You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@stanbol.apache.org by Reto Bachmann-Gmür <re...@wymiwyg.com> on 2013/10/21 14:13:07 UTC
Contenthub / CMS Adapter (was Re: Commit window for 0.x release in
trunk closes this Friday)
Hi Rupert, all,
I would envisage this for 1.0.0. But I'm not sure about ContentHub/CMS
Adapter. One hand there hasn't been any activity during the last 6 month on
the other hand in the Fusepool project because of the limitation of having
the RDF metadata detached from the Solr index we have replaced it with ECS
(Backend) and Firstswim (GUI). The Fuseppol project would be excited to
contribute these back into Stanbol. For a demo see:
http://beta.fusepool.com/firstswim
Cheers,
Reto
1. https://github.com/fusepool/fusepool-ecs
2. https://github.com/fusepool/fusepool-firstswim
On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 1:27 PM, Rupert Westenthaler <
rupert.westenthaler@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I was considering to create Stanbol launchers without data bundles in
> the release branch. This would allow us to do a binary release.
>
> We could create launchers for
>
> * stateless (Enhancer & Entityhub)
> * semindexing (Stateless & Contenthub & CMS Adapter)
> * reasoning (Ontologymanager & Rules & Reasoning)
> * full (all stanbol modules)
>
> In addition we could include the Entityhub indexing tools as binary
> releases.
>
> WDYT
> Rupert
>
> On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 1:12 PM, Reto Bachmann-Gmür <re...@wymiwyg.com>
> wrote:
> > Hi Fabian
> >
> > As we might need to build more release candidates I suggest to do this in
> > the release branch. For the release plugin to work it will afaik be
> > necessary to adapt the svn url in the pom
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Reto
> >
> >
> > On Sat, Oct 19, 2013 at 1:39 PM, Fabian Christ <
> christ.fabian@googlemail.com
> >> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> good to hear about the progress ;)
> >>
> >> I am currently checking that the trunk is fine when trying to build
> >> with the apache-release profile (this includes the RAT check). Once
> >> this succeeds we could create the release branch.
> >>
> >> Best,
> >> - Fabian
> >>
> >> 2013/10/19 Andreas Kuckartz <a....@ping.de>:
> >> > Rupert Westenthaler:
> >> >> However there is still no progress on the build issues of Andreas. As
> >> >> explained in [4] I can see in the log what is going wrong, but I have
> >> >> still no idea why this is happening in Andreas environment. All my
> >> >> tries to reproduce this where not successful.
> >> >
> >> > I have executed and am executing more experiments with the integration
> >> > tests and will report today or tomorrow. I think that I observed
> >> > something during the start of the launcher which might or might not
> have
> >> > something to do with the issues.
> >> >
> >> > A good thing is that I have no problem reproducing the issues ;-)
> >> >
> >> >> Still I would suggest to close the trunk for new things ASAP. Release
> >> >> related bug fixes can still be done during the release preparation
> and
> >> >> while checking/voting for the release candidates.
> >> >
> >> > +1
> >> >
> >> > Cheers,
> >> > Andreas
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Fabian
> >> http://twitter.com/fctwitt
> >>
>
>
>
> --
> | Rupert Westenthaler rupert.westenthaler@gmail.com
> | Bodenlehenstraße 11 ++43-699-11108907
> | A-5500 Bischofshofen
>
Re: Contenthub / CMS Adapter (was Re: Commit window for 0.x release
in trunk closes this Friday)
Posted by Reto Bachmann-Gmür <re...@wymiwyg.com>.
Hi Rafa
Manifold sounds interesting. I do not see JCR in the list of supported
connectors however.
But yes, ECS has currently no connector for external content-repositories.
Cheers,
Reto
On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 3:29 PM, Rafa Haro <rh...@zaizi.com> wrote:
> Hi Reto,
>
> We once were thinking to develop another implementation of the CMS Adapter
> based on Apache Manifold (http://manifoldcf.apache.org/**) for example
> using the CMIS Repository and Authority Connector and developing an Output
> Connector for Stanbol. I think that maybe that could be a more maintainable
> solution.
>
> WDYT?
>
> Regards
>
> El 21/10/13 14:13, Reto Bachmann-Gmür escribió:
>
> Hi Rupert, all,
>>
>> I would envisage this for 1.0.0. But I'm not sure about ContentHub/CMS
>> Adapter. One hand there hasn't been any activity during the last 6 month
>> on
>> the other hand in the Fusepool project because of the limitation of having
>> the RDF metadata detached from the Solr index we have replaced it with ECS
>> (Backend) and Firstswim (GUI). The Fuseppol project would be excited to
>> contribute these back into Stanbol. For a demo see:
>> http://beta.fusepool.com/**firstswim <http://beta.fusepool.com/firstswim>
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Reto
>>
>>
>> 1. https://github.com/fusepool/**fusepool-ecs<https://github.com/fusepool/fusepool-ecs>
>> 2. https://github.com/fusepool/**fusepool-firstswim<https://github.com/fusepool/fusepool-firstswim>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 1:27 PM, Rupert Westenthaler <
>> rupert.westenthaler@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I was considering to create Stanbol launchers without data bundles in
>>> the release branch. This would allow us to do a binary release.
>>>
>>> We could create launchers for
>>>
>>> * stateless (Enhancer & Entityhub)
>>> * semindexing (Stateless & Contenthub & CMS Adapter)
>>> * reasoning (Ontologymanager & Rules & Reasoning)
>>> * full (all stanbol modules)
>>>
>>> In addition we could include the Entityhub indexing tools as binary
>>> releases.
>>>
>>> WDYT
>>> Rupert
>>>
>>> On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 1:12 PM, Reto Bachmann-Gmür <re...@wymiwyg.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Fabian
>>>>
>>>> As we might need to build more release candidates I suggest to do this
>>>> in
>>>> the release branch. For the release plugin to work it will afaik be
>>>> necessary to adapt the svn url in the pom
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Reto
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Sat, Oct 19, 2013 at 1:39 PM, Fabian Christ <
>>>>
>>> christ.fabian@googlemail.com
>>>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> good to hear about the progress ;)
>>>>>
>>>>> I am currently checking that the trunk is fine when trying to build
>>>>> with the apache-release profile (this includes the RAT check). Once
>>>>> this succeeds we could create the release branch.
>>>>>
>>>>> Best,
>>>>> - Fabian
>>>>>
>>>>> 2013/10/19 Andreas Kuckartz <a....@ping.de>:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Rupert Westenthaler:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> However there is still no progress on the build issues of Andreas. As
>>>>>>> explained in [4] I can see in the log what is going wrong, but I have
>>>>>>> still no idea why this is happening in Andreas environment. All my
>>>>>>> tries to reproduce this where not successful.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> I have executed and am executing more experiments with the integration
>>>>>> tests and will report today or tomorrow. I think that I observed
>>>>>> something during the start of the launcher which might or might not
>>>>>>
>>>>> have
>>>
>>>> something to do with the issues.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> A good thing is that I have no problem reproducing the issues ;-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Still I would suggest to close the trunk for new things ASAP. Release
>>>>>>> related bug fixes can still be done during the release preparation
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> and
>>>
>>>> while checking/voting for the release candidates.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>> Andreas
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Fabian
>>>>> http://twitter.com/fctwitt
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> | Rupert Westenthaler rupert.westenthaler@gmail.com
>>> | Bodenlehenstraße 11 ++43-699-11108907
>>> | A-5500 Bischofshofen
>>>
>>>
>
> --
>
> ------------------------------
> This message should be regarded as confidential. If you have received this
> email in error please notify the sender and destroy it immediately.
> Statements of intent shall only become binding when confirmed in hard copy
> by an authorised signatory.
>
> Zaizi Ltd is registered in England and Wales with the registration number
> 6440931. The Registered Office is Brook House, 229 Shepherds Bush Road,
> London W6 7AN.
Re: Contenthub / CMS Adapter (was Re: Commit window for 0.x release
in trunk closes this Friday)
Posted by Reto Bachmann-Gmür <re...@wymiwyg.com>.
Hi Rupert, all,
Yes that's still missing. The question is if these components are still
maintained. Or if they would be obsoleted adopting fusepool ECS.
A quick feature overview of ECS:
- ECS offers a true REST API, only entry URI and understanding the ontology
are needed to access the service
- Allows uploading content and faceted search based on dc:subject (where
the rdf:type id the type of facet) and rdf:type only
- The facet values are RDF resources, as such they have all their properties
- Based on clerezza and lucene no unsecured (and non-RDF) Solr endpoint is
exposed
It doesn't currently itself expose any GUI. A GUI for searching only is
provided by the firstswim project. This uses rdfstore.js which is currently
LGPL but wich will be release MIT (according to its author).
As for the archetypes which aren't there yet either I plan to port them
archetypes (but that's trivial compared with porting contenthub).
Cheers,
Reto
Re: Contenthub / CMS Adapter (was Re: Commit window for 0.x release
in trunk closes this Friday)
Posted by Rupert Westenthaler <ru...@gmail.com>.
Hi Reto, all
what is the plan for the contenthub/ and cmsadapter/ in the trunk. I
have noticed that they are missing in the new trunk.
best
Rupert
On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 4:04 PM, Antonio David Perez Morales
<ap...@zaizi.com> wrote:
> Hi All
>
> +1 to use Manifold to replace CMS Adapter of Stanbol. Moreover using
> Manifold we can keep the right permission of documents in Stanbol for each
> user.
>
> I have used Manifold and implemented/modified some connectors so I could
> help in this task if everyone agrees.
>
> Regards
>
>
> On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 3:52 PM, Rafa Haro <rh...@zaizi.com> wrote:
>
>> So, if you all think it is a good idea, I will create an issue to start
>> working on it.
>>
>> +1 about Fusepool ECS. I have check its Github entry but would be fine to
>> have more details in order to know the differences with ContentHub.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Rafa
>>
>> El 21/10/13 15:37, Rupert Westenthaler escribió:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> Replacing the CMS Adapter with Manifoldcf seams like a good Idea as it
>>> seams that this whole Apache project aims to do similar things as this
>>> Stanbol component.
>>>
>>> Regarding the Fusepool ECS: Are there more information about the
>>> features/architecture of this component? The demo shows that it does
>>> support full text search and some kind of faceting, but it is hard to
>>> see how similar/different it is in comparison with the current
>>> Contenthub.
>>>
>>> best
>>> Rupert
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 3:29 PM, Rafa Haro <rh...@zaizi.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Reto,
>>>>
>>>> We once were thinking to develop another implementation of the CMS
>>>> Adapter
>>>> based on Apache Manifold (http://manifoldcf.apache.org/**) for example
>>>> using
>>>> the CMIS Repository and Authority Connector and developing an Output
>>>> Connector for Stanbol. I think that maybe that could be a more
>>>> maintainable
>>>> solution.
>>>>
>>>> WDYT?
>>>>
>>>> Regards
>>>>
>>>> El 21/10/13 14:13, Reto Bachmann-Gmür escribió:
>>>>
>>>> Hi Rupert, all,
>>>>>
>>>>> I would envisage this for 1.0.0. But I'm not sure about ContentHub/CMS
>>>>> Adapter. One hand there hasn't been any activity during the last 6 month
>>>>> on
>>>>> the other hand in the Fusepool project because of the limitation of
>>>>> having
>>>>> the RDF metadata detached from the Solr index we have replaced it with
>>>>> ECS
>>>>> (Backend) and Firstswim (GUI). The Fuseppol project would be excited to
>>>>> contribute these back into Stanbol. For a demo see:
>>>>> http://beta.fusepool.com/**firstswim<http://beta.fusepool.com/firstswim>
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>> Reto
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> 1. https://github.com/fusepool/**fusepool-ecs<https://github.com/fusepool/fusepool-ecs>
>>>>> 2. https://github.com/fusepool/**fusepool-firstswim<https://github.com/fusepool/fusepool-firstswim>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 1:27 PM, Rupert Westenthaler <
>>>>> rupert.westenthaler@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I was considering to create Stanbol launchers without data bundles in
>>>>>> the release branch. This would allow us to do a binary release.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> We could create launchers for
>>>>>>
>>>>>> * stateless (Enhancer & Entityhub)
>>>>>> * semindexing (Stateless & Contenthub & CMS Adapter)
>>>>>> * reasoning (Ontologymanager & Rules & Reasoning)
>>>>>> * full (all stanbol modules)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> In addition we could include the Entityhub indexing tools as binary
>>>>>> releases.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> WDYT
>>>>>> Rupert
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 1:12 PM, Reto Bachmann-Gmür <re...@wymiwyg.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi Fabian
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> As we might need to build more release candidates I suggest to do this
>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>> the release branch. For the release plugin to work it will afaik be
>>>>>>> necessary to adapt the svn url in the pom
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>> Reto
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Sat, Oct 19, 2013 at 1:39 PM, Fabian Christ <
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> christ.fabian@googlemail.com
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> good to hear about the progress ;)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I am currently checking that the trunk is fine when trying to build
>>>>>>>> with the apache-release profile (this includes the RAT check). Once
>>>>>>>> this succeeds we could create the release branch.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>>> - Fabian
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 2013/10/19 Andreas Kuckartz <a....@ping.de>:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Rupert Westenthaler:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> However there is still no progress on the build issues of Andreas.
>>>>>>>>>> As
>>>>>>>>>> explained in [4] I can see in the log what is going wrong, but I
>>>>>>>>>> have
>>>>>>>>>> still no idea why this is happening in Andreas environment. All my
>>>>>>>>>> tries to reproduce this where not successful.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I have executed and am executing more experiments with the
>>>>>>>>> integration
>>>>>>>>> tests and will report today or tomorrow. I think that I observed
>>>>>>>>> something during the start of the launcher which might or might not
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> have
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> something to do with the issues.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> A good thing is that I have no problem reproducing the issues ;-)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Still I would suggest to close the trunk for new things ASAP.
>>>>>>>>>> Release
>>>>>>>>>> related bug fixes can still be done during the release preparation
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> while checking/voting for the release candidates.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>>>> Andreas
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> Fabian
>>>>>>>> http://twitter.com/fctwitt
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> | Rupert Westenthaler rupert.westenthaler@gmail.com
>>>>>> | Bodenlehenstraße 11 ++43-699-11108907
>>>>>> | A-5500 Bischofshofen
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>> --
>>>>
>>>> ------------------------------
>>>> This message should be regarded as confidential. If you have received
>>>> this
>>>> email in error please notify the sender and destroy it immediately.
>>>> Statements of intent shall only become binding when confirmed in hard
>>>> copy
>>>> by an authorised signatory.
>>>>
>>>> Zaizi Ltd is registered in England and Wales with the registration number
>>>> 6440931. The Registered Office is Brook House, 229 Shepherds Bush Road,
>>>> London W6 7AN.
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> ------------------------------
>> This message should be regarded as confidential. If you have received this
>> email in error please notify the sender and destroy it immediately.
>> Statements of intent shall only become binding when confirmed in hard copy
>> by an authorised signatory.
>>
>> Zaizi Ltd is registered in England and Wales with the registration number
>> 6440931. The Registered Office is Brook House, 229 Shepherds Bush Road,
>> London W6 7AN.
>>
>
> --
>
> ------------------------------
> This message should be regarded as confidential. If you have received this
> email in error please notify the sender and destroy it immediately.
> Statements of intent shall only become binding when confirmed in hard copy
> by an authorised signatory.
>
> Zaizi Ltd is registered in England and Wales with the registration number
> 6440931. The Registered Office is Brook House, 229 Shepherds Bush Road,
> London W6 7AN.
--
| Rupert Westenthaler rupert.westenthaler@gmail.com
| Bodenlehenstraße 11 ++43-699-11108907
| A-5500 Bischofshofen
Re: Contenthub / CMS Adapter (was Re: Commit window for 0.x release
in trunk closes this Friday)
Posted by Antonio David Perez Morales <ap...@zaizi.com>.
Hi All
+1 to use Manifold to replace CMS Adapter of Stanbol. Moreover using
Manifold we can keep the right permission of documents in Stanbol for each
user.
I have used Manifold and implemented/modified some connectors so I could
help in this task if everyone agrees.
Regards
On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 3:52 PM, Rafa Haro <rh...@zaizi.com> wrote:
> So, if you all think it is a good idea, I will create an issue to start
> working on it.
>
> +1 about Fusepool ECS. I have check its Github entry but would be fine to
> have more details in order to know the differences with ContentHub.
>
> Cheers,
> Rafa
>
> El 21/10/13 15:37, Rupert Westenthaler escribió:
>
> Hi all,
>>
>> Replacing the CMS Adapter with Manifoldcf seams like a good Idea as it
>> seams that this whole Apache project aims to do similar things as this
>> Stanbol component.
>>
>> Regarding the Fusepool ECS: Are there more information about the
>> features/architecture of this component? The demo shows that it does
>> support full text search and some kind of faceting, but it is hard to
>> see how similar/different it is in comparison with the current
>> Contenthub.
>>
>> best
>> Rupert
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 3:29 PM, Rafa Haro <rh...@zaizi.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Reto,
>>>
>>> We once were thinking to develop another implementation of the CMS
>>> Adapter
>>> based on Apache Manifold (http://manifoldcf.apache.org/**) for example
>>> using
>>> the CMIS Repository and Authority Connector and developing an Output
>>> Connector for Stanbol. I think that maybe that could be a more
>>> maintainable
>>> solution.
>>>
>>> WDYT?
>>>
>>> Regards
>>>
>>> El 21/10/13 14:13, Reto Bachmann-Gmür escribió:
>>>
>>> Hi Rupert, all,
>>>>
>>>> I would envisage this for 1.0.0. But I'm not sure about ContentHub/CMS
>>>> Adapter. One hand there hasn't been any activity during the last 6 month
>>>> on
>>>> the other hand in the Fusepool project because of the limitation of
>>>> having
>>>> the RDF metadata detached from the Solr index we have replaced it with
>>>> ECS
>>>> (Backend) and Firstswim (GUI). The Fuseppol project would be excited to
>>>> contribute these back into Stanbol. For a demo see:
>>>> http://beta.fusepool.com/**firstswim<http://beta.fusepool.com/firstswim>
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Reto
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 1. https://github.com/fusepool/**fusepool-ecs<https://github.com/fusepool/fusepool-ecs>
>>>> 2. https://github.com/fusepool/**fusepool-firstswim<https://github.com/fusepool/fusepool-firstswim>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 1:27 PM, Rupert Westenthaler <
>>>> rupert.westenthaler@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>
>>>>> I was considering to create Stanbol launchers without data bundles in
>>>>> the release branch. This would allow us to do a binary release.
>>>>>
>>>>> We could create launchers for
>>>>>
>>>>> * stateless (Enhancer & Entityhub)
>>>>> * semindexing (Stateless & Contenthub & CMS Adapter)
>>>>> * reasoning (Ontologymanager & Rules & Reasoning)
>>>>> * full (all stanbol modules)
>>>>>
>>>>> In addition we could include the Entityhub indexing tools as binary
>>>>> releases.
>>>>>
>>>>> WDYT
>>>>> Rupert
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 1:12 PM, Reto Bachmann-Gmür <re...@wymiwyg.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Fabian
>>>>>>
>>>>>> As we might need to build more release candidates I suggest to do this
>>>>>> in
>>>>>> the release branch. For the release plugin to work it will afaik be
>>>>>> necessary to adapt the svn url in the pom
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>> Reto
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sat, Oct 19, 2013 at 1:39 PM, Fabian Christ <
>>>>>>
>>>>> christ.fabian@googlemail.com
>>>>>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> good to hear about the progress ;)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I am currently checking that the trunk is fine when trying to build
>>>>>>> with the apache-release profile (this includes the RAT check). Once
>>>>>>> this succeeds we could create the release branch.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>> - Fabian
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 2013/10/19 Andreas Kuckartz <a....@ping.de>:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Rupert Westenthaler:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> However there is still no progress on the build issues of Andreas.
>>>>>>>>> As
>>>>>>>>> explained in [4] I can see in the log what is going wrong, but I
>>>>>>>>> have
>>>>>>>>> still no idea why this is happening in Andreas environment. All my
>>>>>>>>> tries to reproduce this where not successful.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I have executed and am executing more experiments with the
>>>>>>>> integration
>>>>>>>> tests and will report today or tomorrow. I think that I observed
>>>>>>>> something during the start of the launcher which might or might not
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> have
>>>>>
>>>>>> something to do with the issues.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> A good thing is that I have no problem reproducing the issues ;-)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Still I would suggest to close the trunk for new things ASAP.
>>>>>>>>> Release
>>>>>>>>> related bug fixes can still be done during the release preparation
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>
>>>>>> while checking/voting for the release candidates.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>>> Andreas
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Fabian
>>>>>>> http://twitter.com/fctwitt
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> | Rupert Westenthaler rupert.westenthaler@gmail.com
>>>>> | Bodenlehenstraße 11 ++43-699-11108907
>>>>> | A-5500 Bischofshofen
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> ------------------------------
>>> This message should be regarded as confidential. If you have received
>>> this
>>> email in error please notify the sender and destroy it immediately.
>>> Statements of intent shall only become binding when confirmed in hard
>>> copy
>>> by an authorised signatory.
>>>
>>> Zaizi Ltd is registered in England and Wales with the registration number
>>> 6440931. The Registered Office is Brook House, 229 Shepherds Bush Road,
>>> London W6 7AN.
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> --
>
> ------------------------------
> This message should be regarded as confidential. If you have received this
> email in error please notify the sender and destroy it immediately.
> Statements of intent shall only become binding when confirmed in hard copy
> by an authorised signatory.
>
> Zaizi Ltd is registered in England and Wales with the registration number
> 6440931. The Registered Office is Brook House, 229 Shepherds Bush Road,
> London W6 7AN.
>
--
------------------------------
This message should be regarded as confidential. If you have received this
email in error please notify the sender and destroy it immediately.
Statements of intent shall only become binding when confirmed in hard copy
by an authorised signatory.
Zaizi Ltd is registered in England and Wales with the registration number
6440931. The Registered Office is Brook House, 229 Shepherds Bush Road,
London W6 7AN.
Re: Contenthub / CMS Adapter (was Re: Commit window for 0.x release
in trunk closes this Friday)
Posted by Rafa Haro <rh...@zaizi.com>.
So, if you all think it is a good idea, I will create an issue to start
working on it.
+1 about Fusepool ECS. I have check its Github entry but would be fine
to have more details in order to know the differences with ContentHub.
Cheers,
Rafa
El 21/10/13 15:37, Rupert Westenthaler escribió:
> Hi all,
>
> Replacing the CMS Adapter with Manifoldcf seams like a good Idea as it
> seams that this whole Apache project aims to do similar things as this
> Stanbol component.
>
> Regarding the Fusepool ECS: Are there more information about the
> features/architecture of this component? The demo shows that it does
> support full text search and some kind of faceting, but it is hard to
> see how similar/different it is in comparison with the current
> Contenthub.
>
> best
> Rupert
>
>
> On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 3:29 PM, Rafa Haro <rh...@zaizi.com> wrote:
>> Hi Reto,
>>
>> We once were thinking to develop another implementation of the CMS Adapter
>> based on Apache Manifold (http://manifoldcf.apache.org/) for example using
>> the CMIS Repository and Authority Connector and developing an Output
>> Connector for Stanbol. I think that maybe that could be a more maintainable
>> solution.
>>
>> WDYT?
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> El 21/10/13 14:13, Reto Bachmann-Gmür escribió:
>>
>>> Hi Rupert, all,
>>>
>>> I would envisage this for 1.0.0. But I'm not sure about ContentHub/CMS
>>> Adapter. One hand there hasn't been any activity during the last 6 month
>>> on
>>> the other hand in the Fusepool project because of the limitation of having
>>> the RDF metadata detached from the Solr index we have replaced it with ECS
>>> (Backend) and Firstswim (GUI). The Fuseppol project would be excited to
>>> contribute these back into Stanbol. For a demo see:
>>> http://beta.fusepool.com/firstswim
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Reto
>>>
>>>
>>> 1. https://github.com/fusepool/fusepool-ecs
>>> 2. https://github.com/fusepool/fusepool-firstswim
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 1:27 PM, Rupert Westenthaler <
>>> rupert.westenthaler@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> I was considering to create Stanbol launchers without data bundles in
>>>> the release branch. This would allow us to do a binary release.
>>>>
>>>> We could create launchers for
>>>>
>>>> * stateless (Enhancer & Entityhub)
>>>> * semindexing (Stateless & Contenthub & CMS Adapter)
>>>> * reasoning (Ontologymanager & Rules & Reasoning)
>>>> * full (all stanbol modules)
>>>>
>>>> In addition we could include the Entityhub indexing tools as binary
>>>> releases.
>>>>
>>>> WDYT
>>>> Rupert
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 1:12 PM, Reto Bachmann-Gmür <re...@wymiwyg.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> Hi Fabian
>>>>>
>>>>> As we might need to build more release candidates I suggest to do this
>>>>> in
>>>>> the release branch. For the release plugin to work it will afaik be
>>>>> necessary to adapt the svn url in the pom
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>> Reto
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sat, Oct 19, 2013 at 1:39 PM, Fabian Christ <
>>>> christ.fabian@googlemail.com
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> good to hear about the progress ;)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I am currently checking that the trunk is fine when trying to build
>>>>>> with the apache-release profile (this includes the RAT check). Once
>>>>>> this succeeds we could create the release branch.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>> - Fabian
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 2013/10/19 Andreas Kuckartz <a....@ping.de>:
>>>>>>> Rupert Westenthaler:
>>>>>>>> However there is still no progress on the build issues of Andreas. As
>>>>>>>> explained in [4] I can see in the log what is going wrong, but I have
>>>>>>>> still no idea why this is happening in Andreas environment. All my
>>>>>>>> tries to reproduce this where not successful.
>>>>>>> I have executed and am executing more experiments with the integration
>>>>>>> tests and will report today or tomorrow. I think that I observed
>>>>>>> something during the start of the launcher which might or might not
>>>> have
>>>>>>> something to do with the issues.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> A good thing is that I have no problem reproducing the issues ;-)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Still I would suggest to close the trunk for new things ASAP. Release
>>>>>>>> related bug fixes can still be done during the release preparation
>>>> and
>>>>>>>> while checking/voting for the release candidates.
>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>> Andreas
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Fabian
>>>>>> http://twitter.com/fctwitt
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> | Rupert Westenthaler rupert.westenthaler@gmail.com
>>>> | Bodenlehenstraße 11 ++43-699-11108907
>>>> | A-5500 Bischofshofen
>>>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> ------------------------------
>> This message should be regarded as confidential. If you have received this
>> email in error please notify the sender and destroy it immediately.
>> Statements of intent shall only become binding when confirmed in hard copy
>> by an authorised signatory.
>>
>> Zaizi Ltd is registered in England and Wales with the registration number
>> 6440931. The Registered Office is Brook House, 229 Shepherds Bush Road,
>> London W6 7AN.
>
>
--
------------------------------
This message should be regarded as confidential. If you have received this
email in error please notify the sender and destroy it immediately.
Statements of intent shall only become binding when confirmed in hard copy
by an authorised signatory.
Zaizi Ltd is registered in England and Wales with the registration number
6440931. The Registered Office is Brook House, 229 Shepherds Bush Road,
London W6 7AN.
Re: Contenthub / CMS Adapter (was Re: Commit window for 0.x release
in trunk closes this Friday)
Posted by Rupert Westenthaler <ru...@gmail.com>.
Hi all,
Replacing the CMS Adapter with Manifoldcf seams like a good Idea as it
seams that this whole Apache project aims to do similar things as this
Stanbol component.
Regarding the Fusepool ECS: Are there more information about the
features/architecture of this component? The demo shows that it does
support full text search and some kind of faceting, but it is hard to
see how similar/different it is in comparison with the current
Contenthub.
best
Rupert
On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 3:29 PM, Rafa Haro <rh...@zaizi.com> wrote:
> Hi Reto,
>
> We once were thinking to develop another implementation of the CMS Adapter
> based on Apache Manifold (http://manifoldcf.apache.org/) for example using
> the CMIS Repository and Authority Connector and developing an Output
> Connector for Stanbol. I think that maybe that could be a more maintainable
> solution.
>
> WDYT?
>
> Regards
>
> El 21/10/13 14:13, Reto Bachmann-Gmür escribió:
>
>> Hi Rupert, all,
>>
>> I would envisage this for 1.0.0. But I'm not sure about ContentHub/CMS
>> Adapter. One hand there hasn't been any activity during the last 6 month
>> on
>> the other hand in the Fusepool project because of the limitation of having
>> the RDF metadata detached from the Solr index we have replaced it with ECS
>> (Backend) and Firstswim (GUI). The Fuseppol project would be excited to
>> contribute these back into Stanbol. For a demo see:
>> http://beta.fusepool.com/firstswim
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Reto
>>
>>
>> 1. https://github.com/fusepool/fusepool-ecs
>> 2. https://github.com/fusepool/fusepool-firstswim
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 1:27 PM, Rupert Westenthaler <
>> rupert.westenthaler@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I was considering to create Stanbol launchers without data bundles in
>>> the release branch. This would allow us to do a binary release.
>>>
>>> We could create launchers for
>>>
>>> * stateless (Enhancer & Entityhub)
>>> * semindexing (Stateless & Contenthub & CMS Adapter)
>>> * reasoning (Ontologymanager & Rules & Reasoning)
>>> * full (all stanbol modules)
>>>
>>> In addition we could include the Entityhub indexing tools as binary
>>> releases.
>>>
>>> WDYT
>>> Rupert
>>>
>>> On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 1:12 PM, Reto Bachmann-Gmür <re...@wymiwyg.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi Fabian
>>>>
>>>> As we might need to build more release candidates I suggest to do this
>>>> in
>>>> the release branch. For the release plugin to work it will afaik be
>>>> necessary to adapt the svn url in the pom
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Reto
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Sat, Oct 19, 2013 at 1:39 PM, Fabian Christ <
>>>
>>> christ.fabian@googlemail.com
>>>>>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> good to hear about the progress ;)
>>>>>
>>>>> I am currently checking that the trunk is fine when trying to build
>>>>> with the apache-release profile (this includes the RAT check). Once
>>>>> this succeeds we could create the release branch.
>>>>>
>>>>> Best,
>>>>> - Fabian
>>>>>
>>>>> 2013/10/19 Andreas Kuckartz <a....@ping.de>:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Rupert Westenthaler:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> However there is still no progress on the build issues of Andreas. As
>>>>>>> explained in [4] I can see in the log what is going wrong, but I have
>>>>>>> still no idea why this is happening in Andreas environment. All my
>>>>>>> tries to reproduce this where not successful.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I have executed and am executing more experiments with the integration
>>>>>> tests and will report today or tomorrow. I think that I observed
>>>>>> something during the start of the launcher which might or might not
>>>
>>> have
>>>>>>
>>>>>> something to do with the issues.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> A good thing is that I have no problem reproducing the issues ;-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Still I would suggest to close the trunk for new things ASAP. Release
>>>>>>> related bug fixes can still be done during the release preparation
>>>
>>> and
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> while checking/voting for the release candidates.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>> Andreas
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Fabian
>>>>> http://twitter.com/fctwitt
>>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> | Rupert Westenthaler rupert.westenthaler@gmail.com
>>> | Bodenlehenstraße 11 ++43-699-11108907
>>> | A-5500 Bischofshofen
>>>
>
>
> --
>
> ------------------------------
> This message should be regarded as confidential. If you have received this
> email in error please notify the sender and destroy it immediately.
> Statements of intent shall only become binding when confirmed in hard copy
> by an authorised signatory.
>
> Zaizi Ltd is registered in England and Wales with the registration number
> 6440931. The Registered Office is Brook House, 229 Shepherds Bush Road,
> London W6 7AN.
--
| Rupert Westenthaler rupert.westenthaler@gmail.com
| Bodenlehenstraße 11 ++43-699-11108907
| A-5500 Bischofshofen
Re: Contenthub / CMS Adapter (was Re: Commit window for 0.x release
in trunk closes this Friday)
Posted by Rafa Haro <rh...@zaizi.com>.
Hi Reto,
We once were thinking to develop another implementation of the CMS
Adapter based on Apache Manifold (http://manifoldcf.apache.org/) for
example using the CMIS Repository and Authority Connector and developing
an Output Connector for Stanbol. I think that maybe that could be a more
maintainable solution.
WDYT?
Regards
El 21/10/13 14:13, Reto Bachmann-Gmür escribió:
> Hi Rupert, all,
>
> I would envisage this for 1.0.0. But I'm not sure about ContentHub/CMS
> Adapter. One hand there hasn't been any activity during the last 6 month on
> the other hand in the Fusepool project because of the limitation of having
> the RDF metadata detached from the Solr index we have replaced it with ECS
> (Backend) and Firstswim (GUI). The Fuseppol project would be excited to
> contribute these back into Stanbol. For a demo see:
> http://beta.fusepool.com/firstswim
>
> Cheers,
> Reto
>
>
> 1. https://github.com/fusepool/fusepool-ecs
> 2. https://github.com/fusepool/fusepool-firstswim
>
>
> On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 1:27 PM, Rupert Westenthaler <
> rupert.westenthaler@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I was considering to create Stanbol launchers without data bundles in
>> the release branch. This would allow us to do a binary release.
>>
>> We could create launchers for
>>
>> * stateless (Enhancer & Entityhub)
>> * semindexing (Stateless & Contenthub & CMS Adapter)
>> * reasoning (Ontologymanager & Rules & Reasoning)
>> * full (all stanbol modules)
>>
>> In addition we could include the Entityhub indexing tools as binary
>> releases.
>>
>> WDYT
>> Rupert
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 1:12 PM, Reto Bachmann-Gmür <re...@wymiwyg.com>
>> wrote:
>>> Hi Fabian
>>>
>>> As we might need to build more release candidates I suggest to do this in
>>> the release branch. For the release plugin to work it will afaik be
>>> necessary to adapt the svn url in the pom
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Reto
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sat, Oct 19, 2013 at 1:39 PM, Fabian Christ <
>> christ.fabian@googlemail.com
>>>> wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> good to hear about the progress ;)
>>>>
>>>> I am currently checking that the trunk is fine when trying to build
>>>> with the apache-release profile (this includes the RAT check). Once
>>>> this succeeds we could create the release branch.
>>>>
>>>> Best,
>>>> - Fabian
>>>>
>>>> 2013/10/19 Andreas Kuckartz <a....@ping.de>:
>>>>> Rupert Westenthaler:
>>>>>> However there is still no progress on the build issues of Andreas. As
>>>>>> explained in [4] I can see in the log what is going wrong, but I have
>>>>>> still no idea why this is happening in Andreas environment. All my
>>>>>> tries to reproduce this where not successful.
>>>>> I have executed and am executing more experiments with the integration
>>>>> tests and will report today or tomorrow. I think that I observed
>>>>> something during the start of the launcher which might or might not
>> have
>>>>> something to do with the issues.
>>>>>
>>>>> A good thing is that I have no problem reproducing the issues ;-)
>>>>>
>>>>>> Still I would suggest to close the trunk for new things ASAP. Release
>>>>>> related bug fixes can still be done during the release preparation
>> and
>>>>>> while checking/voting for the release candidates.
>>>>> +1
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>> Andreas
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Fabian
>>>> http://twitter.com/fctwitt
>>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> | Rupert Westenthaler rupert.westenthaler@gmail.com
>> | Bodenlehenstraße 11 ++43-699-11108907
>> | A-5500 Bischofshofen
>>
--
------------------------------
This message should be regarded as confidential. If you have received this
email in error please notify the sender and destroy it immediately.
Statements of intent shall only become binding when confirmed in hard copy
by an authorised signatory.
Zaizi Ltd is registered in England and Wales with the registration number
6440931. The Registered Office is Brook House, 229 Shepherds Bush Road,
London W6 7AN.