You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@openoffice.apache.org by Rob Weir <ro...@apache.org> on 2013/06/27 20:46:50 UTC
Draft blog post: Not Interested
https://blogs.apache.org/preview/OOo/?previewEntry=not_interested
This is another reference post, that we can point people to in the
future. It will help avoid explaining this over and over again, for
recurring questions like these.
Regards,
-Rob
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Draft blog post: Not Interested
Posted by Kay Schenk <ka...@gmail.com>.
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 1:36 PM, Rob Weir <ro...@apache.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 3:09 PM, Donald Whytock <dw...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 2:46 PM, Rob Weir <ro...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> >> https://blogs.apache.org/preview/OOo/?previewEntry=not_interested
> >>
> >> This is another reference post, that we can point people to in the
> >> future. It will help avoid explaining this over and over again, for
> >> recurring questions like these.
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >>
> >> -Rob
>
good!
> >>
> >
> > "relevant, non-spammy" -> "relevant and non-spammy"
> >
>
> Thanks.
>
> > Did you want to say anything about lack of a particular point of contact
> > and unlikelihood of returning phone calls?
> >
>
> We have been known to have a PMC member call someone back, if there
> was a legitimate reason to do so. For example, we do return calls
> for press inquiries. So I would not say never. But it is, as you
> say, unlikely.
>
> -Rob
>
> > Don
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
>
>
--
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
MzK
"If you stick with a vision, it might not all work,
but some of it will be absolute genius."
-- Kim Cattrall
Re: Draft blog post: Not Interested
Posted by Rob Weir <ro...@apache.org>.
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 3:09 PM, Donald Whytock <dw...@apache.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 2:46 PM, Rob Weir <ro...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> https://blogs.apache.org/preview/OOo/?previewEntry=not_interested
>>
>> This is another reference post, that we can point people to in the
>> future. It will help avoid explaining this over and over again, for
>> recurring questions like these.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> -Rob
>>
>
> "relevant, non-spammy" -> "relevant and non-spammy"
>
Thanks.
> Did you want to say anything about lack of a particular point of contact
> and unlikelihood of returning phone calls?
>
We have been known to have a PMC member call someone back, if there
was a legitimate reason to do so. For example, we do return calls
for press inquiries. So I would not say never. But it is, as you
say, unlikely.
-Rob
> Don
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Draft blog post: Not Interested
Posted by Donald Whytock <dw...@apache.org>.
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 2:46 PM, Rob Weir <ro...@apache.org> wrote:
> https://blogs.apache.org/preview/OOo/?previewEntry=not_interested
>
> This is another reference post, that we can point people to in the
> future. It will help avoid explaining this over and over again, for
> recurring questions like these.
>
> Regards,
>
> -Rob
>
"relevant, non-spammy" -> "relevant and non-spammy"
Did you want to say anything about lack of a particular point of contact
and unlikelihood of returning phone calls?
Don