You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@lucene.apache.org by "James Dyer (Resolved) (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2012/04/17 17:56:17 UTC

[jira] [Resolved] (SOLR-1867) CachedSQLentity processor is using unbounded hashmap

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1867?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

James Dyer resolved SOLR-1867.
------------------------------

    Resolution: Won't Fix

SOLR-2382 allowed for plugable cache implementations (3.6 & 4.x).  There are 2 (uncommitted thus far) cache implementations that store the cache on-disk (See SOLR-2613 and SOLR-2948).  

Finally, if the memory leak described was due to ThreadLocal usage, this was eliminated in 4.0 with the removal of the "threads" feature.
                
> CachedSQLentity processor is using unbounded hashmap 
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-1867
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1867
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: contrib - DataImportHandler
>    Affects Versions: 1.4
>            Reporter: barani
>
> I am using cachedSqlEntityprocessor in DIH to index the data. Please find a sample dataconfig structure, 
> <entity x query="select * from x"> ---> object 
> <entity y query="select * from y" processor="cachedSqlEntityprocessor" cachekey=y.id cachevalue=x.id> --> object properties 
> For each and every object I would be retrieveing corresponding object properties (in my subqueries). 
> I get in to OOM very often and I think thats a trade off if I use cachedSqlEntityprocessor. 
> My assumption is that when I use cachedSqlEntityprocessor the indexing happens as follows, 
> First entity x will get executed and the entire table gets stored in cache 
> next entity y gets executed and entire table gets stored in cache 
> Finally the compasion heppens through hash map . 
> So always I need to have the memory allocated to SOLR JVM more than or equal to the data present in tables.
> One more issue is that even after SOLR completes indexing, the memory used previously is not getting released. I could still see the JVM consuming 1.5 GB after the indexing completes. I tried to use Java hotspot options but didnt see any differences.. GC is not getting invoked even after a long time when using CachedSQLentity processor
> Main issue seem to be the fact that  the CachedSQLentity processor cache is an unbounded HashMap, with no option to bound it. 
> Reference: http://n3.nabble.com/Need-info-on-CachedSQLentity-processor-tt698418.html#a698418

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org