PHP vrs. Java version

[Bipin Upadhyay <mu...@gmail.com>]

Hi,

Chris clarified while replying to a mail a couple of hours ago that
the PHP version doesn't supoort REST yet. I am (and am sure other too)
would like to know other unsupported features as of now.
No offences, just curious so as not spend time on trying to fix things
that are not yet supported. :)


On a more specific note, if handler/service classes are implemented
and the handler is specified in the config file, can I safely say that
any social gadget with JSON will run for PHP?


Thanks in advance.

-- Bipin Upadhyay.
I'd love to change the world,
but they won't gimme the source code.
http://projectbee.org/

Re: PHP vrs. Java version

[David Primmer <da...@gmail.com>]

Next week, I'll try to put more thought into creating a better task
list for the java rest server. Right now, there are ~100 todo's in the
source and there could be a lot more.

davep

On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 7:59 PM, Kevin Brown <et...@google.com> wrote:
> We should probably make a milestones page for both versions so that we don't
> have to answer these questions all the time :)
>
> Just so that everyone knows, there are tracking tasks for most 0.8 items.
> REST is a really big item, so it's not as simple as a single task for either
> language.
>
> We don't currently have 0.8 tracking issues for social data javascript
> (opensocial-0.8 feature). We should definitely add those. I'm pretty sure
> there are tracking issues for all server-side items (though REST should be
> more granular), as well as for gadgets.* javascript package.
>
> On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 7:42 PM, Chris Chabot <ch...@xs4all.nl> wrote:
>
>> 0.7 wise feature support is pretty identical between the 2 versions.
>>
>> 0.8 work is in progress on both versions too, they started on the RESTful
>> interface on the java side already, but i believe it doesn't support
>> put/delete yet, just read actions, so it's not quite complete yet on the
>> java side either ... as far as 'broken stuff' goes, the
>> javascript/samplecontainer is the only thing i can really think off.
>>
>> The end goal is that both versions support the same feature sets again by
>> the time we both reach full 0.8 support, it's just the bit of development in
>> between that can get out of sync here and there.
>>
>>        -- Chris
>>
>>
>> On Jun 7, 2008, at 4:36 AM, Bipin Upadhyay wrote:
>>
>>  Hi,
>>>
>>> Chris clarified while replying to a mail a couple of hours ago that
>>> the PHP version doesn't supoort REST yet. I am (and am sure other too)
>>> would like to know other unsupported features as of now.
>>> No offences, just curious so as not spend time on trying to fix things
>>> that are not yet supported. :)
>>>
>>>
>>> On a more specific note, if handler/service classes are implemented
>>> and the handler is specified in the config file, can I safely say that
>>> any social gadget with JSON will run for PHP?
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks in advance.
>>>
>>> -- Bipin Upadhyay.
>>> I'd love to change the world,
>>> but they won't gimme the source code.
>>> http://projectbee.org/
>>>
>>
>>
>

Re: PHP vrs. Java version

[Kevin Brown <et...@google.com>]

We should probably make a milestones page for both versions so that we don't
have to answer these questions all the time :)

Just so that everyone knows, there are tracking tasks for most 0.8 items.
REST is a really big item, so it's not as simple as a single task for either
language.

We don't currently have 0.8 tracking issues for social data javascript
(opensocial-0.8 feature). We should definitely add those. I'm pretty sure
there are tracking issues for all server-side items (though REST should be
more granular), as well as for gadgets.* javascript package.

On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 7:42 PM, Chris Chabot <ch...@xs4all.nl> wrote:

> 0.7 wise feature support is pretty identical between the 2 versions.
>
> 0.8 work is in progress on both versions too, they started on the RESTful
> interface on the java side already, but i believe it doesn't support
> put/delete yet, just read actions, so it's not quite complete yet on the
> java side either ... as far as 'broken stuff' goes, the
> javascript/samplecontainer is the only thing i can really think off.
>
> The end goal is that both versions support the same feature sets again by
> the time we both reach full 0.8 support, it's just the bit of development in
> between that can get out of sync here and there.
>
>        -- Chris
>
>
> On Jun 7, 2008, at 4:36 AM, Bipin Upadhyay wrote:
>
>  Hi,
>>
>> Chris clarified while replying to a mail a couple of hours ago that
>> the PHP version doesn't supoort REST yet. I am (and am sure other too)
>> would like to know other unsupported features as of now.
>> No offences, just curious so as not spend time on trying to fix things
>> that are not yet supported. :)
>>
>>
>> On a more specific note, if handler/service classes are implemented
>> and the handler is specified in the config file, can I safely say that
>> any social gadget with JSON will run for PHP?
>>
>>
>> Thanks in advance.
>>
>> -- Bipin Upadhyay.
>> I'd love to change the world,
>> but they won't gimme the source code.
>> http://projectbee.org/
>>
>
>

Re: PHP vrs. Java version

[Chris Chabot <ch...@xs4all.nl>]

0.7 wise feature support is pretty identical between the 2 versions.

0.8 work is in progress on both versions too, they started on the  
RESTful interface on the java side already, but i believe it doesn't  
support put/delete yet, just read actions, so it's not quite complete  
yet on the java side either ... as far as 'broken stuff' goes, the  
javascript/samplecontainer is the only thing i can really think off.

The end goal is that both versions support the same feature sets again  
by the time we both reach full 0.8 support, it's just the bit of  
development in between that can get out of sync here and there.

	-- Chris

On Jun 7, 2008, at 4:36 AM, Bipin Upadhyay wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Chris clarified while replying to a mail a couple of hours ago that
> the PHP version doesn't supoort REST yet. I am (and am sure other too)
> would like to know other unsupported features as of now.
> No offences, just curious so as not spend time on trying to fix things
> that are not yet supported. :)
>
>
> On a more specific note, if handler/service classes are implemented
> and the handler is specified in the config file, can I safely say that
> any social gadget with JSON will run for PHP?
>
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
> -- Bipin Upadhyay.
> I'd love to change the world,
> but they won't gimme the source code.
> http://projectbee.org/