You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to legal-discuss@apache.org by Mladen Turk <mt...@apache.org> on 2009/07/17 14:42:20 UTC
Content of the people.apache.org/~user
Hi,
Is there anywhere documented the stuff that can go inside
those locations from the legal POV, or is the content completely
the member/committer responsibility.
Regards
--
^TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org
Re: Content of the people.apache.org/~user
Posted by Henri Yandell <ba...@apache.org>.
I don't think there's anything to be concerned about. With appropriate
svn auth configuration you'd be happy putting it in.
On Friday, July 17, 2009, David Jencks <da...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> On Jul 17, 2009, at 1:19 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
>
>
> In the lack of any ISP-like agreement, I'm going to claim that it's
> all under the ICLA.
>
> So don't put anything there that you wouldn't feel happy committing
> somewhere in SVN, and be aware that Apache have a broad license to
> anything in there.
>
>
> It might be a good idea to either discuss this or make everyone who has NDA covered materials like the tcks aware of this. We've been accustomed to passing the tcks around through people.apache.org accounts which obviously is inappropriate under this policy.
>
> thanks
> david jencks
> /runs off to make sure I don't have any such tck material in my account...
>
>
>
> Hen
>
> On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 5:42 AM, Mladen Turk<mt...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Is there anywhere documented the stuff that can go inside
> those locations from the legal POV, or is the content completely
> the member/committer responsibility.
>
>
> Regards
> --
> ^TM
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org
Content of the people.apache.org/~user
Posted by Henri Yandell <ba...@apache.org>.
ASL part is interesting, as opposed to ASF. I'll claim that there is
no assumption of license, what's in ~foo is proprietary to foo except
that the CLA means we can redistribute. We can also decide that
something be removed if we like - a policy we can grow organically
over time.
So not ASL unless specified.
For the example of someone using it to advertise their company - I'd
expect Infra to be able to police that, possibly by talking to the
members to judge the way the foundation is leaning on the subject.
On Friday, July 17, 2009, Mladen Turk <mt...@apache.org> wrote:
> On 17/07/09 23:05, David Jencks wrote:
>
>
> On Jul 17, 2009, at 1:19 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
>
>
> In the lack of any ISP-like agreement, I'm going to claim that it's
> all under the ICLA.
>
> So don't put anything there that you wouldn't feel happy committing
> somewhere in SVN, and be aware that Apache have a broad license to
> anything in there.
>
>
> It might be a good idea to either discuss this or make everyone who has
> NDA covered materials like the tcks aware of this. We've been accustomed
> to passing the tcks around through people.apache.org accounts which
> obviously is inappropriate under this policy.
>
>
>
> Well I was more interested of the content
> inside ~user/public_html/ (only this is public).
>
> I suppose (like Henri said) that the content
> should match the ASL policy, and it falls under
> the ASL by default, eg. content not strictly
> related to any of the current projects.
> That's fine and clear.
>
> But, what about html content?
>
> Eg. Is there something preventing someone
> for putting the following:
> "OK, I'm a committer for this project and
> if you wish I can provide you with the support
> for a fee, blah, blah ... "
>
> So my question was about that kind of a content, not
> about sharing the .mp3 or linux kernel source
> covered by non-ASL compatible licenses.
>
> The above content inside ~xyz/public_html/index.html
> could even have ASL prologue :) making it perfectly
> compliant, and I can of course have my opinion on
> the morality of such content, but certainly not
> about legality.
>
>
> Regards
> --
> ^TM
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org
Re: Content of the people.apache.org/~user
Posted by Mladen Turk <mt...@apache.org>.
On 17/07/09 23:05, David Jencks wrote:
>
> On Jul 17, 2009, at 1:19 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
>
>> In the lack of any ISP-like agreement, I'm going to claim that it's
>> all under the ICLA.
>>
>> So don't put anything there that you wouldn't feel happy committing
>> somewhere in SVN, and be aware that Apache have a broad license to
>> anything in there.
>
> It might be a good idea to either discuss this or make everyone who has
> NDA covered materials like the tcks aware of this. We've been accustomed
> to passing the tcks around through people.apache.org accounts which
> obviously is inappropriate under this policy.
>
Well I was more interested of the content
inside ~user/public_html/ (only this is public).
I suppose (like Henri said) that the content
should match the ASL policy, and it falls under
the ASL by default, eg. content not strictly
related to any of the current projects.
That's fine and clear.
But, what about html content?
Eg. Is there something preventing someone
for putting the following:
"OK, I'm a committer for this project and
if you wish I can provide you with the support
for a fee, blah, blah ... "
So my question was about that kind of a content, not
about sharing the .mp3 or linux kernel source
covered by non-ASL compatible licenses.
The above content inside ~xyz/public_html/index.html
could even have ASL prologue :) making it perfectly
compliant, and I can of course have my opinion on
the morality of such content, but certainly not
about legality.
Regards
--
^TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org
Re: Content of the people.apache.org/~user
Posted by David Jencks <da...@yahoo.com>.
On Jul 17, 2009, at 1:19 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
> In the lack of any ISP-like agreement, I'm going to claim that it's
> all under the ICLA.
>
> So don't put anything there that you wouldn't feel happy committing
> somewhere in SVN, and be aware that Apache have a broad license to
> anything in there.
It might be a good idea to either discuss this or make everyone who
has NDA covered materials like the tcks aware of this. We've been
accustomed to passing the tcks around through people.apache.org
accounts which obviously is inappropriate under this policy.
thanks
david jencks
/runs off to make sure I don't have any such tck material in my
account...
>
> Hen
>
> On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 5:42 AM, Mladen Turk<mt...@apache.org> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Is there anywhere documented the stuff that can go inside
>> those locations from the legal POV, or is the content completely
>> the member/committer responsibility.
>>
>>
>> Regards
>> --
>> ^TM
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org
>>
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org
Re: Content of the people.apache.org/~user
Posted by Henri Yandell <hy...@gmail.com>.
In the lack of any ISP-like agreement, I'm going to claim that it's
all under the ICLA.
So don't put anything there that you wouldn't feel happy committing
somewhere in SVN, and be aware that Apache have a broad license to
anything in there.
Hen
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 5:42 AM, Mladen Turk<mt...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is there anywhere documented the stuff that can go inside
> those locations from the legal POV, or is the content completely
> the member/committer responsibility.
>
>
> Regards
> --
> ^TM
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org