You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@directory.apache.org by "Emmanuel Lecharny (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2010/06/04 18:48:53 UTC

[jira] Commented: (DIRSHARED-62) Improve antlr generated code [shared-ldap]

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRSHARED-62?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12875658#action_12875658 ] 

Emmanuel Lecharny commented on DIRSHARED-62:
--------------------------------------------

I'm afraid we won't be able to do anything about it, as this code is generated. We would have to fix the generator :/

> Improve antlr generated code [shared-ldap]
> ------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: DIRSHARED-62
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRSHARED-62
>             Project: Directory Shared
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>         Environment: All
>            Reporter: Felix Knecht
>
> The generated code by antlr could be improved regarding performance. Listed classes below use the construct new Integer(...) a lot of times in their constructor. If these classes are created many times it's an improvement to have Integer.valueOf(...). Looking at the generated classes almost all values for new Integer are in a range of [-128,128] what matches the criterias for more performance [1].
> Classes:
> /shared-ldap/target/generated-sources/antlr/org/apache/directory/shared/ldap/aci/AntlrACIItemCheckerLexer.java
> /shared-ldap/target/generated-sources/antlr/org/apache/directory/shared/ldap/aci/AntlrACIItemLexer.java
> /shared-ldap/target/generated-sources/antlr/org/apache/directory/shared/ldap/subtree/AntlrSubtreeSpecificationCheckerLexer.java
> /shared-ldap/target/generated-sources/antlr/org/apache/directory/shared/ldap/subtree/AntlrSubtreeSpecificationLexer.java
> /shared-ldap/target/generated-sources/antlr/org/apache/directory/shared/ldap/trigger/AntlrTriggerSpecificationLexer.java
> [1] http://findbugs.sourceforge.net/bugDescriptions.html#DM_NUMBER_CTOR
>  Using new Integer(int) is guaranteed to always result in a new object whereas Integer.valueOf(int) allows caching of values to be done by the compiler, class library, or JVM. Using of cached values avoids object allocation and the code will be faster.
> Values between -128 and 127 are guaranteed to have corresponding cached instances and using valueOf is approximately 3.5 times faster than using constructor. For values outside the constant range the performance of both styles is the same.
> Unless the class must be compatible with JVMs predating Java 1.5, use either autoboxing or the valueOf() method when creating instances of Long, Integer, Short, Character, and Byte. 

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.