You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@ignite.apache.org by "Dmitriy Pavlov (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2019/08/20 16:32:00 UTC
[jira] [Updated] (IGNITE-5227) StackOverflowError in
GridCacheMapEntry#checkOwnerChanged()
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-5227?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Dmitriy Pavlov updated IGNITE-5227:
-----------------------------------
Fix Version/s: 2.8
> StackOverflowError in GridCacheMapEntry#checkOwnerChanged()
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: IGNITE-5227
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-5227
> Project: Ignite
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: 1.6
> Reporter: Alexey Goncharuk
> Assignee: Stepachev Maksim
> Priority: Critical
> Fix For: 2.8
>
> Time Spent: 40m
> Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> A simple test reproducing this error:
> {code}
> /**
> * @throws Exception if failed.
> */
> public void testBatchUnlock() throws Exception {
> startGrid(0);
> grid(0).createCache(new CacheConfiguration<Integer, Integer>(DEFAULT_CACHE_NAME)
> .setAtomicityMode(CacheAtomicityMode.TRANSACTIONAL));
> try {
> final CountDownLatch releaseLatch = new CountDownLatch(1);
> IgniteInternalFuture<Object> fut = GridTestUtils.runAsync(new Callable<Object>() {
> @Override public Object call() throws Exception {
> IgniteCache<Object, Object> cache = grid(0).cache(null);
> Lock lock = cache.lock("key");
> try {
> lock.lock();
> releaseLatch.await();
> }
> finally {
> lock.unlock();
> }
> return null;
> }
> });
> Map<String, String> putMap = new LinkedHashMap<>();
> putMap.put("key", "trigger");
> for (int i = 0; i < 10_000; i++)
> putMap.put("key-" + i, "value");
> IgniteCache<Object, Object> asyncCache = grid(0).cache(null).withAsync();
> asyncCache.putAll(putMap);
> IgniteFuture<Object> resFut = asyncCache.future();
> Thread.sleep(1000);
> releaseLatch.countDown();
> fut.get();
> resFut.get();
> }
> finally {
> stopAllGrids();
> }
> {code}
> We should replace a recursive call with a simple iteration over the linked list.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.2#803003)