You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to commits@cassandra.apache.org by "Sam Tunnicliffe (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2015/09/25 23:48:04 UTC

[jira] [Commented] (CASSANDRA-10390) inconsistent quoted identifier handling in UDTs

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-10390?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14908724#comment-14908724 ] 

Sam Tunnicliffe commented on CASSANDRA-10390:
---------------------------------------------

This is a python driver bug, types like the one described are legal & can in fact be accessed using the java driver. I've opened [https://datastax-oss.atlassian.net/browse/PYTHON-413|PYTHON-413] and we'll need to update the bundled driver once that's resolved. 

> inconsistent quoted identifier handling in UDTs
> -----------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CASSANDRA-10390
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-10390
>             Project: Cassandra
>          Issue Type: Bug
>         Environment: 2.2.1
>            Reporter: Jonathan Halliday
>            Assignee: Sam Tunnicliffe
>             Fix For: 2.2.x
>
>
> > create keyspace test with replication = {'class': 'SimpleStrategy', 'replication_factor': 1 } ;
> > create type if not exists mytype ("my.field" text);
> > desc keyspace; -- observe that mytype is listed
> > create table mytable (pk int primary key, myfield frozen<mytype>);
> > desc keyspace; -- observe that mytype is listed, but mytable is not.
> > select * from mytable;
> ValueError: Type names and field names can only contain alphanumeric characters and underscores: 'my.field'
> create table myothertable (pk int primary key, "my.field" text);
> select * from myothertable; -- valid
> huh? It's valid to create a field of a table, or a field of a type, with a quoted name containing non-alpha chars, but it's not valid to use a such a type in a table?  I can just about live with that though it seems unnecessarily restrictive, but allowing creation of such a table and then making it invisible/unusable definitely seems wrong.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)