You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@rocketmq.apache.org by Zhouxiang Zhan <zh...@gmail.com> on 2022/03/08 07:11:18 UTC
[DISCUSS] [RIP-39] Support gRPC protocol
Hi. RocketMQ Community:
We are proposing to implement the gRPC protocol on RocketMQ.
Detailed proposal: https://shimo.im/docs/gXqmeEPYgdUw5bqo/ 「RIP-39：Support
gRPC protocol」
Looking forward to more detailed discussions.
Re: [DISCUSS] [RIP-39] Support gRPC protocol
Posted by Zhanhui Li <li...@apache.org>.
It is completely possible to maintain API compatible while transport and
codec are replaced with gRPC. However, another RIP is also proposing
amendment to the existing API, with strong focus on consistency,
immutability, and ease of use.
Considering the well received SemVer paradigm (see https://semver.org/),
wondering that we should upgrade the major version and keep the new SDK
capable of co-existence with current ones. That is, the new SDK is able to
run alongside 4.x version in the same JVM, allowing partial migration to
the new SDK. In the meantime, maintaining version 4.x for some time until
it reached end-of-life.
On Wed, Mar 9, 2022 at 1:35 PM Xiaorui Wang <vi...@apache.org> wrote:
> I think it is a right choice to support gRPC. However, I have a concern for
> the client compatibility, whether the benefits of gRPC can be used by
> upgrading SDK. If so, the cost of the upgrade should be taken into account.
>
> I look forward to receiving your reply on the questions I raised.
>
> Cheers
>
> Xiaorui Wang 王小瑞
> Apache RocketMQ PMC chair
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 8, 2022 at 3:11 PM Zhouxiang Zhan <zh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi. RocketMQ Community:
> >
> > We are proposing to implement the gRPC protocol on RocketMQ.
> >
> > Detailed proposal: https://shimo.im/docs/gXqmeEPYgdUw5bqo/
> 「RIP-39：Support
> > gRPC protocol」
> >
> > Looking forward to more detailed discussions.
> >
>
[RESULT] [VOTE] [RIP-39] Support gRPC protocol
Posted by Zhouxiang Zhan <zh...@gmail.com>.
Hello RocketMQ Community,
This is the vote result for the kickoff of RIP-39 Support gRPC protocol,
and it has been passed with [4] binding +1s:
*Binding votes +1s:*
yukon(yukon@apache.org)
lollipopjin(lollipop@apache.org)
Zhanhui Li(lizhanhui@apache.org)
Xiaorui Wang(vintagewang@apache.org)
This RIP will be accepted and its status will be updated to RocketMQ wiki
soon.
Thanks.
lollipop <lo...@apache.org> 于2022年3月14日周一 15:05写道：
> +1
>
> On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 12:57 PM Zhanhui Li <li...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 12:45 PM Xiaorui Wang <vi...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > Best regards,
> > >
> > > Xiaorui Wang[1] - Apache RocketMQ PMC chair
> > > [1] https://github.com/vintagewang
> > >
> > >
> > > On Wed, Mar 9, 2022 at 4:32 PM 陈仲良 <ch...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Currently the .NET environment SDK is very lacking. I hope the new
> sdk
> > > > based on gRPC protocol could solve the problem.
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
[RESULT] [VOTE] [RIP-39] Support gRPC protocol
Posted by Zhouxiang Zhan <zh...@gmail.com>.
Hello RocketMQ Community,
This is the vote result for the kickoff of RIP-39 Support gRPC protocol,
and it has been passed with [4] binding +1s:
*Binding votes +1s:*
yukon(yukon@apache.org)
lollipopjin(lollipop@apache.org)
Zhanhui Li(lizhanhui@apache.org)
Xiaorui Wang(vintagewang@apache.org)
This RIP will be accepted and its status will be updated to RocketMQ wiki
soon.
Thanks.
On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 3:05 PM lollipop <lo...@apache.org> wrote:
> +1
>
> On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 12:57 PM Zhanhui Li <li...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 12:45 PM Xiaorui Wang <vi...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > Best regards,
> > >
> > > Xiaorui Wang[1] - Apache RocketMQ PMC chair
> > > [1] https://github.com/vintagewang
> > >
> > >
> > > On Wed, Mar 9, 2022 at 4:32 PM 陈仲良 <ch...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Currently the .NET environment SDK is very lacking. I hope the new
> sdk
> > > > based on gRPC protocol could solve the problem.
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: [DISCUSS] [RIP-39] Support gRPC protocol
Posted by lollipop <lo...@apache.org>.
+1
On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 12:57 PM Zhanhui Li <li...@apache.org> wrote:
> +1
>
> On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 12:45 PM Xiaorui Wang <vi...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > Best regards,
> >
> > Xiaorui Wang[1] - Apache RocketMQ PMC chair
> > [1] https://github.com/vintagewang
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 9, 2022 at 4:32 PM 陈仲良 <ch...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Currently the .NET environment SDK is very lacking. I hope the new sdk
> > > based on gRPC protocol could solve the problem.
> > >
> >
>
Re: [DISCUSS] [RIP-39] Support gRPC protocol
Posted by Zhanhui Li <li...@apache.org>.
+1
On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 12:45 PM Xiaorui Wang <vi...@apache.org>
wrote:
> +1
>
> Best regards,
>
> Xiaorui Wang[1] - Apache RocketMQ PMC chair
> [1] https://github.com/vintagewang
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 9, 2022 at 4:32 PM 陈仲良 <ch...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Currently the .NET environment SDK is very lacking. I hope the new sdk
> > based on gRPC protocol could solve the problem.
> >
>
Re: [DISCUSS] [RIP-39] Support gRPC protocol
Posted by Xiaorui Wang <vi...@apache.org>.
+1
Best regards,
Xiaorui Wang[1] - Apache RocketMQ PMC chair
[1] https://github.com/vintagewang
On Wed, Mar 9, 2022 at 4:32 PM 陈仲良 <ch...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Currently the .NET environment SDK is very lacking. I hope the new sdk
> based on gRPC protocol could solve the problem.
>
Re: [VOTE] [RIP-39] Support gRPC protocol
Posted by yukon <yu...@apache.org>.
+1
On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 11:02 AM Zhouxiang Zhan <zh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi, RocketMQ Community,
>
> This is the vote for [RIP-39] Support gRPC protocol.
>
> Detailed proposal <https://shimo.im/docs/gXqmeEPYgdUw5bqo>.
>
> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours or until the necessary number
> of votes are reached.
>
> Please vote accordingly:
> [ ] +1 approve
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
>
> Thanks.
>
>
> Xiaorui Wang <vi...@apache.org> 于2022年3月9日周三 16:48写道：
>
> > OK, I support this RIP.
> >
> > I'm delighted to see more and more RIP this year, which shows that our
> > community is maturing. We look forward to more membersjoin us and become
> > the contributors of RocketMQ.
> >
> > Best regards,
> >
> > Xiaorui Wang 王小瑞
> > Apache RocketMQ PMC chair
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 9, 2022 at 4:32 PM 陈仲良 <ch...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Currently the .NET environment SDK is very lacking. I hope the new sdk
> > > based on gRPC protocol could solve the problem.
> > >
> >
>
[VOTE] [RIP-39] Support gRPC protocol
Posted by Zhouxiang Zhan <zh...@gmail.com>.
Hi, RocketMQ Community,
This is the vote for [RIP-39] Support gRPC protocol.
Detailed proposal <https://shimo.im/docs/gXqmeEPYgdUw5bqo>.
The vote will be open for at least 72 hours or until the necessary number
of votes are reached.
Please vote accordingly:
[ ] +1 approve
[ ] +0 no opinion
[ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
Thanks.
Xiaorui Wang <vi...@apache.org> 于2022年3月9日周三 16:48写道：
> OK, I support this RIP.
>
> I'm delighted to see more and more RIP this year, which shows that our
> community is maturing. We look forward to more membersjoin us and become
> the contributors of RocketMQ.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Xiaorui Wang 王小瑞
> Apache RocketMQ PMC chair
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 9, 2022 at 4:32 PM 陈仲良 <ch...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Currently the .NET environment SDK is very lacking. I hope the new sdk
> > based on gRPC protocol could solve the problem.
> >
>
Re: [DISCUSS] [RIP-39] Support gRPC protocol
Posted by Xiaorui Wang <vi...@apache.org>.
OK, I support this RIP.
I'm delighted to see more and more RIP this year, which shows that our
community is maturing. We look forward to more membersjoin us and become
the contributors of RocketMQ.
Best regards,
Xiaorui Wang 王小瑞
Apache RocketMQ PMC chair
On Wed, Mar 9, 2022 at 4:32 PM 陈仲良 <ch...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Currently the .NET environment SDK is very lacking. I hope the new sdk
> based on gRPC protocol could solve the problem.
>
Re: [DISCUSS] [RIP-39] Support gRPC protocol
Posted by 陈仲良 <ch...@gmail.com>.
Currently the .NET environment SDK is very lacking. I hope the new sdk
based on gRPC protocol could solve the problem.
Re: [DISCUSS] [RIP-39] Support gRPC protocol
Posted by Zhouxiang Zhan <zh...@gmail.com>.
The compatibility of SDK is an important part of this RIP.
We propose to use the pop interface and the existing queue balance
mechanism
to ensure the smooth upgrade from remoting SDK and even the situation
of both remoting SDK and gRPC SDK in the same producer group or consumer
group.
Re: [DISCUSS] [RIP-39] Support gRPC protocol
Posted by Xiaorui Wang <vi...@apache.org>.
I think it is a right choice to support gRPC. However, I have a concern for
the client compatibility, whether the benefits of gRPC can be used by
upgrading SDK. If so, the cost of the upgrade should be taken into account.
I look forward to receiving your reply on the questions I raised.
Cheers
Xiaorui Wang 王小瑞
Apache RocketMQ PMC chair
On Tue, Mar 8, 2022 at 3:11 PM Zhouxiang Zhan <zh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi. RocketMQ Community:
>
> We are proposing to implement the gRPC protocol on RocketMQ.
>
> Detailed proposal: https://shimo.im/docs/gXqmeEPYgdUw5bqo/ 「RIP-39：Support
> gRPC protocol」
>
> Looking forward to more detailed discussions.
>