Re: Is it ok to Parameterize location of Second level decorators

[ch...@bhartitelesoft.com]

I am sorry that I have still not made contribution and 
making suggestions.. :(


But this may be possible... e.g thinlet throws swing code 
for rich client using 1 code generator ; another generates 
MIDP Code ...

http://thinlet.sourceforge.net/home.html

Basically you are making abstract screen definition and 
depending on the target generate code.

Same principle is used by my company. When we develop code 
for 1 phone ; we take Device capability from WURFL and 
according transcode the output.

Someone seems to be working on OpenLaszlo and Ofbiz and 
making Lazlo for business. Same OpenLaszlo script might 
work on mobile too. Sun seems to working with them

http://www.openlaszlo.org/node/342 

Chand

> I'd like to see what others have to say about this 
subject.
> 
> The question is: How can we accomodate OFBiz running on 
portable devices without 
> re-writing the entire UI? Is that even possible?
> 
> How does "parameterizing the location of decorators" 
help this effort? I'm not 
> clear on how such a thing would be implemented.
> 
> 
> Anil Patel wrote:
> > Hi,
> > Is it Ok to parameterize location of decorators that 
are derived from
> > main-decorator. By doing this special purpose 
applications will be able
> > customize tab bar and few others things without having 
to copy bunch of
> > screen code form Ofbiz main components.
> > 
> > If this seems to be acceptable Idea and then I'll like 
to submit patch to
> > parameterize screens in accounting, product/catalog, 
facility.
> > 
> > Regards
> > Anil Patel
> > 
> 


----------------------------------------------------------
http://www.bhartitelesoft.com
Telecommunication and E-Commerce solutions for the future.