You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@lucene.apache.org by "David Smiley (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2016/04/14 19:41:25 UTC
[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-6637) Solr should have a way to restore a
core
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6637?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15241575#comment-15241575 ]
David Smiley commented on SOLR-6637:
------------------------------------
While working on SOLR-5750 (Collection level backup/restore), I read the code for RestoreCore and I'm confused why the "prefer local copy" logic is expressly avoided for these file extensions: .si, .liv, and the segments_. Why these files? It seems arbitrary and there are no comments saying why. Do you know [~varunthacker]?
> Solr should have a way to restore a core
> ----------------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-6637
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6637
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Varun Thacker
> Assignee: Varun Thacker
> Fix For: 5.2, master
>
> Attachments: SOLR-6637.patch, SOLR-6637.patch, SOLR-6637.patch, SOLR-6637.patch, SOLR-6637.patch, SOLR-6637.patch, SOLR-6637.patch, SOLR-6637.patch, SOLR-6637.patch, SOLR-6637.patch
>
>
> We have a core backup command which backs up the index. We should have a restore command too.
> This would restore any named snapshots created by the replication handlers backup command.
> While working on this patch right now I realized that during backup we only backup the index. Should we backup the conf files also? Any thoughts? I could separate Jira for this.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org