You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@spamassassin.apache.org by Justin Mason <jm...@jmason.org> on 2007/05/02 15:10:58 UTC
Re: svn commit: r534404 - /spamassassin/branches/b3_2_0/
Michael Parker writes:
> jm@apache.org wrote:
> > Author: jm
> > Date: Wed May 2 04:59:05 2007
> > New Revision: 534404
> >
> > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=534404
> > Log:
> > Creating the new 3.2.0 maintainance branch
> >
> > Added:
> > spamassassin/branches/b3_2_0/
> > - copied from r534402, spamassassin/tags/spamassassin_release_3_2_0/
> >
>
> Any particular reason you went with b3_2_0 instead of 3.2 like we did
> for 3.0 and 3.1?
build/README used the "b3_x_0" format. if "3.2" was more appropriate, we
should have updated the procedure docs... :(
--j.
Re: svn commit: r534404 - /spamassassin/branches/b3_2_0/
Posted by Michael Parker <pa...@pobox.com>.
Justin Mason wrote:
> Michael Parker writes:
>> jm@apache.org wrote:
>>> Author: jm
>>> Date: Wed May 2 04:59:05 2007
>>> New Revision: 534404
>>>
>>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=534404
>>> Log:
>>> Creating the new 3.2.0 maintainance branch
>>>
>>> Added:
>>> spamassassin/branches/b3_2_0/
>>> - copied from r534402, spamassassin/tags/spamassassin_release_3_2_0/
>>>
>> Any particular reason you went with b3_2_0 instead of 3.2 like we did
>> for 3.0 and 3.1?
>
> build/README used the "b3_x_0" format. if "3.2" was more appropriate, we
> should have updated the procedure docs... :(
>
Hmm that doesn't make it right, I think breaking from what was already
established is a bad idea. I'd vote for going ahead and recreating the
branch in the right place and removing this.
I'd be happy to update any README files that are misguided.
Michael