You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to commits@cassandra.apache.org by "Sylvain Lebresne (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2016/02/22 10:34:18 UTC

[jira] [Resolved] (CASSANDRA-10849) Decide how to handle with null multi-cell collections

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-10849?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Sylvain Lebresne resolved CASSANDRA-10849.
------------------------------------------
    Resolution: Duplicate

Marking as duplicate of CASSANDRA-11064 since as said above the patch there handles the changes for this.

> Decide how to handle with null multi-cell collections
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CASSANDRA-10849
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-10849
>             Project: Cassandra
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Robert Stupp
>            Priority: Minor
>
> CASSANDRA-10650 introduced the ability to generate the CQL literal from a serialized representation - currently only used to store a UDA's INITCOND.
> The code to generate the CQL literal for a {{null}} collection deals with that in the following way:
> * null frozen collections --> CQL literal {{null}}
> * empty frozen collections --> CQL literal {{[]}} (or {{\{\}}} for maps)
> * null multi-cell collections --> CQL literal {{[]}} (or {{\{\}}} for maps) ; there's no way to distinguish null from empty
> * empty multi-cell collections --> CQL literal {{[]}} (or {{\{\}}} for maps) ; there's no way to distinguish null from empty
> CASSANDRA-10840 exposed that the handling is not optimal and the patch deals with this by using a "frozen" state type to generate the CQL literal.
> It's currently not a critical thing yet - just want to know whether it's ok how CASSANDRA-10840 handles this or {{CQL3Type.toCQLLiteral}} should be changed.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)