You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@geronimo.apache.org by Jason Dillon <ja...@planet57.com> on 2006/08/18 04:31:59 UTC
G & ActiveMQ 4
We still need to finish getting the 4.x series into the server. I
think this is a must for 1.2. The AMQ folks are close to releasing
4.1, which is the first release that is using m2 and has m2
artifacts. I think we should switch over trunk to use the 4.1-
SHAPSHOT and then 4.1 when they get the release out.
Still need to get those gbeans hooked up that Hiram added too, they
are not included in the assembly, though we are building them.
Any objections to getting 4.1[-SNAPSHOT] in sometime soonish (week or
so)?
--jason
Re: G & ActiveMQ 4
Posted by Jason Dillon <ja...@planet57.com>.
On Aug 17, 2006, at 7:53 PM, Bruce Snyder wrote:
> On 8/17/06, Bruce Snyder <br...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 8/17/06, Jason Dillon <ja...@planet57.com> wrote:
>> > We still need to finish getting the 4.x series into the server. I
>> > think this is a must for 1.2. The AMQ folks are close to releasing
>> > 4.1, which is the first release that is using m2 and has m2
>> > artifacts. I think we should switch over trunk to use the 4.1-
>> > SHAPSHOT and then 4.1 when they get the release out.
>>
>> Actually we've been using Maven 2 on ActiveMQ since back in
>> January or
>> February.
>
> My apologies, I just realized that I misinterpreted your statement
> about Maven 2 :-(.
No worries.
--jason
Re: G & ActiveMQ 4
Posted by Bruce Snyder <br...@gmail.com>.
On 8/17/06, Bruce Snyder <br...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 8/17/06, Jason Dillon <ja...@planet57.com> wrote:
> > We still need to finish getting the 4.x series into the server. I
> > think this is a must for 1.2. The AMQ folks are close to releasing
> > 4.1, which is the first release that is using m2 and has m2
> > artifacts. I think we should switch over trunk to use the 4.1-
> > SHAPSHOT and then 4.1 when they get the release out.
>
> Actually we've been using Maven 2 on ActiveMQ since back in January or
> February.
My apologies, I just realized that I misinterpreted your statement
about Maven 2 :-(.
> > Still need to get those gbeans hooked up that Hiram added too, they
> > are not included in the assembly, though we are building them.
> >
> > Any objections to getting 4.1[-SNAPSHOT] in sometime soonish (week or
> > so)?
>
> +1 No objection from me.
>
> Bruce
> --
> perl -e 'print unpack("u30","D0G)U8V4\@4VYY9&5R\"F)R=6-E+G-N>61E<D\!G;6%I;\"YC;VT*"
> );'
>
> Apache Geronimo - http://geronimo.apache.org/
> Apache ActiveMQ - http://incubator.apache.org/activemq/
> Apache ServiceMix - http://incubator.apache.org/servicemix/
> Castor - http://castor.org/
>
--
perl -e 'print unpack("u30","D0G)U8V4\@4VYY9&5R\"F)R=6-E+G-N>61E<D\!G;6%I;\"YC;VT*"
);'
Apache Geronimo - http://geronimo.apache.org/
Apache ActiveMQ - http://incubator.apache.org/activemq/
Apache ServiceMix - http://incubator.apache.org/servicemix/
Castor - http://castor.org/
Re: G & ActiveMQ 4
Posted by Hiram Chirino <hi...@hiramchirino.com>.
Yep. I plan won working on it a bit this week and next.
On 8/18/06, Jason Dillon <ja...@planet57.com> wrote:
> I'm gonna need some help from the ActiveMQ folks... I did a quick try
> to enable the modules that Hiram added a while ago, and switch out
> the versions and well it barfed all over the place.
>
> Anyone have some free time to help?
>
> --jason
>
>
> On Aug 17, 2006, at 7:50 PM, Bruce Snyder wrote:
>
> > On 8/17/06, Jason Dillon <ja...@planet57.com> wrote:
> >> We still need to finish getting the 4.x series into the server. I
> >> think this is a must for 1.2. The AMQ folks are close to releasing
> >> 4.1, which is the first release that is using m2 and has m2
> >> artifacts. I think we should switch over trunk to use the 4.1-
> >> SHAPSHOT and then 4.1 when they get the release out.
> >
> > Actually we've been using Maven 2 on ActiveMQ since back in January or
> > February.
> >
> >> Still need to get those gbeans hooked up that Hiram added too, they
> >> are not included in the assembly, though we are building them.
> >>
> >> Any objections to getting 4.1[-SNAPSHOT] in sometime soonish (week or
> >> so)?
> >
> > +1 No objection from me.
> >
> > Bruce
> > --
> > perl -e 'print unpack("u30","D0G)U8V4\@4VYY9&5R\"F)R=6-E+G-N>61E<D\!
> > G;6%I;\"YC;VT*"
> > );'
> >
> > Apache Geronimo - http://geronimo.apache.org/
> > Apache ActiveMQ - http://incubator.apache.org/activemq/
> > Apache ServiceMix - http://incubator.apache.org/servicemix/
> > Castor - http://castor.org/
>
>
--
Regards,
Hiram
Blog: http://hiramchirino.com
Re: G & ActiveMQ 4
Posted by Jason Dillon <ja...@planet57.com>.
I'm gonna need some help from the ActiveMQ folks... I did a quick try
to enable the modules that Hiram added a while ago, and switch out
the versions and well it barfed all over the place.
Anyone have some free time to help?
--jason
On Aug 17, 2006, at 7:50 PM, Bruce Snyder wrote:
> On 8/17/06, Jason Dillon <ja...@planet57.com> wrote:
>> We still need to finish getting the 4.x series into the server. I
>> think this is a must for 1.2. The AMQ folks are close to releasing
>> 4.1, which is the first release that is using m2 and has m2
>> artifacts. I think we should switch over trunk to use the 4.1-
>> SHAPSHOT and then 4.1 when they get the release out.
>
> Actually we've been using Maven 2 on ActiveMQ since back in January or
> February.
>
>> Still need to get those gbeans hooked up that Hiram added too, they
>> are not included in the assembly, though we are building them.
>>
>> Any objections to getting 4.1[-SNAPSHOT] in sometime soonish (week or
>> so)?
>
> +1 No objection from me.
>
> Bruce
> --
> perl -e 'print unpack("u30","D0G)U8V4\@4VYY9&5R\"F)R=6-E+G-N>61E<D\!
> G;6%I;\"YC;VT*"
> );'
>
> Apache Geronimo - http://geronimo.apache.org/
> Apache ActiveMQ - http://incubator.apache.org/activemq/
> Apache ServiceMix - http://incubator.apache.org/servicemix/
> Castor - http://castor.org/
Re: G & ActiveMQ 4
Posted by Bruce Snyder <br...@gmail.com>.
On 8/17/06, Jason Dillon <ja...@planet57.com> wrote:
> We still need to finish getting the 4.x series into the server. I
> think this is a must for 1.2. The AMQ folks are close to releasing
> 4.1, which is the first release that is using m2 and has m2
> artifacts. I think we should switch over trunk to use the 4.1-
> SHAPSHOT and then 4.1 when they get the release out.
Actually we've been using Maven 2 on ActiveMQ since back in January or
February.
> Still need to get those gbeans hooked up that Hiram added too, they
> are not included in the assembly, though we are building them.
>
> Any objections to getting 4.1[-SNAPSHOT] in sometime soonish (week or
> so)?
+1 No objection from me.
Bruce
--
perl -e 'print unpack("u30","D0G)U8V4\@4VYY9&5R\"F)R=6-E+G-N>61E<D\!G;6%I;\"YC;VT*"
);'
Apache Geronimo - http://geronimo.apache.org/
Apache ActiveMQ - http://incubator.apache.org/activemq/
Apache ServiceMix - http://incubator.apache.org/servicemix/
Castor - http://castor.org/