Re: [VOTE] Close down the Lucene.NET project, effective January 31, 2011

[Simon Willnauer <si...@googlemail.com>]

On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 4:43 PM, Grant Ingersoll <gs...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> On Dec 30, 2010, at 5:48 PM, Chris Hostetter wrote:
>
>>
>> : My vote is -1 to the current resolution, because it lacks a plan for
>> : continuity for the userbase. It seems that although development has
>> : stagnated, there is actually a reasonably active user list, and this
>> : resolution doesn't describe what will happen to them.
>>
>> I share robert's concern, the lucene.net mailing list(s) is where the
>> existing community seems to be rallying to discuss an incubation proposal,
>> and i don't wnat to pull the rug out from under them.
>>
>> I'm assuming that just because this resolution says the project resources
>> will be shutdown, doesn't mean they need to be terminated
>> immediately upon the completion of hte vote -- while things like svn
>> commit and the website updating should happen ASAP, it seems reasonable to
>> leave the mailing lists in place for the near future.
>>
>> I'm +1 based on that assumption.
>>
>
> Correct.  It should be noted that the community is now working on an Incubator proposal, so we should be able to make a smooth transition.
That is awesome news!

simon
>
> -Grant
>
>

Re: [VOTE] Close down the Lucene.NET project, effective January 31, 2011

[Grant Ingersoll <gs...@apache.org>]

As a formality, this vote has passed.  I am glad to see that the .NET community has stepped up.

-Grant

On Jan 2, 2011, at 6:29 PM, Troy Howard wrote:

> Awesome is where we start... ;)
> 
> Thanks,
> Troy
> 
> 
> On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 9:17 AM, Simon Willnauer
> <si...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>> On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 4:43 PM, Grant Ingersoll <gs...@apache.org> wrote:
>>> 
>>> On Dec 30, 2010, at 5:48 PM, Chris Hostetter wrote:
>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> : My vote is -1 to the current resolution, because it lacks a plan for
>>>> : continuity for the userbase. It seems that although development has
>>>> : stagnated, there is actually a reasonably active user list, and this
>>>> : resolution doesn't describe what will happen to them.
>>>> 
>>>> I share robert's concern, the lucene.net mailing list(s) is where the
>>>> existing community seems to be rallying to discuss an incubation proposal,
>>>> and i don't wnat to pull the rug out from under them.
>>>> 
>>>> I'm assuming that just because this resolution says the project resources
>>>> will be shutdown, doesn't mean they need to be terminated
>>>> immediately upon the completion of hte vote -- while things like svn
>>>> commit and the website updating should happen ASAP, it seems reasonable to
>>>> leave the mailing lists in place for the near future.
>>>> 
>>>> I'm +1 based on that assumption.
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> Correct.  It should be noted that the community is now working on an Incubator proposal, so we should be able to make a smooth transition.
>> That is awesome news!
>> 
>> simon
>>> 
>>> -Grant
>>> 
>>> 
>> 

Re: [VOTE] Close down the Lucene.NET project, effective January 31, 2011

[Troy Howard <th...@gmail.com>]

Awesome is where we start... ;)

Thanks,
Troy


On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 9:17 AM, Simon Willnauer
<si...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 4:43 PM, Grant Ingersoll <gs...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>> On Dec 30, 2010, at 5:48 PM, Chris Hostetter wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> : My vote is -1 to the current resolution, because it lacks a plan for
>>> : continuity for the userbase. It seems that although development has
>>> : stagnated, there is actually a reasonably active user list, and this
>>> : resolution doesn't describe what will happen to them.
>>>
>>> I share robert's concern, the lucene.net mailing list(s) is where the
>>> existing community seems to be rallying to discuss an incubation proposal,
>>> and i don't wnat to pull the rug out from under them.
>>>
>>> I'm assuming that just because this resolution says the project resources
>>> will be shutdown, doesn't mean they need to be terminated
>>> immediately upon the completion of hte vote -- while things like svn
>>> commit and the website updating should happen ASAP, it seems reasonable to
>>> leave the mailing lists in place for the near future.
>>>
>>> I'm +1 based on that assumption.
>>>
>>
>> Correct.  It should be noted that the community is now working on an Incubator proposal, so we should be able to make a smooth transition.
> That is awesome news!
>
> simon
>>
>> -Grant
>>
>>
>