You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@nifi.apache.org by "Koji Kawamura (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2019/07/17 02:38:00 UTC

[jira] [Updated] (NIFI-5970) PutSQL with batch size > 1 + DBCPConnectionPoolLookup results in missing database.name

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-5970?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Koji Kawamura updated NIFI-5970:
--------------------------------
    Status: Patch Available  (was: In Progress)

> PutSQL with batch size > 1 + DBCPConnectionPoolLookup results in missing database.name
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: NIFI-5970
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-5970
>             Project: Apache NiFi
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 1.8.0
>            Reporter: Bryan Bende
>            Assignee: Koji Kawamura
>            Priority: Minor
>          Time Spent: 10m
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> When the batch size is greater than 1 we end up passing null for the attributes that get passed in to the DBCPConnectionPoolLookup, this is because the attributes of each flow file could be different:
> [https://github.com/apache/nifi/blob/master/nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-extension-utils/nifi-processor-utils/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/processor/util/pattern/Put.java#L97]
> Part of the issue is that at this point in the code we have no idea if we are using a DBCPConnectionPoolLookup that requires the database.name attribute, or just a regular DBCPConnectionPool that doesn't.
> https://stackoverflow.com/questions/54312773/dbcpconnectionpoollookup-complaining-about-missing-database-name-even-when-it-is



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.14#76016)