You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@subversion.apache.org by Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis <ar...@gmail.com> on 2008/10/20 01:40:34 UTC
Question about subversion/tests/cmdline/tree_conflict_tests.py:ensure_tree_conflict()
subversion/tests/cmdline/tree_conflict_tests.py:ensure_tree_conflict() contains:
except svntest.Failure:
# Reason for catching exceptions here is to be able to see progress
# during early development when a large number of sub-tests often
# fail. When the feature is stable, the "try" and "except" can go away.
(exc_type, exc_val) = sys.exc_info()[:2]
print "EXCEPTION for", str(inc_action), "onto", str(loc_action) + ": ",
for x in traceback.format_exception_only(exc_type, exc_val):
sys.stdout.write(x)
print
Is this code still needed?
--
Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
Re: Question about
subversion/tests/cmdline/tree_conflict_tests.py:ensure_tree_conflict()
Posted by Julian Foad <ju...@btopenworld.com>.
On Mon, 2008-10-20 at 03:40 +0200, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
wrote:
> subversion/tests/cmdline/tree_conflict_tests.py:ensure_tree_conflict() contains:
>
> except svntest.Failure:
> # Reason for catching exceptions here is to be able to see progress
> # during early development when a large number of sub-tests often
> # fail. When the feature is stable, the "try" and "except" can go away.
> (exc_type, exc_val) = sys.exc_info()[:2]
> print "EXCEPTION for", str(inc_action), "onto", str(loc_action) + ": ",
> for x in traceback.format_exception_only(exc_type, exc_val):
> sys.stdout.write(x)
> print
>
> Is this code still needed?
No, it isn't. Thanks for noticing.
I have deleted it in r33773.
- Julian
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org