You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@tomcat.apache.org by bu...@apache.org on 2003/06/11 21:29:37 UTC
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 20689] New: -
mod_jk2, the /jkstatus page, and apache::worker
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20689>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20689
mod_jk2, the /jkstatus page, and apache::worker
Summary: mod_jk2, the /jkstatus page, and apache::worker
Product: Tomcat 4
Version: 4.1.24
Platform: Sun
OS/Version: Solaris
Status: NEW
Severity: Normal
Priority: Other
Component: Connector:Coyote JK 2
AssignedTo: tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org
ReportedBy: crozierm@conducivetech.com
I'm using mod_jk2 with apache in "worker" mode, meaning that there are several
different httpd processes that stay alive (instead of forking) and are delegated
requests. I noticed that when setting a jk2 channel to graceful by updating
workers2.properties and hitting the /jkstatus page, only one of the "worker" httpd's
would pick up the change. Other httpd+mod_jk2 processes would continue to forward
new sessions to the "graceful" channel. The solution was to access the /jkstatus page
repeatedly until every httpd process had served /jkstatus and picked up the changed
attributes.
If possible, it would be more convenient if accessing /jkstatus a single time would cause
all the httpd workers to check workers2.properties for updates.
Thanks!
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tomcat-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org