > >> > > > >>>>>>
> > >> > > > >>>>>> From: Renee Mascarinas <re...@gmail.com>
> > >> > > > >>>>>> To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
> > >> > > > >>>>>> Date: 10/21/2016 11:19 AM
> > >> > > > >>>>>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] SystemML New Logo Ideas
> > >> > > > >>>>>> ------------------------------
> > >> > > > >>>>>>
> > >> > > > >>>>>>
> > >> > > > >>>>>>
> > >> > > > >>>>>> love these!!! thank you so much!
> > >> > > > >>>>>>
> > >> > > > >>>>>> +1 on option 1 because it's both minimalistic and fun!
> > >> > > > >>>>>>
> > >> > > > >>>>>> On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 10:50 AM, Rose Peng <
> > >> > rosypenguin@gmail.com>
> > >> > > > >>>>>>
> > >> > > > >>>>>> wrote:
> > >> > > > >>>>>
> > >> > > > >>>>>
> > >> > > > >>>>>> imgur: http://i.imgur.com/iuvOIDB.png
> > >> > > > >>>>>>
> > >> > > > >>>>>>> google drive:
> > >> > > > >>>>>>> https://drive.google.com/file/
> > >> d/0B70RXaqBkBoydnlZQUF3N3NUa2c/
> > >> > > > >>>>>>> view?usp=sharing
> > >> > > > >>>>>>> <https://drive.google.com/file
> > >> /d/0B70RXaqBkBoydnlZQUF3N3NUa2c/
> > >> > > > >>>>>>> view?usp=sharing>
> > >> > > > >>>>>>>
> > >> > > > >>>>>>> Hopefully one of these work.
> > >> > > > >>>>>>>
> > >> > > > >>>>>>> Thanks,
> > >> > > > >>>>>>> Rose
> > >> > > > >>>>>>>
> > >> > > > >>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 8:41 PM, Felix Schüler <
> > >> > > > fschueler@posteo.de>
> > >> > > > >>>>>>> wrote:
> > >> > > > >>>>>>>
> > >> > > > >>>>>>> Hi Rose,
> > >> > > > >>>>>>>
> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>
> > >> > > > >>>>>>>> I believe the attachment was removed - probably because
> > of
> > >> > size
> > >> > > > >>>>>>>> limitations. Could you upload it somewhere else and
> share
> > >> the
> > >> > > > link?
> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>
> > >> > > > >>>>>>>> Felix
> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>
> > >> > > > >>>>>>>> On 20.10.2016 20:02, Rose Peng wrote:
> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>
> > >> > > > >>>>>>>> Hi everyone,
> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>
> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>> The design team has explored a few logo concepts, and
> we
> > >> > would
> > >> > > > love
> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>
> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>> to
> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>
> > >> > > > >>>>>>>
> > >> > > > >>>>>> see which ideas you like the most! We're looking for a
> logo
> > >> that
> > >> > > > >>>>>>>
> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>
> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>> conveys
> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>
> > >> > > > >>>>>>>
> > >> > > > >>>>>>> optimization, and we came up with a robot. The smile is
> > >> > inspired
> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>
> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>
> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>> by a
> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>
> > >> > > > >>>>>>>
> > >> > > > >>>>> matrix bracket to bring to mind the mathematical
> background
> > of
> > >> > > > >>>>>>
> > >> > > > >>>>>>>
> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>> SystemML.
> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>
> > >> > > > >>>>>>>
> > >> > > > >>>>>>>
> > >> > > > >>>>>>>> In the attached image, we have two main types of logo
> > >> > > > explorations.
> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>
> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>> One
> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>
> > >> > > > >>>>>>>
> > >> > > > >>>>>> is a simple forward-facing robot and the other is an
> > >> isometric
> > >> > > > >>>>>>>
> > >> > > > >>>>>>>> interpretation. Below that we pulled out a few to show
> > how
> > >> > they
> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>
> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>> would
> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>
> > >> > > > >>>>>>>
> > >> > > > >>>>> look as logos besides the words "Apache SystemML".
> > >> > > > >>>>>>
> > >> > > > >>>>>>>
> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>> Ultimately, we want the robot to have interchangeable
> > >> parts
> > >> > to
> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>> communicate the customizability of algorithms that
> > >> SystemML
> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>
> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>> provides,
> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>
> > >> > > > >>>>>>>
> > >> > > > >>>>> so
> > >> > > > >>>>>>
> > >> > > > >>>>>>>
> > >> > > > >>>>>>> whatever logo ends up being chosen it could still have
> > >> several
> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>
> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>
> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>> variations.
> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>
> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>
> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>> Personally, we like concept #1 for the minimal look,
> but
> > >> we'd
> > >> > > > love
> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>
> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>> to
> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>
> > >> > > > >>>>>>>
> > >> > > > >>>>> hear your thoughts. Feel free to mix and match or make
> other
> > >> > > > >>>>>>
> > >> > > > >>>>>>>
> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>> suggestions
> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>
> > >> > > > >>>>>>>
> > >> > > > >>>>>>> that we can take into consideration.
> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>
> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>
> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>> Thanks!
> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>
> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>> ----------------------------------------
> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>> *Rose Peng*
> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>> MS HCI 2015 - Georgia Institute of Technology
> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>> (www.rosepeng.com <http://www.rosepeng.com/>)
> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>
> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>
> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>
> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>
> > >> > > > >>>>>>>
> > >> > > > >>>>>>> --
> > >> > > > >>>>>>> ----------------------------------------
> > >> > > > >>>>>>> *Rose Peng*
> > >> > > > >>>>>>> MS HCI 2015 - Georgia Institute of Technology
> > >> > > > >>>>>>> (www.rosepeng.com)
> > >> > > > >>>>>>>
> > >> > > > >>>>>>>
> > >> > > > >>>>>>>
> > >> > > > >>>>>>
> > >> > > > >>>>>>
> > >> > > > >>>>>>
> > >> > > > >>>>>>
> > >> > > > >>>>>
> > >> > > > >>>>
> > >> > > > >>
> > >> > > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > *Madison J. Myers*
> > > *UC Berkeley, Master of Information & Data Science '17*
> > >
> > > *King's College London, MA Political Science '14*
> > > *New York University, BA Political Science '12*
> > >
> > > -
> > > LinkedIn <http://linkedin.com/in/madisonjmyers>
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > *Madison J. Myers*
> > *UC Berkeley, Master of Information & Data Science '17*
> >
> > *King's College London, MA Political Science '14*
> > *New York University, BA Political Science '12*
> >
> > -
> > LinkedIn <http://linkedin.com/in/madisonjmyers>
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] SystemML New Logo Ideas
Posted by Nakul Jindal <na...@gmail.com>.
+1 for #1 - more professional and minimalist
Second favorite is 3 or 4 - is more "fun" and conveys the idea of SystemML
being a "black box" and works well with the animation that Rose Peng worked
on.
-Nakul
On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 2:53 PM, Madison Myers <ma...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> +1 for SystemML action figures as well :D
>
> On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 2:53 PM, Madison Myers <ma...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > +1 for what Mike said! I'd say 1 is my favorite and 4 is my second
> > favorite. Would love to incorporate them all as suggested by Mike and
> > Jeremy.
> >
> > These are really great, btw. Awesome work!
> >
> > On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 2:33 PM, Jeremy Anderson <
> > jeremy@objectadjective.com> wrote:
> >
> >> +1 Mike.
> >>
> >> We're working on t-shirt designs, sticker designs, maybe buttons. Action
> >> figures would be really cool!
> >>
> >> ...........................
> >>
> >> Jeremy Anderson
> >> https://twitter.com/ObjectAdjective
> >> http://www.linkedin.com/in/objectadjective
> >>
> >> On 21 October 2016 at 14:27, <du...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> > I like all of these options! I'll give a +1 for #1 as the main logo,
> >> and
> >> > I also think it would be great to make use of the rest of the designs
> >> > throughout the website and other project materials.
> >> >
> >> > Thanks!!
> >> >
> >> > -Mike
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> >
> >> > Mike Dusenberry
> >> > GitHub: github.com/dusenberrymw
> >> > LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/mikedusenberry
> >> >
> >> > Sent from my iPhone.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > > On Oct 21, 2016, at 1:01 PM, Niketan Pansare <np...@us.ibm.com>
> >> wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > > All the logos are awesome, thanks design team !!
> >> > >
> >> > > I vote for #4.
> >> > >
> >> > > Thanks,
> >> > >
> >> > > Niketan Pansare
> >> > > IBM Almaden Research Center
> >> > > E-mail: npansar At us.ibm.com
> >> > > http://researcher.watson.ibm.com/researcher/view.php?person=
> >> us-npansar
> >> > >
> >> > > Deron Eriksson ---10/21/2016 12:57:25 PM---Given the overwhelming
> >> > support for #1, I give my +1 to #1. Deron
> >> > >
> >> > > From: Deron Eriksson <de...@gmail.com>
> >> > > To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
> >> > > Date: 10/21/2016 12:57 PM
> >> > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] SystemML New Logo Ideas
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > Given the overwhelming support for #1, I give my +1 to #1.
> >> > >
> >> > > Deron
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 12:46 PM, Jason Azares <
> >> jason.azares@gmail.com>
> >> > > wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > > > I vote for #1
> >> > > >
> >> > > > On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 12:27 PM, Matthias Boehm <
> >> > mboehm7@googlemail.com>
> >> > > > wrote:
> >> > > >
> >> > > > > ha, that's interesting - thanks for the pointer Deron, I wasn't
> >> > expecting
> >> > > > > this at all. Somehow my eyes always ignored this.
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > Regards,
> >> > > > > Matthias
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > On 10/21/2016 9:22 PM, Deron Eriksson wrote:
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > >> I think they all look fantastic. My untrained eye likes the
> >> > features of
> >> > > > 3
> >> > > > >> and 4 but I completely defer to the judgements of others here
> >> since
> >> > I
> >> > > > have
> >> > > > >> no training in design and the multitude of considerations
> >> involved
> >> > such
> >> > > > as
> >> > > > >> scalability.
> >> > > > >>
> >> > > > >> I believe the logo trademark is an official requirement of the
> >> ASF (
> >> > > > >> http://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/pmcs.html#graphics),
> >> > although I
> >> > > > >> don't know how strict this is.
> >> > > > >>
> >> > > > >> Deron
> >> > > > >>
> >> > > > >>
> >> > > > >> On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 12:15 PM, Matthias Boehm <
> >> > > > mboehm7@googlemail.com>
> >> > > > >> wrote:
> >> > > > >>
> >> > > > >> Thanks for these proposals. For all the options, I'd prefer to
> >> > remove
> >> > > > the
> >> > > > >>> TM - it's just a little odd for an open source project with no
> >> > > > intentions
> >> > > > >>> to register a trademark. I know, the new Spark logo has it too
> >> but
> >> > it's
> >> > > > >>> probably a different context, especially since there are
> >> > discussions to
> >> > > > >>> add
> >> > > > >>> SPARC support in Spark 2.1 ;-)
> >> > > > >>>
> >> > > > >>> Regards,
> >> > > > >>> Matthias
> >> > > > >>>
> >> > > > >>>
> >> > > > >>> On 10/21/2016 8:47 PM, Dexter Lesaca wrote:
> >> > > > >>>
> >> > > > >>> +1 for 1
> >> > > > >>>>
> >> > > > >>>> On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 11:44 AM Jeremy Anderson <
> >> > > > >>>> jeremy@objectadjective.com>
> >> > > > >>>> wrote:
> >> > > > >>>>
> >> > > > >>>> +1 on option 1 as well.
> >> > > > >>>>
> >> > > > >>>>>
> >> > > > >>>>> For the 4 options, I think it's important that full logo
> with
> >> > name
> >> > > > and
> >> > > > >>>>> mark, scales well. I'm concerned detail will get lost with
> the
> >> > other
> >> > > > 3,
> >> > > > >>>>> at
> >> > > > >>>>> small sizes. I would love to use all of the simple and
> >> isometric
> >> > > > >>>>> versions.
> >> > > > >>>>> They make a great family.
> >> > > > >>>>>
> >> > > > >>>>> ...........................
> >> > > > >>>>>
> >> > > > >>>>> Jeremy Anderson
> >> > > > >>>>> https://twitter.com/ObjectAdjective
> >> > > > >>>>> http://www.linkedin.com/in/objectadjective
> >> > > > >>>>>
> >> > > > >>>>> On 21 October 2016 at 11:27, Frederick R Reiss <
> >> > frreiss@us.ibm.com>
> >> > > > >>>>> wrote:
> >> > > > >>>>>
> >> > > > >>>>> These are awesome! I'm more a fan of option #4 myself.
> >> > > > >>>>>
> >> > > > >>>>>>
> >> > > > >>>>>> Fred
> >> > > > >>>>>>
> >> > > > >>>>>> [image: Inactive hide details for Renee Mascarinas
> >> ---10/21/2016
> >> > > > >>>>>> 11:19:01
> >> > > > >>>>>> AM---love these!!! thank you so much! +1 on option 1
> >> > because]Renee
> >> > > > >>>>>> Mascarinas ---10/21/2016 11:19:01 AM---love these!!! thank
> >> you
> >> > so
> >> > > > >>>>>> much!
> >> > > > >>>>>>
> >> > > > >>>>>> +1
> >> > > > >>>>>
> >> > > > >>>>> on option 1 because it's both minimalistic and fun!
> >> > > > >>>>>>
> >> > > > >>>>>> From: Renee Mascarinas <re...@gmail.com>
> >> > > > >>>>>> To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
> >> > > > >>>>>> Date: 10/21/2016 11:19 AM
> >> > > > >>>>>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] SystemML New Logo Ideas
> >> > > > >>>>>> ------------------------------
> >> > > > >>>>>>
> >> > > > >>>>>>
> >> > > > >>>>>>
> >> > > > >>>>>> love these!!! thank you so much!
> >> > > > >>>>>>
> >> > > > >>>>>> +1 on option 1 because it's both minimalistic and fun!
> >> > > > >>>>>>
> >> > > > >>>>>> On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 10:50 AM, Rose Peng <
> >> > rosypenguin@gmail.com>
> >> > > > >>>>>>
> >> > > > >>>>>> wrote:
> >> > > > >>>>>
> >> > > > >>>>>
> >> > > > >>>>>> imgur: http://i.imgur.com/iuvOIDB.png
> >> > > > >>>>>>
> >> > > > >>>>>>> google drive:
> >> > > > >>>>>>> https://drive.google.com/file/
> >> d/0B70RXaqBkBoydnlZQUF3N3NUa2c/
> >> > > > >>>>>>> view?usp=sharing
> >> > > > >>>>>>> <https://drive.google.com/file
> >> /d/0B70RXaqBkBoydnlZQUF3N3NUa2c/
> >> > > > >>>>>>> view?usp=sharing>
> >> > > > >>>>>>>
> >> > > > >>>>>>> Hopefully one of these work.
> >> > > > >>>>>>>
> >> > > > >>>>>>> Thanks,
> >> > > > >>>>>>> Rose
> >> > > > >>>>>>>
> >> > > > >>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 8:41 PM, Felix Schüler <
> >> > > > fschueler@posteo.de>
> >> > > > >>>>>>> wrote:
> >> > > > >>>>>>>
> >> > > > >>>>>>> Hi Rose,
> >> > > > >>>>>>>
> >> > > > >>>>>>>>
> >> > > > >>>>>>>> I believe the attachment was removed - probably because
> of
> >> > size
> >> > > > >>>>>>>> limitations. Could you upload it somewhere else and share
> >> the
> >> > > > link?
> >> > > > >>>>>>>>
> >> > > > >>>>>>>> Felix
> >> > > > >>>>>>>>
> >> > > > >>>>>>>> On 20.10.2016 20:02, Rose Peng wrote:
> >> > > > >>>>>>>>
> >> > > > >>>>>>>> Hi everyone,
> >> > > > >>>>>>>>>
> >> > > > >>>>>>>>> The design team has explored a few logo concepts, and we
> >> > would
> >> > > > love
> >> > > > >>>>>>>>>
> >> > > > >>>>>>>>> to
> >> > > > >>>>>>>>
> >> > > > >>>>>>>
> >> > > > >>>>>> see which ideas you like the most! We're looking for a logo
> >> that
> >> > > > >>>>>>>
> >> > > > >>>>>>>>
> >> > > > >>>>>>>>> conveys
> >> > > > >>>>>>>>
> >> > > > >>>>>>>
> >> > > > >>>>>>> optimization, and we came up with a robot. The smile is
> >> > inspired
> >> > > > >>>>>>>>
> >> > > > >>>>>>>>>
> >> > > > >>>>>>>>> by a
> >> > > > >>>>>>>>
> >> > > > >>>>>>>
> >> > > > >>>>> matrix bracket to bring to mind the mathematical background
> of
> >> > > > >>>>>>
> >> > > > >>>>>>>
> >> > > > >>>>>>>>> SystemML.
> >> > > > >>>>>>>>
> >> > > > >>>>>>>
> >> > > > >>>>>>>
> >> > > > >>>>>>>> In the attached image, we have two main types of logo
> >> > > > explorations.
> >> > > > >>>>>>>>>
> >> > > > >>>>>>>>> One
> >> > > > >>>>>>>>
> >> > > > >>>>>>>
> >> > > > >>>>>> is a simple forward-facing robot and the other is an
> >> isometric
> >> > > > >>>>>>>
> >> > > > >>>>>>>> interpretation. Below that we pulled out a few to show
> how
> >> > they
> >> > > > >>>>>>>>>
> >> > > > >>>>>>>>> would
> >> > > > >>>>>>>>
> >> > > > >>>>>>>
> >> > > > >>>>> look as logos besides the words "Apache SystemML".
> >> > > > >>>>>>
> >> > > > >>>>>>>
> >> > > > >>>>>>>>> Ultimately, we want the robot to have interchangeable
> >> parts
> >> > to
> >> > > > >>>>>>>>> communicate the customizability of algorithms that
> >> SystemML
> >> > > > >>>>>>>>>
> >> > > > >>>>>>>>> provides,
> >> > > > >>>>>>>>
> >> > > > >>>>>>>
> >> > > > >>>>> so
> >> > > > >>>>>>
> >> > > > >>>>>>>
> >> > > > >>>>>>> whatever logo ends up being chosen it could still have
> >> several
> >> > > > >>>>>>>>
> >> > > > >>>>>>>>>
> >> > > > >>>>>>>>> variations.
> >> > > > >>>>>>>>
> >> > > > >>>>>>>>
> >> > > > >>>>>>>>> Personally, we like concept #1 for the minimal look, but
> >> we'd
> >> > > > love
> >> > > > >>>>>>>>>
> >> > > > >>>>>>>>> to
> >> > > > >>>>>>>>
> >> > > > >>>>>>>
> >> > > > >>>>> hear your thoughts. Feel free to mix and match or make other
> >> > > > >>>>>>
> >> > > > >>>>>>>
> >> > > > >>>>>>>>> suggestions
> >> > > > >>>>>>>>
> >> > > > >>>>>>>
> >> > > > >>>>>>> that we can take into consideration.
> >> > > > >>>>>>>>
> >> > > > >>>>>>>>>
> >> > > > >>>>>>>>> Thanks!
> >> > > > >>>>>>>>>
> >> > > > >>>>>>>>> ----------------------------------------
> >> > > > >>>>>>>>> *Rose Peng*
> >> > > > >>>>>>>>> MS HCI 2015 - Georgia Institute of Technology
> >> > > > >>>>>>>>> (www.rosepeng.com <http://www.rosepeng.com/>)
> >> > > > >>>>>>>>>
> >> > > > >>>>>>>>>
> >> > > > >>>>>>>>
> >> > > > >>>>>>>>
> >> > > > >>>>>>>
> >> > > > >>>>>>> --
> >> > > > >>>>>>> ----------------------------------------
> >> > > > >>>>>>> *Rose Peng*
> >> > > > >>>>>>> MS HCI 2015 - Georgia Institute of Technology
> >> > > > >>>>>>> (www.rosepeng.com)
> >> > > > >>>>>>>
> >> > > > >>>>>>>
> >> > > > >>>>>>>
> >> > > > >>>>>>
> >> > > > >>>>>>
> >> > > > >>>>>>
> >> > > > >>>>>>
> >> > > > >>>>>
> >> > > > >>>>
> >> > > > >>
> >> > > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > *Madison J. Myers*
> > *UC Berkeley, Master of Information & Data Science '17*
> >
> > *King's College London, MA Political Science '14*
> > *New York University, BA Political Science '12*
> >
> > -
> > LinkedIn <http://linkedin.com/in/madisonjmyers>
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> *Madison J. Myers*
> *UC Berkeley, Master of Information & Data Science '17*
>
> *King's College London, MA Political Science '14*
> *New York University, BA Political Science '12*
>
> -
> LinkedIn <http://linkedin.com/in/madisonjmyers>
>
Re: [VOTE] SystemML New Logo Ideas
Posted by Madison Myers <ma...@gmail.com>.
+1 for SystemML action figures as well :D
On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 2:53 PM, Madison Myers <ma...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> +1 for what Mike said! I'd say 1 is my favorite and 4 is my second
> favorite. Would love to incorporate them all as suggested by Mike and
> Jeremy.
>
> These are really great, btw. Awesome work!
>
> On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 2:33 PM, Jeremy Anderson <
> jeremy@objectadjective.com> wrote:
>
>> +1 Mike.
>>
>> We're working on t-shirt designs, sticker designs, maybe buttons. Action
>> figures would be really cool!
>>
>> ...........................
>>
>> Jeremy Anderson
>> https://twitter.com/ObjectAdjective
>> http://www.linkedin.com/in/objectadjective
>>
>> On 21 October 2016 at 14:27, <du...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > I like all of these options! I'll give a +1 for #1 as the main logo,
>> and
>> > I also think it would be great to make use of the rest of the designs
>> > throughout the website and other project materials.
>> >
>> > Thanks!!
>> >
>> > -Mike
>> >
>> > --
>> >
>> > Mike Dusenberry
>> > GitHub: github.com/dusenberrymw
>> > LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/mikedusenberry
>> >
>> > Sent from my iPhone.
>> >
>> >
>> > > On Oct 21, 2016, at 1:01 PM, Niketan Pansare <np...@us.ibm.com>
>> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > All the logos are awesome, thanks design team !!
>> > >
>> > > I vote for #4.
>> > >
>> > > Thanks,
>> > >
>> > > Niketan Pansare
>> > > IBM Almaden Research Center
>> > > E-mail: npansar At us.ibm.com
>> > > http://researcher.watson.ibm.com/researcher/view.php?person=
>> us-npansar
>> > >
>> > > Deron Eriksson ---10/21/2016 12:57:25 PM---Given the overwhelming
>> > support for #1, I give my +1 to #1. Deron
>> > >
>> > > From: Deron Eriksson <de...@gmail.com>
>> > > To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
>> > > Date: 10/21/2016 12:57 PM
>> > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] SystemML New Logo Ideas
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > Given the overwhelming support for #1, I give my +1 to #1.
>> > >
>> > > Deron
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 12:46 PM, Jason Azares <
>> jason.azares@gmail.com>
>> > > wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > I vote for #1
>> > > >
>> > > > On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 12:27 PM, Matthias Boehm <
>> > mboehm7@googlemail.com>
>> > > > wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > > ha, that's interesting - thanks for the pointer Deron, I wasn't
>> > expecting
>> > > > > this at all. Somehow my eyes always ignored this.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Regards,
>> > > > > Matthias
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > > On 10/21/2016 9:22 PM, Deron Eriksson wrote:
>> > > > >
>> > > > >> I think they all look fantastic. My untrained eye likes the
>> > features of
>> > > > 3
>> > > > >> and 4 but I completely defer to the judgements of others here
>> since
>> > I
>> > > > have
>> > > > >> no training in design and the multitude of considerations
>> involved
>> > such
>> > > > as
>> > > > >> scalability.
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >> I believe the logo trademark is an official requirement of the
>> ASF (
>> > > > >> http://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/pmcs.html#graphics),
>> > although I
>> > > > >> don't know how strict this is.
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >> Deron
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >> On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 12:15 PM, Matthias Boehm <
>> > > > mboehm7@googlemail.com>
>> > > > >> wrote:
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >> Thanks for these proposals. For all the options, I'd prefer to
>> > remove
>> > > > the
>> > > > >>> TM - it's just a little odd for an open source project with no
>> > > > intentions
>> > > > >>> to register a trademark. I know, the new Spark logo has it too
>> but
>> > it's
>> > > > >>> probably a different context, especially since there are
>> > discussions to
>> > > > >>> add
>> > > > >>> SPARC support in Spark 2.1 ;-)
>> > > > >>>
>> > > > >>> Regards,
>> > > > >>> Matthias
>> > > > >>>
>> > > > >>>
>> > > > >>> On 10/21/2016 8:47 PM, Dexter Lesaca wrote:
>> > > > >>>
>> > > > >>> +1 for 1
>> > > > >>>>
>> > > > >>>> On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 11:44 AM Jeremy Anderson <
>> > > > >>>> jeremy@objectadjective.com>
>> > > > >>>> wrote:
>> > > > >>>>
>> > > > >>>> +1 on option 1 as well.
>> > > > >>>>
>> > > > >>>>>
>> > > > >>>>> For the 4 options, I think it's important that full logo with
>> > name
>> > > > and
>> > > > >>>>> mark, scales well. I'm concerned detail will get lost with the
>> > other
>> > > > 3,
>> > > > >>>>> at
>> > > > >>>>> small sizes. I would love to use all of the simple and
>> isometric
>> > > > >>>>> versions.
>> > > > >>>>> They make a great family.
>> > > > >>>>>
>> > > > >>>>> ...........................
>> > > > >>>>>
>> > > > >>>>> Jeremy Anderson
>> > > > >>>>> https://twitter.com/ObjectAdjective
>> > > > >>>>> http://www.linkedin.com/in/objectadjective
>> > > > >>>>>
>> > > > >>>>> On 21 October 2016 at 11:27, Frederick R Reiss <
>> > frreiss@us.ibm.com>
>> > > > >>>>> wrote:
>> > > > >>>>>
>> > > > >>>>> These are awesome! I'm more a fan of option #4 myself.
>> > > > >>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>> Fred
>> > > > >>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>> [image: Inactive hide details for Renee Mascarinas
>> ---10/21/2016
>> > > > >>>>>> 11:19:01
>> > > > >>>>>> AM---love these!!! thank you so much! +1 on option 1
>> > because]Renee
>> > > > >>>>>> Mascarinas ---10/21/2016 11:19:01 AM---love these!!! thank
>> you
>> > so
>> > > > >>>>>> much!
>> > > > >>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>> +1
>> > > > >>>>>
>> > > > >>>>> on option 1 because it's both minimalistic and fun!
>> > > > >>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>> From: Renee Mascarinas <re...@gmail.com>
>> > > > >>>>>> To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
>> > > > >>>>>> Date: 10/21/2016 11:19 AM
>> > > > >>>>>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] SystemML New Logo Ideas
>> > > > >>>>>> ------------------------------
>> > > > >>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>> love these!!! thank you so much!
>> > > > >>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>> +1 on option 1 because it's both minimalistic and fun!
>> > > > >>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>> On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 10:50 AM, Rose Peng <
>> > rosypenguin@gmail.com>
>> > > > >>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>> wrote:
>> > > > >>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>> imgur: http://i.imgur.com/iuvOIDB.png
>> > > > >>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>> google drive:
>> > > > >>>>>>> https://drive.google.com/file/
>> d/0B70RXaqBkBoydnlZQUF3N3NUa2c/
>> > > > >>>>>>> view?usp=sharing
>> > > > >>>>>>> <https://drive.google.com/file
>> /d/0B70RXaqBkBoydnlZQUF3N3NUa2c/
>> > > > >>>>>>> view?usp=sharing>
>> > > > >>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>> Hopefully one of these work.
>> > > > >>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>> Thanks,
>> > > > >>>>>>> Rose
>> > > > >>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 8:41 PM, Felix Schüler <
>> > > > fschueler@posteo.de>
>> > > > >>>>>>> wrote:
>> > > > >>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>> Hi Rose,
>> > > > >>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>> I believe the attachment was removed - probably because of
>> > size
>> > > > >>>>>>>> limitations. Could you upload it somewhere else and share
>> the
>> > > > link?
>> > > > >>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>> Felix
>> > > > >>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>> On 20.10.2016 20:02, Rose Peng wrote:
>> > > > >>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>> Hi everyone,
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>> The design team has explored a few logo concepts, and we
>> > would
>> > > > love
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>> to
>> > > > >>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>> see which ideas you like the most! We're looking for a logo
>> that
>> > > > >>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>> conveys
>> > > > >>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>> optimization, and we came up with a robot. The smile is
>> > inspired
>> > > > >>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>> by a
>> > > > >>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>> matrix bracket to bring to mind the mathematical background of
>> > > > >>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>> SystemML.
>> > > > >>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>> In the attached image, we have two main types of logo
>> > > > explorations.
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>> One
>> > > > >>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>> is a simple forward-facing robot and the other is an
>> isometric
>> > > > >>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>> interpretation. Below that we pulled out a few to show how
>> > they
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>> would
>> > > > >>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>> look as logos besides the words "Apache SystemML".
>> > > > >>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>> Ultimately, we want the robot to have interchangeable
>> parts
>> > to
>> > > > >>>>>>>>> communicate the customizability of algorithms that
>> SystemML
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>> provides,
>> > > > >>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>> so
>> > > > >>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>> whatever logo ends up being chosen it could still have
>> several
>> > > > >>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>> variations.
>> > > > >>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>> Personally, we like concept #1 for the minimal look, but
>> we'd
>> > > > love
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>> to
>> > > > >>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>> hear your thoughts. Feel free to mix and match or make other
>> > > > >>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>> suggestions
>> > > > >>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>> that we can take into consideration.
>> > > > >>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>> Thanks!
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>> ----------------------------------------
>> > > > >>>>>>>>> *Rose Peng*
>> > > > >>>>>>>>> MS HCI 2015 - Georgia Institute of Technology
>> > > > >>>>>>>>> (www.rosepeng.com <http://www.rosepeng.com/>)
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>> --
>> > > > >>>>>>> ----------------------------------------
>> > > > >>>>>>> *Rose Peng*
>> > > > >>>>>>> MS HCI 2015 - Georgia Institute of Technology
>> > > > >>>>>>> (www.rosepeng.com)
>> > > > >>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>
>> > > > >>>>
>> > > > >>
>> > > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> >
>>
>
>
>
> --
> *Madison J. Myers*
> *UC Berkeley, Master of Information & Data Science '17*
>
> *King's College London, MA Political Science '14*
> *New York University, BA Political Science '12*
>
> -
> LinkedIn <http://linkedin.com/in/madisonjmyers>
>
>
--
*Madison J. Myers*
*UC Berkeley, Master of Information & Data Science '17*
*King's College London, MA Political Science '14*
*New York University, BA Political Science '12*
-
LinkedIn <http://linkedin.com/in/madisonjmyers>
Re: [VOTE] SystemML New Logo Ideas
Posted by Madison Myers <ma...@gmail.com>.
+1 for what Mike said! I'd say 1 is my favorite and 4 is my second
favorite. Would love to incorporate them all as suggested by Mike and
Jeremy.
These are really great, btw. Awesome work!
On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 2:33 PM, Jeremy Anderson <jeremy@objectadjective.com
> wrote:
> +1 Mike.
>
> We're working on t-shirt designs, sticker designs, maybe buttons. Action
> figures would be really cool!
>
> ...........................
>
> Jeremy Anderson
> https://twitter.com/ObjectAdjective
> http://www.linkedin.com/in/objectadjective
>
> On 21 October 2016 at 14:27, <du...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > I like all of these options! I'll give a +1 for #1 as the main logo, and
> > I also think it would be great to make use of the rest of the designs
> > throughout the website and other project materials.
> >
> > Thanks!!
> >
> > -Mike
> >
> > --
> >
> > Mike Dusenberry
> > GitHub: github.com/dusenberrymw
> > LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/mikedusenberry
> >
> > Sent from my iPhone.
> >
> >
> > > On Oct 21, 2016, at 1:01 PM, Niketan Pansare <np...@us.ibm.com>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > All the logos are awesome, thanks design team !!
> > >
> > > I vote for #4.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > Niketan Pansare
> > > IBM Almaden Research Center
> > > E-mail: npansar At us.ibm.com
> > > http://researcher.watson.ibm.com/researcher/view.php?person=us-npansar
> > >
> > > Deron Eriksson ---10/21/2016 12:57:25 PM---Given the overwhelming
> > support for #1, I give my +1 to #1. Deron
> > >
> > > From: Deron Eriksson <de...@gmail.com>
> > > To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
> > > Date: 10/21/2016 12:57 PM
> > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] SystemML New Logo Ideas
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Given the overwhelming support for #1, I give my +1 to #1.
> > >
> > > Deron
> > >
> > >
> > > On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 12:46 PM, Jason Azares <jason.azares@gmail.com
> >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > I vote for #1
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 12:27 PM, Matthias Boehm <
> > mboehm7@googlemail.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > ha, that's interesting - thanks for the pointer Deron, I wasn't
> > expecting
> > > > > this at all. Somehow my eyes always ignored this.
> > > > >
> > > > > Regards,
> > > > > Matthias
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On 10/21/2016 9:22 PM, Deron Eriksson wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >> I think they all look fantastic. My untrained eye likes the
> > features of
> > > > 3
> > > > >> and 4 but I completely defer to the judgements of others here
> since
> > I
> > > > have
> > > > >> no training in design and the multitude of considerations involved
> > such
> > > > as
> > > > >> scalability.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> I believe the logo trademark is an official requirement of the
> ASF (
> > > > >> http://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/pmcs.html#graphics),
> > although I
> > > > >> don't know how strict this is.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Deron
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 12:15 PM, Matthias Boehm <
> > > > mboehm7@googlemail.com>
> > > > >> wrote:
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Thanks for these proposals. For all the options, I'd prefer to
> > remove
> > > > the
> > > > >>> TM - it's just a little odd for an open source project with no
> > > > intentions
> > > > >>> to register a trademark. I know, the new Spark logo has it too
> but
> > it's
> > > > >>> probably a different context, especially since there are
> > discussions to
> > > > >>> add
> > > > >>> SPARC support in Spark 2.1 ;-)
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> Regards,
> > > > >>> Matthias
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> On 10/21/2016 8:47 PM, Dexter Lesaca wrote:
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> +1 for 1
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 11:44 AM Jeremy Anderson <
> > > > >>>> jeremy@objectadjective.com>
> > > > >>>> wrote:
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> +1 on option 1 as well.
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>> For the 4 options, I think it's important that full logo with
> > name
> > > > and
> > > > >>>>> mark, scales well. I'm concerned detail will get lost with the
> > other
> > > > 3,
> > > > >>>>> at
> > > > >>>>> small sizes. I would love to use all of the simple and
> isometric
> > > > >>>>> versions.
> > > > >>>>> They make a great family.
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>> ...........................
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>> Jeremy Anderson
> > > > >>>>> https://twitter.com/ObjectAdjective
> > > > >>>>> http://www.linkedin.com/in/objectadjective
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>> On 21 October 2016 at 11:27, Frederick R Reiss <
> > frreiss@us.ibm.com>
> > > > >>>>> wrote:
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>> These are awesome! I'm more a fan of option #4 myself.
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>> Fred
> > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>> [image: Inactive hide details for Renee Mascarinas
> ---10/21/2016
> > > > >>>>>> 11:19:01
> > > > >>>>>> AM---love these!!! thank you so much! +1 on option 1
> > because]Renee
> > > > >>>>>> Mascarinas ---10/21/2016 11:19:01 AM---love these!!! thank you
> > so
> > > > >>>>>> much!
> > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>> +1
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>> on option 1 because it's both minimalistic and fun!
> > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>> From: Renee Mascarinas <re...@gmail.com>
> > > > >>>>>> To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
> > > > >>>>>> Date: 10/21/2016 11:19 AM
> > > > >>>>>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] SystemML New Logo Ideas
> > > > >>>>>> ------------------------------
> > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>> love these!!! thank you so much!
> > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>> +1 on option 1 because it's both minimalistic and fun!
> > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>> On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 10:50 AM, Rose Peng <
> > rosypenguin@gmail.com>
> > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>> wrote:
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>>> imgur: http://i.imgur.com/iuvOIDB.png
> > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>> google drive:
> > > > >>>>>>> https://drive.google.com/file/d/
> 0B70RXaqBkBoydnlZQUF3N3NUa2c/
> > > > >>>>>>> view?usp=sharing
> > > > >>>>>>> <https://drive.google.com/file/d/
> 0B70RXaqBkBoydnlZQUF3N3NUa2c/
> > > > >>>>>>> view?usp=sharing>
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>> Hopefully one of these work.
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>> Thanks,
> > > > >>>>>>> Rose
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 8:41 PM, Felix Schüler <
> > > > fschueler@posteo.de>
> > > > >>>>>>> wrote:
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>> Hi Rose,
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>> I believe the attachment was removed - probably because of
> > size
> > > > >>>>>>>> limitations. Could you upload it somewhere else and share
> the
> > > > link?
> > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>> Felix
> > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>> On 20.10.2016 20:02, Rose Peng wrote:
> > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>> Hi everyone,
> > > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>> The design team has explored a few logo concepts, and we
> > would
> > > > love
> > > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>> to
> > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>> see which ideas you like the most! We're looking for a logo
> that
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>> conveys
> > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>> optimization, and we came up with a robot. The smile is
> > inspired
> > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>> by a
> > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>> matrix bracket to bring to mind the mathematical background of
> > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>> SystemML.
> > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>> In the attached image, we have two main types of logo
> > > > explorations.
> > > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>> One
> > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>> is a simple forward-facing robot and the other is an isometric
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>> interpretation. Below that we pulled out a few to show how
> > they
> > > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>> would
> > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>> look as logos besides the words "Apache SystemML".
> > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>> Ultimately, we want the robot to have interchangeable parts
> > to
> > > > >>>>>>>>> communicate the customizability of algorithms that SystemML
> > > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>> provides,
> > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>> so
> > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>> whatever logo ends up being chosen it could still have
> several
> > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>> variations.
> > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>> Personally, we like concept #1 for the minimal look, but
> we'd
> > > > love
> > > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>> to
> > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>> hear your thoughts. Feel free to mix and match or make other
> > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>> suggestions
> > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>> that we can take into consideration.
> > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>> Thanks!
> > > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>> ----------------------------------------
> > > > >>>>>>>>> *Rose Peng*
> > > > >>>>>>>>> MS HCI 2015 - Georgia Institute of Technology
> > > > >>>>>>>>> (www.rosepeng.com <http://www.rosepeng.com/>)
> > > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>> --
> > > > >>>>>>> ----------------------------------------
> > > > >>>>>>> *Rose Peng*
> > > > >>>>>>> MS HCI 2015 - Georgia Institute of Technology
> > > > >>>>>>> (www.rosepeng.com)
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
--
*Madison J. Myers*
*UC Berkeley, Master of Information & Data Science '17*
*King's College London, MA Political Science '14*
*New York University, BA Political Science '12*
-
LinkedIn <http://linkedin.com/in/madisonjmyers>
Re: [VOTE] SystemML New Logo Ideas
Posted by Jeremy Anderson <je...@objectadjective.com>.
+1 Mike.
We're working on t-shirt designs, sticker designs, maybe buttons. Action
figures would be really cool!
...........................
Jeremy Anderson
https://twitter.com/ObjectAdjective
http://www.linkedin.com/in/objectadjective
On 21 October 2016 at 14:27, <du...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I like all of these options! I'll give a +1 for #1 as the main logo, and
> I also think it would be great to make use of the rest of the designs
> throughout the website and other project materials.
>
> Thanks!!
>
> -Mike
>
> --
>
> Mike Dusenberry
> GitHub: github.com/dusenberrymw
> LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/mikedusenberry
>
> Sent from my iPhone.
>
>
> > On Oct 21, 2016, at 1:01 PM, Niketan Pansare <np...@us.ibm.com> wrote:
> >
> > All the logos are awesome, thanks design team !!
> >
> > I vote for #4.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Niketan Pansare
> > IBM Almaden Research Center
> > E-mail: npansar At us.ibm.com
> > http://researcher.watson.ibm.com/researcher/view.php?person=us-npansar
> >
> > Deron Eriksson ---10/21/2016 12:57:25 PM---Given the overwhelming
> support for #1, I give my +1 to #1. Deron
> >
> > From: Deron Eriksson <de...@gmail.com>
> > To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
> > Date: 10/21/2016 12:57 PM
> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] SystemML New Logo Ideas
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Given the overwhelming support for #1, I give my +1 to #1.
> >
> > Deron
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 12:46 PM, Jason Azares <ja...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > I vote for #1
> > >
> > > On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 12:27 PM, Matthias Boehm <
> mboehm7@googlemail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > ha, that's interesting - thanks for the pointer Deron, I wasn't
> expecting
> > > > this at all. Somehow my eyes always ignored this.
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > > Matthias
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On 10/21/2016 9:22 PM, Deron Eriksson wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> I think they all look fantastic. My untrained eye likes the
> features of
> > > 3
> > > >> and 4 but I completely defer to the judgements of others here since
> I
> > > have
> > > >> no training in design and the multitude of considerations involved
> such
> > > as
> > > >> scalability.
> > > >>
> > > >> I believe the logo trademark is an official requirement of the ASF (
> > > >> http://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/pmcs.html#graphics),
> although I
> > > >> don't know how strict this is.
> > > >>
> > > >> Deron
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 12:15 PM, Matthias Boehm <
> > > mboehm7@googlemail.com>
> > > >> wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> Thanks for these proposals. For all the options, I'd prefer to
> remove
> > > the
> > > >>> TM - it's just a little odd for an open source project with no
> > > intentions
> > > >>> to register a trademark. I know, the new Spark logo has it too but
> it's
> > > >>> probably a different context, especially since there are
> discussions to
> > > >>> add
> > > >>> SPARC support in Spark 2.1 ;-)
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Regards,
> > > >>> Matthias
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>> On 10/21/2016 8:47 PM, Dexter Lesaca wrote:
> > > >>>
> > > >>> +1 for 1
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 11:44 AM Jeremy Anderson <
> > > >>>> jeremy@objectadjective.com>
> > > >>>> wrote:
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> +1 on option 1 as well.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> For the 4 options, I think it's important that full logo with
> name
> > > and
> > > >>>>> mark, scales well. I'm concerned detail will get lost with the
> other
> > > 3,
> > > >>>>> at
> > > >>>>> small sizes. I would love to use all of the simple and isometric
> > > >>>>> versions.
> > > >>>>> They make a great family.
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> ...........................
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> Jeremy Anderson
> > > >>>>> https://twitter.com/ObjectAdjective
> > > >>>>> http://www.linkedin.com/in/objectadjective
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> On 21 October 2016 at 11:27, Frederick R Reiss <
> frreiss@us.ibm.com>
> > > >>>>> wrote:
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> These are awesome! I'm more a fan of option #4 myself.
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> Fred
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> [image: Inactive hide details for Renee Mascarinas ---10/21/2016
> > > >>>>>> 11:19:01
> > > >>>>>> AM---love these!!! thank you so much! +1 on option 1
> because]Renee
> > > >>>>>> Mascarinas ---10/21/2016 11:19:01 AM---love these!!! thank you
> so
> > > >>>>>> much!
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> +1
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> on option 1 because it's both minimalistic and fun!
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> From: Renee Mascarinas <re...@gmail.com>
> > > >>>>>> To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
> > > >>>>>> Date: 10/21/2016 11:19 AM
> > > >>>>>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] SystemML New Logo Ideas
> > > >>>>>> ------------------------------
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> love these!!! thank you so much!
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> +1 on option 1 because it's both minimalistic and fun!
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 10:50 AM, Rose Peng <
> rosypenguin@gmail.com>
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> wrote:
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>> imgur: http://i.imgur.com/iuvOIDB.png
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> google drive:
> > > >>>>>>> https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B70RXaqBkBoydnlZQUF3N3NUa2c/
> > > >>>>>>> view?usp=sharing
> > > >>>>>>> <https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B70RXaqBkBoydnlZQUF3N3NUa2c/
> > > >>>>>>> view?usp=sharing>
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> Hopefully one of these work.
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> Thanks,
> > > >>>>>>> Rose
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 8:41 PM, Felix Schüler <
> > > fschueler@posteo.de>
> > > >>>>>>> wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> Hi Rose,
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>> I believe the attachment was removed - probably because of
> size
> > > >>>>>>>> limitations. Could you upload it somewhere else and share the
> > > link?
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>> Felix
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>> On 20.10.2016 20:02, Rose Peng wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>> Hi everyone,
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>> The design team has explored a few logo concepts, and we
> would
> > > love
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>> to
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> see which ideas you like the most! We're looking for a logo that
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>> conveys
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> optimization, and we came up with a robot. The smile is
> inspired
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>> by a
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>> matrix bracket to bring to mind the mathematical background of
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>> SystemML.
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>> In the attached image, we have two main types of logo
> > > explorations.
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>> One
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> is a simple forward-facing robot and the other is an isometric
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>> interpretation. Below that we pulled out a few to show how
> they
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>> would
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>> look as logos besides the words "Apache SystemML".
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>> Ultimately, we want the robot to have interchangeable parts
> to
> > > >>>>>>>>> communicate the customizability of algorithms that SystemML
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>> provides,
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>> so
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> whatever logo ends up being chosen it could still have several
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>> variations.
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>> Personally, we like concept #1 for the minimal look, but we'd
> > > love
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>> to
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>> hear your thoughts. Feel free to mix and match or make other
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>> suggestions
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> that we can take into consideration.
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>> Thanks!
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>> ----------------------------------------
> > > >>>>>>>>> *Rose Peng*
> > > >>>>>>>>> MS HCI 2015 - Georgia Institute of Technology
> > > >>>>>>>>> (www.rosepeng.com <http://www.rosepeng.com/>)
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> --
> > > >>>>>>> ----------------------------------------
> > > >>>>>>> *Rose Peng*
> > > >>>>>>> MS HCI 2015 - Georgia Institute of Technology
> > > >>>>>>> (www.rosepeng.com)
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>
> > >
> >
> >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] SystemML New Logo Ideas
Posted by du...@gmail.com.
I like all of these options! I'll give a +1 for #1 as the main logo, and I also think it would be great to make use of the rest of the designs throughout the website and other project materials.
Thanks!!
-Mike
--
Mike Dusenberry
GitHub: github.com/dusenberrymw
LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/mikedusenberry
Sent from my iPhone.
> On Oct 21, 2016, at 1:01 PM, Niketan Pansare <np...@us.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> All the logos are awesome, thanks design team !!
>
> I vote for #4.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Niketan Pansare
> IBM Almaden Research Center
> E-mail: npansar At us.ibm.com
> http://researcher.watson.ibm.com/researcher/view.php?person=us-npansar
>
> Deron Eriksson ---10/21/2016 12:57:25 PM---Given the overwhelming support for #1, I give my +1 to #1. Deron
>
> From: Deron Eriksson <de...@gmail.com>
> To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
> Date: 10/21/2016 12:57 PM
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] SystemML New Logo Ideas
>
>
>
>
> Given the overwhelming support for #1, I give my +1 to #1.
>
> Deron
>
>
> On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 12:46 PM, Jason Azares <ja...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > I vote for #1
> >
> > On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 12:27 PM, Matthias Boehm <mb...@googlemail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > ha, that's interesting - thanks for the pointer Deron, I wasn't expecting
> > > this at all. Somehow my eyes always ignored this.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Matthias
> > >
> > >
> > > On 10/21/2016 9:22 PM, Deron Eriksson wrote:
> > >
> > >> I think they all look fantastic. My untrained eye likes the features of
> > 3
> > >> and 4 but I completely defer to the judgements of others here since I
> > have
> > >> no training in design and the multitude of considerations involved such
> > as
> > >> scalability.
> > >>
> > >> I believe the logo trademark is an official requirement of the ASF (
> > >> http://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/pmcs.html#graphics), although I
> > >> don't know how strict this is.
> > >>
> > >> Deron
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 12:15 PM, Matthias Boehm <
> > mboehm7@googlemail.com>
> > >> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Thanks for these proposals. For all the options, I'd prefer to remove
> > the
> > >>> TM - it's just a little odd for an open source project with no
> > intentions
> > >>> to register a trademark. I know, the new Spark logo has it too but it's
> > >>> probably a different context, especially since there are discussions to
> > >>> add
> > >>> SPARC support in Spark 2.1 ;-)
> > >>>
> > >>> Regards,
> > >>> Matthias
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> On 10/21/2016 8:47 PM, Dexter Lesaca wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>> +1 for 1
> > >>>>
> > >>>> On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 11:44 AM Jeremy Anderson <
> > >>>> jeremy@objectadjective.com>
> > >>>> wrote:
> > >>>>
> > >>>> +1 on option 1 as well.
> > >>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> For the 4 options, I think it's important that full logo with name
> > and
> > >>>>> mark, scales well. I'm concerned detail will get lost with the other
> > 3,
> > >>>>> at
> > >>>>> small sizes. I would love to use all of the simple and isometric
> > >>>>> versions.
> > >>>>> They make a great family.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> ...........................
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Jeremy Anderson
> > >>>>> https://twitter.com/ObjectAdjective
> > >>>>> http://www.linkedin.com/in/objectadjective
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> On 21 October 2016 at 11:27, Frederick R Reiss <fr...@us.ibm.com>
> > >>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> These are awesome! I'm more a fan of option #4 myself.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> Fred
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> [image: Inactive hide details for Renee Mascarinas ---10/21/2016
> > >>>>>> 11:19:01
> > >>>>>> AM---love these!!! thank you so much! +1 on option 1 because]Renee
> > >>>>>> Mascarinas ---10/21/2016 11:19:01 AM---love these!!! thank you so
> > >>>>>> much!
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> +1
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> on option 1 because it's both minimalistic and fun!
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> From: Renee Mascarinas <re...@gmail.com>
> > >>>>>> To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
> > >>>>>> Date: 10/21/2016 11:19 AM
> > >>>>>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] SystemML New Logo Ideas
> > >>>>>> ------------------------------
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> love these!!! thank you so much!
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> +1 on option 1 because it's both minimalistic and fun!
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 10:50 AM, Rose Peng <ro...@gmail.com>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>> imgur: http://i.imgur.com/iuvOIDB.png
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> google drive:
> > >>>>>>> https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B70RXaqBkBoydnlZQUF3N3NUa2c/
> > >>>>>>> view?usp=sharing
> > >>>>>>> <https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B70RXaqBkBoydnlZQUF3N3NUa2c/
> > >>>>>>> view?usp=sharing>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Hopefully one of these work.
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Thanks,
> > >>>>>>> Rose
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 8:41 PM, Felix Schüler <
> > fschueler@posteo.de>
> > >>>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Hi Rose,
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> I believe the attachment was removed - probably because of size
> > >>>>>>>> limitations. Could you upload it somewhere else and share the
> > link?
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> Felix
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> On 20.10.2016 20:02, Rose Peng wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> Hi everyone,
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> The design team has explored a few logo concepts, and we would
> > love
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> to
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>> see which ideas you like the most! We're looking for a logo that
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> conveys
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> optimization, and we came up with a robot. The smile is inspired
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> by a
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>> matrix bracket to bring to mind the mathematical background of
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> SystemML.
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> In the attached image, we have two main types of logo
> > explorations.
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> One
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>> is a simple forward-facing robot and the other is an isometric
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> interpretation. Below that we pulled out a few to show how they
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> would
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>> look as logos besides the words "Apache SystemML".
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> Ultimately, we want the robot to have interchangeable parts to
> > >>>>>>>>> communicate the customizability of algorithms that SystemML
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> provides,
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>> so
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> whatever logo ends up being chosen it could still have several
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> variations.
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> Personally, we like concept #1 for the minimal look, but we'd
> > love
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> to
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>> hear your thoughts. Feel free to mix and match or make other
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> suggestions
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> that we can take into consideration.
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> Thanks!
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> ----------------------------------------
> > >>>>>>>>> *Rose Peng*
> > >>>>>>>>> MS HCI 2015 - Georgia Institute of Technology
> > >>>>>>>>> (www.rosepeng.com <http://www.rosepeng.com/>)
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> --
> > >>>>>>> ----------------------------------------
> > >>>>>>> *Rose Peng*
> > >>>>>>> MS HCI 2015 - Georgia Institute of Technology
> > >>>>>>> (www.rosepeng.com)
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>
> >
>
>
>
Re: [VOTE] SystemML New Logo Ideas
Posted by Niketan Pansare <np...@us.ibm.com>.
All the logos are awesome, thanks design team !!
I vote for #4.
Thanks,
Niketan Pansare
IBM Almaden Research Center
E-mail: npansar At us.ibm.com
http://researcher.watson.ibm.com/researcher/view.php?person=us-npansar
From: Deron Eriksson <de...@gmail.com>
To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
Date: 10/21/2016 12:57 PM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] SystemML New Logo Ideas
Given the overwhelming support for #1, I give my +1 to #1.
Deron
On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 12:46 PM, Jason Azares <ja...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> I vote for #1
>
> On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 12:27 PM, Matthias Boehm <mb...@googlemail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > ha, that's interesting - thanks for the pointer Deron, I wasn't
expecting
> > this at all. Somehow my eyes always ignored this.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Matthias
> >
> >
> > On 10/21/2016 9:22 PM, Deron Eriksson wrote:
> >
> >> I think they all look fantastic. My untrained eye likes the features
of
> 3
> >> and 4 but I completely defer to the judgements of others here since I
> have
> >> no training in design and the multitude of considerations involved
such
> as
> >> scalability.
> >>
> >> I believe the logo trademark is an official requirement of the ASF (
> >> http://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/pmcs.html#graphics), although I
> >> don't know how strict this is.
> >>
> >> Deron
> >>
> >>
> >> On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 12:15 PM, Matthias Boehm <
> mboehm7@googlemail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> Thanks for these proposals. For all the options, I'd prefer to remove
> the
> >>> TM - it's just a little odd for an open source project with no
> intentions
> >>> to register a trademark. I know, the new Spark logo has it too but
it's
> >>> probably a different context, especially since there are discussions
to
> >>> add
> >>> SPARC support in Spark 2.1 ;-)
> >>>
> >>> Regards,
> >>> Matthias
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On 10/21/2016 8:47 PM, Dexter Lesaca wrote:
> >>>
> >>> +1 for 1
> >>>>
> >>>> On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 11:44 AM Jeremy Anderson <
> >>>> jeremy@objectadjective.com>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> +1 on option 1 as well.
> >>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> For the 4 options, I think it's important that full logo with name
> and
> >>>>> mark, scales well. I'm concerned detail will get lost with the
other
> 3,
> >>>>> at
> >>>>> small sizes. I would love to use all of the simple and isometric
> >>>>> versions.
> >>>>> They make a great family.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> ...........................
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Jeremy Anderson
> >>>>> https://twitter.com/ObjectAdjective
> >>>>> http://www.linkedin.com/in/objectadjective
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On 21 October 2016 at 11:27, Frederick R Reiss <fr...@us.ibm.com>
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> These are awesome! I'm more a fan of option #4 myself.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Fred
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> [image: Inactive hide details for Renee Mascarinas ---10/21/2016
> >>>>>> 11:19:01
> >>>>>> AM---love these!!! thank you so much! +1 on option 1 because]Renee
> >>>>>> Mascarinas ---10/21/2016 11:19:01 AM---love these!!! thank you so
> >>>>>> much!
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> +1
> >>>>>
> >>>>> on option 1 because it's both minimalistic and fun!
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> From: Renee Mascarinas <re...@gmail.com>
> >>>>>> To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
> >>>>>> Date: 10/21/2016 11:19 AM
> >>>>>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] SystemML New Logo Ideas
> >>>>>> ------------------------------
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> love these!!! thank you so much!
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> +1 on option 1 because it's both minimalistic and fun!
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 10:50 AM, Rose Peng
<ro...@gmail.com>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> imgur: http://i.imgur.com/iuvOIDB.png
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> google drive:
> >>>>>>> https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B70RXaqBkBoydnlZQUF3N3NUa2c/
> >>>>>>> view?usp=sharing
> >>>>>>> <https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B70RXaqBkBoydnlZQUF3N3NUa2c/
> >>>>>>> view?usp=sharing>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Hopefully one of these work.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>>>> Rose
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 8:41 PM, Felix Schüler <
> fschueler@posteo.de>
> >>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Hi Rose,
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> I believe the attachment was removed - probably because of size
> >>>>>>>> limitations. Could you upload it somewhere else and share the
> link?
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Felix
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On 20.10.2016 20:02, Rose Peng wrote:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Hi everyone,
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> The design team has explored a few logo concepts, and we would
> love
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> to
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>> see which ideas you like the most! We're looking for a logo that
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> conveys
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> optimization, and we came up with a robot. The smile is inspired
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> by a
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>> matrix bracket to bring to mind the mathematical background of
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> SystemML.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> In the attached image, we have two main types of logo
> explorations.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> One
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>> is a simple forward-facing robot and the other is an isometric
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> interpretation. Below that we pulled out a few to show how they
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> would
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>> look as logos besides the words "Apache SystemML".
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Ultimately, we want the robot to have interchangeable parts to
> >>>>>>>>> communicate the customizability of algorithms that SystemML
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> provides,
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>> so
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> whatever logo ends up being chosen it could still have several
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> variations.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Personally, we like concept #1 for the minimal look, but we'd
> love
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> to
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>> hear your thoughts. Feel free to mix and match or make other
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> suggestions
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> that we can take into consideration.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Thanks!
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> ----------------------------------------
> >>>>>>>>> *Rose Peng*
> >>>>>>>>> MS HCI 2015 - Georgia Institute of Technology
> >>>>>>>>> (www.rosepeng.com <http://www.rosepeng.com/>)
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>> ----------------------------------------
> >>>>>>> *Rose Peng*
> >>>>>>> MS HCI 2015 - Georgia Institute of Technology
> >>>>>>> (www.rosepeng.com)
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>
>
Re: [VOTE] SystemML New Logo Ideas
Posted by Deron Eriksson <de...@gmail.com>.
Given the overwhelming support for #1, I give my +1 to #1.
Deron
On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 12:46 PM, Jason Azares <ja...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> I vote for #1
>
> On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 12:27 PM, Matthias Boehm <mb...@googlemail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > ha, that's interesting - thanks for the pointer Deron, I wasn't expecting
> > this at all. Somehow my eyes always ignored this.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Matthias
> >
> >
> > On 10/21/2016 9:22 PM, Deron Eriksson wrote:
> >
> >> I think they all look fantastic. My untrained eye likes the features of
> 3
> >> and 4 but I completely defer to the judgements of others here since I
> have
> >> no training in design and the multitude of considerations involved such
> as
> >> scalability.
> >>
> >> I believe the logo trademark is an official requirement of the ASF (
> >> http://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/pmcs.html#graphics), although I
> >> don't know how strict this is.
> >>
> >> Deron
> >>
> >>
> >> On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 12:15 PM, Matthias Boehm <
> mboehm7@googlemail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> Thanks for these proposals. For all the options, I'd prefer to remove
> the
> >>> TM - it's just a little odd for an open source project with no
> intentions
> >>> to register a trademark. I know, the new Spark logo has it too but it's
> >>> probably a different context, especially since there are discussions to
> >>> add
> >>> SPARC support in Spark 2.1 ;-)
> >>>
> >>> Regards,
> >>> Matthias
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On 10/21/2016 8:47 PM, Dexter Lesaca wrote:
> >>>
> >>> +1 for 1
> >>>>
> >>>> On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 11:44 AM Jeremy Anderson <
> >>>> jeremy@objectadjective.com>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> +1 on option 1 as well.
> >>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> For the 4 options, I think it's important that full logo with name
> and
> >>>>> mark, scales well. I'm concerned detail will get lost with the other
> 3,
> >>>>> at
> >>>>> small sizes. I would love to use all of the simple and isometric
> >>>>> versions.
> >>>>> They make a great family.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> ...........................
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Jeremy Anderson
> >>>>> https://twitter.com/ObjectAdjective
> >>>>> http://www.linkedin.com/in/objectadjective
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On 21 October 2016 at 11:27, Frederick R Reiss <fr...@us.ibm.com>
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> These are awesome! I'm more a fan of option #4 myself.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Fred
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> [image: Inactive hide details for Renee Mascarinas ---10/21/2016
> >>>>>> 11:19:01
> >>>>>> AM---love these!!! thank you so much! +1 on option 1 because]Renee
> >>>>>> Mascarinas ---10/21/2016 11:19:01 AM---love these!!! thank you so
> >>>>>> much!
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> +1
> >>>>>
> >>>>> on option 1 because it's both minimalistic and fun!
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> From: Renee Mascarinas <re...@gmail.com>
> >>>>>> To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
> >>>>>> Date: 10/21/2016 11:19 AM
> >>>>>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] SystemML New Logo Ideas
> >>>>>> ------------------------------
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> love these!!! thank you so much!
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> +1 on option 1 because it's both minimalistic and fun!
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 10:50 AM, Rose Peng <ro...@gmail.com>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> imgur: http://i.imgur.com/iuvOIDB.png
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> google drive:
> >>>>>>> https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B70RXaqBkBoydnlZQUF3N3NUa2c/
> >>>>>>> view?usp=sharing
> >>>>>>> <https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B70RXaqBkBoydnlZQUF3N3NUa2c/
> >>>>>>> view?usp=sharing>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Hopefully one of these work.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>>>> Rose
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 8:41 PM, Felix Schüler <
> fschueler@posteo.de>
> >>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Hi Rose,
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> I believe the attachment was removed - probably because of size
> >>>>>>>> limitations. Could you upload it somewhere else and share the
> link?
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Felix
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On 20.10.2016 20:02, Rose Peng wrote:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Hi everyone,
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> The design team has explored a few logo concepts, and we would
> love
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> to
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>> see which ideas you like the most! We're looking for a logo that
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> conveys
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> optimization, and we came up with a robot. The smile is inspired
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> by a
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>> matrix bracket to bring to mind the mathematical background of
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> SystemML.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> In the attached image, we have two main types of logo
> explorations.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> One
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>> is a simple forward-facing robot and the other is an isometric
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> interpretation. Below that we pulled out a few to show how they
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> would
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>> look as logos besides the words "Apache SystemML".
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Ultimately, we want the robot to have interchangeable parts to
> >>>>>>>>> communicate the customizability of algorithms that SystemML
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> provides,
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>> so
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> whatever logo ends up being chosen it could still have several
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> variations.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Personally, we like concept #1 for the minimal look, but we'd
> love
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> to
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>> hear your thoughts. Feel free to mix and match or make other
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> suggestions
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> that we can take into consideration.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Thanks!
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> ----------------------------------------
> >>>>>>>>> *Rose Peng*
> >>>>>>>>> MS HCI 2015 - Georgia Institute of Technology
> >>>>>>>>> (www.rosepeng.com <http://www.rosepeng.com/>)
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>> ----------------------------------------
> >>>>>>> *Rose Peng*
> >>>>>>> MS HCI 2015 - Georgia Institute of Technology
> >>>>>>> (www.rosepeng.com)
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>
>
Re: [VOTE] SystemML New Logo Ideas
Posted by Jason Azares <ja...@gmail.com>.
I vote for #1
On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 12:27 PM, Matthias Boehm <mb...@googlemail.com>
wrote:
> ha, that's interesting - thanks for the pointer Deron, I wasn't expecting
> this at all. Somehow my eyes always ignored this.
>
> Regards,
> Matthias
>
>
> On 10/21/2016 9:22 PM, Deron Eriksson wrote:
>
>> I think they all look fantastic. My untrained eye likes the features of 3
>> and 4 but I completely defer to the judgements of others here since I have
>> no training in design and the multitude of considerations involved such as
>> scalability.
>>
>> I believe the logo trademark is an official requirement of the ASF (
>> http://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/pmcs.html#graphics), although I
>> don't know how strict this is.
>>
>> Deron
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 12:15 PM, Matthias Boehm <mb...@googlemail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Thanks for these proposals. For all the options, I'd prefer to remove the
>>> TM - it's just a little odd for an open source project with no intentions
>>> to register a trademark. I know, the new Spark logo has it too but it's
>>> probably a different context, especially since there are discussions to
>>> add
>>> SPARC support in Spark 2.1 ;-)
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Matthias
>>>
>>>
>>> On 10/21/2016 8:47 PM, Dexter Lesaca wrote:
>>>
>>> +1 for 1
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 11:44 AM Jeremy Anderson <
>>>> jeremy@objectadjective.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> +1 on option 1 as well.
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> For the 4 options, I think it's important that full logo with name and
>>>>> mark, scales well. I'm concerned detail will get lost with the other 3,
>>>>> at
>>>>> small sizes. I would love to use all of the simple and isometric
>>>>> versions.
>>>>> They make a great family.
>>>>>
>>>>> ...........................
>>>>>
>>>>> Jeremy Anderson
>>>>> https://twitter.com/ObjectAdjective
>>>>> http://www.linkedin.com/in/objectadjective
>>>>>
>>>>> On 21 October 2016 at 11:27, Frederick R Reiss <fr...@us.ibm.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> These are awesome! I'm more a fan of option #4 myself.
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Fred
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [image: Inactive hide details for Renee Mascarinas ---10/21/2016
>>>>>> 11:19:01
>>>>>> AM---love these!!! thank you so much! +1 on option 1 because]Renee
>>>>>> Mascarinas ---10/21/2016 11:19:01 AM---love these!!! thank you so
>>>>>> much!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> +1
>>>>>
>>>>> on option 1 because it's both minimalistic and fun!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> From: Renee Mascarinas <re...@gmail.com>
>>>>>> To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
>>>>>> Date: 10/21/2016 11:19 AM
>>>>>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] SystemML New Logo Ideas
>>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> love these!!! thank you so much!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> +1 on option 1 because it's both minimalistic and fun!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 10:50 AM, Rose Peng <ro...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> imgur: http://i.imgur.com/iuvOIDB.png
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> google drive:
>>>>>>> https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B70RXaqBkBoydnlZQUF3N3NUa2c/
>>>>>>> view?usp=sharing
>>>>>>> <https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B70RXaqBkBoydnlZQUF3N3NUa2c/
>>>>>>> view?usp=sharing>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hopefully one of these work.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>> Rose
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 8:41 PM, Felix Schüler <fs...@posteo.de>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi Rose,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I believe the attachment was removed - probably because of size
>>>>>>>> limitations. Could you upload it somewhere else and share the link?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Felix
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 20.10.2016 20:02, Rose Peng wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hi everyone,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The design team has explored a few logo concepts, and we would love
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> see which ideas you like the most! We're looking for a logo that
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> conveys
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> optimization, and we came up with a robot. The smile is inspired
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> by a
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>> matrix bracket to bring to mind the mathematical background of
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> SystemML.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> In the attached image, we have two main types of logo explorations.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> One
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> is a simple forward-facing robot and the other is an isometric
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> interpretation. Below that we pulled out a few to show how they
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> would
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>> look as logos besides the words "Apache SystemML".
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Ultimately, we want the robot to have interchangeable parts to
>>>>>>>>> communicate the customizability of algorithms that SystemML
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> provides,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>> so
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> whatever logo ends up being chosen it could still have several
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> variations.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Personally, we like concept #1 for the minimal look, but we'd love
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>> hear your thoughts. Feel free to mix and match or make other
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> suggestions
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> that we can take into consideration.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Thanks!
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ----------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>> *Rose Peng*
>>>>>>>>> MS HCI 2015 - Georgia Institute of Technology
>>>>>>>>> (www.rosepeng.com <http://www.rosepeng.com/>)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> ----------------------------------------
>>>>>>> *Rose Peng*
>>>>>>> MS HCI 2015 - Georgia Institute of Technology
>>>>>>> (www.rosepeng.com)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>
Re: [VOTE] SystemML New Logo Ideas
Posted by Matthias Boehm <mb...@googlemail.com>.
ha, that's interesting - thanks for the pointer Deron, I wasn't
expecting this at all. Somehow my eyes always ignored this.
Regards,
Matthias
On 10/21/2016 9:22 PM, Deron Eriksson wrote:
> I think they all look fantastic. My untrained eye likes the features of 3
> and 4 but I completely defer to the judgements of others here since I have
> no training in design and the multitude of considerations involved such as
> scalability.
>
> I believe the logo trademark is an official requirement of the ASF (
> http://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/pmcs.html#graphics), although I
> don't know how strict this is.
>
> Deron
>
>
> On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 12:15 PM, Matthias Boehm <mb...@googlemail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Thanks for these proposals. For all the options, I'd prefer to remove the
>> TM - it's just a little odd for an open source project with no intentions
>> to register a trademark. I know, the new Spark logo has it too but it's
>> probably a different context, especially since there are discussions to add
>> SPARC support in Spark 2.1 ;-)
>>
>> Regards,
>> Matthias
>>
>>
>> On 10/21/2016 8:47 PM, Dexter Lesaca wrote:
>>
>>> +1 for 1
>>>
>>> On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 11:44 AM Jeremy Anderson <
>>> jeremy@objectadjective.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> +1 on option 1 as well.
>>>>
>>>> For the 4 options, I think it's important that full logo with name and
>>>> mark, scales well. I'm concerned detail will get lost with the other 3,
>>>> at
>>>> small sizes. I would love to use all of the simple and isometric
>>>> versions.
>>>> They make a great family.
>>>>
>>>> ...........................
>>>>
>>>> Jeremy Anderson
>>>> https://twitter.com/ObjectAdjective
>>>> http://www.linkedin.com/in/objectadjective
>>>>
>>>> On 21 October 2016 at 11:27, Frederick R Reiss <fr...@us.ibm.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> These are awesome! I'm more a fan of option #4 myself.
>>>>>
>>>>> Fred
>>>>>
>>>>> [image: Inactive hide details for Renee Mascarinas ---10/21/2016
>>>>> 11:19:01
>>>>> AM---love these!!! thank you so much! +1 on option 1 because]Renee
>>>>> Mascarinas ---10/21/2016 11:19:01 AM---love these!!! thank you so much!
>>>>>
>>>> +1
>>>>
>>>>> on option 1 because it's both minimalistic and fun!
>>>>>
>>>>> From: Renee Mascarinas <re...@gmail.com>
>>>>> To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
>>>>> Date: 10/21/2016 11:19 AM
>>>>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] SystemML New Logo Ideas
>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> love these!!! thank you so much!
>>>>>
>>>>> +1 on option 1 because it's both minimalistic and fun!
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 10:50 AM, Rose Peng <ro...@gmail.com>
>>>>>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> imgur: http://i.imgur.com/iuvOIDB.png
>>>>>> google drive:
>>>>>> https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B70RXaqBkBoydnlZQUF3N3NUa2c/
>>>>>> view?usp=sharing
>>>>>> <https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B70RXaqBkBoydnlZQUF3N3NUa2c/
>>>>>> view?usp=sharing>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hopefully one of these work.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>> Rose
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 8:41 PM, Felix Sch�ler <fs...@posteo.de>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Rose,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I believe the attachment was removed - probably because of size
>>>>>>> limitations. Could you upload it somewhere else and share the link?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Felix
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 20.10.2016 20:02, Rose Peng wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hi everyone,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The design team has explored a few logo concepts, and we would love
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> to
>>>>>
>>>>>> see which ideas you like the most! We're looking for a logo that
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> conveys
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> optimization, and we came up with a robot. The smile is inspired
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> by a
>>>>
>>>>> matrix bracket to bring to mind the mathematical background of
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> SystemML.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> In the attached image, we have two main types of logo explorations.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> One
>>>>>
>>>>>> is a simple forward-facing robot and the other is an isometric
>>>>>>>> interpretation. Below that we pulled out a few to show how they
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> would
>>>>
>>>>> look as logos besides the words "Apache SystemML".
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Ultimately, we want the robot to have interchangeable parts to
>>>>>>>> communicate the customizability of algorithms that SystemML
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> provides,
>>>>
>>>>> so
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> whatever logo ends up being chosen it could still have several
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> variations.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Personally, we like concept #1 for the minimal look, but we'd love
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> to
>>>>
>>>>> hear your thoughts. Feel free to mix and match or make other
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> suggestions
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> that we can take into consideration.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ----------------------------------------
>>>>>>>> *Rose Peng*
>>>>>>>> MS HCI 2015 - Georgia Institute of Technology
>>>>>>>> (www.rosepeng.com <http://www.rosepeng.com/>)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> ----------------------------------------
>>>>>> *Rose Peng*
>>>>>> MS HCI 2015 - Georgia Institute of Technology
>>>>>> (www.rosepeng.com)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>
Re: [VOTE] SystemML New Logo Ideas
Posted by Deron Eriksson <de...@gmail.com>.
I think they all look fantastic. My untrained eye likes the features of 3
and 4 but I completely defer to the judgements of others here since I have
no training in design and the multitude of considerations involved such as
scalability.
I believe the logo trademark is an official requirement of the ASF (
http://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/pmcs.html#graphics), although I
don't know how strict this is.
Deron
On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 12:15 PM, Matthias Boehm <mb...@googlemail.com>
wrote:
> Thanks for these proposals. For all the options, I'd prefer to remove the
> TM - it's just a little odd for an open source project with no intentions
> to register a trademark. I know, the new Spark logo has it too but it's
> probably a different context, especially since there are discussions to add
> SPARC support in Spark 2.1 ;-)
>
> Regards,
> Matthias
>
>
> On 10/21/2016 8:47 PM, Dexter Lesaca wrote:
>
>> +1 for 1
>>
>> On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 11:44 AM Jeremy Anderson <
>> jeremy@objectadjective.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> +1 on option 1 as well.
>>>
>>> For the 4 options, I think it's important that full logo with name and
>>> mark, scales well. I'm concerned detail will get lost with the other 3,
>>> at
>>> small sizes. I would love to use all of the simple and isometric
>>> versions.
>>> They make a great family.
>>>
>>> ...........................
>>>
>>> Jeremy Anderson
>>> https://twitter.com/ObjectAdjective
>>> http://www.linkedin.com/in/objectadjective
>>>
>>> On 21 October 2016 at 11:27, Frederick R Reiss <fr...@us.ibm.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> These are awesome! I'm more a fan of option #4 myself.
>>>>
>>>> Fred
>>>>
>>>> [image: Inactive hide details for Renee Mascarinas ---10/21/2016
>>>> 11:19:01
>>>> AM---love these!!! thank you so much! +1 on option 1 because]Renee
>>>> Mascarinas ---10/21/2016 11:19:01 AM---love these!!! thank you so much!
>>>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>>> on option 1 because it's both minimalistic and fun!
>>>>
>>>> From: Renee Mascarinas <re...@gmail.com>
>>>> To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
>>>> Date: 10/21/2016 11:19 AM
>>>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] SystemML New Logo Ideas
>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> love these!!! thank you so much!
>>>>
>>>> +1 on option 1 because it's both minimalistic and fun!
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 10:50 AM, Rose Peng <ro...@gmail.com>
>>>>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> imgur: http://i.imgur.com/iuvOIDB.png
>>>>> google drive:
>>>>> https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B70RXaqBkBoydnlZQUF3N3NUa2c/
>>>>> view?usp=sharing
>>>>> <https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B70RXaqBkBoydnlZQUF3N3NUa2c/
>>>>> view?usp=sharing>
>>>>>
>>>>> Hopefully one of these work.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Rose
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 8:41 PM, Felix Schüler <fs...@posteo.de>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi Rose,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I believe the attachment was removed - probably because of size
>>>>>> limitations. Could you upload it somewhere else and share the link?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Felix
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 20.10.2016 20:02, Rose Peng wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi everyone,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The design team has explored a few logo concepts, and we would love
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> to
>>>>
>>>>> see which ideas you like the most! We're looking for a logo that
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> conveys
>>>>>
>>>>>> optimization, and we came up with a robot. The smile is inspired
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> by a
>>>
>>>> matrix bracket to bring to mind the mathematical background of
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> SystemML.
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> In the attached image, we have two main types of logo explorations.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> One
>>>>
>>>>> is a simple forward-facing robot and the other is an isometric
>>>>>>> interpretation. Below that we pulled out a few to show how they
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> would
>>>
>>>> look as logos besides the words "Apache SystemML".
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Ultimately, we want the robot to have interchangeable parts to
>>>>>>> communicate the customizability of algorithms that SystemML
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> provides,
>>>
>>>> so
>>>>>
>>>>>> whatever logo ends up being chosen it could still have several
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> variations.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Personally, we like concept #1 for the minimal look, but we'd love
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> to
>>>
>>>> hear your thoughts. Feel free to mix and match or make other
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> suggestions
>>>>>
>>>>>> that we can take into consideration.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ----------------------------------------
>>>>>>> *Rose Peng*
>>>>>>> MS HCI 2015 - Georgia Institute of Technology
>>>>>>> (www.rosepeng.com <http://www.rosepeng.com/>)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> ----------------------------------------
>>>>> *Rose Peng*
>>>>> MS HCI 2015 - Georgia Institute of Technology
>>>>> (www.rosepeng.com)
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
Re: [VOTE] SystemML New Logo Ideas
Posted by Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com>.
On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 12:15 PM, Matthias Boehm <mb...@googlemail.com>
wrote:
> Thanks for these proposals. For all the options, I'd prefer to remove the
> TM - it's just a little odd for an open source project with no intentions
> to register a trademark. I know, the new Spark logo has it too but it's
> probably a different context, especially since there are discussions to add
> SPARC support in Spark 2.1 ;-)
>
> Regards,
> Matthias
We should not remove the TM, the TM is a best practice based on Apache
Branding policy.
--
Luciano Resende
http://twitter.com/lresende1975
http://lresende.blogspot.com/
Re: [VOTE] SystemML New Logo Ideas
Posted by Matthias Boehm <mb...@googlemail.com>.
Thanks for these proposals. For all the options, I'd prefer to remove
the TM - it's just a little odd for an open source project with no
intentions to register a trademark. I know, the new Spark logo has it
too but it's probably a different context, especially since there are
discussions to add SPARC support in Spark 2.1 ;-)
Regards,
Matthias
On 10/21/2016 8:47 PM, Dexter Lesaca wrote:
> +1 for 1
>
> On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 11:44 AM Jeremy Anderson <je...@objectadjective.com>
> wrote:
>
>> +1 on option 1 as well.
>>
>> For the 4 options, I think it's important that full logo with name and
>> mark, scales well. I'm concerned detail will get lost with the other 3, at
>> small sizes. I would love to use all of the simple and isometric versions.
>> They make a great family.
>>
>> ...........................
>>
>> Jeremy Anderson
>> https://twitter.com/ObjectAdjective
>> http://www.linkedin.com/in/objectadjective
>>
>> On 21 October 2016 at 11:27, Frederick R Reiss <fr...@us.ibm.com> wrote:
>>
>>> These are awesome! I'm more a fan of option #4 myself.
>>>
>>> Fred
>>>
>>> [image: Inactive hide details for Renee Mascarinas ---10/21/2016 11:19:01
>>> AM---love these!!! thank you so much! +1 on option 1 because]Renee
>>> Mascarinas ---10/21/2016 11:19:01 AM---love these!!! thank you so much!
>> +1
>>> on option 1 because it's both minimalistic and fun!
>>>
>>> From: Renee Mascarinas <re...@gmail.com>
>>> To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
>>> Date: 10/21/2016 11:19 AM
>>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] SystemML New Logo Ideas
>>> ------------------------------
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> love these!!! thank you so much!
>>>
>>> +1 on option 1 because it's both minimalistic and fun!
>>>
>>> On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 10:50 AM, Rose Peng <ro...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> imgur: http://i.imgur.com/iuvOIDB.png
>>>> google drive:
>>>> https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B70RXaqBkBoydnlZQUF3N3NUa2c/
>>>> view?usp=sharing
>>>> <https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B70RXaqBkBoydnlZQUF3N3NUa2c/
>>>> view?usp=sharing>
>>>>
>>>> Hopefully one of these work.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Rose
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 8:41 PM, Felix Sch�ler <fs...@posteo.de>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi Rose,
>>>>>
>>>>> I believe the attachment was removed - probably because of size
>>>>> limitations. Could you upload it somewhere else and share the link?
>>>>>
>>>>> Felix
>>>>>
>>>>> On 20.10.2016 20:02, Rose Peng wrote:
>>>>>> Hi everyone,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The design team has explored a few logo concepts, and we would love
>>> to
>>>>>> see which ideas you like the most! We're looking for a logo that
>>>> conveys
>>>>>> optimization, and we came up with a robot. The smile is inspired
>> by a
>>>>>> matrix bracket to bring to mind the mathematical background of
>>>> SystemML.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> In the attached image, we have two main types of logo explorations.
>>> One
>>>>>> is a simple forward-facing robot and the other is an isometric
>>>>>> interpretation. Below that we pulled out a few to show how they
>> would
>>>>>> look as logos besides the words "Apache SystemML".
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Ultimately, we want the robot to have interchangeable parts to
>>>>>> communicate the customizability of algorithms that SystemML
>> provides,
>>>> so
>>>>>> whatever logo ends up being chosen it could still have several
>>>>> variations.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Personally, we like concept #1 for the minimal look, but we'd love
>> to
>>>>>> hear your thoughts. Feel free to mix and match or make other
>>>> suggestions
>>>>>> that we can take into consideration.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ----------------------------------------
>>>>>> *Rose Peng*
>>>>>> MS HCI 2015 - Georgia Institute of Technology
>>>>>> (www.rosepeng.com <http://www.rosepeng.com/>)
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> ----------------------------------------
>>>> *Rose Peng*
>>>> MS HCI 2015 - Georgia Institute of Technology
>>>> (www.rosepeng.com)
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
Re: [VOTE] SystemML New Logo Ideas
Posted by Dexter Lesaca <de...@gmail.com>.
+1 for 1
On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 11:44 AM Jeremy Anderson <je...@objectadjective.com>
wrote:
> +1 on option 1 as well.
>
> For the 4 options, I think it's important that full logo with name and
> mark, scales well. I'm concerned detail will get lost with the other 3, at
> small sizes. I would love to use all of the simple and isometric versions.
> They make a great family.
>
> ...........................
>
> Jeremy Anderson
> https://twitter.com/ObjectAdjective
> http://www.linkedin.com/in/objectadjective
>
> On 21 October 2016 at 11:27, Frederick R Reiss <fr...@us.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> > These are awesome! I'm more a fan of option #4 myself.
> >
> > Fred
> >
> > [image: Inactive hide details for Renee Mascarinas ---10/21/2016 11:19:01
> > AM---love these!!! thank you so much! +1 on option 1 because]Renee
> > Mascarinas ---10/21/2016 11:19:01 AM---love these!!! thank you so much!
> +1
> > on option 1 because it's both minimalistic and fun!
> >
> > From: Renee Mascarinas <re...@gmail.com>
> > To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
> > Date: 10/21/2016 11:19 AM
> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] SystemML New Logo Ideas
> > ------------------------------
> >
> >
> >
> > love these!!! thank you so much!
> >
> > +1 on option 1 because it's both minimalistic and fun!
> >
> > On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 10:50 AM, Rose Peng <ro...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > > imgur: http://i.imgur.com/iuvOIDB.png
> > > google drive:
> > > https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B70RXaqBkBoydnlZQUF3N3NUa2c/
> > > view?usp=sharing
> > > <https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B70RXaqBkBoydnlZQUF3N3NUa2c/
> > > view?usp=sharing>
> > >
> > > Hopefully one of these work.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Rose
> > >
> > > On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 8:41 PM, Felix Schüler <fs...@posteo.de>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi Rose,
> > > >
> > > > I believe the attachment was removed - probably because of size
> > > > limitations. Could you upload it somewhere else and share the link?
> > > >
> > > > Felix
> > > >
> > > > On 20.10.2016 20:02, Rose Peng wrote:
> > > > > Hi everyone,
> > > > >
> > > > > The design team has explored a few logo concepts, and we would love
> > to
> > > > > see which ideas you like the most! We're looking for a logo that
> > > conveys
> > > > > optimization, and we came up with a robot. The smile is inspired
> by a
> > > > > matrix bracket to bring to mind the mathematical background of
> > > SystemML.
> > > > >
> > > > > In the attached image, we have two main types of logo explorations.
> > One
> > > > > is a simple forward-facing robot and the other is an isometric
> > > > > interpretation. Below that we pulled out a few to show how they
> would
> > > > > look as logos besides the words "Apache SystemML".
> > > > >
> > > > > Ultimately, we want the robot to have interchangeable parts to
> > > > > communicate the customizability of algorithms that SystemML
> provides,
> > > so
> > > > > whatever logo ends up being chosen it could still have several
> > > > variations.
> > > > >
> > > > > Personally, we like concept #1 for the minimal look, but we'd love
> to
> > > > > hear your thoughts. Feel free to mix and match or make other
> > > suggestions
> > > > > that we can take into consideration.
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks!
> > > > >
> > > > > ----------------------------------------
> > > > > *Rose Peng*
> > > > > MS HCI 2015 - Georgia Institute of Technology
> > > > > (www.rosepeng.com <http://www.rosepeng.com/>)
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > ----------------------------------------
> > > *Rose Peng*
> > > MS HCI 2015 - Georgia Institute of Technology
> > > (www.rosepeng.com)
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] SystemML New Logo Ideas
Posted by Jeremy Anderson <je...@objectadjective.com>.
+1 on option 1 as well.
For the 4 options, I think it's important that full logo with name and
mark, scales well. I'm concerned detail will get lost with the other 3, at
small sizes. I would love to use all of the simple and isometric versions.
They make a great family.
...........................
Jeremy Anderson
https://twitter.com/ObjectAdjective
http://www.linkedin.com/in/objectadjective
On 21 October 2016 at 11:27, Frederick R Reiss <fr...@us.ibm.com> wrote:
> These are awesome! I'm more a fan of option #4 myself.
>
> Fred
>
> [image: Inactive hide details for Renee Mascarinas ---10/21/2016 11:19:01
> AM---love these!!! thank you so much! +1 on option 1 because]Renee
> Mascarinas ---10/21/2016 11:19:01 AM---love these!!! thank you so much! +1
> on option 1 because it's both minimalistic and fun!
>
> From: Renee Mascarinas <re...@gmail.com>
> To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
> Date: 10/21/2016 11:19 AM
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] SystemML New Logo Ideas
> ------------------------------
>
>
>
> love these!!! thank you so much!
>
> +1 on option 1 because it's both minimalistic and fun!
>
> On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 10:50 AM, Rose Peng <ro...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > imgur: http://i.imgur.com/iuvOIDB.png
> > google drive:
> > https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B70RXaqBkBoydnlZQUF3N3NUa2c/
> > view?usp=sharing
> > <https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B70RXaqBkBoydnlZQUF3N3NUa2c/
> > view?usp=sharing>
> >
> > Hopefully one of these work.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Rose
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 8:41 PM, Felix Schüler <fs...@posteo.de>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Rose,
> > >
> > > I believe the attachment was removed - probably because of size
> > > limitations. Could you upload it somewhere else and share the link?
> > >
> > > Felix
> > >
> > > On 20.10.2016 20:02, Rose Peng wrote:
> > > > Hi everyone,
> > > >
> > > > The design team has explored a few logo concepts, and we would love
> to
> > > > see which ideas you like the most! We're looking for a logo that
> > conveys
> > > > optimization, and we came up with a robot. The smile is inspired by a
> > > > matrix bracket to bring to mind the mathematical background of
> > SystemML.
> > > >
> > > > In the attached image, we have two main types of logo explorations.
> One
> > > > is a simple forward-facing robot and the other is an isometric
> > > > interpretation. Below that we pulled out a few to show how they would
> > > > look as logos besides the words "Apache SystemML".
> > > >
> > > > Ultimately, we want the robot to have interchangeable parts to
> > > > communicate the customizability of algorithms that SystemML provides,
> > so
> > > > whatever logo ends up being chosen it could still have several
> > > variations.
> > > >
> > > > Personally, we like concept #1 for the minimal look, but we'd love to
> > > > hear your thoughts. Feel free to mix and match or make other
> > suggestions
> > > > that we can take into consideration.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks!
> > > >
> > > > ----------------------------------------
> > > > *Rose Peng*
> > > > MS HCI 2015 - Georgia Institute of Technology
> > > > (www.rosepeng.com <http://www.rosepeng.com/>)
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > ----------------------------------------
> > *Rose Peng*
> > MS HCI 2015 - Georgia Institute of Technology
> > (www.rosepeng.com)
> >
>
>
>
>
Re: [VOTE] SystemML New Logo Ideas
Posted by Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com>.
On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 11:27 AM, Frederick R Reiss <fr...@us.ibm.com>
wrote:
> These are awesome! I'm more a fan of option #4 myself.
>
>
I like option $4 myself as well.
--
Luciano Resende
http://twitter.com/lresende1975
http://lresende.blogspot.com/
Re: [VOTE] SystemML New Logo Ideas
Posted by Frederick R Reiss <fr...@us.ibm.com>.
These are awesome! I'm more a fan of option #4 myself.
Fred
From: Renee Mascarinas <re...@gmail.com>
To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
Date: 10/21/2016 11:19 AM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] SystemML New Logo Ideas
love these!!! thank you so much!
+1 on option 1 because it's both minimalistic and fun!
On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 10:50 AM, Rose Peng <ro...@gmail.com> wrote:
> imgur: http://i.imgur.com/iuvOIDB.png
> google drive:
> https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B70RXaqBkBoydnlZQUF3N3NUa2c/
> view?usp=sharing
> <https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B70RXaqBkBoydnlZQUF3N3NUa2c/
> view?usp=sharing>
>
> Hopefully one of these work.
>
> Thanks,
> Rose
>
> On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 8:41 PM, Felix Schüler <fs...@posteo.de>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Rose,
> >
> > I believe the attachment was removed - probably because of size
> > limitations. Could you upload it somewhere else and share the link?
> >
> > Felix
> >
> > On 20.10.2016 20:02, Rose Peng wrote:
> > > Hi everyone,
> > >
> > > The design team has explored a few logo concepts, and we would love
to
> > > see which ideas you like the most! We're looking for a logo that
> conveys
> > > optimization, and we came up with a robot. The smile is inspired by a
> > > matrix bracket to bring to mind the mathematical background of
> SystemML.
> > >
> > > In the attached image, we have two main types of logo explorations.
One
> > > is a simple forward-facing robot and the other is an isometric
> > > interpretation. Below that we pulled out a few to show how they would
> > > look as logos besides the words "Apache SystemML".
> > >
> > > Ultimately, we want the robot to have interchangeable parts to
> > > communicate the customizability of algorithms that SystemML provides,
> so
> > > whatever logo ends up being chosen it could still have several
> > variations.
> > >
> > > Personally, we like concept #1 for the minimal look, but we'd love to
> > > hear your thoughts. Feel free to mix and match or make other
> suggestions
> > > that we can take into consideration.
> > >
> > > Thanks!
> > >
> > > ----------------------------------------
> > > *Rose Peng*
> > > MS HCI 2015 - Georgia Institute of Technology
> > > (www.rosepeng.com <http://www.rosepeng.com/>)
> >
>
>
>
> --
> ----------------------------------------
> *Rose Peng*
> MS HCI 2015 - Georgia Institute of Technology
> (www.rosepeng.com)
>
Re: [VOTE] SystemML New Logo Ideas
Posted by Renee Mascarinas <re...@gmail.com>.
love these!!! thank you so much!
+1 on option 1 because it's both minimalistic and fun!
On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 10:50 AM, Rose Peng <ro...@gmail.com> wrote:
> imgur: http://i.imgur.com/iuvOIDB.png
> google drive:
> https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B70RXaqBkBoydnlZQUF3N3NUa2c/
> view?usp=sharing
> <https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B70RXaqBkBoydnlZQUF3N3NUa2c/
> view?usp=sharing>
>
> Hopefully one of these work.
>
> Thanks,
> Rose
>
> On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 8:41 PM, Felix Schüler <fs...@posteo.de>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Rose,
> >
> > I believe the attachment was removed - probably because of size
> > limitations. Could you upload it somewhere else and share the link?
> >
> > Felix
> >
> > On 20.10.2016 20:02, Rose Peng wrote:
> > > Hi everyone,
> > >
> > > The design team has explored a few logo concepts, and we would love to
> > > see which ideas you like the most! We're looking for a logo that
> conveys
> > > optimization, and we came up with a robot. The smile is inspired by a
> > > matrix bracket to bring to mind the mathematical background of
> SystemML.
> > >
> > > In the attached image, we have two main types of logo explorations. One
> > > is a simple forward-facing robot and the other is an isometric
> > > interpretation. Below that we pulled out a few to show how they would
> > > look as logos besides the words "Apache SystemML".
> > >
> > > Ultimately, we want the robot to have interchangeable parts to
> > > communicate the customizability of algorithms that SystemML provides,
> so
> > > whatever logo ends up being chosen it could still have several
> > variations.
> > >
> > > Personally, we like concept #1 for the minimal look, but we'd love to
> > > hear your thoughts. Feel free to mix and match or make other
> suggestions
> > > that we can take into consideration.
> > >
> > > Thanks!
> > >
> > > ----------------------------------------
> > > *Rose Peng*
> > > MS HCI 2015 - Georgia Institute of Technology
> > > (www.rosepeng.com <http://www.rosepeng.com/>)
> >
>
>
>
> --
> ----------------------------------------
> *Rose Peng*
> MS HCI 2015 - Georgia Institute of Technology
> (www.rosepeng.com)
>
Re: [VOTE] SystemML New Logo Ideas
Posted by Rose Peng <ro...@gmail.com>.
imgur: http://i.imgur.com/iuvOIDB.png
google drive:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B70RXaqBkBoydnlZQUF3N3NUa2c/view?usp=sharing
<https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B70RXaqBkBoydnlZQUF3N3NUa2c/view?usp=sharing>
Hopefully one of these work.
Thanks,
Rose
On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 8:41 PM, Felix Schüler <fs...@posteo.de> wrote:
> Hi Rose,
>
> I believe the attachment was removed - probably because of size
> limitations. Could you upload it somewhere else and share the link?
>
> Felix
>
> On 20.10.2016 20:02, Rose Peng wrote:
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > The design team has explored a few logo concepts, and we would love to
> > see which ideas you like the most! We're looking for a logo that conveys
> > optimization, and we came up with a robot. The smile is inspired by a
> > matrix bracket to bring to mind the mathematical background of SystemML.
> >
> > In the attached image, we have two main types of logo explorations. One
> > is a simple forward-facing robot and the other is an isometric
> > interpretation. Below that we pulled out a few to show how they would
> > look as logos besides the words "Apache SystemML".
> >
> > Ultimately, we want the robot to have interchangeable parts to
> > communicate the customizability of algorithms that SystemML provides, so
> > whatever logo ends up being chosen it could still have several
> variations.
> >
> > Personally, we like concept #1 for the minimal look, but we'd love to
> > hear your thoughts. Feel free to mix and match or make other suggestions
> > that we can take into consideration.
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > ----------------------------------------
> > *Rose Peng*
> > MS HCI 2015 - Georgia Institute of Technology
> > (www.rosepeng.com <http://www.rosepeng.com/>)
>
--
----------------------------------------
*Rose Peng*
MS HCI 2015 - Georgia Institute of Technology
(www.rosepeng.com)
Re: [VOTE] SystemML New Logo Ideas
Posted by Felix Schüler <fs...@posteo.de>.
Hi Rose,
I believe the attachment was removed - probably because of size
limitations. Could you upload it somewhere else and share the link?
Felix
On 20.10.2016 20:02, Rose Peng wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> The design team has explored a few logo concepts, and we would love to
> see which ideas you like the most! We're looking for a logo that conveys
> optimization, and we came up with a robot. The smile is inspired by a
> matrix bracket to bring to mind the mathematical background of SystemML.
>
> In the attached image, we have two main types of logo explorations. One
> is a simple forward-facing robot and the other is an isometric
> interpretation. Below that we pulled out a few to show how they would
> look as logos besides the words "Apache SystemML".
>
> Ultimately, we want the robot to have interchangeable parts to
> communicate the customizability of algorithms that SystemML provides, so
> whatever logo ends up being chosen it could still have several variations.
>
> Personally, we like concept #1 for the minimal look, but we'd love to
> hear your thoughts. Feel free to mix and match or make other suggestions
> that we can take into consideration.
>
> Thanks!
>
> ----------------------------------------
> *Rose Peng*
> MS HCI 2015 - Georgia Institute of Technology
> (www.rosepeng.com <http://www.rosepeng.com/>)