You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to netcat@netbeans.apache.org by paloris_J <pa...@gmail.com> on 2018/09/02 13:18:10 UTC
Re: Is list still going
I just had a look at your url. It looks really good.
I had it running in nb 9rc1 under java 8 and tryed out some of what you
said.
But then downloaded
Product Version: Apache NetBeans IDE 9.0 (Build
incubator-netbeans-release-334-on-20180708)
Java: 10.0.1; Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM 10.0.1+10
And the options of installing java web and java ee are not avaliable.
I was thinking about doing a web cast with some of the examples that
you gave
On 28/08/18 16:43, Rick Hegarty wrote:
> Glenn,
>
> You raise a good point regarding the state of our test specifications, and
> it had been on my mind as well. I updated the Test Specifications for Unit
> Testing (JUnit and TestNG) during Release 9.0 testing, but they still need
> further work:
>
> - The JUnit tests (
> https://netbeans-vm.apache.org/synergy/client/app/#/specification/390/v/2)
> take too long and need to be reduced. They also need to support JUnit 5
> functionality.
> - The TestNG tests (
> https://netbeans-vm.apache.org/synergy/client/app/#/title/testng_test_specification/)
> need to be expanded, and support TestNG 6 functionality.
>
> I'll volunteer to work on those, but anyone else is welcome to participate
> - just let me know.
>
> I'd also thought about creating additional Test Specifications for other
> testing frameworks such as Spock and Mockito, but I invite feedback and
> approval on that idea before we proceed. Perhaps they are not used enough
> to merit Test Specifications?
>
> It is also important that we have volunteers for peer review of any new or
> updated test specifications. We don't want to be discovering that those
> test specifications are inadequate during 9.1 testing!
>
> Rick
>
> On Mon, Aug 27, 2018 at 9:17 AM Glenn Holmer <ce...@kolabnow.com.invalid>
> wrote:
>
>> On 08/26/2018 07:47 AM, paloris_J wrote:
>>> I notice that on the archives that there is no new emails
>>
>> NetCAT for 9.0 has completed, so that's perfectly normal.
>>
>> But it's never too early to start thinking about the next NetCAT,
>> especially with the shorter release cycle NetBeans will be undertaking.
>> My own concern is with the test specifications, which had gotten out of
>> date over the years. Now we NetBeans users are responsible for all of
>> this ourselves. In the Profiler tribe, there was not even time to update
>> all of the specs to reflect the current functionality of NetBeans.
>>
>> Are we comfortable with these specifications now? Are they the best way
>> to test NetBeans releases? What should we be doing ahead of time to
>> prepare for the next NetCAT? And most importantly, what is the role of
>> NetCAT in the new Apache world of NetBeans? How should NetCAT fit into
>> the development and release process?
>>
>> I'd be curious to hear people's opinions on these questions.
>>
>> --
>> Glenn Holmer (Linux registered user #16682)
>> "After the vintage season came the aftermath -- and Cenbe."
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: netcat-unsubscribe@netbeans.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: netcat-help@netbeans.apache.org
>>
>> For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit:
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists
>>
>>
>