1.4 release

[Greg Brown <gk...@mac.com>]

Hi all,

We're getting ready to tag the 1.4 release - if you have time, please review the current build and let us know if you see any issues. Otherwise, we'll plan to tag on Tuesday or Wednesday and put the release to a vote.

Thanks,
Greg

Re: 1.4 release

[Niclas Hedhman <ni...@hedhman.org>]

On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 12:40 AM, Greg Brown <gk...@mac.com> wrote:
> Assuming that there are no issues with it, this set of artifacts is ultimately going to be released to the public as Pivot 1.4. So I believe we will need to call for an official vote (correct me if I am wrong).

I think that you may not change the name of the released artifacts to
go from "RC" to "final" without a corresponding vote. So, if an RC is
going to be produced, Martijn's suggestion is that such artifact
doesn't necessarily need a PMC vote, UNLESS you upload it into /dist.
So, I suspect that you may both be right, the question is if you want
to have one or two rounds of votes and vetting.


Cheers
-- 
Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer
http://www.qi4j.org - New Energy for Java

I  live here; http://tinyurl.com/2qq9er
I  work here; http://tinyurl.com/2ymelc
I relax here; http://tinyurl.com/2cgsug

Re: 1.4 release

[Greg Brown <gk...@mac.com>]

Assuming that there are no issues with it, this set of artifacts is ultimately going to be released to the public as Pivot 1.4. So I believe we will need to call for an official vote (correct me if I am wrong).

Thanks,
Greg

On Dec 20, 2009, at 11:09 AM, Martijn Dashorst wrote:

> Just a quick note: as long as you don't release to the general public
> (i.e. users@) you don't have to formally vote on artifacts. This only
> holds for things that are kept on dev@ or the occasional users seeing
> if a bug has been fixed.
> 
> Martijn
> 
> On Sun, Dec 20, 2009 at 3:23 PM, Greg Brown <gk...@mac.com> wrote:
>> Why don't we just call for a vote? That way we don't have to go through the vetting process twice.
>> 
>> I actually already did a full review of the artifacts and am ready to vote +1 when the vote is called.
>> 
>> 
>> On Dec 20, 2009, at 3:44 AM, Todd Volkert wrote:
>> 
>>> Tags are cheap, so I actually went ahead and created the RC1 tag.  I'll call
>>> for a vote soon, but in the meantime, if you want to bang on it a little:
>>> http://people.apache.org/~tvolkert/dist/pivot/v1.4-rc1/
>>> 
>>> -T
>>> 
>>> On Sat, Dec 19, 2009 at 10:52 AM, Greg Brown <gk...@mac.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Hi all,
>>>> 
>>>> We're getting ready to tag the 1.4 release - if you have time, please
>>>> review the current build and let us know if you see any issues. Otherwise,
>>>> we'll plan to tag on Tuesday or Wednesday and put the release to a vote.
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Greg
>>>> 
>>>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com
> Apache Wicket 1.4 increases type safety for web applications
> Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.4.4

Re: 1.4 release

[Martijn Dashorst <ma...@gmail.com>]

Just a quick note: as long as you don't release to the general public
(i.e. users@) you don't have to formally vote on artifacts. This only
holds for things that are kept on dev@ or the occasional users seeing
if a bug has been fixed.

Martijn

On Sun, Dec 20, 2009 at 3:23 PM, Greg Brown <gk...@mac.com> wrote:
> Why don't we just call for a vote? That way we don't have to go through the vetting process twice.
>
> I actually already did a full review of the artifacts and am ready to vote +1 when the vote is called.
>
>
> On Dec 20, 2009, at 3:44 AM, Todd Volkert wrote:
>
>> Tags are cheap, so I actually went ahead and created the RC1 tag.  I'll call
>> for a vote soon, but in the meantime, if you want to bang on it a little:
>> http://people.apache.org/~tvolkert/dist/pivot/v1.4-rc1/
>>
>> -T
>>
>> On Sat, Dec 19, 2009 at 10:52 AM, Greg Brown <gk...@mac.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> We're getting ready to tag the 1.4 release - if you have time, please
>>> review the current build and let us know if you see any issues. Otherwise,
>>> we'll plan to tag on Tuesday or Wednesday and put the release to a vote.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Greg
>>>
>>>
>
>



-- 
Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com
Apache Wicket 1.4 increases type safety for web applications
Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.4.4

Re: 1.4 release

[Greg Brown <gk...@mac.com>]

Why don't we just call for a vote? That way we don't have to go through the vetting process twice.

I actually already did a full review of the artifacts and am ready to vote +1 when the vote is called.


On Dec 20, 2009, at 3:44 AM, Todd Volkert wrote:

> Tags are cheap, so I actually went ahead and created the RC1 tag.  I'll call
> for a vote soon, but in the meantime, if you want to bang on it a little:
> http://people.apache.org/~tvolkert/dist/pivot/v1.4-rc1/
> 
> -T
> 
> On Sat, Dec 19, 2009 at 10:52 AM, Greg Brown <gk...@mac.com> wrote:
> 
>> Hi all,
>> 
>> We're getting ready to tag the 1.4 release - if you have time, please
>> review the current build and let us know if you see any issues. Otherwise,
>> we'll plan to tag on Tuesday or Wednesday and put the release to a vote.
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Greg
>> 
>> 

Re: 1.4 release

[Todd Volkert <tv...@gmail.com>]

Tags are cheap, so I actually went ahead and created the RC1 tag.  I'll call
for a vote soon, but in the meantime, if you want to bang on it a little:
http://people.apache.org/~tvolkert/dist/pivot/v1.4-rc1/

-T

On Sat, Dec 19, 2009 at 10:52 AM, Greg Brown <gk...@mac.com> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> We're getting ready to tag the 1.4 release - if you have time, please
> review the current build and let us know if you see any issues. Otherwise,
> we'll plan to tag on Tuesday or Wednesday and put the release to a vote.
>
> Thanks,
> Greg
>
>