You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@camel.apache.org by Hadrian Zbarcea <hz...@gmail.com> on 2012/03/01 05:19:52 UTC

Re: [DISCUSS] Camel 2.9.1 Release

First attempt to release camel-2.9.1 failed with an osgi related 
problem. Will look into it in the morning and restart the builds.

Hadrian

On 02/28/2012 06:39 PM, Christian Müller wrote:
> I fixed this for Camel 2.10.0. The fix is to late to go into Camel 2.9.1
> because we should test it also with other JMS providers first.
> I have no other issues which have to go into Camel 2.9.1.
>
> Best,
> Christian
>
> On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 11:08 PM, Christian Müller<
> christian.mueller@gmail.com>  wrote:
>
>> If it's considered as bug or improvement, I would like to fix [1]. It's an
>> issue we hit last week in our development team and have to use a ugly
>> workaround...
>>
>> [1]
>> http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/DefaultUnitOfWork-doesn-t-copy-headers-from-the-original-message-if-it-s-a-JmsMessage-td5518546.html
>>
>> Best,
>> Christian
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 6:20 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea<hz...@gmail.com>wrote:
>>
>>> Thank Chris, looking into it.
>>> Hadrian
>>>
>>>
>>> On 02/27/2012 09:56 AM, chris snow wrote:
>>>
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/**jira/browse/CAMEL-5030<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-5030>would be good :)
>>>>
>>>> Although it's tagged as an improvement, the patch could be considered a
>>>> fix
>>>> as the 2.9.0 version of smpp doesn't work in my environment due to its
>>>> lack
>>>> of proxy support.
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 2:32 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea<hz...@gmail.com>
>>>>   wrote:
>>>>
>>>>   Yeah, got busy with other things :(. I am looking at last small fixes we
>>>>> can do in 2.9.x and build the kits probably on Wed. The builds were ok
>>>>> last
>>>>> week we should be in good shape. The jenkins builds only show one
>>>>> failure
>>>>> which I believe to be a test issue, but I'll look into it anyway.
>>>>>
>>>>> If anybody has fixes they want in, please shout.
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>> Hadrian
>>>>>
>>>>> [1] http://s.apache.org/Rxp
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 02/25/2012 09:43 AM, Christian Müller wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>   Hello Hadrian!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Do you have any updates for the Camel 2.9.1 release for us?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>> Christian
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 3:24 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea<hz...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>   wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>   Hi Babak, most of those are assigned to me and is ongoing work. Since
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> then
>>>>>>> I discovered issues with uris in a few other components. My intention
>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>> resolve as many as I can in 2.9.1. The idea is to pick up the low
>>>>>>> hanging
>>>>>>> fruits now and for the 3.0 release all camel uris to be proper uris.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> In addition to these issues I am sure others will be resolved as
>>>>>>> well, so
>>>>>>> I think the number of issues solved in 2.9.1 will be somewhere
>>>>>>> between 80
>>>>>>> and 100.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>> Hadrian
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 02/08/2012 09:04 AM, Babak Vahdat wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>   Hi
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Currently there're 17 open tickets most of them were postponed to
>>>>>>>> 2.9.1
>>>>>>>> as
>>>>>>>> there was the intention to bring 2.9.0 out the door, mostly regarding
>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>> proper URI format/usage stuff, etc.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Would be the idea to postpone these tickets again to another 2.9.x
>>>>>>>> release
>>>>>>>> or can it be managed to resolve them properly by this target release?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Babak
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> View this message in context: http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.******
>>>>>>>> com/DISCUSS-Camel-2-9-1-******Release-tp5463566p5466569.****html<
>>>>>>>> http://camel.465427.n5.**nabbl**e.com/DISCUSS-Camel-2-9-**<http://nabble.com/DISCUSS-Camel-2-9-**>
>>>>>>>> 1-Release-tp5463566p5466569.****html<http://camel.465427.n5.**
>>>>>>>> nabble.com/DISCUSS-Camel-2-9-**1-Release-tp5463566p5466569.**html<http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Camel-2-9-1-Release-tp5463566p5466569.html>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>   Sent from the Camel Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>   --
>>>>>>> Hadrian Zbarcea
>>>>>>> Principal Software Architect
>>>>>>> Talend, Inc
>>>>>>> http://coders.talend.com/
>>>>>>> http://camelbot.blogspot.com/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>   --
>>>>> Hadrian Zbarcea
>>>>> Principal Software Architect
>>>>> Talend, Inc
>>>>> http://coders.talend.com/
>>>>> http://camelbot.blogspot.com/
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>> --
>>> Hadrian Zbarcea
>>> Principal Software Architect
>>> Talend, Inc
>>> http://coders.talend.com/
>>> http://camelbot.blogspot.com/
>>>
>>
>>
>

-- 
Hadrian Zbarcea
Principal Software Architect
Talend, Inc
http://coders.talend.com/
http://camelbot.blogspot.com/

Re: [DISCUSS] Camel 2.9.1 Release

Posted by Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>.
Hi Hadrian,

I will take a look also.

Regards
JB

On 03/01/2012 05:19 AM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote:
> First attempt to release camel-2.9.1 failed with an osgi related
> problem. Will look into it in the morning and restart the builds.
>
> Hadrian
>
> On 02/28/2012 06:39 PM, Christian Müller wrote:
>> I fixed this for Camel 2.10.0. The fix is to late to go into Camel 2.9.1
>> because we should test it also with other JMS providers first.
>> I have no other issues which have to go into Camel 2.9.1.
>>
>> Best,
>> Christian
>>
>> On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 11:08 PM, Christian Müller<
>> christian.mueller@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> If it's considered as bug or improvement, I would like to fix [1].
>>> It's an
>>> issue we hit last week in our development team and have to use a ugly
>>> workaround...
>>>
>>> [1]
>>> http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/DefaultUnitOfWork-doesn-t-copy-headers-from-the-original-message-if-it-s-a-JmsMessage-td5518546.html
>>>
>>>
>>> Best,
>>> Christian
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 6:20 PM, Hadrian
>>> Zbarcea<hz...@gmail.com>wrote:
>>>
>>>> Thank Chris, looking into it.
>>>> Hadrian
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 02/27/2012 09:56 AM, chris snow wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/**jira/browse/CAMEL-5030<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-5030>would
>>>>> be good :)
>>>>>
>>>>> Although it's tagged as an improvement, the patch could be
>>>>> considered a
>>>>> fix
>>>>> as the 2.9.0 version of smpp doesn't work in my environment due to its
>>>>> lack
>>>>> of proxy support.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 2:32 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea<hz...@gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Yeah, got busy with other things :(. I am looking at last small
>>>>> fixes we
>>>>>> can do in 2.9.x and build the kits probably on Wed. The builds
>>>>>> were ok
>>>>>> last
>>>>>> week we should be in good shape. The jenkins builds only show one
>>>>>> failure
>>>>>> which I believe to be a test issue, but I'll look into it anyway.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If anybody has fixes they want in, please shout.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>> Hadrian
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [1] http://s.apache.org/Rxp
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 02/25/2012 09:43 AM, Christian Müller wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hello Hadrian!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Do you have any updates for the Camel 2.9.1 release for us?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>> Christian
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 3:24 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea<hz...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi Babak, most of those are assigned to me and is ongoing work.
>>>>>>> Since
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> then
>>>>>>>> I discovered issues with uris in a few other components. My
>>>>>>>> intention
>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>> resolve as many as I can in 2.9.1. The idea is to pick up the low
>>>>>>>> hanging
>>>>>>>> fruits now and for the 3.0 release all camel uris to be proper
>>>>>>>> uris.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> In addition to these issues I am sure others will be resolved as
>>>>>>>> well, so
>>>>>>>> I think the number of issues solved in 2.9.1 will be somewhere
>>>>>>>> between 80
>>>>>>>> and 100.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>>> Hadrian
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 02/08/2012 09:04 AM, Babak Vahdat wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hi
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Currently there're 17 open tickets most of them were postponed to
>>>>>>>>> 2.9.1
>>>>>>>>> as
>>>>>>>>> there was the intention to bring 2.9.0 out the door, mostly
>>>>>>>>> regarding
>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>> proper URI format/usage stuff, etc.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Would be the idea to postpone these tickets again to another 2.9.x
>>>>>>>>> release
>>>>>>>>> or can it be managed to resolve them properly by this target
>>>>>>>>> release?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Babak
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> View this message in context: http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.******
>>>>>>>>> com/DISCUSS-Camel-2-9-1-******Release-tp5463566p5466569.****html<
>>>>>>>>> http://camel.465427.n5.**nabbl**e.com/DISCUSS-Camel-2-9-**<http://nabble.com/DISCUSS-Camel-2-9-**>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 1-Release-tp5463566p5466569.****html<http://camel.465427.n5.**
>>>>>>>>> nabble.com/DISCUSS-Camel-2-9-**1-Release-tp5463566p5466569.**html<http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Camel-2-9-1-Release-tp5463566p5466569.html>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Sent from the Camel Development mailing list archive at
>>>>>>>>>> Nabble.com.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> Hadrian Zbarcea
>>>>>>>> Principal Software Architect
>>>>>>>> Talend, Inc
>>>>>>>> http://coders.talend.com/
>>>>>>>> http://camelbot.blogspot.com/
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Hadrian Zbarcea
>>>>>> Principal Software Architect
>>>>>> Talend, Inc
>>>>>> http://coders.talend.com/
>>>>>> http://camelbot.blogspot.com/
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Hadrian Zbarcea
>>>> Principal Software Architect
>>>> Talend, Inc
>>>> http://coders.talend.com/
>>>> http://camelbot.blogspot.com/
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>

-- 
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbonofre@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com