You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@opennlp.apache.org by "James Kosin (Resolved) (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2012/03/17 03:26:38 UTC

[jira] [Resolved] (OPENNLP-471) DictionaryNameFinder has HASHing issues

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENNLP-471?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

James Kosin resolved OPENNLP-471.
---------------------------------

       Resolution: Fixed
    Fix Version/s: tools-1.5.3

I'm setting this issue as resolved ... but, do comment here .  We can re-open and address other issues.
                
> DictionaryNameFinder has HASHing issues
> ---------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: OPENNLP-471
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENNLP-471
>             Project: OpenNLP
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Name Finder
>            Reporter: James Kosin
>              Labels: dictionary, namefinder
>             Fix For: tools-1.5.3
>
>
> The DictionaryNameFinder has issues finding multi-token names when the dictionary is searched a token at a time by the find() method.  If, the dictionary doesn't have a single (or shorter) token match available in the dictionary.
> Having a dictionary with {"folic", "acid"} without an entry for {"folic"} will cause the find() method to totally skip the fact there is a longer match possible.
> Thanks to Jim for pushing this and to my debugging skills to find.
> Two possiblilites come to mind:
> 1)  I don't really like, is we turn it into a larger problem by trying longer matches when shorter ones don't match.  Unfortunately, this turns quickly into a race to see who can wait longer.
> 2)  A way of returning a possible match that may need exploring, or a look-ahead type system to say we don't match "folic" but if you have "acid" after "folic" we have a match for that in the dictionary.
> 3)  Leave it as is and modify the dictionary to add shorter terms to the dictionary... maybe marking as not-a-valid entry so we can know we need a longer match.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira