You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@tuscany.apache.org by Simon Laws <si...@googlemail.com> on 2008/07/02 16:53:27 UTC

R1.3 update and call for help

Some more JIRA have been closed out but there are still some that need
attention and remain unassigned. See the list at

https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&&pid=12310210&fixfor=12313221&sorter/field=priority&sorter/order=DESC

The ones I see at the moment are...

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2409 - There is a discussion
thread on this (
http://www.mail-archive.com/dev@tuscany.apache.org/msg00433.html) so I would
like to bring that to a conclusion ASAP.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2417 - personally I don't
think we need to reinstate auto port selection. If we can agree this is an
easy fix
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2419 - sample/helloworld-bpel
needs some love
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2441 - demo/xml-bigbank also
needs attention
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2442 - we need to sort out
remaining references to incubator/ing

Other things that need to be done.

Test the web apps on different containers. I need volunteers for Tomcat5,
Geronimo, WebSphere
Do the legal checking
We need to either release the parent pom or fix the sca pom. I'm waiting for
a reply from Ant as he made the suggestion re. fixing up the sca pom.

As before the release status summary is at

http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TUSCANYWIKI/R1.3+Checklist

I'd like to get an RC for voting on before the end of this week. All help is
gratefully received either fixing the things we know about already or
looking at RC0 which is here

http://people.apache.org/~slaws/tuscany/1.3-RC0/

Thanks

Simon

Re: R1.3 update and call for help

Posted by Simon Laws <si...@googlemail.com>.
On Fri, Jul 4, 2008 at 1:35 PM, ant elder <an...@gmail.com> wrote:

>
>
> On Fri, Jul 4, 2008 at 9:45 AM, ant elder <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 3:53 PM, Simon Laws <si...@googlemail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Some more JIRA have been closed out but there are still some that need
>>> attention and remain unassigned. See the list at
>>>
>>>
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&&pid=12310210&fixfor=12313221&sorter/field=priority&sorter/order=DESC
>>>
>>> The ones I see at the moment are...
>>>
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2409 - There is a
>>> discussion thread on this (
>>> http://www.mail-archive.com/dev@tuscany.apache.org/msg00433.html) so I
>>> would like to bring that to a conclusion ASAP.
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2417 - personally I don't
>>> think we need to reinstate auto port selection. If we can agree this is an
>>> easy fix
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2419 -
>>> sample/helloworld-bpel needs some love
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2441 - demo/xml-bigbank
>>> also needs attention
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2442 - we need to sort out
>>> remaining references to incubator/ing
>>>
>>> Other things that need to be done.
>>>
>>> Test the web apps on different containers. I need volunteers for Tomcat5,
>>> Geronimo, WebSphere
>>> Do the legal checking
>>> We need to either release the parent pom or fix the sca pom. I'm waiting
>>> for a reply from Ant as he made the suggestion re. fixing up the sca pom.
>>>
>>> As before the release status summary is at
>>>
>>> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TUSCANYWIKI/R1.3+Checklist
>>>
>>> I'd like to get an RC for voting on before the end of this week. All help
>>> is gratefully received either fixing the things we know about already or
>>> looking at RC0 which is here
>>>
>>> http://people.apache.org/~slaws/tuscany/1.3-RC0/<http://people.apache.org/%7Eslaws/tuscany/1.3-RC0/>
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>>
>>> Simon
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> A lot of those things are done or closer to done now so i'm going to spend
>> a bit of time on the license and notice file reviews, so can i request
>> everyone start being a bit careful with any 1.3 branch checkins which make
>> pom.xml changes so the dependencies don't change without warning.
>>
>>    ...ant
>>
>
> I'm about done on this legal tidy up for now and the 1.3 branch is looking
> in quite good shape to me with most of the samples i try running ok. How
> about an RC1 so others can more easily start reviewing? The main JIRA left
> is TUSCANY-2409, is anyone actively working on that?
>
>    ...ant
>

I think you're right TUSCANY-2409 is this only one I know about but It
doesn't look like anyone is looking at it. I'd also like to get this
promoted service fix in and hopefully that will be done today.

Simon

Re: R1.3 update and call for help

Posted by ant elder <an...@gmail.com>.
On Fri, Jul 4, 2008 at 9:45 AM, ant elder <an...@gmail.com> wrote:

>
>
> On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 3:53 PM, Simon Laws <si...@googlemail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Some more JIRA have been closed out but there are still some that need
>> attention and remain unassigned. See the list at
>>
>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&&pid=12310210&fixfor=12313221&sorter/field=priority&sorter/order=DESC
>>
>> The ones I see at the moment are...
>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2409 - There is a
>> discussion thread on this (
>> http://www.mail-archive.com/dev@tuscany.apache.org/msg00433.html) so I
>> would like to bring that to a conclusion ASAP.
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2417 - personally I don't
>> think we need to reinstate auto port selection. If we can agree this is an
>> easy fix
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2419 -
>> sample/helloworld-bpel needs some love
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2441 - demo/xml-bigbank
>> also needs attention
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2442 - we need to sort out
>> remaining references to incubator/ing
>>
>> Other things that need to be done.
>>
>> Test the web apps on different containers. I need volunteers for Tomcat5,
>> Geronimo, WebSphere
>> Do the legal checking
>> We need to either release the parent pom or fix the sca pom. I'm waiting
>> for a reply from Ant as he made the suggestion re. fixing up the sca pom.
>>
>> As before the release status summary is at
>>
>> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TUSCANYWIKI/R1.3+Checklist
>>
>> I'd like to get an RC for voting on before the end of this week. All help
>> is gratefully received either fixing the things we know about already or
>> looking at RC0 which is here
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~slaws/tuscany/1.3-RC0/<http://people.apache.org/%7Eslaws/tuscany/1.3-RC0/>
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Simon
>>
>>
>>
> A lot of those things are done or closer to done now so i'm going to spend
> a bit of time on the license and notice file reviews, so can i request
> everyone start being a bit careful with any 1.3 branch checkins which make
> pom.xml changes so the dependencies don't change without warning.
>
>    ...ant
>

I'm about done on this legal tidy up for now and the 1.3 branch is looking
in quite good shape to me with most of the samples i try running ok. How
about an RC1 so others can more easily start reviewing? The main JIRA left
is TUSCANY-2409, is anyone actively working on that?

   ...ant

Re: R1.3 update and call for help

Posted by Simon Laws <si...@googlemail.com>.
On Fri, Jul 4, 2008 at 9:45 AM, ant elder <an...@gmail.com> wrote:

>
>
> On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 3:53 PM, Simon Laws <si...@googlemail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Some more JIRA have been closed out but there are still some that need
>> attention and remain unassigned. See the list at
>>
>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&&pid=12310210&fixfor=12313221&sorter/field=priority&sorter/order=DESC
>>
>> The ones I see at the moment are...
>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2409 - There is a
>> discussion thread on this (
>> http://www.mail-archive.com/dev@tuscany.apache.org/msg00433.html) so I
>> would like to bring that to a conclusion ASAP.
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2417 - personally I don't
>> think we need to reinstate auto port selection. If we can agree this is an
>> easy fix
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2419 -
>> sample/helloworld-bpel needs some love
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2441 - demo/xml-bigbank
>> also needs attention
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2442 - we need to sort out
>> remaining references to incubator/ing
>>
>> Other things that need to be done.
>>
>> Test the web apps on different containers. I need volunteers for Tomcat5,
>> Geronimo, WebSphere
>> Do the legal checking
>> We need to either release the parent pom or fix the sca pom. I'm waiting
>> for a reply from Ant as he made the suggestion re. fixing up the sca pom.
>>
>> As before the release status summary is at
>>
>> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TUSCANYWIKI/R1.3+Checklist
>>
>> I'd like to get an RC for voting on before the end of this week. All help
>> is gratefully received either fixing the things we know about already or
>> looking at RC0 which is here
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~slaws/tuscany/1.3-RC0/<http://people.apache.org/%7Eslaws/tuscany/1.3-RC0/>
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Simon
>>
>>
>>
> A lot of those things are done or closer to done now so i'm going to spend
> a bit of time on the license and notice file reviews, so can i request
> everyone start being a bit careful with any 1.3 branch checkins which make
> pom.xml changes so the dependencies don't change without warning.
>
>    ...ant
>

Thanks Ant, I'm delayed looking at a recursive composition issue that has
come to light.

Simon

Re: R1.3 update and call for help

Posted by ant elder <an...@gmail.com>.
On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 3:53 PM, Simon Laws <si...@googlemail.com>
wrote:

> Some more JIRA have been closed out but there are still some that need
> attention and remain unassigned. See the list at
>
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&&pid=12310210&fixfor=12313221&sorter/field=priority&sorter/order=DESC
>
> The ones I see at the moment are...
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2409 - There is a discussion
> thread on this (
> http://www.mail-archive.com/dev@tuscany.apache.org/msg00433.html) so I
> would like to bring that to a conclusion ASAP.
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2417 - personally I don't
> think we need to reinstate auto port selection. If we can agree this is an
> easy fix
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2419 -
> sample/helloworld-bpel needs some love
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2441 - demo/xml-bigbank also
> needs attention
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2442 - we need to sort out
> remaining references to incubator/ing
>
> Other things that need to be done.
>
> Test the web apps on different containers. I need volunteers for Tomcat5,
> Geronimo, WebSphere
> Do the legal checking
> We need to either release the parent pom or fix the sca pom. I'm waiting
> for a reply from Ant as he made the suggestion re. fixing up the sca pom.
>
> As before the release status summary is at
>
> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TUSCANYWIKI/R1.3+Checklist
>
> I'd like to get an RC for voting on before the end of this week. All help
> is gratefully received either fixing the things we know about already or
> looking at RC0 which is here
>
> http://people.apache.org/~slaws/tuscany/1.3-RC0/<http://people.apache.org/%7Eslaws/tuscany/1.3-RC0/>
>
> Thanks
>
> Simon
>
>
>
A lot of those things are done or closer to done now so i'm going to spend a
bit of time on the license and notice file reviews, so can i request
everyone start being a bit careful with any 1.3 branch checkins which make
pom.xml changes so the dependencies don't change without warning.

   ...ant

Re: R1.3 update and call for help

Posted by Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com>.
I'm ok either way, so +1 to drop the parent pom.

On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 9:23 AM, Raymond Feng <en...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 to drop the parent pom and add required declarations to sca/pom.xml.
>
> Thanks,
> Raymond
> From: ant elder
> Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2008 8:57 AM
> To: dev@tuscany.apache.org
> Subject: Re: R1.3 update and call for help
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 3:53 PM, Simon Laws <si...@googlemail.com>
> wrote:
>
> <snip>
>
>> We need to either release the parent pom or fix the sca pom. I'm waiting
>> for a reply from Ant as he made the suggestion re. fixing up the sca pom.
>>
>
> From previous discussion i wasn't sure everyone was in agreement we should
> drop the parent pom so I was waiting to see if there were any comments from
> those who'd already voted for releasing a new parent pom to see if everyone
> is happy with dropping it now. Releasing a new parent now would delay the
> 1.3 RC now as it would have to wait for the parent release votes, so in the
> sake of expediency i'll do the changes this evening to drop the parent pom
> unless any one shouts.
>
>    ...ant
>
>



-- 
Luciano Resende
Apache Tuscany Committer
http://people.apache.org/~lresende
http://lresende.blogspot.com/

Re: R1.3 update and call for help

Posted by Raymond Feng <en...@gmail.com>.
+1 to drop the parent pom and add required declarations to sca/pom.xml.

Thanks,
Raymond


From: ant elder 
Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2008 8:57 AM
To: dev@tuscany.apache.org 
Subject: Re: R1.3 update and call for help





On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 3:53 PM, Simon Laws <si...@googlemail.com> wrote:

<snip>


  We need to either release the parent pom or fix the sca pom. I'm waiting for a reply from Ant as he made the suggestion re. fixing up the sca pom. 



>From previous discussion i wasn't sure everyone was in agreement we should drop the parent pom so I was waiting to see if there were any comments from those who'd already voted for releasing a new parent pom to see if everyone is happy with dropping it now. Releasing a new parent now would delay the 1.3 RC now as it would have to wait for the parent release votes, so in the sake of expediency i'll do the changes this evening to drop the parent pom unless any one shouts.

   ...ant

Re: R1.3 update and call for help

Posted by ant elder <an...@gmail.com>.
On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 3:53 PM, Simon Laws <si...@googlemail.com>
wrote:

<snip>

We need to either release the parent pom or fix the sca pom. I'm waiting for
> a reply from Ant as he made the suggestion re. fixing up the sca pom.
>
>
>From previous discussion i wasn't sure everyone was in agreement we should
drop the parent pom so I was waiting to see if there were any comments from
those who'd already voted for releasing a new parent pom to see if everyone
is happy with dropping it now. Releasing a new parent now would delay the
1.3 RC now as it would have to wait for the parent release votes, so in the
sake of expediency i'll do the changes this evening to drop the parent pom
unless any one shouts.

   ...ant

Re: R1.3 update and call for help

Posted by ant elder <an...@gmail.com>.
On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 1:22 AM, Simon Nash <na...@apache.org> wrote:

> Simon Nash wrote:
>
>> ant elder wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 4:31 PM, Simon Nash <nash@apache.org <mailto:
>>> nash@apache.org>> wrote:
>>>
>>>    Simon Laws wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>        On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 2:51 PM, Simon Laws
>>>        <simonslaws@googlemail.com <ma...@googlemail.com>
>>>        <mailto:simonslaws@googlemail.com
>>>        <ma...@googlemail.com>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>           On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 12:20 PM, ant elder
>>>        <ant.elder@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>
>>>           <mailto:ant.elder@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>>>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>               I said I'd do an RC2 today but there are still some open
>>>        JIRAs,
>>>               the main ones being TUSCANY-2480, TUSCANY-2484, and
>>>               TUSCANY-2486. Whats the status and ETA for fixes for
>>>        these? Can
>>>               i help with any of those, i've done work on the ?wsdl
>>>        endpoints
>>>               in the past so could help with TUSCANY-2480 if its needed?
>>>
>>>                  ...ant
>>>
>>>        (cut)
>>>           Hi Ant
>>>
>>>           I have a fix for TUSCANY-2484 which I'm testing at the moment
>>>        but it
>>>           has implications for TUSCANY-2324 so we will have to revisit
>>> that
>>>           before we respin. I've just moved TUSACANY-2324 into 1.3 as I
>>>        note
>>>           some changes for that were checked into the branch for this
>>>        problem
>>>           but that it wasn't associated with 1.3 in JIRA. I think we
>>>        need to
>>>           delay until tomorrow.
>>>
>>>           Simon
>>>
>>>
>>>        Hi ant
>>>
>>>        I'm done with these fixes now. We need to get the go ahead from
>>>        others who have been making fixes in 1.3, e.g. Simon Nash, but
>>>        from my pov we can go ahead with the respin. Are you happy to
>>>        press the buttons for the respin I still haven't caught up after
>>>        being out and could do with some time to do that.
>>>
>>>        Simon
>>>
>>>     >
>>>    All the work I have been doing on the issues that are named in this
>>>    thread is now completed in the 1.3 branch.  I'm now working on getting
>>>    the same code into trunk.  So from my perspective it's fine to go
>>> ahead
>>>    with another 1.3 RC respin.
>>>
>>>     Simon
>>>
>>>
>>> Wonderful. I shall go make an RC2, probably wont get it done today now
>>> but should have it out for voting by tomorrow.
>>>
>>>   ...ant
>>>
>>  >
>> I just committed a one-line change to a sample.  See TUSCANY-2417
>> for details of the reason for this.  If you have already picked up
>> the code for RC2, it's not necessary to do a respin just for this.
>>
>>  Simon
>>
>>  I checked in fixes for TUSCANY-2479 and TUSCANY-2481 into both the
> 1.3 branch and trunk.  It would be good if you could include these
> fixes in the next 1.3 RC if it's not too late.  Thanks.
>
>  Simon
>

Ok i'll redo it now to pick these up.

   ...ant

Re: R1.3 update and call for help

Posted by Simon Nash <na...@apache.org>.
Simon Nash wrote:
> ant elder wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 4:31 PM, Simon Nash <nash@apache.org 
>> <ma...@apache.org>> wrote:
>>
>>     Simon Laws wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>         On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 2:51 PM, Simon Laws
>>         <simonslaws@googlemail.com <ma...@googlemail.com>
>>         <mailto:simonslaws@googlemail.com
>>         <ma...@googlemail.com>>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>            On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 12:20 PM, ant elder
>>         <ant.elder@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>
>>            <mailto:ant.elder@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>>> 
>> wrote:
>>
>>                I said I'd do an RC2 today but there are still some open
>>         JIRAs,
>>                the main ones being TUSCANY-2480, TUSCANY-2484, and
>>                TUSCANY-2486. Whats the status and ETA for fixes for
>>         these? Can
>>                i help with any of those, i've done work on the ?wsdl
>>         endpoints
>>                in the past so could help with TUSCANY-2480 if its needed?
>>
>>                   ...ant
>>
>>         (cut)
>>            Hi Ant
>>
>>            I have a fix for TUSCANY-2484 which I'm testing at the moment
>>         but it
>>            has implications for TUSCANY-2324 so we will have to 
>> revisit that
>>            before we respin. I've just moved TUSACANY-2324 into 1.3 as I
>>         note
>>            some changes for that were checked into the branch for this
>>         problem
>>            but that it wasn't associated with 1.3 in JIRA. I think we
>>         need to
>>            delay until tomorrow.
>>
>>            Simon
>>
>>
>>         Hi ant
>>
>>         I'm done with these fixes now. We need to get the go ahead from
>>         others who have been making fixes in 1.3, e.g. Simon Nash, but
>>         from my pov we can go ahead with the respin. Are you happy to
>>         press the buttons for the respin I still haven't caught up after
>>         being out and could do with some time to do that.
>>
>>         Simon
>>
>>      >
>>     All the work I have been doing on the issues that are named in this
>>     thread is now completed in the 1.3 branch.  I'm now working on 
>> getting
>>     the same code into trunk.  So from my perspective it's fine to go 
>> ahead
>>     with another 1.3 RC respin.
>>
>>      Simon
>>
>>
>> Wonderful. I shall go make an RC2, probably wont get it done today now 
>> but should have it out for voting by tomorrow.
>>
>>    ...ant
>  >
> I just committed a one-line change to a sample.  See TUSCANY-2417
> for details of the reason for this.  If you have already picked up
> the code for RC2, it's not necessary to do a respin just for this.
> 
>   Simon
> 
I checked in fixes for TUSCANY-2479 and TUSCANY-2481 into both the
1.3 branch and trunk.  It would be good if you could include these
fixes in the next 1.3 RC if it's not too late.  Thanks.

   Simon

Re: R1.3 update and call for help

Posted by Simon Nash <na...@apache.org>.
ant elder wrote:
> 
> 
> On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 4:31 PM, Simon Nash <nash@apache.org 
> <ma...@apache.org>> wrote:
> 
>     Simon Laws wrote:
> 
> 
> 
>         On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 2:51 PM, Simon Laws
>         <simonslaws@googlemail.com <ma...@googlemail.com>
>         <mailto:simonslaws@googlemail.com
>         <ma...@googlemail.com>>> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
>            On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 12:20 PM, ant elder
>         <ant.elder@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>
>            <mailto:ant.elder@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>>> wrote:
> 
>                I said I'd do an RC2 today but there are still some open
>         JIRAs,
>                the main ones being TUSCANY-2480, TUSCANY-2484, and
>                TUSCANY-2486. Whats the status and ETA for fixes for
>         these? Can
>                i help with any of those, i've done work on the ?wsdl
>         endpoints
>                in the past so could help with TUSCANY-2480 if its needed?
> 
>                   ...ant
> 
>         (cut)
>            Hi Ant
> 
>            I have a fix for TUSCANY-2484 which I'm testing at the moment
>         but it
>            has implications for TUSCANY-2324 so we will have to revisit that
>            before we respin. I've just moved TUSACANY-2324 into 1.3 as I
>         note
>            some changes for that were checked into the branch for this
>         problem
>            but that it wasn't associated with 1.3 in JIRA. I think we
>         need to
>            delay until tomorrow.
> 
>            Simon
> 
> 
>         Hi ant
> 
>         I'm done with these fixes now. We need to get the go ahead from
>         others who have been making fixes in 1.3, e.g. Simon Nash, but
>         from my pov we can go ahead with the respin. Are you happy to
>         press the buttons for the respin I still haven't caught up after
>         being out and could do with some time to do that.
> 
>         Simon
> 
>      >
>     All the work I have been doing on the issues that are named in this
>     thread is now completed in the 1.3 branch.  I'm now working on getting
>     the same code into trunk.  So from my perspective it's fine to go ahead
>     with another 1.3 RC respin.
> 
>      Simon
> 
> 
> Wonderful. I shall go make an RC2, probably wont get it done today now 
> but should have it out for voting by tomorrow.
> 
>    ...ant
 >
I just committed a one-line change to a sample.  See TUSCANY-2417
for details of the reason for this.  If you have already picked up
the code for RC2, it's not necessary to do a respin just for this.

   Simon

Re: R1.3 update and call for help

Posted by ant elder <an...@gmail.com>.
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 4:31 PM, Simon Nash <na...@apache.org> wrote:

> Simon Laws wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 2:51 PM, Simon Laws <simonslaws@googlemail.com<mailto:
>> simonslaws@googlemail.com>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>    On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 12:20 PM, ant elder <ant.elder@gmail.com
>>    <ma...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>>        I said I'd do an RC2 today but there are still some open JIRAs,
>>        the main ones being TUSCANY-2480, TUSCANY-2484, and
>>        TUSCANY-2486. Whats the status and ETA for fixes for these? Can
>>        i help with any of those, i've done work on the ?wsdl endpoints
>>        in the past so could help with TUSCANY-2480 if its needed?
>>
>>           ...ant
>>
>> (cut)
>>    Hi Ant
>>
>>    I have a fix for TUSCANY-2484 which I'm testing at the moment but it
>>    has implications for TUSCANY-2324 so we will have to revisit that
>>    before we respin. I've just moved TUSACANY-2324 into 1.3 as I note
>>    some changes for that were checked into the branch for this problem
>>    but that it wasn't associated with 1.3 in JIRA. I think we need to
>>    delay until tomorrow.
>>
>>    Simon
>>
>>
>> Hi ant
>>
>> I'm done with these fixes now. We need to get the go ahead from others who
>> have been making fixes in 1.3, e.g. Simon Nash, but from my pov we can go
>> ahead with the respin. Are you happy to press the buttons for the respin I
>> still haven't caught up after being out and could do with some time to do
>> that.
>>
>> Simon
>>
> >
> All the work I have been doing on the issues that are named in this
> thread is now completed in the 1.3 branch.  I'm now working on getting
> the same code into trunk.  So from my perspective it's fine to go ahead
> with another 1.3 RC respin.
>
>  Simon
>
>
Wonderful. I shall go make an RC2, probably wont get it done today now but
should have it out for voting by tomorrow.

   ...ant

Re: R1.3 update and call for help

Posted by Simon Nash <na...@apache.org>.
Simon Laws wrote:
> 
> 
> On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 2:51 PM, Simon Laws <simonslaws@googlemail.com 
> <ma...@googlemail.com>> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
>     On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 12:20 PM, ant elder <ant.elder@gmail.com
>     <ma...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> 
>         I said I'd do an RC2 today but there are still some open JIRAs,
>         the main ones being TUSCANY-2480, TUSCANY-2484, and
>         TUSCANY-2486. Whats the status and ETA for fixes for these? Can
>         i help with any of those, i've done work on the ?wsdl endpoints
>         in the past so could help with TUSCANY-2480 if its needed?
> 
>            ...ant
> 
> (cut) 
> 
>     Hi Ant
> 
>     I have a fix for TUSCANY-2484 which I'm testing at the moment but it
>     has implications for TUSCANY-2324 so we will have to revisit that
>     before we respin. I've just moved TUSACANY-2324 into 1.3 as I note
>     some changes for that were checked into the branch for this problem
>     but that it wasn't associated with 1.3 in JIRA. I think we need to
>     delay until tomorrow.
> 
>     Simon
> 
> 
> Hi ant
> 
> I'm done with these fixes now. We need to get the go ahead from others 
> who have been making fixes in 1.3, e.g. Simon Nash, but from my pov we 
> can go ahead with the respin. Are you happy to press the buttons for the 
> respin I still haven't caught up after being out and could do with some 
> time to do that.
> 
> Simon
 >
All the work I have been doing on the issues that are named in this
thread is now completed in the 1.3 branch.  I'm now working on getting
the same code into trunk.  So from my perspective it's fine to go ahead
with another 1.3 RC respin.

   Simon

Re: Re: R1.3 update and call for help

Posted by Simon Laws <si...@googlemail.com>.
On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 2:51 PM, Simon Laws <si...@googlemail.com>
wrote:

>
>
> On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 12:20 PM, ant elder <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I said I'd do an RC2 today but there are still some open JIRAs, the main
>> ones being TUSCANY-2480, TUSCANY-2484, and TUSCANY-2486. Whats the status
>> and ETA for fixes for these? Can i help with any of those, i've done work on
>> the ?wsdl endpoints in the past so could help with TUSCANY-2480 if its
>> needed?
>>
>>    ...ant
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 8:02 AM, ant elder <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Following on from this there has been another problem found in 1.3 with
>>> the new generated wsdl -
>>> http://apache.markmail.org/message/fryloi6byuyjqvrl for which I've
>>> raised TUSCANY-2480, could someone take a look at that as I'm out the rest
>>> of the week otherwise i'll pick it up on Monday.
>>>
>>> What i think we should do is plan on having an RC2 next Tuesday which
>>> will give time for the two problems to be fixed with the hope that that is
>>> the final RC so we'd get the release officially out by the end of next week.
>>> For that to work RC2 needs to be good, i'm a bit worried about that as
>>> there's only been two people who have posted that they've reviewed RC1 so
>>> far. Be a shame if we need an RC3 because of a problem that could have been
>>> found in RC1 - if you have time please review:
>>> http://apache.markmail.org/message/fmlak6bfhentybf7
>>>
>>>    ...ant
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 10:36 AM, ant elder <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> An update on 1.3 for those watching this thread:
>>>>
>>>> - a release candidate is available for review at
>>>> http://people.apache.org/~antelder/tuscany/1.3-RC1a/<http://people.apache.org/%7Eantelder/tuscany/1.3-RC1a/>with comments to this VOTE thread:
>>>> http://apache.markmail.org/message/fmlak6bfhentybf7
>>>>
>>>> - waiting for a final fix before making a new release candidate as
>>>> discussed in this thread:
>>>> http://apache.markmail.org/message/tuomadm4b3kubgjn
>>>>
>>>>    ...ant
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 9:29 AM, ant elder <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Quite a few updates to the 1.3 branch over night so it looks like we
>>>>> need a new RC1, here's what I think we should do:
>>>>>
>>>>> - I'm not sure if there are still things outstanding so I'll leave the
>>>>> 1.3 branch open for updates till tomorrow
>>>>> - tomorrow I'll re tag and respin RC1 and call a vote on that
>>>>> - after then the 1.3 branch goes to RTC so updates to trunk and raise a
>>>>> JIRA against 1.3 if you want a change in 1.3
>>>>> - plan on likely needing an RC2 early next week to fix any issues found
>>>>> in RC1
>>>>>
>>>>> This should get a 1.3 out late next week. We can have a 1.3.1 in the
>>>>> near future to pick up things that miss 1.3. Does this sound ok to everyone
>>>>> to get what they need in 1.3 or 1.3.1?
>>>>>
>>>>> In the meantime the distros at
>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~antelder/tuscany/1.3-RC1/<http://people.apache.org/%7Eantelder/tuscany/1.3-RC1/>are still useful for reviewing if anyone has the time and inclination.
>>>>>
>>>>>    ...ant
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 10:15 AM, ant elder <an...@gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> This is excellent help, thanks Yang.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Note I've created a new RC1 distro which includes the correctly built
>>>>>> jars with out the shade plugin problem so that can be used to test the
>>>>>> standalone samples, see
>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~antelder/tuscany/1.3-RC1/<http://people.apache.org/%7Eantelder/tuscany/1.3-RC1/>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Will wait and see how things go today before deciding to call a vote
>>>>>> on that or spin a new RC before calling a vote - everyone, reviews of this
>>>>>> RC are welcome!
>>>>>>
>>>>>>    ...ant
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 10:07 AM, Sun Yang <sy...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Got it. I will retest them tomorrow.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Best Regards,
>>>>>>> Yang Sun
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 2008/7/8 Feng Wang <fw...@gmail.com>:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi,Sun
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Websphere, you must set application properties to use the
>>>>>>>> application class loader before the parent container class loader.
>>>>>>>> There is an explanation on the Sebastien's blog.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> http://jsdelfino.blogspot.com/2007/10/how-to-use-apache-tuscany-with.html
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>> Feng Wang
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 2008-07-08 15:32:55,Sun Yang <sy...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> >Hi, Simon:
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> >I did a test against Tomcat 5.5.26 and Websphere 6.1 with JDK 1.5
>>>>>>>> based on
>>>>>>>> >your package.
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> >The webapps in samples directory all passed the tests in Tomcat
>>>>>>>> 5.5.26.
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> >While in Websphere 6.1, the result is not good.
>>>>>>>> >calculator-webapp         pass
>>>>>>>> >feed-aggregator-webapp pass
>>>>>>>> >-------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>> >calculator-ws-webapp failed
>>>>>>>> >helloworld-ws-sdo-webapp failed
>>>>>>>> >The log trace is attached. I am guessing some class confliction
>>>>>>>> there.
>>>>>>>> >-------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>> >helloworld-dojo-webapp failed
>>>>>>>> >helloworld-jsonrpc-webapp failed
>>>>>>>> >No expected response. A screenshot for helloworld-dojo-webapp is
>>>>>>>> attached.
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> >Thanks,
>>>>>>>> >Yang Sun
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> >2008/7/5 Simon Laws <si...@googlemail.com>:
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>> >> On Sat, Jul 5, 2008 at 6:43 AM, Sun Yang <sy...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>> >>> Hi, Simon:
>>>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>>>> >>> I am not sure whether it is a bit late. I can commit 1-2
>>>>>>>> hours/day to help
>>>>>>>> >>> you do this testing (tomcat 5, websphere).
>>>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>>>> >>> If you need my help, please reply me.
>>>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>>>> >>> Regards,
>>>>>>>> >>> Yang Sun
>>>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>>>> >>> 2008/7/2 Simon Laws <si...@googlemail.com>:
>>>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>>>> >>> Some more JIRA have been closed out but there are still some
>>>>>>>> that need
>>>>>>>> >>>> attention and remain unassigned. See the list at
>>>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&&pid=12310210&fixfor=12313221&sorter/field=priority&sorter/order=DESC
>>>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>>>> >>>> The ones I see at the moment are...
>>>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>>>> >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2409 - There is
>>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>> >>>> discussion thread on this (
>>>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>>>> http://www.mail-archive.com/dev@tuscany.apache.org/msg00433.html)
>>>>>>>> so I
>>>>>>>> >>>> would like to bring that to a conclusion ASAP.
>>>>>>>> >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2417 -
>>>>>>>> personally I don't
>>>>>>>> >>>> think we need to reinstate auto port selection. If we can agree
>>>>>>>> this is an
>>>>>>>> >>>> easy fix
>>>>>>>> >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2419 -
>>>>>>>> >>>> sample/helloworld-bpel needs some love
>>>>>>>> >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2441 -
>>>>>>>> demo/xml-bigbank
>>>>>>>> >>>> also needs attention
>>>>>>>> >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2442 - we need
>>>>>>>> to sort out
>>>>>>>> >>>> remaining references to incubator/ing
>>>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>>>> >>>> Other things that need to be done.
>>>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>>>> >>>> Test the web apps on different containers. I need volunteers
>>>>>>>> for Tomcat5,
>>>>>>>> >>>> Geronimo, WebSphere
>>>>>>>> >>>> Do the legal checking
>>>>>>>> >>>> We need to either release the parent pom or fix the sca pom.
>>>>>>>> I'm waiting
>>>>>>>> >>>> for a reply from Ant as he made the suggestion re. fixing up
>>>>>>>> the sca pom.
>>>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>>>> >>>> As before the release status summary is at
>>>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>>>> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TUSCANYWIKI/R1.3+Checklist
>>>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>>>> >>>> I'd like to get an RC for voting on before the end of this
>>>>>>>> week. All help
>>>>>>>> >>>> is gratefully received either fixing the things we know about
>>>>>>>> already or
>>>>>>>> >>>> looking at RC0 which is here
>>>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>>>> >>>> http://people.apache.org/~slaws/tuscany/1.3-RC0/<http://people.apache.org/%7Eslaws/tuscany/1.3-RC0/>
>>>>>>>> <http://people.apache.org/%7Eslaws/tuscany/1.3-RC0/>
>>>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>>>> >>>> Thanks
>>>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>>>> >>>> Simon
>>>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>>>> >> Great, thanks for the offer Sun. Am just about to post about RC1.
>>>>>>>> If you
>>>>>>>> >> find any issues raise a JIRA against 1.3
>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>> >> Thanks
>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>> >> Simon
>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>> Hi Ant
>
> I have a fix for TUSCANY-2484 which I'm testing at the moment but it has
> implications for TUSCANY-2324 so we will have to revisit that before we
> respin. I've just moved TUSACANY-2324 into 1.3 as I note some changes for
> that were checked into the branch for this problem but that it wasn't
> associated with 1.3 in JIRA. I think we need to delay until tomorrow.
>
> Simon
>

Hi ant

I'm done with these fixes now. We need to get the go ahead from others who
have been making fixes in 1.3, e.g. Simon Nash, but from my pov we can go
ahead with the respin. Are you happy to press the buttons for the respin I
still haven't caught up after being out and could do with some time to do
that.

Simon

Re: Re: R1.3 update and call for help

Posted by Simon Laws <si...@googlemail.com>.
On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 12:20 PM, ant elder <an...@gmail.com> wrote:

> I said I'd do an RC2 today but there are still some open JIRAs, the main
> ones being TUSCANY-2480, TUSCANY-2484, and TUSCANY-2486. Whats the status
> and ETA for fixes for these? Can i help with any of those, i've done work on
> the ?wsdl endpoints in the past so could help with TUSCANY-2480 if its
> needed?
>
>    ...ant
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 8:02 AM, ant elder <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Following on from this there has been another problem found in 1.3 with
>> the new generated wsdl -
>> http://apache.markmail.org/message/fryloi6byuyjqvrl for which I've raised
>> TUSCANY-2480, could someone take a look at that as I'm out the rest of the
>> week otherwise i'll pick it up on Monday.
>>
>> What i think we should do is plan on having an RC2 next Tuesday which will
>> give time for the two problems to be fixed with the hope that that is the
>> final RC so we'd get the release officially out by the end of next week. For
>> that to work RC2 needs to be good, i'm a bit worried about that as there's
>> only been two people who have posted that they've reviewed RC1 so far. Be a
>> shame if we need an RC3 because of a problem that could have been found in
>> RC1 - if you have time please review:
>> http://apache.markmail.org/message/fmlak6bfhentybf7
>>
>>    ...ant
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 10:36 AM, ant elder <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> An update on 1.3 for those watching this thread:
>>>
>>> - a release candidate is available for review at
>>> http://people.apache.org/~antelder/tuscany/1.3-RC1a/<http://people.apache.org/%7Eantelder/tuscany/1.3-RC1a/>with comments to this VOTE thread:
>>> http://apache.markmail.org/message/fmlak6bfhentybf7
>>>
>>> - waiting for a final fix before making a new release candidate as
>>> discussed in this thread:
>>> http://apache.markmail.org/message/tuomadm4b3kubgjn
>>>
>>>    ...ant
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 9:29 AM, ant elder <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Quite a few updates to the 1.3 branch over night so it looks like we
>>>> need a new RC1, here's what I think we should do:
>>>>
>>>> - I'm not sure if there are still things outstanding so I'll leave the
>>>> 1.3 branch open for updates till tomorrow
>>>> - tomorrow I'll re tag and respin RC1 and call a vote on that
>>>> - after then the 1.3 branch goes to RTC so updates to trunk and raise a
>>>> JIRA against 1.3 if you want a change in 1.3
>>>> - plan on likely needing an RC2 early next week to fix any issues found
>>>> in RC1
>>>>
>>>> This should get a 1.3 out late next week. We can have a 1.3.1 in the
>>>> near future to pick up things that miss 1.3. Does this sound ok to everyone
>>>> to get what they need in 1.3 or 1.3.1?
>>>>
>>>> In the meantime the distros at
>>>> http://people.apache.org/~antelder/tuscany/1.3-RC1/<http://people.apache.org/%7Eantelder/tuscany/1.3-RC1/>are still useful for reviewing if anyone has the time and inclination.
>>>>
>>>>    ...ant
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 10:15 AM, ant elder <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> This is excellent help, thanks Yang.
>>>>>
>>>>> Note I've created a new RC1 distro which includes the correctly built
>>>>> jars with out the shade plugin problem so that can be used to test the
>>>>> standalone samples, see
>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~antelder/tuscany/1.3-RC1/<http://people.apache.org/%7Eantelder/tuscany/1.3-RC1/>
>>>>>
>>>>> Will wait and see how things go today before deciding to call a vote on
>>>>> that or spin a new RC before calling a vote - everyone, reviews of this RC
>>>>> are welcome!
>>>>>
>>>>>    ...ant
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 10:07 AM, Sun Yang <sy...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Got it. I will retest them tomorrow.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Best Regards,
>>>>>> Yang Sun
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 2008/7/8 Feng Wang <fw...@gmail.com>:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi,Sun
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Websphere, you must set application properties to use the
>>>>>>> application class loader before the parent container class loader.
>>>>>>> There is an explanation on the Sebastien's blog.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://jsdelfino.blogspot.com/2007/10/how-to-use-apache-tuscany-with.html
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>> Feng Wang
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 2008-07-08 15:32:55,Sun Yang <sy...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> >Hi, Simon:
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> >I did a test against Tomcat 5.5.26 and Websphere 6.1 with JDK 1.5
>>>>>>> based on
>>>>>>> >your package.
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> >The webapps in samples directory all passed the tests in Tomcat
>>>>>>> 5.5.26.
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> >While in Websphere 6.1, the result is not good.
>>>>>>> >calculator-webapp         pass
>>>>>>> >feed-aggregator-webapp pass
>>>>>>> >-------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>> >calculator-ws-webapp failed
>>>>>>> >helloworld-ws-sdo-webapp failed
>>>>>>> >The log trace is attached. I am guessing some class confliction
>>>>>>> there.
>>>>>>> >-------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>> >helloworld-dojo-webapp failed
>>>>>>> >helloworld-jsonrpc-webapp failed
>>>>>>> >No expected response. A screenshot for helloworld-dojo-webapp is
>>>>>>> attached.
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> >Thanks,
>>>>>>> >Yang Sun
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> >2008/7/5 Simon Laws <si...@googlemail.com>:
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>> >> On Sat, Jul 5, 2008 at 6:43 AM, Sun Yang <sy...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>> >>> Hi, Simon:
>>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>>> >>> I am not sure whether it is a bit late. I can commit 1-2
>>>>>>> hours/day to help
>>>>>>> >>> you do this testing (tomcat 5, websphere).
>>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>>> >>> If you need my help, please reply me.
>>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>>> >>> Regards,
>>>>>>> >>> Yang Sun
>>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>>> >>> 2008/7/2 Simon Laws <si...@googlemail.com>:
>>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>>> >>> Some more JIRA have been closed out but there are still some that
>>>>>>> need
>>>>>>> >>>> attention and remain unassigned. See the list at
>>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&&pid=12310210&fixfor=12313221&sorter/field=priority&sorter/order=DESC
>>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>>> >>>> The ones I see at the moment are...
>>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>>> >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2409 - There is a
>>>>>>> >>>> discussion thread on this (
>>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>>> http://www.mail-archive.com/dev@tuscany.apache.org/msg00433.html) so
>>>>>>> I
>>>>>>> >>>> would like to bring that to a conclusion ASAP.
>>>>>>> >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2417 - personally
>>>>>>> I don't
>>>>>>> >>>> think we need to reinstate auto port selection. If we can agree
>>>>>>> this is an
>>>>>>> >>>> easy fix
>>>>>>> >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2419 -
>>>>>>> >>>> sample/helloworld-bpel needs some love
>>>>>>> >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2441 -
>>>>>>> demo/xml-bigbank
>>>>>>> >>>> also needs attention
>>>>>>> >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2442 - we need to
>>>>>>> sort out
>>>>>>> >>>> remaining references to incubator/ing
>>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>>> >>>> Other things that need to be done.
>>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>>> >>>> Test the web apps on different containers. I need volunteers for
>>>>>>> Tomcat5,
>>>>>>> >>>> Geronimo, WebSphere
>>>>>>> >>>> Do the legal checking
>>>>>>> >>>> We need to either release the parent pom or fix the sca pom. I'm
>>>>>>> waiting
>>>>>>> >>>> for a reply from Ant as he made the suggestion re. fixing up the
>>>>>>> sca pom.
>>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>>> >>>> As before the release status summary is at
>>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>>> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TUSCANYWIKI/R1.3+Checklist
>>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>>> >>>> I'd like to get an RC for voting on before the end of this week.
>>>>>>> All help
>>>>>>> >>>> is gratefully received either fixing the things we know about
>>>>>>> already or
>>>>>>> >>>> looking at RC0 which is here
>>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>>> >>>> http://people.apache.org/~slaws/tuscany/1.3-RC0/<http://people.apache.org/%7Eslaws/tuscany/1.3-RC0/>
>>>>>>> <http://people.apache.org/%7Eslaws/tuscany/1.3-RC0/>
>>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>>> >>>> Thanks
>>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>>> >>>> Simon
>>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>>> >> Great, thanks for the offer Sun. Am just about to post about RC1.
>>>>>>> If you
>>>>>>> >> find any issues raise a JIRA against 1.3
>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>> >> Thanks
>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>> >> Simon
>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
> Hi Ant

I have a fix for TUSCANY-2484 which I'm testing at the moment but it has
implications for TUSCANY-2324 so we will have to revisit that before we
respin. I've just moved TUSACANY-2324 into 1.3 as I note some changes for
that were checked into the branch for this problem but that it wasn't
associated with 1.3 in JIRA. I think we need to delay until tomorrow.

Simon

Re: Re: R1.3 update and call for help

Posted by ant elder <an...@gmail.com>.
I said I'd do an RC2 today but there are still some open JIRAs, the main
ones being TUSCANY-2480, TUSCANY-2484, and TUSCANY-2486. Whats the status
and ETA for fixes for these? Can i help with any of those, i've done work on
the ?wsdl endpoints in the past so could help with TUSCANY-2480 if its
needed?

   ...ant

On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 8:02 AM, ant elder <an...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Following on from this there has been another problem found in 1.3 with the
> new generated wsdl - http://apache.markmail.org/message/fryloi6byuyjqvrlfor which I've raised TUSCANY-2480, could someone take a look at that as I'm
> out the rest of the week otherwise i'll pick it up on Monday.
>
> What i think we should do is plan on having an RC2 next Tuesday which will
> give time for the two problems to be fixed with the hope that that is the
> final RC so we'd get the release officially out by the end of next week. For
> that to work RC2 needs to be good, i'm a bit worried about that as there's
> only been two people who have posted that they've reviewed RC1 so far. Be a
> shame if we need an RC3 because of a problem that could have been found in
> RC1 - if you have time please review:
> http://apache.markmail.org/message/fmlak6bfhentybf7
>
>    ...ant
>
> On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 10:36 AM, ant elder <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> An update on 1.3 for those watching this thread:
>>
>> - a release candidate is available for review at
>> http://people.apache.org/~antelder/tuscany/1.3-RC1a/<http://people.apache.org/%7Eantelder/tuscany/1.3-RC1a/>with comments to this VOTE thread:
>> http://apache.markmail.org/message/fmlak6bfhentybf7
>>
>> - waiting for a final fix before making a new release candidate as
>> discussed in this thread:
>> http://apache.markmail.org/message/tuomadm4b3kubgjn
>>
>>    ...ant
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 9:29 AM, ant elder <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Quite a few updates to the 1.3 branch over night so it looks like we need
>>> a new RC1, here's what I think we should do:
>>>
>>> - I'm not sure if there are still things outstanding so I'll leave the
>>> 1.3 branch open for updates till tomorrow
>>> - tomorrow I'll re tag and respin RC1 and call a vote on that
>>> - after then the 1.3 branch goes to RTC so updates to trunk and raise a
>>> JIRA against 1.3 if you want a change in 1.3
>>> - plan on likely needing an RC2 early next week to fix any issues found
>>> in RC1
>>>
>>> This should get a 1.3 out late next week. We can have a 1.3.1 in the near
>>> future to pick up things that miss 1.3. Does this sound ok to everyone to
>>> get what they need in 1.3 or 1.3.1?
>>>
>>> In the meantime the distros at
>>> http://people.apache.org/~antelder/tuscany/1.3-RC1/<http://people.apache.org/%7Eantelder/tuscany/1.3-RC1/>are still useful for reviewing if anyone has the time and inclination.
>>>
>>>    ...ant
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 10:15 AM, ant elder <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> This is excellent help, thanks Yang.
>>>>
>>>> Note I've created a new RC1 distro which includes the correctly built
>>>> jars with out the shade plugin problem so that can be used to test the
>>>> standalone samples, see
>>>> http://people.apache.org/~antelder/tuscany/1.3-RC1/<http://people.apache.org/%7Eantelder/tuscany/1.3-RC1/>
>>>>
>>>> Will wait and see how things go today before deciding to call a vote on
>>>> that or spin a new RC before calling a vote - everyone, reviews of this RC
>>>> are welcome!
>>>>
>>>>    ...ant
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 10:07 AM, Sun Yang <sy...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Got it. I will retest them tomorrow.
>>>>>
>>>>> Best Regards,
>>>>> Yang Sun
>>>>>
>>>>> 2008/7/8 Feng Wang <fw...@gmail.com>:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi,Sun
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Websphere, you must set application properties to use the
>>>>>> application class loader before the parent container class loader.
>>>>>> There is an explanation on the Sebastien's blog.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://jsdelfino.blogspot.com/2007/10/how-to-use-apache-tuscany-with.html
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>> Feng Wang
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 2008-07-08 15:32:55,Sun Yang <sy...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> >Hi, Simon:
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >I did a test against Tomcat 5.5.26 and Websphere 6.1 with JDK 1.5
>>>>>> based on
>>>>>> >your package.
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >The webapps in samples directory all passed the tests in Tomcat
>>>>>> 5.5.26.
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >While in Websphere 6.1, the result is not good.
>>>>>> >calculator-webapp         pass
>>>>>> >feed-aggregator-webapp pass
>>>>>> >-------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>> >calculator-ws-webapp failed
>>>>>> >helloworld-ws-sdo-webapp failed
>>>>>> >The log trace is attached. I am guessing some class confliction
>>>>>> there.
>>>>>> >-------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>> >helloworld-dojo-webapp failed
>>>>>> >helloworld-jsonrpc-webapp failed
>>>>>> >No expected response. A screenshot for helloworld-dojo-webapp is
>>>>>> attached.
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >Thanks,
>>>>>> >Yang Sun
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >2008/7/5 Simon Laws <si...@googlemail.com>:
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >> On Sat, Jul 5, 2008 at 6:43 AM, Sun Yang <sy...@gmail.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >>> Hi, Simon:
>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>> >>> I am not sure whether it is a bit late. I can commit 1-2 hours/day
>>>>>> to help
>>>>>> >>> you do this testing (tomcat 5, websphere).
>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>> >>> If you need my help, please reply me.
>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>> >>> Regards,
>>>>>> >>> Yang Sun
>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>> >>> 2008/7/2 Simon Laws <si...@googlemail.com>:
>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>> >>> Some more JIRA have been closed out but there are still some that
>>>>>> need
>>>>>> >>>> attention and remain unassigned. See the list at
>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&&pid=12310210&fixfor=12313221&sorter/field=priority&sorter/order=DESC
>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>> >>>> The ones I see at the moment are...
>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>> >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2409 - There is a
>>>>>> >>>> discussion thread on this (
>>>>>> >>>> http://www.mail-archive.com/dev@tuscany.apache.org/msg00433.html)
>>>>>> so I
>>>>>> >>>> would like to bring that to a conclusion ASAP.
>>>>>> >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2417 - personally
>>>>>> I don't
>>>>>> >>>> think we need to reinstate auto port selection. If we can agree
>>>>>> this is an
>>>>>> >>>> easy fix
>>>>>> >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2419 -
>>>>>> >>>> sample/helloworld-bpel needs some love
>>>>>> >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2441 -
>>>>>> demo/xml-bigbank
>>>>>> >>>> also needs attention
>>>>>> >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2442 - we need to
>>>>>> sort out
>>>>>> >>>> remaining references to incubator/ing
>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>> >>>> Other things that need to be done.
>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>> >>>> Test the web apps on different containers. I need volunteers for
>>>>>> Tomcat5,
>>>>>> >>>> Geronimo, WebSphere
>>>>>> >>>> Do the legal checking
>>>>>> >>>> We need to either release the parent pom or fix the sca pom. I'm
>>>>>> waiting
>>>>>> >>>> for a reply from Ant as he made the suggestion re. fixing up the
>>>>>> sca pom.
>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>> >>>> As before the release status summary is at
>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TUSCANYWIKI/R1.3+Checklist
>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>> >>>> I'd like to get an RC for voting on before the end of this week.
>>>>>> All help
>>>>>> >>>> is gratefully received either fixing the things we know about
>>>>>> already or
>>>>>> >>>> looking at RC0 which is here
>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>> >>>> http://people.apache.org/~slaws/tuscany/1.3-RC0/<http://people.apache.org/%7Eslaws/tuscany/1.3-RC0/>
>>>>>> <http://people.apache.org/%7Eslaws/tuscany/1.3-RC0/>
>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>> >>>> Thanks
>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>> >>>> Simon
>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>> >> Great, thanks for the offer Sun. Am just about to post about RC1.
>>>>>> If you
>>>>>> >> find any issues raise a JIRA against 1.3
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >> Thanks
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >> Simon
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>

Re: Re: R1.3 update and call for help

Posted by ant elder <an...@gmail.com>.
Following on from this there has been another problem found in 1.3 with the
new generated wsdl - http://apache.markmail.org/message/fryloi6byuyjqvrl for
which I've raised TUSCANY-2480, could someone take a look at that as I'm out
the rest of the week otherwise i'll pick it up on Monday.

What i think we should do is plan on having an RC2 next Tuesday which will
give time for the two problems to be fixed with the hope that that is the
final RC so we'd get the release officially out by the end of next week. For
that to work RC2 needs to be good, i'm a bit worried about that as there's
only been two people who have posted that they've reviewed RC1 so far. Be a
shame if we need an RC3 because of a problem that could have been found in
RC1 - if you have time please review:
http://apache.markmail.org/message/fmlak6bfhentybf7

   ...ant

On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 10:36 AM, ant elder <an...@gmail.com> wrote:

> An update on 1.3 for those watching this thread:
>
> - a release candidate is available for review at
> http://people.apache.org/~antelder/tuscany/1.3-RC1a/<http://people.apache.org/%7Eantelder/tuscany/1.3-RC1a/>with comments to this VOTE thread:
> http://apache.markmail.org/message/fmlak6bfhentybf7
>
> - waiting for a final fix before making a new release candidate as
> discussed in this thread:
> http://apache.markmail.org/message/tuomadm4b3kubgjn
>
>    ...ant
>
> On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 9:29 AM, ant elder <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Quite a few updates to the 1.3 branch over night so it looks like we need
>> a new RC1, here's what I think we should do:
>>
>> - I'm not sure if there are still things outstanding so I'll leave the 1.3
>> branch open for updates till tomorrow
>> - tomorrow I'll re tag and respin RC1 and call a vote on that
>> - after then the 1.3 branch goes to RTC so updates to trunk and raise a
>> JIRA against 1.3 if you want a change in 1.3
>> - plan on likely needing an RC2 early next week to fix any issues found in
>> RC1
>>
>> This should get a 1.3 out late next week. We can have a 1.3.1 in the near
>> future to pick up things that miss 1.3. Does this sound ok to everyone to
>> get what they need in 1.3 or 1.3.1?
>>
>> In the meantime the distros at
>> http://people.apache.org/~antelder/tuscany/1.3-RC1/<http://people.apache.org/%7Eantelder/tuscany/1.3-RC1/>are still useful for reviewing if anyone has the time and inclination.
>>
>>    ...ant
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 10:15 AM, ant elder <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> This is excellent help, thanks Yang.
>>>
>>> Note I've created a new RC1 distro which includes the correctly built
>>> jars with out the shade plugin problem so that can be used to test the
>>> standalone samples, see
>>> http://people.apache.org/~antelder/tuscany/1.3-RC1/<http://people.apache.org/%7Eantelder/tuscany/1.3-RC1/>
>>>
>>> Will wait and see how things go today before deciding to call a vote on
>>> that or spin a new RC before calling a vote - everyone, reviews of this RC
>>> are welcome!
>>>
>>>    ...ant
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 10:07 AM, Sun Yang <sy...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Got it. I will retest them tomorrow.
>>>>
>>>> Best Regards,
>>>> Yang Sun
>>>>
>>>> 2008/7/8 Feng Wang <fw...@gmail.com>:
>>>>
>>>> Hi,Sun
>>>>>
>>>>> On Websphere, you must set application properties to use the
>>>>> application class loader before the parent container class loader.
>>>>> There is an explanation on the Sebastien's blog.
>>>>>
>>>>> http://jsdelfino.blogspot.com/2007/10/how-to-use-apache-tuscany-with.html
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Feng Wang
>>>>>
>>>>> On 2008-07-08 15:32:55,Sun Yang <sy...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> >Hi, Simon:
>>>>> >
>>>>> >I did a test against Tomcat 5.5.26 and Websphere 6.1 with JDK 1.5
>>>>> based on
>>>>> >your package.
>>>>> >
>>>>> >The webapps in samples directory all passed the tests in Tomcat
>>>>> 5.5.26.
>>>>> >
>>>>> >While in Websphere 6.1, the result is not good.
>>>>> >calculator-webapp         pass
>>>>> >feed-aggregator-webapp pass
>>>>> >-------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> >calculator-ws-webapp failed
>>>>> >helloworld-ws-sdo-webapp failed
>>>>> >The log trace is attached. I am guessing some class confliction there.
>>>>> >-------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> >helloworld-dojo-webapp failed
>>>>> >helloworld-jsonrpc-webapp failed
>>>>> >No expected response. A screenshot for helloworld-dojo-webapp is
>>>>> attached.
>>>>> >
>>>>> >Thanks,
>>>>> >Yang Sun
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> >2008/7/5 Simon Laws <si...@googlemail.com>:
>>>>> >
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> On Sat, Jul 5, 2008 at 6:43 AM, Sun Yang <sy...@gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >>> Hi, Simon:
>>>>> >>>
>>>>> >>> I am not sure whether it is a bit late. I can commit 1-2 hours/day
>>>>> to help
>>>>> >>> you do this testing (tomcat 5, websphere).
>>>>> >>>
>>>>> >>> If you need my help, please reply me.
>>>>> >>>
>>>>> >>> Regards,
>>>>> >>> Yang Sun
>>>>> >>>
>>>>> >>> 2008/7/2 Simon Laws <si...@googlemail.com>:
>>>>> >>>
>>>>> >>> Some more JIRA have been closed out but there are still some that
>>>>> need
>>>>> >>>> attention and remain unassigned. See the list at
>>>>> >>>>
>>>>> >>>>
>>>>> >>>>
>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&&pid=12310210&fixfor=12313221&sorter/field=priority&sorter/order=DESC
>>>>> >>>>
>>>>> >>>> The ones I see at the moment are...
>>>>> >>>>
>>>>> >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2409 - There is a
>>>>> >>>> discussion thread on this (
>>>>> >>>> http://www.mail-archive.com/dev@tuscany.apache.org/msg00433.html)
>>>>> so I
>>>>> >>>> would like to bring that to a conclusion ASAP.
>>>>> >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2417 - personally I
>>>>> don't
>>>>> >>>> think we need to reinstate auto port selection. If we can agree
>>>>> this is an
>>>>> >>>> easy fix
>>>>> >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2419 -
>>>>> >>>> sample/helloworld-bpel needs some love
>>>>> >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2441 -
>>>>> demo/xml-bigbank
>>>>> >>>> also needs attention
>>>>> >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2442 - we need to
>>>>> sort out
>>>>> >>>> remaining references to incubator/ing
>>>>> >>>>
>>>>> >>>> Other things that need to be done.
>>>>> >>>>
>>>>> >>>> Test the web apps on different containers. I need volunteers for
>>>>> Tomcat5,
>>>>> >>>> Geronimo, WebSphere
>>>>> >>>> Do the legal checking
>>>>> >>>> We need to either release the parent pom or fix the sca pom. I'm
>>>>> waiting
>>>>> >>>> for a reply from Ant as he made the suggestion re. fixing up the
>>>>> sca pom.
>>>>> >>>>
>>>>> >>>> As before the release status summary is at
>>>>> >>>>
>>>>> >>>>
>>>>> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TUSCANYWIKI/R1.3+Checklist
>>>>> >>>>
>>>>> >>>> I'd like to get an RC for voting on before the end of this week.
>>>>> All help
>>>>> >>>> is gratefully received either fixing the things we know about
>>>>> already or
>>>>> >>>> looking at RC0 which is here
>>>>> >>>>
>>>>> >>>> http://people.apache.org/~slaws/tuscany/1.3-RC0/<http://people.apache.org/%7Eslaws/tuscany/1.3-RC0/>
>>>>> <http://people.apache.org/%7Eslaws/tuscany/1.3-RC0/>
>>>>> >>>>
>>>>> >>>> Thanks
>>>>> >>>>
>>>>> >>>> Simon
>>>>> >>>>
>>>>> >>>>
>>>>> >>>>
>>>>> >>>
>>>>> >> Great, thanks for the offer Sun. Am just about to post about RC1. If
>>>>> you
>>>>> >> find any issues raise a JIRA against 1.3
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> Thanks
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> Simon
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>

Re: Re: R1.3 update and call for help

Posted by ant elder <an...@gmail.com>.
An update on 1.3 for those watching this thread:

- a release candidate is available for review at
http://people.apache.org/~antelder/tuscany/1.3-RC1a/ with comments to this
VOTE thread: http://apache.markmail.org/message/fmlak6bfhentybf7

- waiting for a final fix before making a new release candidate as discussed
in this thread: http://apache.markmail.org/message/tuomadm4b3kubgjn

   ...ant

On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 9:29 AM, ant elder <an...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Quite a few updates to the 1.3 branch over night so it looks like we need a
> new RC1, here's what I think we should do:
>
> - I'm not sure if there are still things outstanding so I'll leave the 1.3
> branch open for updates till tomorrow
> - tomorrow I'll re tag and respin RC1 and call a vote on that
> - after then the 1.3 branch goes to RTC so updates to trunk and raise a
> JIRA against 1.3 if you want a change in 1.3
> - plan on likely needing an RC2 early next week to fix any issues found in
> RC1
>
> This should get a 1.3 out late next week. We can have a 1.3.1 in the near
> future to pick up things that miss 1.3. Does this sound ok to everyone to
> get what they need in 1.3 or 1.3.1?
>
> In the meantime the distros at
> http://people.apache.org/~antelder/tuscany/1.3-RC1/<http://people.apache.org/%7Eantelder/tuscany/1.3-RC1/>are still useful for reviewing if anyone has the time and inclination.
>
>    ...ant
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 10:15 AM, ant elder <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> This is excellent help, thanks Yang.
>>
>> Note I've created a new RC1 distro which includes the correctly built jars
>> with out the shade plugin problem so that can be used to test the standalone
>> samples, see http://people.apache.org/~antelder/tuscany/1.3-RC1/<http://people.apache.org/%7Eantelder/tuscany/1.3-RC1/>
>>
>> Will wait and see how things go today before deciding to call a vote on
>> that or spin a new RC before calling a vote - everyone, reviews of this RC
>> are welcome!
>>
>>    ...ant
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 10:07 AM, Sun Yang <sy...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Got it. I will retest them tomorrow.
>>>
>>> Best Regards,
>>> Yang Sun
>>>
>>> 2008/7/8 Feng Wang <fw...@gmail.com>:
>>>
>>> Hi,Sun
>>>>
>>>> On Websphere, you must set application properties to use the application
>>>> class loader before the parent container class loader.
>>>> There is an explanation on the Sebastien's blog.
>>>>
>>>> http://jsdelfino.blogspot.com/2007/10/how-to-use-apache-tuscany-with.html
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Feng Wang
>>>>
>>>> On 2008-07-08 15:32:55,Sun Yang <sy...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> >Hi, Simon:
>>>> >
>>>> >I did a test against Tomcat 5.5.26 and Websphere 6.1 with JDK 1.5 based
>>>> on
>>>> >your package.
>>>> >
>>>> >The webapps in samples directory all passed the tests in Tomcat
>>>> 5.5.26.
>>>> >
>>>> >While in Websphere 6.1, the result is not good.
>>>> >calculator-webapp         pass
>>>> >feed-aggregator-webapp pass
>>>> >-------------------------------------------------------
>>>> >calculator-ws-webapp failed
>>>> >helloworld-ws-sdo-webapp failed
>>>> >The log trace is attached. I am guessing some class confliction there.
>>>> >-------------------------------------------------------
>>>> >helloworld-dojo-webapp failed
>>>> >helloworld-jsonrpc-webapp failed
>>>> >No expected response. A screenshot for helloworld-dojo-webapp is
>>>> attached.
>>>> >
>>>> >Thanks,
>>>> >Yang Sun
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >2008/7/5 Simon Laws <si...@googlemail.com>:
>>>> >
>>>> >>
>>>> >>
>>>> >> On Sat, Jul 5, 2008 at 6:43 AM, Sun Yang <sy...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> >>
>>>> >>> Hi, Simon:
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> I am not sure whether it is a bit late. I can commit 1-2 hours/day
>>>> to help
>>>> >>> you do this testing (tomcat 5, websphere).
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> If you need my help, please reply me.
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> Regards,
>>>> >>> Yang Sun
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> 2008/7/2 Simon Laws <si...@googlemail.com>:
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> Some more JIRA have been closed out but there are still some that
>>>> need
>>>> >>>> attention and remain unassigned. See the list at
>>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>>
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&&pid=12310210&fixfor=12313221&sorter/field=priority&sorter/order=DESC
>>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>> The ones I see at the moment are...
>>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2409 - There is a
>>>> >>>> discussion thread on this (
>>>> >>>> http://www.mail-archive.com/dev@tuscany.apache.org/msg00433.html)
>>>> so I
>>>> >>>> would like to bring that to a conclusion ASAP.
>>>> >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2417 - personally I
>>>> don't
>>>> >>>> think we need to reinstate auto port selection. If we can agree
>>>> this is an
>>>> >>>> easy fix
>>>> >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2419 -
>>>> >>>> sample/helloworld-bpel needs some love
>>>> >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2441 -
>>>> demo/xml-bigbank
>>>> >>>> also needs attention
>>>> >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2442 - we need to
>>>> sort out
>>>> >>>> remaining references to incubator/ing
>>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>> Other things that need to be done.
>>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>> Test the web apps on different containers. I need volunteers for
>>>> Tomcat5,
>>>> >>>> Geronimo, WebSphere
>>>> >>>> Do the legal checking
>>>> >>>> We need to either release the parent pom or fix the sca pom. I'm
>>>> waiting
>>>> >>>> for a reply from Ant as he made the suggestion re. fixing up the
>>>> sca pom.
>>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>> As before the release status summary is at
>>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>>
>>>> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TUSCANYWIKI/R1.3+Checklist
>>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>> I'd like to get an RC for voting on before the end of this week.
>>>> All help
>>>> >>>> is gratefully received either fixing the things we know about
>>>> already or
>>>> >>>> looking at RC0 which is here
>>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>> http://people.apache.org/~slaws/tuscany/1.3-RC0/<http://people.apache.org/%7Eslaws/tuscany/1.3-RC0/>
>>>> <http://people.apache.org/%7Eslaws/tuscany/1.3-RC0/>
>>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>> Thanks
>>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>> Simon
>>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>
>>>> >> Great, thanks for the offer Sun. Am just about to post about RC1. If
>>>> you
>>>> >> find any issues raise a JIRA against 1.3
>>>> >>
>>>> >> Thanks
>>>> >>
>>>> >> Simon
>>>> >>
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>

Re: Re: R1.3 update and call for help

Posted by ant elder <an...@gmail.com>.
Quite a few updates to the 1.3 branch over night so it looks like we need a
new RC1, here's what I think we should do:

- I'm not sure if there are still things outstanding so I'll leave the 1.3
branch open for updates till tomorrow
- tomorrow I'll re tag and respin RC1 and call a vote on that
- after then the 1.3 branch goes to RTC so updates to trunk and raise a JIRA
against 1.3 if you want a change in 1.3
- plan on likely needing an RC2 early next week to fix any issues found in
RC1

This should get a 1.3 out late next week. We can have a 1.3.1 in the near
future to pick up things that miss 1.3. Does this sound ok to everyone to
get what they need in 1.3 or 1.3.1?

In the meantime the distros at
http://people.apache.org/~antelder/tuscany/1.3-RC1/ are still useful for
reviewing if anyone has the time and inclination.

   ...ant

On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 10:15 AM, ant elder <an...@gmail.com> wrote:

> This is excellent help, thanks Yang.
>
> Note I've created a new RC1 distro which includes the correctly built jars
> with out the shade plugin problem so that can be used to test the standalone
> samples, see http://people.apache.org/~antelder/tuscany/1.3-RC1/<http://people.apache.org/%7Eantelder/tuscany/1.3-RC1/>
>
> Will wait and see how things go today before deciding to call a vote on
> that or spin a new RC before calling a vote - everyone, reviews of this RC
> are welcome!
>
>    ...ant
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 10:07 AM, Sun Yang <sy...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Got it. I will retest them tomorrow.
>>
>> Best Regards,
>> Yang Sun
>>
>> 2008/7/8 Feng Wang <fw...@gmail.com>:
>>
>> Hi,Sun
>>>
>>> On Websphere, you must set application properties to use the application
>>> class loader before the parent container class loader.
>>> There is an explanation on the Sebastien's blog.
>>> http://jsdelfino.blogspot.com/2007/10/how-to-use-apache-tuscany-with.html
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Feng Wang
>>>
>>> On 2008-07-08 15:32:55,Sun Yang <sy...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> >Hi, Simon:
>>> >
>>> >I did a test against Tomcat 5.5.26 and Websphere 6.1 with JDK 1.5 based
>>> on
>>> >your package.
>>> >
>>> >The webapps in samples directory all passed the tests in Tomcat 5.5.26.
>>> >
>>> >While in Websphere 6.1, the result is not good.
>>> >calculator-webapp         pass
>>> >feed-aggregator-webapp pass
>>> >-------------------------------------------------------
>>> >calculator-ws-webapp failed
>>> >helloworld-ws-sdo-webapp failed
>>> >The log trace is attached. I am guessing some class confliction there.
>>> >-------------------------------------------------------
>>> >helloworld-dojo-webapp failed
>>> >helloworld-jsonrpc-webapp failed
>>> >No expected response. A screenshot for helloworld-dojo-webapp is
>>> attached.
>>> >
>>> >Thanks,
>>> >Yang Sun
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >2008/7/5 Simon Laws <si...@googlemail.com>:
>>> >
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> On Sat, Jul 5, 2008 at 6:43 AM, Sun Yang <sy...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >>> Hi, Simon:
>>> >>>
>>> >>> I am not sure whether it is a bit late. I can commit 1-2 hours/day to
>>> help
>>> >>> you do this testing (tomcat 5, websphere).
>>> >>>
>>> >>> If you need my help, please reply me.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Regards,
>>> >>> Yang Sun
>>> >>>
>>> >>> 2008/7/2 Simon Laws <si...@googlemail.com>:
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Some more JIRA have been closed out but there are still some that
>>> need
>>> >>>> attention and remain unassigned. See the list at
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&&pid=12310210&fixfor=12313221&sorter/field=priority&sorter/order=DESC
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> The ones I see at the moment are...
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2409 - There is a
>>> >>>> discussion thread on this (
>>> >>>> http://www.mail-archive.com/dev@tuscany.apache.org/msg00433.html)
>>> so I
>>> >>>> would like to bring that to a conclusion ASAP.
>>> >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2417 - personally I
>>> don't
>>> >>>> think we need to reinstate auto port selection. If we can agree this
>>> is an
>>> >>>> easy fix
>>> >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2419 -
>>> >>>> sample/helloworld-bpel needs some love
>>> >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2441 -
>>> demo/xml-bigbank
>>> >>>> also needs attention
>>> >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2442 - we need to
>>> sort out
>>> >>>> remaining references to incubator/ing
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> Other things that need to be done.
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> Test the web apps on different containers. I need volunteers for
>>> Tomcat5,
>>> >>>> Geronimo, WebSphere
>>> >>>> Do the legal checking
>>> >>>> We need to either release the parent pom or fix the sca pom. I'm
>>> waiting
>>> >>>> for a reply from Ant as he made the suggestion re. fixing up the sca
>>> pom.
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> As before the release status summary is at
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>
>>> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TUSCANYWIKI/R1.3+Checklist
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> I'd like to get an RC for voting on before the end of this week. All
>>> help
>>> >>>> is gratefully received either fixing the things we know about
>>> already or
>>> >>>> looking at RC0 which is here
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> http://people.apache.org/~slaws/tuscany/1.3-RC0/<http://people.apache.org/%7Eslaws/tuscany/1.3-RC0/>
>>> <http://people.apache.org/%7Eslaws/tuscany/1.3-RC0/>
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> Thanks
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> Simon
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>
>>> >> Great, thanks for the offer Sun. Am just about to post about RC1. If
>>> you
>>> >> find any issues raise a JIRA against 1.3
>>> >>
>>> >> Thanks
>>> >>
>>> >> Simon
>>> >>
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>
>

Re: Re: R1.3 update and call for help

Posted by ant elder <an...@gmail.com>.
This is excellent help, thanks Yang.

Note I've created a new RC1 distro which includes the correctly built jars
with out the shade plugin problem so that can be used to test the standalone
samples, see http://people.apache.org/~antelder/tuscany/1.3-RC1/

Will wait and see how things go today before deciding to call a vote on that
or spin a new RC before calling a vote - everyone, reviews of this RC are
welcome!

   ...ant

On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 10:07 AM, Sun Yang <sy...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Got it. I will retest them tomorrow.
>
> Best Regards,
> Yang Sun
>
> 2008/7/8 Feng Wang <fw...@gmail.com>:
>
> Hi,Sun
>>
>> On Websphere, you must set application properties to use the application
>> class loader before the parent container class loader.
>> There is an explanation on the Sebastien's blog.
>> http://jsdelfino.blogspot.com/2007/10/how-to-use-apache-tuscany-with.html
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Feng Wang
>>
>> On 2008-07-08 15:32:55,Sun Yang <sy...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> >Hi, Simon:
>> >
>> >I did a test against Tomcat 5.5.26 and Websphere 6.1 with JDK 1.5 based
>> on
>> >your package.
>> >
>> >The webapps in samples directory all passed the tests in Tomcat 5.5.26.
>> >
>> >While in Websphere 6.1, the result is not good.
>> >calculator-webapp         pass
>> >feed-aggregator-webapp pass
>> >-------------------------------------------------------
>> >calculator-ws-webapp failed
>> >helloworld-ws-sdo-webapp failed
>> >The log trace is attached. I am guessing some class confliction there.
>> >-------------------------------------------------------
>> >helloworld-dojo-webapp failed
>> >helloworld-jsonrpc-webapp failed
>> >No expected response. A screenshot for helloworld-dojo-webapp is
>> attached.
>> >
>> >Thanks,
>> >Yang Sun
>> >
>> >
>> >2008/7/5 Simon Laws <si...@googlemail.com>:
>> >
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On Sat, Jul 5, 2008 at 6:43 AM, Sun Yang <sy...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> Hi, Simon:
>> >>>
>> >>> I am not sure whether it is a bit late. I can commit 1-2 hours/day to
>> help
>> >>> you do this testing (tomcat 5, websphere).
>> >>>
>> >>> If you need my help, please reply me.
>> >>>
>> >>> Regards,
>> >>> Yang Sun
>> >>>
>> >>> 2008/7/2 Simon Laws <si...@googlemail.com>:
>> >>>
>> >>> Some more JIRA have been closed out but there are still some that need
>> >>>> attention and remain unassigned. See the list at
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&&pid=12310210&fixfor=12313221&sorter/field=priority&sorter/order=DESC
>> >>>>
>> >>>> The ones I see at the moment are...
>> >>>>
>> >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2409 - There is a
>> >>>> discussion thread on this (
>> >>>> http://www.mail-archive.com/dev@tuscany.apache.org/msg00433.html) so
>> I
>> >>>> would like to bring that to a conclusion ASAP.
>> >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2417 - personally I
>> don't
>> >>>> think we need to reinstate auto port selection. If we can agree this
>> is an
>> >>>> easy fix
>> >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2419 -
>> >>>> sample/helloworld-bpel needs some love
>> >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2441 -
>> demo/xml-bigbank
>> >>>> also needs attention
>> >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2442 - we need to sort
>> out
>> >>>> remaining references to incubator/ing
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Other things that need to be done.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Test the web apps on different containers. I need volunteers for
>> Tomcat5,
>> >>>> Geronimo, WebSphere
>> >>>> Do the legal checking
>> >>>> We need to either release the parent pom or fix the sca pom. I'm
>> waiting
>> >>>> for a reply from Ant as he made the suggestion re. fixing up the sca
>> pom.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> As before the release status summary is at
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TUSCANYWIKI/R1.3+Checklist
>> >>>>
>> >>>> I'd like to get an RC for voting on before the end of this week. All
>> help
>> >>>> is gratefully received either fixing the things we know about already
>> or
>> >>>> looking at RC0 which is here
>> >>>>
>> >>>> http://people.apache.org/~slaws/tuscany/1.3-RC0/<http://people.apache.org/%7Eslaws/tuscany/1.3-RC0/>
>> <http://people.apache.org/%7Eslaws/tuscany/1.3-RC0/>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Thanks
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Simon
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>
>> >> Great, thanks for the offer Sun. Am just about to post about RC1. If
>> you
>> >> find any issues raise a JIRA against 1.3
>> >>
>> >> Thanks
>> >>
>> >> Simon
>> >>
>> >
>>
>>
>

Re: Re: R1.3 update and call for help

Posted by Sun Yang <sy...@gmail.com>.
Got it. I will retest them tomorrow.

Best Regards,
Yang Sun

2008/7/8 Feng Wang <fw...@gmail.com>:

> Hi,Sun
>
> On Websphere, you must set application properties to use the application
> class loader before the parent container class loader.
> There is an explanation on the Sebastien's blog.
> http://jsdelfino.blogspot.com/2007/10/how-to-use-apache-tuscany-with.html
>
> Thanks,
> Feng Wang
>
> On 2008-07-08 15:32:55,Sun Yang <sy...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >Hi, Simon:
> >
> >I did a test against Tomcat 5.5.26 and Websphere 6.1 with JDK 1.5 based on
> >your package.
> >
> >The webapps in samples directory all passed the tests in Tomcat 5.5.26.
> >
> >While in Websphere 6.1, the result is not good.
> >calculator-webapp         pass
> >feed-aggregator-webapp pass
> >-------------------------------------------------------
> >calculator-ws-webapp failed
> >helloworld-ws-sdo-webapp failed
> >The log trace is attached. I am guessing some class confliction there.
> >-------------------------------------------------------
> >helloworld-dojo-webapp failed
> >helloworld-jsonrpc-webapp failed
> >No expected response. A screenshot for helloworld-dojo-webapp is attached.
> >
> >Thanks,
> >Yang Sun
> >
> >
> >2008/7/5 Simon Laws <si...@googlemail.com>:
> >
> >>
> >>
> >> On Sat, Jul 5, 2008 at 6:43 AM, Sun Yang <sy...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi, Simon:
> >>>
> >>> I am not sure whether it is a bit late. I can commit 1-2 hours/day to
> help
> >>> you do this testing (tomcat 5, websphere).
> >>>
> >>> If you need my help, please reply me.
> >>>
> >>> Regards,
> >>> Yang Sun
> >>>
> >>> 2008/7/2 Simon Laws <si...@googlemail.com>:
> >>>
> >>> Some more JIRA have been closed out but there are still some that need
> >>>> attention and remain unassigned. See the list at
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&&pid=12310210&fixfor=12313221&sorter/field=priority&sorter/order=DESC
> >>>>
> >>>> The ones I see at the moment are...
> >>>>
> >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2409 - There is a
> >>>> discussion thread on this (
> >>>> http://www.mail-archive.com/dev@tuscany.apache.org/msg00433.html) so
> I
> >>>> would like to bring that to a conclusion ASAP.
> >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2417 - personally I
> don't
> >>>> think we need to reinstate auto port selection. If we can agree this
> is an
> >>>> easy fix
> >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2419 -
> >>>> sample/helloworld-bpel needs some love
> >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2441 - demo/xml-bigbank
> >>>> also needs attention
> >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2442 - we need to sort
> out
> >>>> remaining references to incubator/ing
> >>>>
> >>>> Other things that need to be done.
> >>>>
> >>>> Test the web apps on different containers. I need volunteers for
> Tomcat5,
> >>>> Geronimo, WebSphere
> >>>> Do the legal checking
> >>>> We need to either release the parent pom or fix the sca pom. I'm
> waiting
> >>>> for a reply from Ant as he made the suggestion re. fixing up the sca
> pom.
> >>>>
> >>>> As before the release status summary is at
> >>>>
> >>>> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TUSCANYWIKI/R1.3+Checklist
> >>>>
> >>>> I'd like to get an RC for voting on before the end of this week. All
> help
> >>>> is gratefully received either fixing the things we know about already
> or
> >>>> looking at RC0 which is here
> >>>>
> >>>> http://people.apache.org/~slaws/tuscany/1.3-RC0/<http://people.apache.org/%7Eslaws/tuscany/1.3-RC0/>
> <http://people.apache.org/%7Eslaws/tuscany/1.3-RC0/>
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks
> >>>>
> >>>> Simon
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >> Great, thanks for the offer Sun. Am just about to post about RC1. If you
> >> find any issues raise a JIRA against 1.3
> >>
> >> Thanks
> >>
> >> Simon
> >>
> >
>
>

Re: Re: R1.3 update and call for help

Posted by Feng Wang <fw...@gmail.com>.
Hi,Sun

On Websphere, you must set application properties to use the application class loader before the parent container class loader.
There is an explanation on the Sebastien's blog.
http://jsdelfino.blogspot.com/2007/10/how-to-use-apache-tuscany-with.html
	 
Thanks,
Feng Wang

On 2008-07-08 15:32:55,Sun Yang <sy...@gmail.com> wrote:

>Hi, Simon:
>
>I did a test against Tomcat 5.5.26 and Websphere 6.1 with JDK 1.5 based on
>your package.
>
>The webapps in samples directory all passed the tests in Tomcat 5.5.26.
>
>While in Websphere 6.1, the result is not good.
>calculator-webapp         pass
>feed-aggregator-webapp pass
>-------------------------------------------------------
>calculator-ws-webapp failed
>helloworld-ws-sdo-webapp failed
>The log trace is attached. I am guessing some class confliction there.
>-------------------------------------------------------
>helloworld-dojo-webapp failed
>helloworld-jsonrpc-webapp failed
>No expected response. A screenshot for helloworld-dojo-webapp is attached.
>
>Thanks,
>Yang Sun
>
>
>2008/7/5 Simon Laws <si...@googlemail.com>:
>
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Jul 5, 2008 at 6:43 AM, Sun Yang <sy...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi, Simon:
>>>
>>> I am not sure whether it is a bit late. I can commit 1-2 hours/day to help
>>> you do this testing (tomcat 5, websphere).
>>>
>>> If you need my help, please reply me.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Yang Sun
>>>
>>> 2008/7/2 Simon Laws <si...@googlemail.com>:
>>>
>>> Some more JIRA have been closed out but there are still some that need
>>>> attention and remain unassigned. See the list at
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&&pid=12310210&fixfor=12313221&sorter/field=priority&sorter/order=DESC
>>>>
>>>> The ones I see at the moment are...
>>>>
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2409 - There is a
>>>> discussion thread on this (
>>>> http://www.mail-archive.com/dev@tuscany.apache.org/msg00433.html) so I
>>>> would like to bring that to a conclusion ASAP.
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2417 - personally I don't
>>>> think we need to reinstate auto port selection. If we can agree this is an
>>>> easy fix
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2419 -
>>>> sample/helloworld-bpel needs some love
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2441 - demo/xml-bigbank
>>>> also needs attention
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2442 - we need to sort out
>>>> remaining references to incubator/ing
>>>>
>>>> Other things that need to be done.
>>>>
>>>> Test the web apps on different containers. I need volunteers for Tomcat5,
>>>> Geronimo, WebSphere
>>>> Do the legal checking
>>>> We need to either release the parent pom or fix the sca pom. I'm waiting
>>>> for a reply from Ant as he made the suggestion re. fixing up the sca pom.
>>>>
>>>> As before the release status summary is at
>>>>
>>>> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TUSCANYWIKI/R1.3+Checklist
>>>>
>>>> I'd like to get an RC for voting on before the end of this week. All help
>>>> is gratefully received either fixing the things we know about already or
>>>> looking at RC0 which is here
>>>>
>>>> http://people.apache.org/~slaws/tuscany/1.3-RC0/<http://people.apache.org/%7Eslaws/tuscany/1.3-RC0/>
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>>
>>>> Simon
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>> Great, thanks for the offer Sun. Am just about to post about RC1. If you
>> find any issues raise a JIRA against 1.3
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Simon
>>
>

Re: R1.3 update and call for help

Posted by Sun Yang <sy...@gmail.com>.
Hi, Simon:

I did a test against Tomcat 5.5.26 and Websphere 6.1 with JDK 1.5 based on
your package.

The webapps in samples directory all passed the tests in Tomcat 5.5.26.

While in Websphere 6.1, the result is not good.
calculator-webapp         pass
feed-aggregator-webapp pass
-------------------------------------------------------
calculator-ws-webapp failed
helloworld-ws-sdo-webapp failed
The log trace is attached. I am guessing some class confliction there.
-------------------------------------------------------
helloworld-dojo-webapp failed
helloworld-jsonrpc-webapp failed
No expected response. A screenshot for helloworld-dojo-webapp is attached.

Thanks,
Yang Sun


2008/7/5 Simon Laws <si...@googlemail.com>:

>
>
> On Sat, Jul 5, 2008 at 6:43 AM, Sun Yang <sy...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi, Simon:
>>
>> I am not sure whether it is a bit late. I can commit 1-2 hours/day to help
>> you do this testing (tomcat 5, websphere).
>>
>> If you need my help, please reply me.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Yang Sun
>>
>> 2008/7/2 Simon Laws <si...@googlemail.com>:
>>
>> Some more JIRA have been closed out but there are still some that need
>>> attention and remain unassigned. See the list at
>>>
>>>
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&&pid=12310210&fixfor=12313221&sorter/field=priority&sorter/order=DESC
>>>
>>> The ones I see at the moment are...
>>>
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2409 - There is a
>>> discussion thread on this (
>>> http://www.mail-archive.com/dev@tuscany.apache.org/msg00433.html) so I
>>> would like to bring that to a conclusion ASAP.
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2417 - personally I don't
>>> think we need to reinstate auto port selection. If we can agree this is an
>>> easy fix
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2419 -
>>> sample/helloworld-bpel needs some love
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2441 - demo/xml-bigbank
>>> also needs attention
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2442 - we need to sort out
>>> remaining references to incubator/ing
>>>
>>> Other things that need to be done.
>>>
>>> Test the web apps on different containers. I need volunteers for Tomcat5,
>>> Geronimo, WebSphere
>>> Do the legal checking
>>> We need to either release the parent pom or fix the sca pom. I'm waiting
>>> for a reply from Ant as he made the suggestion re. fixing up the sca pom.
>>>
>>> As before the release status summary is at
>>>
>>> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TUSCANYWIKI/R1.3+Checklist
>>>
>>> I'd like to get an RC for voting on before the end of this week. All help
>>> is gratefully received either fixing the things we know about already or
>>> looking at RC0 which is here
>>>
>>> http://people.apache.org/~slaws/tuscany/1.3-RC0/<http://people.apache.org/%7Eslaws/tuscany/1.3-RC0/>
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>>
>>> Simon
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
> Great, thanks for the offer Sun. Am just about to post about RC1. If you
> find any issues raise a JIRA against 1.3
>
> Thanks
>
> Simon
>

Re: R1.3 update and call for help

Posted by Simon Laws <si...@googlemail.com>.
On Sat, Jul 5, 2008 at 6:43 AM, Sun Yang <sy...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi, Simon:
>
> I am not sure whether it is a bit late. I can commit 1-2 hours/day to help
> you do this testing (tomcat 5, websphere).
>
> If you need my help, please reply me.
>
> Regards,
> Yang Sun
>
> 2008/7/2 Simon Laws <si...@googlemail.com>:
>
> Some more JIRA have been closed out but there are still some that need
>> attention and remain unassigned. See the list at
>>
>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&&pid=12310210&fixfor=12313221&sorter/field=priority&sorter/order=DESC
>>
>> The ones I see at the moment are...
>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2409 - There is a
>> discussion thread on this (
>> http://www.mail-archive.com/dev@tuscany.apache.org/msg00433.html) so I
>> would like to bring that to a conclusion ASAP.
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2417 - personally I don't
>> think we need to reinstate auto port selection. If we can agree this is an
>> easy fix
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2419 -
>> sample/helloworld-bpel needs some love
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2441 - demo/xml-bigbank
>> also needs attention
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2442 - we need to sort out
>> remaining references to incubator/ing
>>
>> Other things that need to be done.
>>
>> Test the web apps on different containers. I need volunteers for Tomcat5,
>> Geronimo, WebSphere
>> Do the legal checking
>> We need to either release the parent pom or fix the sca pom. I'm waiting
>> for a reply from Ant as he made the suggestion re. fixing up the sca pom.
>>
>> As before the release status summary is at
>>
>> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TUSCANYWIKI/R1.3+Checklist
>>
>> I'd like to get an RC for voting on before the end of this week. All help
>> is gratefully received either fixing the things we know about already or
>> looking at RC0 which is here
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~slaws/tuscany/1.3-RC0/<http://people.apache.org/%7Eslaws/tuscany/1.3-RC0/>
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Simon
>>
>>
>>
>
Great, thanks for the offer Sun. Am just about to post about RC1. If you
find any issues raise a JIRA against 1.3

Thanks

Simon

Re: R1.3 update and call for help

Posted by Sun Yang <sy...@gmail.com>.
Hi, Simon:

I am not sure whether it is a bit late. I can commit 1-2 hours/day to help
you do this testing (tomcat 5, websphere).

If you need my help, please reply me.

Regards,
Yang Sun

2008/7/2 Simon Laws <si...@googlemail.com>:

> Some more JIRA have been closed out but there are still some that need
> attention and remain unassigned. See the list at
>
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&&pid=12310210&fixfor=12313221&sorter/field=priority&sorter/order=DESC
>
> The ones I see at the moment are...
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2409 - There is a discussion
> thread on this (
> http://www.mail-archive.com/dev@tuscany.apache.org/msg00433.html) so I
> would like to bring that to a conclusion ASAP.
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2417 - personally I don't
> think we need to reinstate auto port selection. If we can agree this is an
> easy fix
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2419 -
> sample/helloworld-bpel needs some love
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2441 - demo/xml-bigbank also
> needs attention
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2442 - we need to sort out
> remaining references to incubator/ing
>
> Other things that need to be done.
>
> Test the web apps on different containers. I need volunteers for Tomcat5,
> Geronimo, WebSphere
> Do the legal checking
> We need to either release the parent pom or fix the sca pom. I'm waiting
> for a reply from Ant as he made the suggestion re. fixing up the sca pom.
>
> As before the release status summary is at
>
> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TUSCANYWIKI/R1.3+Checklist
>
> I'd like to get an RC for voting on before the end of this week. All help
> is gratefully received either fixing the things we know about already or
> looking at RC0 which is here
>
> http://people.apache.org/~slaws/tuscany/1.3-RC0/<http://people.apache.org/%7Eslaws/tuscany/1.3-RC0/>
>
> Thanks
>
> Simon
>
>
>