You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@commons.apache.org by "Harsha Vardhan (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2020/01/28 14:29:00 UTC
[jira] [Comment Edited] (CLI-244) Non-existing option is not
reported as a failure when it follows an option that accepts multiple
values
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLI-244?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17025153#comment-17025153 ]
Harsha Vardhan edited comment on CLI-244 at 1/28/20 2:28 PM:
-------------------------------------------------------------
The DefaultParser implementation can solve this issue by simply changing the order of if-else-if conditions in the handleToken(String) method.
The existing implementation (as of v1.4) is as follows:
{code:java}
...
else if (currentOption != null && currentOption.acceptsArg() && isArgument(token))
{
currentOption.addValueForProcessing(Util.stripLeadingAndTrailingQuotes(token));
}
else if (token.startsWith("--"))
{
handleLongOption(token);
}
...
{code}
But changing the order to the following seems to work:
{code:java}
...
else if (token.startsWith("--"))
{
handleLongOption(token);
}
else if (currentOption != null && currentOption.acceptsArg() && isArgument(token))
{
currentOption.addValueForProcessing(Util.stripLeadingAndTrailingQuotes(token));
}
...
{code}
was (Author: harshatech2012):
The DefaultParser implementation can solve this issue by simply changing the order of if-else-if conditions in the handleToken(String) method.
The existing implementation is as follows:
{code:java}
...
else if (currentOption != null && currentOption.acceptsArg() && isArgument(token))
{
currentOption.addValueForProcessing(Util.stripLeadingAndTrailingQuotes(token));
}
else if (token.startsWith("--"))
{
handleLongOption(token);
}
...
{code}
But changing the order to the following seems to work:
{code:java}
...
else if (token.startsWith("--"))
{
handleLongOption(token);
}
else if (currentOption != null && currentOption.acceptsArg() && isArgument(token))
{
currentOption.addValueForProcessing(Util.stripLeadingAndTrailingQuotes(token));
}
...
{code}
> Non-existing option is not reported as a failure when it follows an option that accepts multiple values
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CLI-244
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLI-244
> Project: Commons CLI
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: CLI-1.x
> Affects Versions: 1.2
> Environment: Java 7
> Linux/Windows
> Reporter: Ivan C
> Priority: Critical
>
> If I define the following options:
> {code:java}
> Option dest = OptionBuilder
> .withArgName("-d")
> .withDescription("Destination")
> .hasArg()
> .create("-d");
> dest.setRequired(true);
> Option filenames = OptionBuilder
> .withArgName("-f")
> .withDescription("Filenames; comma separated")
> .hasArgs()
> .withValueSeparator(',')
> .create("-f");
> {code}
> when I parse the following arguments
> {code}
> -d c:\development\test -f abc.txt -qa hello
> {code}
> rather than getting a ParseException, the code thinks abc.txt, -qa, hello are the values for the -f option.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)