You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@arrow.apache.org by "Ben Kietzman (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2020/03/23 18:52:00 UTC
[jira] [Updated] (ARROW-6959) [C++] Clarify what signatures are
preferred for compute kernels
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-6959?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Ben Kietzman updated ARROW-6959:
--------------------------------
Fix Version/s: 1.0.0
> [C++] Clarify what signatures are preferred for compute kernels
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: ARROW-6959
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-6959
> Project: Apache Arrow
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: C++
> Reporter: Ben Kietzman
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 1.0.0
>
>
> Many of the compute kernels feature functions which accept only array inputs in addition to functions which accept Datums. The former seems implicitly like a convenience wrapper around the latter but I don't think this is explicit anywhere. Is there a preferred overload for bindings to use? Is it preferred that C++ implementers provide convenience wrappers for different permutations of argument type? (for example, Filter now provides an overload for record batch input as well as array input)
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)