You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@spark.apache.org by "Everett Anderson (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2017/02/14 02:39:41 UTC
[jira] [Created] (SPARK-19586) Incorrect push down filter for
double negative in SQL
Everett Anderson created SPARK-19586:
----------------------------------------
Summary: Incorrect push down filter for double negative in SQL
Key: SPARK-19586
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-19586
Project: Spark
Issue Type: Bug
Components: SQL
Affects Versions: 2.0.2
Reporter: Everett Anderson
Fix For: 2.1.0
Opening this as it's a somewhat serious issue in the 2.0.x tree in case there's a 2.0.3 planned, but it is fixed in 2.1.0.
While it works in 1.6.2 and 2.1.0, it appears 2.0.2 has a significant filter optimization error.
Example:
// Create some fake data
import org.apache.spark.sql.Row
import org.apache.spark.sql.Dataset
import org.apache.spark.sql.types._
val rowsRDD = sc.parallelize(Seq(
Row(1, "fred"),
Row(2, "amy"),
Row(3, null)))
val schema = StructType(Seq(
StructField("id", IntegerType, nullable = true),
StructField("username", StringType, nullable = true)))
val data = sqlContext.createDataFrame(rowsRDD, schema)
val path = "/tmp/test_data"
data.write.mode("overwrite").parquet(path)
val testData = sqlContext.read.parquet(path)
testData.registerTempTable("filter_test_table")
%sql
explain select count(*) from filter_test_table where not( username is not null)
or
spark.sql("select count(*) from filter_test_table where not( username is not null)").explain
In 2.0.2, I'm seeing
== Physical Plan ==
*HashAggregate(keys=[], functions=[count(1)])
+- Exchange SinglePartition
+- *HashAggregate(keys=[], functions=[partial_count(1)])
+- *Project
+- *Filter (isnotnull(username#35) && NOT isnotnull(username#35))
+- *BatchedScan parquet default.<hive table name>[username#35] Format: ParquetFormat, InputPaths: <path to parquet>, PartitionFilters: [], PushedFilters: [IsNotNull(username), Not(IsNotNull(username))], ReadSchema: struct<username:string>
which seems like both an impossible Filter and an impossible pushed filter.
In Spark 1.6.2 it was
== Physical Plan ==
TungstenAggregate(key=[], functions=[(count(1),mode=Final,isDistinct=false)], output=[_c0#1822L])
+- TungstenExchange SinglePartition, None
+- TungstenAggregate(key=[], functions=[(count(1),mode=Partial,isDistinct=false)], output=[count#1825L])
+- Project
+- Filter NOT isnotnull(username#1590)
+- Scan ParquetRelation[username#1590] InputPaths: <path to parquet>, PushedFilters: [Not(IsNotNull(username))]
and 2.1.0 it's working again as
== Physical Plan ==
*HashAggregate(keys=[], functions=[count(1)])
+- Exchange SinglePartition
+- *HashAggregate(keys=[], functions=[partial_count(1)])
+- *Project
+- *Filter NOT isnotnull(username#14)
+- *FileScan parquet [username#14] Batched: true, Format: Parquet, Location: InMemoryFileIndex[file:/tmp/test_table], PartitionFilters: [], PushedFilters: [Not(IsNotNull(username))], ReadSchema: struct<username:string>
while it's easy for humans in interactive cases to work around this by removing the double negative, it's a bit harder if it's a programmatic construct.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscribe@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-help@spark.apache.org