You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to docs@httpd.apache.org by bu...@apache.org on 2015/12/29 23:56:47 UTC
[Bug 57109] GPG verification examples are wrong
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57109
Luca Toscano <to...@gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |INVALID
--- Comment #2 from Luca Toscano <to...@gmail.com> ---
Hi!
>From https://www.gnupg.org/documentation/manpage.html it seems that we are ok:
"""
–verify [[=sigfile=] [=signed-files=]]
Assume that sigfile is a signature and verify it without generating any output.
With no arguments, the signature packet is read from stdin (it may be a
detached signature when not used in batch mode). If only a sigfile is given, it
may be a complete signature or a detached signature, in which case the signed
stuff is expected in a file without the ".sig" or ".asc" extension (if such a
file does not exist it is expected at stdin; use a single dash ("-") as
filename to force a read from stdin). With more than 1 argument, the first
should be a detached signature and the remaining files are the signed stuff.
"""
From: http://httpd.apache.org/dev/verification.html
"In this example, you are already assumed to have downloaded
httpd-2.0.44.tar.gz (the release) and httpd-2.0.44.tar.gz.asc (the detached
signature)."
Closing this bug, please re-open it if I missed something!
Luca
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: docs-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: docs-help@httpd.apache.org