Re : Configuring "slaves" for a "master" backup without restarting

[nourredine khadri <no...@yahoo.com>]

Good idea. Thanks.

Also, in such architecture (Master/Slave), is there any best practices for index stored on an NFS mounted filesystem ?


Specially about the rsync step, when the "slaves" want to synchronize their index from a remote filesystem (pb of inconsistent views of the directory).

Nourredine.




________________________________
De : Noble Paul നോബിള്‍  नोब्ळ् <no...@corp.aol.com>
À : solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Envoyé le : Lundi, 14 Septembre 2009, 16h15mn 55s
Objet : Re: Configuring "slaves" for a "master" backup without restarting

you can put both master1 and master2 behind a VIP.

If Master 1 goes down make the VIP point to Master2

On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 7:11 PM, nourredine khadri
<no...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> A question about scalability.
>
> Let imagine the following architecture based on Master/Slave schema :
>
> - A "master" for the indexation called Master 1
> - A backup of Master 1 (called Master 2)
> - Several "slaves" for search linked to Master 1
>
> Can I configure the "slaves" to be automatically linked to Master 2 if Master 1 fails without restarting the JVMs?
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
> Nourredine.
>
>
>



-- 
-----------------------------------------------------
Noble Paul | Principal Engineer| AOL | http://aol.com