[jira] [Commented] (JUDDI-1020) Use an alternate documentation mechanism than the jboss docbook plugin

["ASF subversion and git services (Jira)" <ju...@ws.apache.org>]

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JUDDI-1020?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17609238#comment-17609238 ] 

ASF subversion and git services commented on JUDDI-1020:
--------------------------------------------------------

Commit 76d055283912aaad65dd1d1bac4ebc5d9f6c18e7 in juddi's branch refs/heads/feature/JUDDI-978 from Alex O'Ree
[ https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=juddi.git;h=76d055283 ]

JUDDI-1020 resolves all known formating and packaging issues with maven pdf plugin switch (from docbook)


> Use an alternate documentation mechanism than the jboss docbook plugin
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: JUDDI-1020
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JUDDI-1020
>             Project: jUDDI
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: build
>            Reporter: Alex O'Ree
>            Assignee: Alex O'Ree
>            Priority: Major
>         Attachments: juddi-client-guide.pdf, juddi-server-guide.pdf
>
>
> long story short, maven frequently has issues resolving either xlts or the docbook plugins. I think it's an issue on the jboss maven repo either blocking too many concurrent requests or some kind of quote or bandwidth cap, etc. Maybe we can use the maven site plugin + pdf plugins to get a near equivalent setup or maybe there are some other alternatives out there



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)